Surya wrote:I merely wasat not having the core competency that yet another BRite has
At least you are out of diapers, hear I am a kindergardner who is still in Diapers.

Surya wrote:I merely wasat not having the core competency that yet another BRite has
Singha wrote:well its a bigger (fatter) sub than Kilo for sure both the sail and hull are fatter. so maybe it does need those grates, maybe some guy (artist) was trying to "improve" the looks and make it more chankian and threatening...who knows....but the Yuan does exist and follow-ons based on it are logical to expect.
chinese are not pushovers in naval design, and Rubin has been giving them help for SSK if not more. there will be reasons of logic for everything and this could include some engineering challenges that large grates work around perhaps.
My next Q was : Thank You, but, why is so big? Does it offers any advantages?The lada class has their hydroplanes on the fin. It is visual. There are two different classes of chinese submarines in the pictures. In one of them the hydroplanes are well forward, which is visual. All other slits in all the submarines are just openings for the free flow of water out of the casing ( the external covering of the hull), when the submarine surfaces. It could also be diesel exhaust baffles during snorting; provided they are conventional subs and not nukes.
No. The water accumulated underwater has to be drained out post surfacing.
At the end of 2007, Chinese helicopter-maker Avic 2 asked us to provide an engine for the Z-15, the Chinese version of the EC175,” recalls Cyril Volte. “So we offered an equal partnership on the Ardiden 3C, which is designated WZ-16 in China. Our Chinese partners are providing the cold section, while Turbomeca retains responsibility for the hot section.” (editor’s note: the combustor and high-pressure turbine). Engine certification by Chinese aviation authorities is expected in 2013.
"We" as in who got pawned? People like you? I'm sure not in your league and let me see, how many on BRF are...prithvi wrote:<SNIP> gotta accept here .. !! we got pawned... what the heck was the second pic..?![]()
Might be a version of the Shakti? Classic French behaviour - selling to both sides for money.chackojoseph wrote:For records
At the end of 2007, Chinese helicopter-maker Avic 2 asked us to provide an engine for the Z-15, the Chinese version of the EC175,” recalls Cyril Volte. “So we offered an equal partnership on the Ardiden 3C, which is designated WZ-16 in China. Our Chinese partners are providing the cold section, while Turbomeca retains responsibility for the hot section.” (editor’s note: the combustor and high-pressure turbine). Engine certification by Chinese aviation authorities is expected in 2013.
Could be. I wanted to point out that Chinese have issues with the "hot parts." Logically, the Military engines too have similar issues. IMHO>merlin wrote:Might be a version of the Shakti? Classic French behaviour - selling to both sides for money.
Balance of powers
"We are not trying to hold China down. China has been a great power for thousands of years.
"It is a global power and will be a global power. So the question is how we work our way through this in a way that ensures that we continue to have positive relations," Mr Gates said.
"I think the Chinese have learned a powerful lesson from the Soviet experience," he said, in an apparent reference to over-spending on military goals to the detriment of the economy.
"They do not intend to try to compete with us across the full range of our capabilities but I think they are intending to develop capabilities that give them a considerable freedom of action in Asia and the opportunity to extend their influence."
Well its an open market and any one including French can sell weapon to any country and no country holds a veto over what should be sold to any other country , the French , Russians and US they all do that onlee.merlin wrote:Classic French behaviour - selling to both sides for money.
Banana republic onleee saar, what to do?Austin wrote:Well its an open market and any one including French can sell weapon to any country and no country holds a veto over what should be sold to any other country , the French , Russians and US they all do that onlee.merlin wrote:Classic French behaviour - selling to both sides for money.
Construction of new airfields and the upgradation of advanced landing grounds (ALGs) and helipads in and around the TAR, coupled with the acquisition of new transport aircraft, will enhance China’s strategic airlift capability resulting in faster induction and concentration of field formations in comparatively shorter time-frames and, consequently, over shorter warning periods. The construction of airfields and ALGs closer to Indian borders boosts the PLA Air Force fighter aircrafts’ striking range and provides it the ability to strike and engage targets in India on a broad front and in depth.
