Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 2011

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Cosmo_R
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3407
Joined: 24 Apr 2010 01:24

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by Cosmo_R »

I do not want to sound like a leech but I think there is an American blessing to this declared partnership between India and Afghanistan.
A timid and weak Congress would not have risked another major terrorist attack on India UNLESS there is an assurance from US.
JMT
Altair
I don't think that's a big secret. Clinton urged India in July and more recently to look 'outward'. OTOH, I don't think there is any 'assurance'.

What's emerging IMHO, is that the thing that India feared the most--a coalition in Kabul including the Taliban is off the table after Rabbani's assassination. IOW, Karzai has come around to India's POV compared to what he said when MMS visited Kabul.

Again, IMHO, the strategic partnership stuff is not that different from what India is already doing for Afghanistan. We are not going to supply weapons to ANA (as yet).

The kiss and make up stuff WRT Pakistan (peace talks, dropping of opposition to EU package etc) is good PR for when the next massive attack happens (prediction: PC will still have no intelligence) and a military strike by India takes place.

Somewhere in there is an understanding on India/AFGH joint covert ops inside TSP. Being covert, of course, they are not going to highlight it :)
Rahul M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 17167
Joined: 17 Aug 2005 21:09
Location: Skies over BRFATA
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by Rahul M »

ArmenT wrote:
Rahul M wrote:username changed to Kasundi.
<OT>Dada, please tell me you're thinking of Bikrampurer brand</OT> :)
no no, some new one. I will have to check the label. :P
JE Menon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7143
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by JE Menon »

>>I think there is an American blessing to this declared partnership between India and Afghanistan.

Blessing? More like encouraging, and what some might consider pleading even.

The Mullen statement is very important, despite the backpedalling. End of the day, it is not DoS that is doing the fighting. Amirkhan has a very clearheaded view of the Pak reality. Just like us. But they are all scrunched up about what to do next. Just like us. There aren't many options. And those that are there aren't easily digestible. Sooner or later though they, and we, will have to just swallow - probably deal with another uncomfortable musharraf, maybe go into Pakistan, and let out the inner Pakistaniyat once and for all.
kasthuri
BRFite
Posts: 411
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 08:17
Location: Mount Doom in Mordor

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by kasthuri »

^^^Exactly...here are Mullen's words

Mullen, who has for years led the U.S. military’s effort to improve cooperation with Pakistan, continued, saying, "[The government of Pakistan] may believe that, by using these proxies, they are hedging their bets or redressing what they feel is an imbalance in regional power, but in reality they have already lost that bet. {Looks like the decision to involve India was taken long before}

"By exporting violence, they have eroded their internal security and their position in the region. They have undermined their international credibility and threatened their economic well-being. Only a decision to break with this policy can pave the road to a positive future for Pakistan."

Speaking alongside Mullen, U.S. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta said, “We’re going to do everything we have to do to defend our forces,” but declined to specify what operational steps his department might take.

He did say, however, that the Pakistanis would not likely “be surprised by the actions that we might or might not take. {This is definitely not boots on the ground}

“The first order now is to put as much pressure on Pakistan as we can to deal with this issue,” he said.
Last edited by kasthuri on 05 Oct 2011 21:17, edited 1 time in total.
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34981
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by shiv »

SSridhar wrote:The 'strategic partnership' between India and Afghanistan means there will be a massive terror strike against India in both India and Kabul very soon from ISI/LeT/Haqqani. Make no mistake about that.
Siradher my birather! Where have you been?
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60273
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by ramana »

JEM,
More likely the US decided not to object anymore to Indo-Afghan ties as they did in the past to mollycoddle the TSP snake. MKB says even after Mullen's mullings the US contacted the Hackany's thru TSP "bad" services (ISI 8) ).
Altair
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2620
Joined: 30 Dec 2009 12:51
Location: Hovering over Pak Airspace in AWACS

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by Altair »

I have been retracing where India actually had a break from age old US thinking about our involvement in Afghanistan. I can only say that Osama's death changed many things in our favor. Whoever provided that information to US must really love India. It has been all downhill since then for Pakistan. Some very very invaluable information must have been found in that raid.
devesh
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5129
Joined: 17 Feb 2011 03:27

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by devesh »

who knows, 30 years from now a movie will be made about how the first sightings and info on OBL were given to Maasa by Raa agints onlee....a very distinct possibility...
KLNMurthy
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4849
Joined: 17 Aug 2005 13:06

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by KLNMurthy »

