
http://www.ndtv.com/video/player/left-r ... /209364?sp
Would beg to differ here.brihaspati wrote:.... It reminds me of MKG, who in pursuit of ever-more refined definition of civilization - and a very personal, dictatorial sense of what social as well as general "justice" or unbiasedness means - managed to put millions into slaughter, rape and trauma in the long run.
The failure to see the long term consequences, what the nation should mean clearly - leads to a fuzziness about values and a tendency to do equal-eqals between issues/faiths/ideologies/objectives that are not equal. ...
I have this sadistic urge to follow her and have been doing for quiet some time. I did send her some very sick mails, just to throw her off-balance psychologically. She has a pure hatred for anything patriotic Indian. Let me try to be more clear. She hates you if you say Bharat Mata ki jai. She will quote that Muslims laid their lives for freedom struggle and hence we should not say "Bharat mata". If you say Jai Jawan Jai Kisan, She would say Indian Jawans are rapists and follow a systemic oppression of minorities. You say India is a fast emerging global economic power she would start off with the economic imbalance and all that crap. She will never digest anything good about India. She does not have the courage to stab Bharat mata herself but she will give a knife to anyone who is ready to stab Bharat mata.uddu wrote: You know what, Most of the people here in BR says Arundhati types are the left, But i do feel she belongs to something else. Something that's not the left. Or May be something that's not actually left in any manner. If we assume Communists parties in India as left, then surely she did not belong to that category. There is something else with these people....
Wonder why this same logic never seems to hold with INC/commies when it comes to NaMo, who has been steamrolling all opponents in election after election?It was digusting watch Commie/ Congressi talking about Om Puri insulting the Indian people who have voted for them.
My inference from this quote is that Kejriwal would be willing to let the Congress or Left share stage with Anna but not the BJP...However, we have been clear that no BJP leader or leader of any communal organisation will share the stage with us.
How would you know its a good idea without having a handle on the costs associated with bringing the entire babucracy under purview of Lokpal?Hari Seldon wrote: Like bringing the *entire* central babucracy under purview & scrutiny, like having public service guarantees and timelines for service delivery with associated penalities should timelines be skipped. Regardless of where the idea originated, I support it if its good for India.
The Tea Party movement had no central leadership, but was composed of a loose affiliation of national and local groups that determined their own platforms and agendas. Similarity exists,but to a limited extent only. TEA-was used as an acronym for "Taxed Enough Already" and the general drift was against inordinate taxation.The attempt on reduction of the national debt and federal budget deficit, and adherence to an originalist interpretation of the United States Constitution were the main points of the TEA party movement.sugriva wrote:The Anna Hazare Andolan has eerie similarities with the Tea Party movement in the US.
Sources said besides the obvious names under fire, parties may use the reconstitution opening to rethink their membership in the panel which has become important after Hazare's agitation. They may want to nominate members who would contribute to the tricky issue while articulating the party's stand in the face of hard lobbying by civil society.
Experts said the consultation may see more participation than before because of the publicity to Lokpal issue after Hazare's agitation.
Six of the seven Congress members are not said to know much about law and the party could rethink their names. Given the stakes involved after BJP sided with Hazare's demands politically despite realizing they could test constitutional limits, the opposition party also could review its nominations.
Looking at the difference in the leadership structure is missing the wood for the trees. The similarities run deep. I know what Tea in Tea Party stands for. Just as corruption is an issue for the "middle class" in India, tax is an issue for the wealthier whites in America. Both have positions that are born out of selfishness. I will expound on what I mean by "middle class" a little later but let me expound more on the similarities.sanjeevpunj wrote: The Tea Party movement had no central leadership, but was composed of a loose affiliation of national and local groups that determined their own platforms and agendas. Similarity exists,but to a limited extent only. TEA-was used as an acronym for "Taxed Enough Already" and the general drift was against inordinate taxation.The attempt on reduction of the national debt and federal budget deficit, and adherence to an originalist interpretation of the United States Constitution were the main points of the TEA party movement.