Another major infrastructure development is the construction of new missile bases in Tibet. According to recent reports, China has placed advanced Dong Feng-21 medium-range ballistic missiles along the borders it shares with India. During a future conflict with India, the PLA could easily move 500 to 600 mobile ballistic missile launchers to bases close to the Indian border from their current deployment opposite Taiwan.
Complexities of the Tibetan terrain, vagaries of climate, and sustenance capacities of the thrust lines chosen, are all factors that influence the depth of operations that are planned to be undertaken. To address this aspect, the PLA is reportedly constructing Hyperbaric Chambers to facilitate the rapid acclimatisation of troops brought in from lower altitudes. It is also building the first batch of oxygen-enriched barracks using plants for troops in the TAR at the Nagchu Military Sub-Command at an altitude of 4,500 metres.
This is the part that sounds silly. If you rapidly induct unacclimatized troops and put them in oxygen enriched barracks or even in "hyperbaric chambers - they will all be happy and comfortable - but they will remain unacclimatized and will not develop the body defence reaction to high altitude. The body detects low oxygen levels and reacts in ways that will not be triggered by providing higher oxygen levels. This will make it worse for them in a hot war everyone agrees to fight a war inside those barracks.VinodTK wrote:China preparing Tibet as future war zoneTo address this aspect, the PLA is reportedly constructing Hyperbaric Chambers to facilitate the rapid acclimatisation of troops brought in from lower altitudes. It is also building the first batch of oxygen-enriched barracks using plants for troops in the TAR at the Nagchu Military Sub-Command at an altitude of 4,500 metres.
navneeet wrote:Relax: China’s First Aircraft Carrier is a Piece of Junk
An interesting article from David Axe
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/06 ... e-of-junk/
China has struggled for years to design and build adequate powerplants for its ships and aircraft. Although Chinese aerospace firms are increasingly adept at manufacturing airframes, they still have not mastered motors. That’s why the new WZ-10 attack helicopter was delayed nearly a decade, and why there appear to be two different prototypes for the J-20 stealth fighter. One flies with reliable Russian-made AL-31F engines; the other apparently uses a less trustworthy Chinese design, the WS-10A.![]()
Russia, China to wrap up gas deal before Hu visit
By Gleb Bryanski
MOSCOW | Tue May 31, 2011 5:16pm BST
MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia said on Tuesday it would finalise a major gas supply deal with China in time for a visit in mid-June by President Hu Jintao, wrapping up years of talks to open a new export route to the world's biggest energy market.
Deputy Prime Minister Igor Sechin said he had reached broad agreement at a meeting in Moscow with his counterpart Wang Qishan to supply China with 68 billion cubic metres (bcm) a year of gas over a timespan of 30 years.
Gas export monopoly Gazprom (GAZP.MM) would deliver 30 bcm a year through the 'Altai' route, pumping gas from its existing fields in western Siberia across the narrow stretch of common border located between Kazakhstan and Mongolia.
A further 38 bcm per year would go by pipeline down Russia's Pacific seaboard and into northeast China. The viability of this route had been in doubt until recently.
The launch of gas exports to China would break Russia's export dependency on the European market, to which the world's largest gas producer expects to export over 150 bcm this year.
Sechin said final agreement had not yet been reached on price but the two sides had tasked their state energy firms, Gazprom and CNPC CNPET.UL with finalising terms.
"We have asked Gazprom and CNPC to finish talks and prepare a package of contracts for signing before June 10," Sechin told reporters in Moscow.
"We are one big step away from achieving our aims," Liu Tienan, head of China's state energy directorate, told a separate news conference. "We have created the conditions for the final step."
Officials want a deal to be finalised before a visit to Russia by President Hu, who will be the guest of honour at the St Petersburg International Economic Forum on June 16-18.
Separately, Russian officials said a dispute over payments for Russian oil exports to China had been resolved, after China had paid nearly $200 million (121 million pounds) in outstanding arrears to state controlled oil major Rosneft and pipeline monopoly Transneft.
START DATE
Neither side gave any dates for the start of gas deliveries, but the 'Altai' route is likely to start first as it would tap into Gazprom's core resource base of fields in western Siberia that are already in production.
The Pacific route, by contrast, would rely on developing new gas assets, such as the Chayandinskoye field, in remote eastern Siberia that are years away from exploitation.