So one factor in the inking of the Indo-afghan treaty might have been the Taliban's refusal to participate in a coalition in post-2014 afghanistan. Looks like a reprise of pakis prior to 1947 refusing to work with congress.
krithivas
BRFite
Posts: 783
Joined: 20 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: Offline

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by krithivas »

This is somewhat true just based on wide news coverage (news.google.com and type India or Afghanistan) unlike the past where complete silence for any Indian investment in Afghanistan.
ramana wrote:JEM,
More likely the US decided not to object anymore to Indo-Afghan ties as they did in the past to mollycoddle the TSP snake. MKB says even after Mullen's mullings the US contacted the Hackany's thru TSP "bad" services (ISI 8) ).
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60273
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by ramana »

devesh wrote:who knows, 30 years from now a movie will be made about how the first sightings and info on OBL were given to Maasa by Raa agints onlee....a very distinct possibility...

RamaY had his own CT on why now in the OBL thread!
sudeepj
BRFite
Posts: 1982
Joined: 27 Nov 2008 11:25

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by sudeepj »

Never thought I would use the names of George Clooney and Pakistan in the same bit of news, but here goes :-)

http://www.businessinsider.com/george-c ... ma-2011-10
Clooney's promoting his new movie "Ides Of March," in which he stars as a Democratic presidential candidate and described as a "pretty cynical film."
Clooney also provided some insight into what Obama is thinking: at a recent fundraiser, Clooney asked the President, "What keeps you up at night?" His answer: "Pakistan. That worries me."
RamaY
BRF Oldie
Posts: 17249
Joined: 10 Aug 2006 21:11
Location: http://bharata-bhuti.blogspot.com/

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by RamaY »

This was the Highly Classified post Ramanaji was referring to
RamaY wrote:Gaganullah,

I see some merit in this. Per my sources (highly classified) -

USA and Pakistan Govt were aware of OBL's whereabouts since the beginning of GWOT. They decided to keep OBL under house arrest so they can continue with their GWOT as planned.

Indian intelligence agencies were able to track down OBL's exact location early this year. They have been planning a special ops mission to kill OBL and expose USA and Pakistan perfidy.

That is why India went along with GCC plan to move 20K+ Pakistani army to GCC area, so it will reduce the risk of Paki retaliation after the planned cross-border raid.

When USA pressed GoI on why they rejected F-16 and F-18 from MMRCA deal, someone in GoI leaked to USA that it is because of this OBL finding and exposure of USA perfidy.

USA did not have any option but to orchestrate a quick raid on that Abbotabad compound to kill OBL themselves before Indians could do. It is also believed that KSA has agreed to declare OBL a non-muslim, if there is a mass outrage across muslim world against this USA operation.

That helicopter crashed when it hit the electricity lines going over the compound.

The same source also informed that RAW has detailed knowledge of the whereabouts of Mohammad Azar, Hafeez Saeed, and Dawood Ibrahim and Indian cross border raids will happen sometime in next 6-12 months; before the announcement of mid-term elections in India.

We have to see if Pakistan army can handle such a coordinated raid to capture/kill those three assets by India. The insider says that Pakistan may call back its troops from GCC area.

As a consequence of this development Bahrain is expected to fall in to Shia hands. Iran will give up its nuke dreams in return for a nuke umbrella by Russia. India-Russia-Iran will support a free Afghanistan, coinciding with USA withdrawal. It is also believed that PRC will be kicked out of this big boy game as it is yet to prove its capabilities w.r.t protecting its allies. So far PRC hasn't proved its capabilities beyond supplying 1st generation heavy nukes and highly unreliable missile delivery systems to Pakistan and North Korea.

To protect its geopolitical interests, USA is expected to develop at least two bases in Af-Pak border.
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21234
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by Prem »

Aukat-E_Pakistan in their own Juban
( Wohi Poak who received 20Million $ aid check from indian Ambassdor to UNO)
pakistan's ambassador to america - shameless paki politicians

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_H8aR4b ... re=related
Amber G.
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11163
Joined: 17 Dec 2002 12:31
Location: Ohio, USA

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by Amber G. »

Relationship between Afghanistan and Pakistan plumets to new low
Relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan plummeted to new lows Wednesday as Afghan intelligence officials announced they had foiled a Pakistan-based plot to assassinate Hamid Karzai, the Afghan President.

