Exactly what you suggested Rajeshji. No need to mistreat the diplobrat (nice term btwRajeshA wrote:
At the diplomatic level, best is not to make a big deal of the issue but always pay in kind.
 ) but keep him/her locked up for atleast a few days. Let the foggy bottom diplomats sweat a bit. Tit for tat indeed.
 ) but keep him/her locked up for atleast a few days. Let the foggy bottom diplomats sweat a bit. Tit for tat indeed. Harassment of our diplomats by the americans has been going on for too long now, and its time to put an end to this nonsense. American diplomats should be treated the same way ours are treated by them.
And if the US press goes rabid wrt India...who gives a sh*t? We have been getting hammered in the western press for the last 50 years for everything from 'oppression of biss loving kashmiris' to 'human rights violations' and 'oppression of wimmens'. Why should we worry about it now?
If we desist from protecting our diplomats out of fear of american disapproval or 'military action', we might as well disband the Indian Parliament and President's office, and sign on officially as a US dependent colony.
PS: Remember the case of Michael Faye?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_P._Fay
Even tiny Singapore showed a middle finger to the US when it came to implementing its laws, despite Bill Clinton's personal intervention. India is much bigger and more powerful.


 Just kidding the Onion.com has a whole satirical piece on it.
  Just kidding the Onion.com has a whole satirical piece on it. Have they ever heard of the term "self-interest" given that it is the bedrock of their own strategy.
 Have they ever heard of the term "self-interest" given that it is the bedrock of their own strategy.