Start dates have often slipped since the two sides signed a memorandum of understanding in 2006, with a joint document inked in October 2009 stating that deliveries would start in 2014-15.
Sechin, who has a sweeping energy policy mandate, has come under pressure to deliver a gas deal after the collapse of a strategic partnership between Rosneft (ROSN.MM) and BP (BP.L) that he masterminded.
Price terms, a key sticking point given Gazprom's push to benchmark the price China pays off its European export prices, have yet to be finalised, officials said.
No Chinese loan is foreseen as part of the gas export supply deal, and Gazprom's deputy CEO Alexander Medvedev said the company would have no problems financing pipeline construction.
That contrasts with an oil export deal Sechin negotiated under which Rosneft (ROSN.MM) received a $15 billion oil-backed loan and Transneft TRNF_P.MM a $10 billion credit.
Russia has also lagged behind the gas-rich states of former Soviet Central Asia, which have already started exports to China. Last month, China lent Turkmenistan's state gas firm $4.1 billion, backed by gas supplies.
Sechin dismissed suggestions that the Central Asians had secured a first-mover advantage. "I think Gazprom is fully competitive in this context," he told reporters.
(Additional reporting by Melissa Akin and Vladimir Soldatkin, Writing by Douglas Busvine; Editing by Alfred Kueppers)
Russia hails oil pipe as first step towards China
By Charles Clover in Moscow
Published: September 27 2010 20:23 | Last updated: September 27 2010 20:23
Russia and China opened a historic oil pipeline in a move hailed by their leaders as the first step towards diversifying Russia�s energy exports away from Europe and towards its eastern neighbour.
The commercial logic of greater energy links between one of the largest producers of energy and the world�s largest consumer has outweighed political distrust between the two nations, which fought a brief war in 1969 and only two years ago finalised border delimitation.
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and his Chinese counterpart Hu Jintao marked the completion of the Chinese branch by simultaneously pressing a button to open the pipeline during a ceremony in Beijing on Monday.
�Our co-operation has already reached the level of strategic partnership,� said Mr Medvedev. Negotiations over the pipeline, which began 14 years ago, have tracked the warming relations between the two countries, which now conduct military exercises together.
The pipeline represents a strategic shift for Russia�s energy industry. Currently, its maze of oil and gas pipelines head westward, supplying Europe, and Russian leaders have long said they wanted to diversify exports.
Julia Nanay, of PFC Energy in Washington, said such moves had �become an important strategic priority for Russia�.
The new EPSO pipeline snakes through east Siberian steppes from the Russian town of Skvordino to Daqing, an oil hub in China.
It is expected to start pumping 300,000 barrels a day on January 1. State-controlled Rosneft, Russia�s largest oil concern, will sell the crude to China�s top energy group, PetroChina.
Oil exports are to be followed by gas exports, as China is eager to burn less coal and more environmentally friendly gas. In 2006 Russia agreed to build two gas pipelines to China, carrying 68bn cu m of gas per year, though failure to agree on a pricing formula have delayed the progress of the gas lines.
Russian gas export monopoly Gazprom said it had cemented terms for a supply deal to sell 30bn?cu?m to China National Petroleum Corp annually. The two countries have not managed to clinch a gas price deal, however.
�We expect commercial contracts by the middle of 2011,� Igor Sechin, Russia�s deputy prime minister, told reporters.
�Practically, there are no limits for the growth of gas consumption in China,� said Mr Sechin, who is chairman of Russian oil company Rosneft and oversees the country�s energy and metals industries. �Secondly, Russia has all the gas needed for China�s economic development.�
Russia wants to supply all of China's gas needs
The Associated Press
Date: Monday Sep. 27, 2010 6:08 AM ET
BEIJING � China and Russia signed agreements Monday to boost energy cooperation, while Moscow said it is ready to supply its energy hungry neighbor with all its natural gas needs.
No dollar value was given to the agreements signed during a state visit by Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, but they include documents on cooperation in coal, natural gas, nuclear energy and renewable energy.
Russian Deputy Prime Minister Igor Sechin told reporters in Beijing that Russia is in talks with Chinese partners on plans to launch natural gas supplies to China starting in 2015, according to the state ITAR-Tass news agency.