Officials said they arrested six people in Kabul, including one of Mr. Karzai’s bodyguards, who were allegedly plotting with al-Qaeda and the Pakistan-based Haqqani network to kill him.
<snip>
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21234
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by Prem »

http://www.longwarjournal.org/threat-ma ... eatens.php
( Yeh Kaisa Aaaya Jamana , yeh Kaisa)
'Good' Taliban leader threatens suicide attacks against electric company
senior Taliban commander and administrator of a religious seminary in North Waziristan, Maulana Abdul Khaliq Haqqani, on Monday threatened to send suicide bombers to eliminate two officials of the Tribal Electric Supply Company (Tesco) if they did not restore power supply to Waziristan within 48 hours. The Taliban leader issued a strong-worded statement to media against the Tesco officials and also warned tribal journalists of dire consequences if his statement did not appear in their respective papers.Maulana Abdul Khaliq Haqqani, the administrator of Gulshan-e-Ilm Madrassa in Miramshah, directed his fighters to kidnap the two officials, Tesco regional chief Pervaiz Khan and Executive Engineer Jamshed Ali Khan, and bring them to North Waziristan where they would be given exemplary punishment for their failure to ensure power supply to Waziristan.He directed the Taliban of Darra Adamkhel and Mohmand Agency, led by Commander Tariq Afridi and Maulvi Omar Khalid, respectively, to kidnap the two senior Tesco officials.Taliban operating in Darra Adamkhel and Mohmand Agency are known for their brutality and ruthlessness among their fellow tribal militants.Haqqani said he would then send his suicide bombers to eliminate them if they did not restore power supply to the tribal region.He said he had obtained complete details and addresses of the two officials and his fighters would soon target them there.I would give cash rewards to my fighters if they kill Pervaiz Khan and Jamshed Ali Khan in front of their house and I will claim responsibility for their killings, the Taliban commander said in the statement that he personally delivered to reporters here, with a warning of serious consequences if his statement was not given space in the newspapers.Maulana Abdul Khaliq Haqqani is a deputy of overall North Waziristan Taliban leader Hafiz Gul Bahadar. He is known to provide support for the Haqqani Network and other Taliban fighters in Afghanistan. [See LWJ report, Pakistani Army rejects North Waziristan operation, for a list of senior Taliban and al Qaeda leaders operating in the tribal agency].
Rudradev
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4273
Joined: 06 Apr 2003 12:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by Rudradev »

http://www.npr.org/2011/10/05/140947193 ... -extremism

ATTN: Rangudu, SSridhar, Shiv and others who archive useful media material


Forget the article printed on this webpage. Click on "Listen To The Story" and download the audio file if you can. Listen from about 8 mins 30 sec to 14 mins 45 sec. The really good stuff starts at about 12 mins, before that is useful context.

The interview is with Ken Ballen, a former US Federal Prosecutor who interviewed many terrorists to write a book about their psychology.

In this part of the interview, Ballen says something that's been said on BRF for years but which I've NEVER heard before, expressly stated, in the US media.

"Pakistani state/Pak Govt/TSPA/ISI == Al Qaeda." They ARE the enemy. Bin Laden was a waste of attention, Pakis are and have always been the real danger.

Not "some elements of ISI may have sympathies towards Al-Qaeda" type apologism... he says "they are doing it."

Wish I knew how to get a transcript of this.
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21234
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by Prem »

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.as ... 2011_pg3_1
Indo-Afghan strategic partnership
The very outcome the policy of strategic depth was intended to prevent has finally come to pass, precisely because of that policy. Afghan President Hamid Karzai and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh have just signed an Indo-Afghan strategic partnership agreement in New Delhi. The agreement deepens existing ties in the trade and culture fields, but most significantly, in security cooperation. It envisages Indian training, equipping and capacity building of the Afghan security forces in the run up to and after the US/Nato withdrawal by 2014. Pakistan’s so-called strategic depth policy could be seen as consisting of denying India influence in Afghanistan, which our military and intelligence establishment has tended to view as its ‘backyard’, a description fiercely contested by all Afghans, even the Taliban. The ingress with the Afghan security forces yields a level of influence at the heart of the Afghan state that can only be understood in the light of history. The Soviet-trained and equipped Afghan army in the past was imbued with revolutionary communist ideas transmitted by exposure to what the Soviet Union represented. The Republican coup of 1973, as the communist one of 1978, would probably never have come about without the tacit and explicit backing of the Afghan army. Indian-trained and equipped Afghan security forces will almost certainly repeat that historical parallel, this time to the advantage of India. The ‘nutcracker’ squeeze from east and west so feared by our military strategists may well now become a reality, especially given the recent frictions between Kabul and Islamabad over the safe havens of Pakistani soil used by the Afghan Taliban and Haqqani network to attack US/Nato/Afghan forces across the border and the assassination of Burhanuddin Rabbani. On the latter issue, the Afghan National Directorate of Security has accused Pakistan of not cooperating in the investigation into the murder. Of course our foreign office, in usual mode, denies this. In short, our brilliant strategists have succeeded beyond measure in driving Afghanistan into the arms of India. How has all this come to pass?
Pakistan’s military establishment has tried, and failed, to convince the world that it has genuine and legitimate interests in Afghanistan and therefore cannot leave things to take their own course. Had that ‘interest’ been confined to having a friendly government in Kabul while recognising the sovereign right of the Afghan people to manage their own affairs themselves, and backed up by help rather than sabotage of the Afghan polity and society, Islamabad may have obtained more purchase. As things stand now, Afghanistan will continue to lose a great deal in the prolongation of its internal conflict, in which the contending sides may be backed by rivals India and Pakistan. But the real loser in the end will be none other than Pakistan itself, internationally already isolated, regionally seen as a troublemaker extraordinaire. *
Rangudu
BRFite
Posts: 1751
Joined: 03 Mar 2002 12:31
Location: USA

