
sorry for the poor image quality.
http://expressbuzz.com/thesundaystandar ... 66247.htmlthere was a report yesterday about the creation of a new central agency to b headed by the NSA.Its supposedly called strategic protection staff and is funded by the PMO.The report slams the government for the creation of yet another agency and lack of coordination and synergy between different intelligent agencies.Did anyone notice it??cant find the link on their site though.
Shekar Duppatta is stooping too low. Wrong reasosn in last line.Penny-wise government sets up secret cell
Express News Service
First Published : 17 Apr 2011 12:45:00 AM IST
Last Updated : 18 Apr 2011 11:20:22 AM IST
NEWDELHI: Austerity can wait.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has sanctioned the creation of yet another powerful office under National Security Advisor (NSA) Shiv Shankar Menon Called the Strategic Programme Staff (SPS), it will be serviced by 33 officers at an annual cost of Rs 4.24 crore.
While Menon holds the rank of Minister of State, the SPS will have one secretary, nine directors and 23 support staff, including one principal private secretary, nine private secretaries, four drivers and six multi-tasking employees. This is in addition to the people already working for the NSA and National Security Council Secretariat.
The SPS has also been allocated a massive office in New Delhi.This is the first time that the PMO has not followed the normal procedure of seeking advance budgetary approval before setting up a new body.
In fact, the SPS creation process was such a closely-guarded secret that not even top bureaucrats were involved. A top-secret note, dated April 8, 2011, signed by a joint secretary in the National Security Council Secretariat, says: “This secretariat was not aware of the proposal of setting up the SPS at the time of formulating the Budget Estimates for 2011-2012 and, therefore, no provision has been included towards this in BE 2011-2012 and neither it is possible to meet the expenditure on the new raising from the NSS budget allocation.” The note reveals that the exercise started even before Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee presented his budget on February 28, 2011. Both Mukherjee and the Secretary (Expenditure) had given their official nod on January 10 itself. Surprisingly, the PMO conveyed its approval to the NCS only on March 5. As per the rules, any proposal for the creation of a new department has to be submitted to the Cabinet with full justification. In the case of the SPS, no such justification has been seen by anyone except a note seeking the release of funds
The PMO seems to be in such a tearing hurry that it has sought money from the Contingency Fund of India for making the SPS functional immediately. Bureaucratic sources say that the SPS will be used by Menon to be independent of agencies like Intelligence Bureau (IB), Research & Analysis Wing (RAW) and Military Intelligence. None of the other 50 ministries and 150-odd departments has such massive paraphernalia to service a single authority. None of the previous NSAs like Brajesh Mishra, J N Dixit and M K Narayanan had demanded such huge infrastructure either.
The government is already spending over Rs 200 crore on the IB and an unaudited sum on R&AW operations; the addition of yet another white elephant will significantly hike expenditure and start a turf war among the already inimical security agencies.
if 200 crore is not a typo does that mean IB gets only 200cr for its operations ? what are they expected to do with pay their sources with photostat copies of 1000re notes ?All these netas need to be hauled up and put in a training school to inculcate strategic thinkingThe government is already spending over Rs 200 crore on the IB and an unaudited sum on R&AW operations;
The Prime Minister's Office has approved setting up of a Strategic Programme Staff to function under the National Security Advisor. This unique back up to National Security Advisor will be headed by a secretary level officer, to be packed with directors and deputy secretaries as staff members.
According to sources, the proposal was initiated by the present NSA, Shiv Shankar Menon [ Images ], who got it approved by the PMO. The Union home ministry was of the view that the the post of secretary cannot be created without the approval of the Union Cabinet. "But this was over-ruled by the PMO," added the source.
The national security advisor secretariat shall now have a secretary status official to head the department. "The NSA position is becoming too unwieldy," said the source. The Intelligence Bureau and the Research & Analysis Wing had their reservations about the SPS proposal, and their reports are being processed by the latter, before it will be submitted to the NSA.
{So NSA was getting a lot of chaff from the tow agencies. Now it will get winnowed before NSA gets it. Hence the takleef and Ind Exp leak!}
The IB and the RA&W were backing up the NSA during the tenures of tenure of M K Narayanan and J N Dikshit. But now with Menon in position, the department is keen to de-link the two agencies from the NSA, said a source. The SPS' basic responsibility is to render assistance to the NSA.
The SPS will also be party reporting to the National Security Council Secretariat.
A correspondent in New Delhi
Yes will do. The book opened my eyes on this. Trends and analysis needs dedicated groups.ramana wrote:
This goes back to Chanakya's dictum on ensuring assesment by those who have to implement the decisons.