"Russia is ready to meet China's full demand in gas," Sechin was quoted as saying in the report.
Russia is the world's biggest energy producer and China is the world's largest energy consumer, overtaking the United States last year.
Although Europe remains Russia's largest export market for gas and oil, both Beijing and Moscow have been seeking to diversify their energy sources and markets, despite a long history of mutual suspicion and tensions.
Medvedev is on a three-day visit that started Sunday. He met Chinese President Hu Jintao for talks Monday and praised closer ties with China.
"I believe that the contact between the two countries is completely in the interest of the Russian and Chinese peoples," Medvedev said in opening remarks.
Hu hailed a "new era" in partnership. "Both sides believe that the current strategic partnership between China and Russia stands at a new starting point," the Chinese leader said at the end of talks.
Sechin said that if talks with China on gas supplies went well, Russia could sign commercial contracts by the middle of next year, ITAR-Tass said.
Russian news agency Interfax cited Russian Energy Minister Sergei Shmatko as saying that "in my opinion, the main terms of (gas) supplies, apart from the price, have been agreed upon."
In late August, Russia opened its section of a 1,000-kilometre crude oil pipeline from eastern Siberia to China, which will connect Russian oil fields with Daqing, a major oil production base in northeastern China.
Russia and China split bitterly 50 years ago over interpretations of communist ideology. In recent years, their relationship has warmed but they remain divided by culture and a preference in both capitals for acting independently.
Both see themselves as rivals to Washington and all three are permanent members of the UN Security Council. China and Russia have close ties to Iran and though they supported UN sanctions adopted last month against Tehran over its suspected nuclear program, they have objected to stronger measures.
Right... the Russian army is short of willing people.ParGha wrote:Please take the strategy/geopolitics discussion to appropriate forum. WRT Russia using Chinese money to build defenses against the Chinese, you also need reliable and willing manpower to man those defenses and Russia isn't going to get that with Chinese money alone.
So does the Israeli army but one rarely hears of motivational issues from that corner of the world. In the case of the Russian army, better pay and working conditions will go a long way in improving morale, both of which need cash.Gaur wrote:^^
I hope you are aware that the Russian Army mostly consists of conscripts.
And you take it to the other logical extreme that the Russian army is so disparate that it's effectively ineffective. Here is my last opinion on the matter:Gaur wrote:^^
That is a highly simplistic view of the matter. The lack of motivation and divisions among Russian people (especially political and regional) are at extreme contrast to the unity and motivation of Israeli people . Not to mention the differences between their version of conscription and that of Israel. So, Russia cannot be compared with Israel. Anyway, this is way OT here.
OK tell me which forum to watch.DavidD wrote:I'm surprised that you guys just found out about that new sub,
Vietnam Confirms Kilo Sub Buy at Shangri-La
By WENDELL MINNICK
Published : 5 Jun 2011
SINGAPORE - Vietnam will procure six Russian-built Kilo-class attack submarines "to defend" the country. Vietnam's Defense Minister, Gen. Phung Quang Thanh, made the comment June 5 at the 10th Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore 5. Analysts put the price tag for the deal at just over $3 billion.
The announcement comes in the wake of official protests lodged by Hanoi over a May 26 incident when three Chinese vessels operated by the State Oceanic Administration harassed the Binh Minh 02, a Vietnamese oil exploration seismic survey vessel belonging to the Vietnam Oil and Gas Group (PetroVietnam). One of the Chinese vessels cut the ship's survey cable. The incident occurred within Vietnam's Exclusive Economic Zone.
The incident causes "considerable concern on the maintenance of peace and stability in the East Sea [South China Sea]," he said. Further, Vietnam has "exercised patience in managing the incident with peaceful means in accordance with the international laws and the principle of determinedly protecting our national sovereignty."
The incident caused outrage in Vietnam, resulting in public protests at the Chinese embassy and hacker attacks on Chinese government websites.
Thanh met with Chinese Defense Minister Liang Guanglie at a bilateral meeting during the Shangri-La to discuss issues, including the incident. The Dialogue is organized by the London-based International Institute of Strategic Studies (IISS) and held annually each June in Singapore.