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by Rangudu »

Rudradev,

I was listening to it on the drive home from work and am already trying to figure out who this guy "Zeddy" is. :)
hnair
Forum Moderator
Posts: 4654
Joined: 03 May 2006 01:31
Location: Trivandrum

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by hnair »

Rudradev wrote:http://www.npr.org/2011/10/05/140947193 ... -extremism

ATTN: Rangudu, SSridhar, Shiv and others who archive useful media material

Wish I knew how to get a transcript of this.
Rudradev-saar, this link says transcripts
http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript ... =140947193
BALLEN: That's correct, Zedi.

DAVIES: Right, who says he spent a lifetime as a warrior for Islam, killed countless people, and his - I mean, you have his words running many, many, many pages. It's quite a story. He is kind of shocking, he's a braggart, and I had to wonder at times whether I could believe him. He was first in his class at this, and he was a better killer than anyone at that, and knew all of these important jihadis. How - could you corroborate much of his story?

BALLEN: Actually, I did, and I corroborated it with American intelligence officials. But also if you - over the last couple months there's been several reports in the New York Times of people very much like him, if not perhaps him, who have also been talking now to outsiders.

So I was able to corroborate some of the principal facts of what he told me, and it was pretty shocking. One thing he told me at the time, and this - when he first told me this was 2008, and nobody thought this at the time. But he said the Pakistani ISI was protecting bin Laden in northwest Pakistan, and basically he nailed it. :oops:

DAVIES: That's the inter-intelligence services, right, the...

BALLEN: That's correct.

DAVIES: And that's been very much in the news lately as, you know, Mike Mullen, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs, accused them of - the ISI of being involved in some way in attacks on American forces in Afghanistan. And I wanted just to ask you a bit about this because he - part of what he said was, you Americans, you're all so obsessed with bin Laden - this of course was when bin Laden was alive - you're missing the real story, which is what the Pakistanis are up to. What did he tell you?

BALLEN: He said that's exactly right, you're missing the real story. And you sit across the table from generals who talk the democratic talk, who dress up and speak in queen's English to you, yet harbor sympathy towards radical Islam as fervently as bin Laden himself.

Zedi said these people are the real danger. They have access to nuclear weapons. They're inside the government of Pakistan. They have access to money, they have access to arms, and in fact, he said, they were arming the Taliban and that they were in alliance.

So think about this, Dave. We spent $20 billion since 9/11 directly in payments to the Pakistani government. Meanwhile, the Pakistani government is hiring this fellow, Zedi, to run a training camp where he trains terrorists who fight against us in Afghanistan, who fight against India, and he's smuggling arms to the Taliban that we're fighting.

As Zedi said to me, you Americans really are funding both sides in the war on terror, literally.

DAVIES: Right, what's interesting about his account is he's not simply saying there are ranking Pakistani intelligence or military officials who are sympathetic to the Taliban or al-Qaida. They're doing it. He would go to a meeting at which there was - the Taliban were to move arms or set up some operation, and there would be these ranking officials of Pakistani intelligence in the room running it, right?

BALLEN: That's correct, that's correct. He even went to one meeting after 9/11 where he met with one of the top al-Qaida operatives near Abbottabad, where bin Laden was, and a leading high-level ISI Pakistani army guy, and they talked about how to smuggle illicit weapons from the former Soviet Union, nuclear. :oops:

DAVIES: And Zedi was never caught and brought to justice, right? He...