Guy is a raving lunatic. Driving down to hamam bokhari to apologize for singing vande mataram is not kommunal?Arjun wrote:It is a long journey ahead: Kejriwal
Good interview of Kejriwal....I found this quote interesting:My inference from this quote is that Kejriwal would be willing to let the Congress or Left share stage with Anna but not the BJP...However, we have been clear that no BJP leader or leader of any communal organisation will share the stage with us.
Power to the Annistas!sugriva wrote:sanjeevpunj wrote: ...............One last point. If you were to consider corruption as a sort of tax, then the dichotomy between the tea party and the AHA andolan would appear to be less dissonant. One other point. The Tea Party and the AHA andolan (annistas*) would probably hate each other.
*There, I created a new name for the AHA andolankaris
I would blame the BJP more than I would team Anna. Until the Lokpal bill is actually passed - the bargaining power is more with BJP than with Anna, despite whatever hype the latter might create. If the BJP does not force Kejriwal to define 'communal' in objective terms - it will have only itself to blame for its abject surrender. If a party cannot even stand up to itself and show some basic spine so as not to allow every Tom, Dick and Harry to walk all over it - what use is it for? Why should a party with such low self-esteem be allowed to represent a big section of the populace?VinayB wrote:For the delusional counting the 'gains' out of team Anna, count this - BJP is certified kommunal, and hamam bokari is certified secular, and kommunalism is certified a bigger problem than korruption. Ponder this question - chances of upa-3 increased or decreased after team anna drama?
Nesoj wrote:...
Now consider a group of Baboons. They are the loudest, most dangerous, most obnoxious, most viciously aggressive and least intelligent of all primates. And what is the proper collective noun for a group of baboons?
Believe it or not .....
................................. a Congress !!!!!
Arjun wrote:It is a long journey ahead: Kejriwal
Good interview of Kejriwal....I found this quote interesting:My inference from this quote is that Kejriwal would be willing to let the Congress or Left share stage with Anna but not the BJP...However, we have been clear that no BJP leader or leader of any communal organisation will share the stage with us.
It is in here: BaboonAditya_V wrote:I dont think what Nesoj wrote is correct though. I have not found anywhere a group of Baboons is called a Congress ...
How relevant!!Aditya_V wrote:... neither can the Baboons be called unitelligent, in fact they are very intelligent and opportunistic animals, who in fact fool Gazzels that they are friendly animals who warn them of leopards, Lions approaching and then prey on Gazzel Fawns...
Aditya_V wrote:...More intelligent Antelope like impalla etc {viz BRFites} dont get fooled by thier behaviour and stronger Herbivores like Zebra, Buffalo and Elephants cannot be preyed upon by them.
Unfortunately, that perception is not limited Kejriwal. Just a couple of days ago, I met a very old friend, a very smart person. During the chat she acknowledged that India needs Na Mo for the next 10 years or it would really be in trouble. As the discussion progressed, she claimed that Na Mo is responsible for the Gujarat riots. She then went on to say that Godhra was NaMo's creation. I asked her if she believes that Modi was orchestrated the stopping the train and burning the pilgrims. She said, she does not have proof but she would let me know when she finds it.Arjun wrote:It is a long journey ahead: Kejriwal
Good interview of Kejriwal....I found this quote interesting:However, we have been clear that no BJP leader or leader of any communal organisation will share the stage with us.
BJP/RSS agenda of equality has enough popularity. Problem, is there is no champion of the cause."If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it".
Not easy, Jagan and Jaya will be allowed as they are potential allies. BJP will never own one, they tried one with AAJ Tak and HT which was promtly with some behind the scenes force taken over by NDTV .ashashi wrote:quote="Arjun"]It is a long journey ahead: Kejriwal
Good interview of Kejriwal....I found this quote interesting:Unfortunately, that perception is not limited Kejriwal. Just a couple of days ago from Bengaluru, I met a very old friend, a very smart person. During the chat she acknowledged that India needs Na Mo for the next 10 years or it would really be in trouble. As the discussion progressed, she claimed that Na Mo is responsible for the Gujarat riots. She then went on to say that Godhra was NaMo's creation. I asked her if she believes that Modi was orchestrated the stopping the train and burning the pilgrims. She said, she does not have proof but she would let me know when she finds it.That got me thinking about myself about how surprised I was to see Justice Thomas's report on Godse and RSS. Being a long time BJP supporter and one who participated in RSS shakas when I was in my early teens, this should not have come as a surprise. I simply bought into the idea that Godse acted on RSS orders as show in the film Gandhi.However, we have been clear that no BJP leader or leader of any communal organisation will share the stage with us./quote]
Like most of the Indians, I fell victim to a lie. Cannot count how many hundreds of times I heard that lie.BJP/RSS agenda of equality has enough popularity. Problem, is there is no champion of the cause."If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it".