Acharya, Need you to look up that "Informing Statecraft" by Cordesman.
IMHO you have found the problem in desh's intel set up . Here intel gatherer is asked wht he makes of information collected by him either in dual ( gatherer + analyzer) role or worse promotion to a 9-5 job to analyze but then with no special training since its assumed he or she knows for they have worked x yrs in field . It works at local policing level where u need keen observer of human behavior but at national level its like missing the wood for trees. Maybe it works to profile foreign nation's leadership ( there too why not ask one of our jyotisacharyas who i can bet will tell u more in depth with precision )Trends and analysis needs dedicated groups.
Information gathering is a separate specialty
The U.S. State Department showed immense interest in the Unique Identification (UID) project being implemented by the Government of India and wanted to know details including “the name, model, and version of the biometric collection devices used for the ID.” The office of the Secretary of State, on December 17, 2009, sent a cable ( 240481: secret/noforn) under the name of Hillary Clinton asking the U.S. Embassy in New Delhi to find out the motivation behind the project and to collect as much information on it as possible.
The ostensible reason behind the interest in the U.S. was that the project “could present a vulnerable target for regional extremist groups — such as Lashkar e-Tayyiba — who could obtain fraudulent Indian ID cards during the large-scale enrolment for use in travel or as breeder documents to apply for passports.”
Hence, the State Department wanted to know what security features would be incorporated in the card, and anti-fraud measures adopted, and if any encryption method would be used. It wanted to know whether the standards would meet International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) norms.
The ICAO is a specialised agency of the United Nations with 190 contracting states, mandated to promote safe and efficient international air travel. It periodically recommends standards for aspects of air travel. Its recommendations have included machine readable travel documents with biometric enhance ments.
Use in other sectors
It was clear from the cable that the U.S. interest in the UID project was not limited to anti-fraud measures. It was keen to know “what is India's strategic plan for utilizing biometric ID card technology in the military, law enforcement, and private sectors.” There was particular interest to know how the biometric card would be used at the borders, ports and airports, and whether it would be used to issue passports. The Embassy in Delhi was asked to find out the following: “Which foreign countries and/or corporations are assisting in the development of the ID card? Which biometric systems (i.e. fingerprints, facial recognition, iris scan, etc.) will be incorporated into the card? What systems, databases, or portals will the named biometric ID card collection devices in India communicate with?”
Specific instructions were given to Embassy officials to report on any efforts to ‘“spoof' or defeat biometric enrolment, such as fingerprint alteration.” The State Department impressed on them that their valuable inputs would be “incorporated into a strategic assessment for senior US policymakers on the regional implications in South Asia of the biometric ID program.”
^^^Article about the recent NTRO's efforts in SIGINT...Every day, at a secret facility of the National Technical Research Organisation (NTRO) near Kala Ghoda in south Mumbai, a team of 18 operators sits peering through massive amounts of data coming in through undersea cables from across continents into an international gateway facility several kilometres away in Malad. The cables carry voice and internet data from Europe to Asia and vice versa, and by tapping into them, Indian intelligence is now playing Big Brother with a vengeance.
And they want freedom and RTI like in US as if it is the same situation. Such as distance from reality is mind bogglingramana wrote:Interesting thing is they cite US problems and assume they are the same in India. The article highlights the concerns of the civli society agitators but doesn't highlight the regular scrutiny of the monitoring that the GOI has in place. It has a CT angle or thrust to it. India is the target of a concerted terrorist campaign from TSP and with benighn support from US.
DCH, Heywood unsecured wifi in Mumbai. etc.
I agree. They wanted us to invade - it would have been a nice exit for them or a taken the heat off and allowed the US to have a lever on TSP to do the needful and at the same time hit India and economy.ramana wrote:Interesting thing is they cite US problems and assume they are the same in India. The article highlights the concerns of the civli society agitators but doesn't highlight the regular scrutiny of the monitoring that the GOI has in place. It has a CT angle or thrust to it. India is the target of a concerted terrorist campaign from TSP and with benighn support from US.
DCH, Heywood unsecured wifi in Mumbai. etc.
shyamd wrote:http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?271157
Cabinet Secretariat opens inquiry into corruption at NTRO & RAW ARC
KD says hes in the process of being extradited to india being banned a terrorist.he has come out in public with the allegations against him in a big sense.he has also promised to reveal the name of an MP who reportedly had contact with him throughout the operations and in whose car he was smuggled out of india to nepal.suryag wrote:PV was in reign then, so INC would be open for all kinds of inquiry into this incident. But what is the significance of the timing, this doesnt help INC in the electionss