BALLEN: Zedi was never caught and brought to justice. He lives comfortably today in Pakistan, as all of these folks do :oops: . No one has ever come - been held to account for their activities in that country when it involves radicalism. So he was a very colorful figure, very well-educated. His English was impeccable, very bright guy and disillusioned by his time as a terrorist, very bitter about what happened to him, which I think provided part of the motivation to open up.

I mean, he carried a lot of guilt with him. It was almost a confessional.

DAVIES: Yeah, and what was he bitter about, what disillusionment?

BALLEN: First he was very - and this is a story that's not told in the West. He worked for the radical Islamic party in Pakistan, and he was very embittered by the corruption. The radicals, there was a tremendous amount of theft. This is true. Another one of the Taliban fighters that I spoke to talked about the corruption of the Taliban, people stealing money.

And this is a story we don't expose very much here in this country, and people are really unaware of the kind of rampant corruption that's inside these radical groups. You have - it's very interesting, Dave. You have almost two sides to the movement. You have the true believers, who are religiously convinced that what they're doing is the right thing and they're going to fight for God and die and go to heaven.

And then you have some of the people involved in the movement who offer a religious veneer but are as ruthless and corrupt as the worst politicians anywhere.
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34981
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by shiv »

BALLEN: He said that's exactly right, you're missing the real story. And you sit across the table from generals who talk the democratic talk, who dress up and speak in queen's English to you, yet harbor sympathy towards radical Islam as fervently as bin Laden himself.

Zedi said these people are the real danger. They have access to nuclear weapons. They're inside the government of Pakistan. They have access to money, they have access to arms, and in fact, he said, they were arming the Taliban and that they were in alliance.

So think about this, Dave. We spent $20 billion since 9/11 directly in payments to the Pakistani government. Meanwhile, the Pakistani government is hiring this fellow, Zedi, to run a training camp where he trains terrorists who fight against us in Afghanistan, who fight against India, and he's smuggling arms to the Taliban that we're fighting.

As Zedi said to me, you Americans really are funding both sides in the war on terror, literally.

DAVIES: Right, what's interesting about his account is he's not simply saying there are ranking Pakistani intelligence or military officials who are sympathetic to the Taliban or al-Qaida. They're doing it. He would go to a meeting at which there was - the Taliban were to move arms or set up some operation, and there would be these ranking officials of Pakistani intelligence in the room running it, right?

BALLEN: That's correct, that's correct. He even went to one meeting after 9/11 where he met with one of the top al-Qaida operatives near Abbottabad, where bin Laden was, and a leading high-level ISI Pakistani army guy, and they talked about how to smuggle illicit weapons from the former Soviet Union, nuclear.

<Added later : flipping heck - I edited this message instead of quoting it - never mind - no harm -nairgolis has linked the ranscript>
Last edited by shiv on 06 Oct 2011 05:55, edited 3 times in total.
Rudradev
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4273
Joined: 06 Apr 2003 12:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by Rudradev »

hnair wrote:
Rudradev wrote:http://www.npr.org/2011/10/05/140947193 ... -extremism

ATTN: Rangudu, SSridhar, Shiv and others who archive useful media material

Wish I knew how to get a transcript of this.
Rudradev-saar, this link says transcripts
http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript ... =140947193
Alhamdullillah! Many thanks Nairgolis sahab.

Probably the transcript hadn't yet been uploaded when I checked the page earlier.
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34981
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by shiv »

Rangudu wrote:Rudradev,

I was listening to it on the drive home from work and am already trying to figure out who this guy "Zeddy" is. :)
I'm guessing its "Zaidi"
Virupaksha
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 3110
Joined: 28 Jun 2007 06:36

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by Virupaksha »

nothing new but a few american bulbs lighting AFTER retirement. Question is wtf were they doing before??

watching the green paint on nukes dry while funding the army?
Satya_anveshi
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3532
Joined: 08 Jan 2007 02:37

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by Satya_anveshi »

shiv wrote:I'm guessing its "Zaidi"
the book is available on g- books:
Part-4 talks about The Confessions of Zeddy
Zeddy aka Zahid, who according to the author is part of PA/ISI and has his finger one step removed from Nook.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60273
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by ramana »

Rudradev, What Zedi was confirming was this truth:
ramana wrote:Thanks to Shiv!

Image
Harish
BRFite
Posts: 148
Joined: 27 Dec 2004 10:30
Location: Bharat

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by Harish »

The recent assassination of Rabbani apparently means that the Taliban does not want to be part of a power-sharing formula in a future Afghan coalition government. But it is difficult to understand why the Taliban would not like that arrangement.