Why doesnt BJP invest in promoting nationalistic and equality based view points in the media. Heck if Jagan and Jaya can own TV channels, why cant BJP?
Retrospection is not onlee available to us, but was also available to MKG, no? He hailed from Gujarat, and was pretty aware of the history of Gujarat vis-a-vis Islamism. He spent decades fencing with the South African Brit regime, and in the end scored political points while conceding the virtual ban on Indian immigration. He was not aware of the timeline and his particular cross-roads of history? What the h*** - each of us at every moment of time are crossing cross-roads of history.sumishi wrote:Would beg to differ here.brihaspati wrote:.... It reminds me of MKG, who in pursuit of ever-more refined definition of civilization - and a very personal, dictatorial sense of what social as well as general "justice" or unbiasedness means - managed to put millions into slaughter, rape and trauma in the long run.
The failure to see the long term consequences, what the nation should mean clearly - leads to a fuzziness about values and a tendency to do equal-eqals between issues/faiths/ideologies/objectives that are not equal. ...
First, from the vantage and advantage of retrospection, it is relatively quite easy to pull the pieces of the historical jigsaw puzzle and arrive at a conclusion on what should / should not have been. Those treading the timeline at the cross roads of history do not have that privilege.
Second, there were more factors for partition (most importantly the Great Game) than only the inability of MKG to recognise long-term consequences.
So indirectly INC could possibly stand for for Indian National troop of ******?sumishi wrote:It is in here: BaboonAditya_V wrote:I dont think what Nesoj wrote is correct though. I have not found anywhere a group of Baboons is called a Congress ...
How relevant!!Aditya_V wrote:... neither can the Baboons be called unitelligent, in fact they are very intelligent and opportunistic animals, who in fact fool Gazzels that they are friendly animals who warn them of leopards, Lions approaching and then prey on Gazzel Fawns...![]()
![]()
Aditya_V wrote:...More intelligent Antelope like impalla etc {viz BRFites} dont get fooled by thier behaviour and stronger Herbivores like Zebra, Buffalo and Elephants cannot be preyed upon by them.
As regards MKG, no doubt there were very serious problems. Coming to Team Anna - my feeling is that Kejriwal is well-meaning but afflicted with the same mental blocks that many Indians with a supposedly secularist education suffer from. Anna himself, having had little schooling, has more robust instincts (which come out in his references to Shivaji, for example).brihaspati wrote: Retrospection is not onlee available to us, but was also available to MKG, no?
A link to collective nouns. http://www.rinkworks.com/words/collective.shtmlNesoj wrote:On a much lighter note (to cool down the hot discussion going on) - enjoy !!!
The English language has some wonderfully anthropomorphic collective nouns for the various groups of animals.
We are all familiar with a Herd of cows, a Flock of chickens, a School of fish and a Gaggle of geese.
However, less widely known is a Pride of lions, a Murder of crows , an Exaltation of doves and, presumably because they look so wise, a Parliament of owls.
Now consider a group of Baboons. They are the loudest, most dangerous, most obnoxious, most viciously aggressive and least intelligent of all primates. And what is the proper collective noun for a group of baboons?
Believe it or not .....
................................. a Congress !!!!!