Lt. Gen. Nguyen Chi Vinh, Deputy Minister of Defense, also confirmed the Kilo submarine deal and added that Vietnam was also buying "Su-30 fighters and surface-to-air missiles." However, the procurements were not tied to the May 26 incident and were "part of our weapons appreciation program for enhancing our capabilities." He said Vietnam has a "legitimate need to upgrade our military capability."
Vinh emphasized that the recent incident with China was a "civilian clash" and not a military issue. Vietnamese law enforcement and maritime agencies are responsible for these types of problems, he said. "What happened, happened" and it must he handled within the guidelines of international law by peaceful means. However, Vinh stressed that Vietnam would use "all means to protect our national sovereignty."
China's military has been expanding its capabilities and influence in the South China Sea with a new submarine base on Hainan Island, and preparations are underway to begin sea trials of its first aircraft carrier.
China and Vietnam have been bumping into one another in the South China Sea since the 1970s. In 1974 China took the Paracel Islands by military force from then-South Vietnam, and Hanoi has continued to claim sovereignty over the islands. Periodic arrests of Vietnamese fishermen in the area have also caused frustration in Hanoi.
In 1988 China and Vietnam Fought over the Johnson South Reef in the South China Sea. China sank two Vietnamese naval vessels and opened fire on Vietnamese troops occupying the reef. A video documentary widely aired in Vietnam, dubbed the "Spratly Islands Massacre", available on YouTube, allegedly shows a Chinese frigate gunning down around 30 Vietnamese soldiers on the reef.
The latest incident has raised concerns China is becoming aggressive in the South China Sea and risks sparking a conflict. However, a member of the Chinese delegation attending the Shangri-La Dialogue said the Chinese vessels involved in the May 26 incident might be acting unilaterally without the consent or encouragement of Beijing. The State Oceanic Administration and other non-military maritime patrol and law enforcement organizations have in the past acted carelessly, he said. These organizations are often fighting over budgets and attempting to justify their existence, thus they sometimes "act muscularly."
Sinodefence.com is a good one if you don't wanna register, china-defense.com/smf is pretty good too, but you'll have to register to access the contents. There are few fanboys on there, I can only think of one off the top of my head(a transplant from pak defence, of courseshiv wrote:OK tell me which forum to watch.DavidD wrote:I'm surprised that you guys just found out about that new sub,
The U.S. is finishing up with their war on terror(pulling out of Iraq/Afghanistan, killing Bin Laden), now the Americans are turning their attention to China, that's a big part of why you're seeing more Chinese-related news.SaiK wrote:There is a sudden increase and spike in china related discussions through out internet, radio (npr), and cnbc other khan media networks including pbs. Japan sure thinks chinese rise as second super power and in seak of energy resources is not going to be peaceful. India is aware, and are slowly strengthening border inch by inch (imo), and those interviews with certain chips on the radio want to assert their history, is not about invasions, but business[/lying and cheating]
Imo, chips are all about playing bad to get what they want. Energy resource hunting, and they will cross swords with anyone on their way.. and wants to emphasize their blue water presence with more force than civilian diplomacy.
Just like terror warning colors, I think chip warning indicators have now reached near Orange level.
chip alert!
To me this sounds like snake oil being sold by your filthier and more vulgar plostitute, PakistanDavidD wrote:
The U.S. is finishing up with their war on terror(pulling out of Iraq/Afghanistan, killing Bin Laden), now the Americans are turning their attention to China, that's a big part of why you're seeing more Chinese-related news.
Like you mean the big Satan and Evil Empire that needs US attentionDavidD wrote:The U.S. is finishing up with their war on terror(pulling out of Iraq/Afghanistan, killing Bin Laden), now the Americans are turning their attention to China, that's a big part of why you're seeing more Chinese-related news.
bennedose AT hotmail should do the trickAustin wrote:Like you mean the big Satan and Evil Empire that needs US attentionDavidD wrote:The U.S. is finishing up with their war on terror(pulling out of Iraq/Afghanistan, killing Bin Laden), now the Americans are turning their attention to China, that's a big part of why you're seeing more Chinese-related news.
Shiv need to drop an email can I have your email id , Thanks
Here is an example :