First, the Taliban would become a legitimate political power with military strength. Second, they can jump into bed with the whore next door and have intercourse all they want. Meaning, they get to act as bakistan's sword arm in the region, get overt weapon supplies, and political recognition. Third, they get a platform to promote their Islamic fundoo agenda in Afghanistan, and can have fun stoning women to death and destroying statues, if any are still left.

Political reconciliation is the way to go because there is no way the bunnies can achieve a clear military victory. Probably this is another brilliant self-goal, aka tactical brilliance, by the moderately enlightened faction within the Taliban. The outcome is extremely disadvantageous to bakistan, so I wonder why they ordered this hit. But then you never know what plans the paki is incubating in his musharraf.
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34981
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by shiv »

Harish wrote:The recent assassination of Rabbani apparently means that the Taliban does not want to be part of a power-sharing formula in a future Afghan coalition government. But it is difficult to understand why the Taliban would not like that arrangement.
1. The Taliban want Pakhtuistan
2. The Taliban's goal is Pakistan
Mihaylo
BRFite
Posts: 762
Joined: 09 Nov 2007 21:10

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by Mihaylo »

RamaY wrote:Gaganullah,

I see some merit in this. Per my sources (highly classified) -

USA and Pakistan Govt were aware of OBL's whereabouts since the beginning of GWOT. They decided to keep OBL under house arrest so they can continue with their GWOT as planned.

Indian intelligence agencies were able to track down OBL's exact location early this year. They have been planning a special ops mission to kill OBL and expose USA and Pakistan perfidy.

That is why India went along with GCC plan to move 20K+ Pakistani army to GCC area, so it will reduce the risk of Paki retaliation after the planned cross-border raid.

When USA pressed GoI on why they rejected F-16 and F-18 from MMRCA deal, someone in GoI leaked to USA that it is because of this OBL finding and exposure of USA perfidy.

USA did not have any option but to orchestrate a quick raid on that Abbotabad compound to kill OBL themselves before Indians could do. It is also believed that KSA has agreed to declare OBL a non-muslim, if there is a mass outrage across muslim world against this USA operation.

That helicopter crashed when it hit the electricity lines going over the compound.

The same source also informed that RAW has detailed knowledge of the whereabouts of Mohammad Azar, Hafeez Saeed, and Dawood Ibrahim and Indian cross border raids will happen sometime in next 6-12 months; before the announcement of mid-term elections in India.

We have to see if Pakistan army can handle such a coordinated raid to capture/kill those three assets by India. The insider says that Pakistan may call back its troops from GCC area.

As a consequence of this development Bahrain is expected to fall in to Shia hands. Iran will give up its nuke dreams in return for a nuke umbrella by Russia. India-Russia-Iran will support a free Afghanistan, coinciding with USA withdrawal. It is also believed that PRC will be kicked out of this big boy game as it is yet to prove its capabilities w.r.t protecting its allies. So far PRC hasn't proved its capabilities beyond supplying 1st generation heavy nukes and highly unreliable missile delivery systems to Pakistan and North Korea.

To protect its geopolitical interests, USA is expected to develop at least two bases in Af-Pak border.
Ok I will be the one to say it!! As per this "classified" report, we were going to take out OBL and that too using our special ops personnel when we don't have the proverbial cajones and have never once tried to take ou Dawood, Masood Azhar, etc, even though the we know where they are at in Pigistan. This claim that we were planning to take out OBL to expose Uncle's and Pigistan's perfidy is laughable, to say the least!!! So we are to believe that suddenly, out of the blue our esteemed politicians have developed the balss to OK cross-border raids when all along there is a legacy of 'dhoti shivering' and unprecedented pacifism.
Even more laughable is the claim regarding why we didn't buy American planes.
i'll 'classify' this 'classified' report from 'classified' sources as garbage.
RajeshA
BRF Oldie
Posts: 16006
Joined: 28 Dec 2007 19:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by RajeshA »

I just wanted to thank everybody who contributed to "Anglo-American Strategy in South India & the Indian Ocean", thanks for getting it locked! :evil:

In the 1940s when the Brits came up with Pakistan and started putting their nefarious designs into practice, it would have been helpful if there was a BRF Thread analyzing their moves and how they used native accomplices and real and imagined (mostly imagined) grievances to realize Pakistan, through which they were able to control both India and Central Asia.

The theory was that the Anglo-Americans are at it again in the South and they are pushing an agenda.