August 30, 2011 01:47 PM
Vinita Deshmukh
The former SC judge says Team Anna had no intention of taking the government head-on over the Lokpal issue, but it was compelled to do so because of its stubborn claim of ‘parliamentary supremacy’. Justice Hegde who was a key member of the joint drafting committee, has urged people to continue the fight for the proper use of the country’s wealth and resources
For some reason the three sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act which Parliament was set to dilute in terms of going soft on prosecution of government officers, who indulged in corruption and illegal commercial transactions, did not go to the Rajya Sabha. Otherwise, this amendment (along with the 17 bills that were passed in 12 minutes on a single day in September 2010), would have showed that the political class sitting in Parliament, which pompously boasts about 'parliamentary supremacy', was not interested in removing corruption, but was in fact keen to condone it, says Santosh Hegde, member of the joint drafting committee of the Lokpal Bill.
Justice Hegde made these remarks during a public lecture he delivered at the Nehru Memorial Hall in Pune on Monday, at the invitation of the chartered accountants fraternity, a day after Anna Hazare broke his 13-day fast for a strong anti-corruption law.
He referred to a report of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India, saying, "According to the 2008-09 CAG report, in one single year Rs54,000 crore, which was to be spent on eight rural development schemes like midday meal, water supply and so on, are not accounted for. Where has the money been siphoned off that would have enhanced the quality of life of thousands of villages? Isn't it time to bring in a strong legislation against such large-scale corruption?''Mr Hegde asked.
The former judge of the Supreme Court also made a pointed reference to the Reliance KG Basin oil deal as likely to become larger than the 2G scam, to make a strong legislation against corruption the topmost priority.
He said, "The first administrative reforms were made in 1962, when Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru was prime minister. Only 14 years after Independence, the need was felt to control decay in the administration. We chose the Scandinavian system of having an ombudsman and it was at that time that it was recommended to have an institution called the Lokpal at the centre and Lokayukta at the state level. But the proposal gathered dust, until in 1984, Ramkrishna Hegde became chief minister of Karnataka and promised value-based governance, and he fulfilled the promise by instituting the Lokayukta at the state level and it became an Act in 1986. However, the government at the centre slept over the issue for 48 years.''
In the context of the scams that were busted in 2010, Justice Hegde said, "Some members in civil society decided to draft a bill and have a discussion with the government. However, the government was unwilling. Anna Hazare sent a letter in February 2011, but there was no reply. It is only when he began his fast in April that the law ministry said the letter sent to the prime minister was misplaced and that we should send another copy. On the third day, an emissary was sent, but Anna insisted that a notification be issued and thus was born the joint drafting committee.''
Justice Hegde, who completed his term as Lokayukta of Karnataka earlier this month, mentioned how all the nine meetings of the joint drafting committee for a strong Lokpal Bill failed, as the government representatives on the committee said a singular "no" or "keep it in brackets" (meaning, "we will see"). Due to this stubborn attitude of the government to stall a strong legislation, that Anna Hazare was compelled to go on a fast a second time. Thereafter, Justice Hegde said, some government representatives even started questioning the credibility of Team Anna, with statements like 'Who are you-the unelectable and the unelected-to tell us how to have a law?' Look at the audacity of these parliamentarians who have changed the meaning of democracy, which in the right essence is by the people, for the people and of the people!''
Urging the people to undertake a mass education campaign on the Jan Lokpal Bill, Justice Hegde said people should not forget the humiliation meted out to the people of India by politicians, and if they meet any of them they should ask them, "Do you know who I am? I am a citizen of India and so I hold the highest office."
Justice Hegde concluded by saying that he felt nostalgic when Anna broke his fast on 28th August. "I was seven years old when my parents took me to a public ground when India attained freedom on 15 August 1947. I felt the same sense of pride and patriotism when Anna broke his fast.''
Asked about his disagreement with Team Anna over Mr Hazare's fast, Justice Hegde said, "I was worried about Anna's health".
Small scale industries provide massive employment and are engines of growth, not only in India but in USA as well. We now see how the 'trickle down economy' really works, don't we? A nation cannot have everybody in large scale industries. 'Balance' is a key aspect that all countries need to achieve. We need a sizable population in labor intensive areas - be it agriculture or small scale industries; we need labor in manufacturing and services.gakakkad wrote:And he along with a few others is responsible for socialist economic planning . Disasters like charkha , cottage industry etc handicapped generations of Indians.