Instead of analyzing their moves using some objectivity, some stalwarts just ended up indulging in throwing brick-bats at each other!

Well Pakistan came about, and now 64 years hence everybody is still crying! Before 1940 nobody had thought about Pakistan, but it still became reality. Why? Because we were unwilling to look at it objectively and trusted the Brits a bit too much! I would like to be proven wrong on the success of such Anglo-American designs in Peninsular India. But we should have at least monitored Anglo-American moves in this direction!

Now the thread is locked and there will be no more 'monitoring'!

So guys, thanks! You are all swell! :evil:

N.B. - And yes, I consider both Jinnahism and Periyarism equally dangerous, and harnessable by Anglo-Americans! But that was not the only angle that needed to be explored! It was more important to explore the Anglo-American agenda to control both Indian Ocean and India.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25382
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by SSridhar »

shiv wrote:
Rangudu wrote:Rudradev,

I was listening to it on the drive home from work and am already trying to figure out who this guy "Zeddy" is. :)
I'm guessing its "Zaidi"
ZH continues to be front-end for the ISI. But, in the interview 'Zeddy' implicates them. I am not sure therefore if 'Zeddy' is indeed ZH. But, again, the ISI has become so brazen nowadays that they no longer cover their tracks even. ZH might have thought that he was simply saying what was well known anyway.
ArmenT
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 4239
Joined: 10 Sep 2007 05:57
Location: Loud, Proud, Ugly American

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by ArmenT »

RajeshA wrote:I just wanted to thank everybody who contributed to "Anglo-American Strategy in South India & the Indian Ocean", thanks for getting it locked! :evil:
Sir, why don't you create your own blog and spout out your ideas there? Worried about not getting enough eyeballs as BRF?
member_19686
BRFite
Posts: 1330
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by member_19686 »

RajeshA wrote:I just wanted to thank everybody who contributed to "Anglo-American Strategy in South India & the Indian Ocean", thanks for getting it locked! :evil:

In the 1940s when the Brits came up with Pakistan and started putting their nefarious designs into practice, it would have been helpful if there was a BRF Thread analyzing their moves and how they used native accomplices and real and imagined (mostly imagined) grievances to realize Pakistan, through which they were able to control both India and Central Asia.

The theory was that the Anglo-Americans are at it again in the South and they are pushing an agenda.

Instead of analyzing their moves using some objectivity, some stalwarts just ended up indulging in throwing brick-bats at each other!

Well Pakistan came about, and now 64 years hence everybody is still crying! Before 1940 nobody had thought about Pakistan, but it still became reality. Why? Because we were unwilling to look at it objectively and trusted the Brits a bit too much! I would like to be proven wrong on the success of such Anglo-American designs in Peninsular India. But we should have at least monitored Anglo-American moves in this direction!

Now the thread is locked and there will be no more 'monitoring'!

So guys, thanks! You are all swell! :evil:

N.B. - And yes, I consider both Jinnahism and Periyarism equally dangerous, and harnessable by Anglo-Americans! But that was not the only angle that needed to be explored! It was more important to explore the Anglo-American agenda to control both Indian Ocean and India.
The ML leadership thought of it and so did their British supporters.

If the Congress leadership didn't think of it or thought it wasn't going to be a reality, all they needed was a study of Islamic history.

Some visionaries like Lala Lajpat Rai saw through it. Bipin Chandra Pal had preceded Huntington by a long time in predicting a "clash of civilizations" way back in 1923.

So let's not think that everyone lived in cuckoo land like the Congress leadership of the 1940s.

The real lesson is, are we ignoring today's Bipin Pal's when it comes to dealing with Pakistan?
RajeshA
BRF Oldie
Posts: 16006
Joined: 28 Dec 2007 19:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by RajeshA »

ArmenT wrote:
RajeshA wrote:I just wanted to thank everybody who contributed to "Anglo-American Strategy in South India & the Indian Ocean", thanks for getting it locked! :evil:
Sir, why don't you create your own blog and spout out your ideas there? Worried about not getting enough eyeballs as BRF?
Quite true! Secondly, it should have been a collective effort at exploring that angle!
Rajdeep
BRFite
Posts: 491
Joined: 23 Aug 2010 20:48

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by Rajdeep »

Marvi Sirmed takes on Hamid jhol and orya maqdumb




:rotfl: These guys are such liars , its like when they see a cat they still call it a dog !
Rudradev
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4273
Joined: 06 Apr 2003 12:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by Rudradev »

RajeshA wrote:I just wanted to thank everybody who contributed to "Anglo-American Strategy in South India & the Indian Ocean", thanks for getting it locked! :evil:
.
Rajesh A-ji,

Don't feel bad! But a fire started with material so inflammable must be very carefully tended if it is to be useful rather than purely incendiary.

The fact is, threads addressing matters of that nature have to be (a) very specific, as in monitoring particular organizations known to be engaging in anti-national activities; (b) any allegations against more "legitimate" parties suspected to be involved with such activities have to be substantiated from not one but diverse credible sources and (c) the threads have to be *very* carefully monitored so that discussion doesn't veer off into at-large characterizations of society and local political behaviour as somehow "suspect".

Unfortunately none of these applied to that thread. Firm lines were not drawn between things such as LTTE (and support of certain parliamentary or state-level politicians for LTTE) vs. much broader issues like English vs. Hindi. If one believes that there is a continuum of political philosophy between these phenomena then one has to make the case far more rationally (and factually) than anybody posting on that thread bothered to.

I am not arguing for "political correctness" as a blinder against threats that need to be assessed. I am saying that, given the nature of Indian society (of which this forum is a microcosm)... EVEN "water-tight" assertions backed up with a very substantial volume of facts, when applied to specific identities within India, are going to rankle people. If the arguments are made in a disciplined manner, and counterpoints/comments are likewise monitored for discipline, then posters are under some obligation to maintain their composure even when confronted with facts they might personally find uncomfortable.

OTOH, if people start making three-line posts laced with incendiary hyperbole, others are going to reply in kind, and you have a disaster. A *genuinely* dangerous disaster, IMHO, from a national security point of view. How many ill-intentioned people wanting to encourage Tamil subnational sentiments, could have linked to some of the posts over there?

In this light I would encourage you to try again; but this time, please remember that a thread once started is your baby, and not everyone on the forum is a responsible adult ;) I would keep watch on the thread until some maturity of discussion evolves, and report any post with even the slightest hint of unsubstantiated or prejudicial allegation to the admins.
Suppiah
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2569
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: -
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by Suppiah »

sudeepj wrote:Never thought I would use the names of George Clooney and Pakistan in the same bit of news, but here goes :-)
Why? All it needs is a "C"
Rudradev
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4273
Joined: 06 Apr 2003 12:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by Rudradev »

SSridhar wrote:
Rangudu wrote:Rudradev,

I was listening to it on the drive home from work and am already trying to figure out who this guy "Zeddy" is. :)
=
ZH continues to be front-end for the ISI. But, in the interview 'Zeddy' implicates them. I am not sure therefore if 'Zeddy' is indeed ZH. But, again, the ISI has become so brazen nowadays that they no longer cover their tracks even. ZH might have thought that he was simply saying what was well known anyway.
I don't think it is Lal Topi. That clown claims to have fought the Soviets with Ahmed Shah Massood... the "Zeddy" referred to in the book is a much younger man who ran an ISI training camp and fought the Americans in Afghanistan.

Ballen (the author) would have easily seen this when he interviewed "Zeddy"... and being conversant with the Islamist radical scene, he is probably familiar with Lal Topi as a public figure anyway.

Also, the interview mentions that "Zeddy" began as a volunteer for "Pakistan's Islamic Political Party" (probably meaning J-e-I) and later gave up active participation in the movement because he was disillusioned with "corruption" in its ranks and leadership. Does this fit Lal Topi's profile? Making assertions about corruption among Islamist groups, really doesn't sound like him.
Last edited by Rudradev on 06 Oct 2011 11:38, edited 1 time in total.
arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10248
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Sep 22, 20

Post by arun »

In the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, religious groups representing the Deobandi and Ahle Hadith (Wahabbi) sub-sects of Mohammaddenism join their co-religionists of the Barelvi sub-sect in protecting Mumtaz Qadri, the murderer of Punjab Governor Salman Taseer.

When Mohammadden groups representing the bulk of the populace endorse murder on grounds of religious sanction in a country that has gone to great lengths to proclaim its Mohammadden identity by claiming among others to be an Ideological Muslim State, Islamic Republic and safe-haven for the Mohammaddens of the Indian Sub-Continent, the only conclusion to be drawn is that Islam far from being a religion of peace is a religion of violence.

Will the member countries of the Organisation of Islamic Co-Operation, the erstwhile Organisation of Islamic Conference, condemn fellow member Pakistan for permitting the painting of Mohammaddenism as a Religion of Violence? :

Deobandis, Wahhabis to join Qadri protests
Post Reply