Arjun wrote:Sanku wrote:The basic root of all problems is first past the post system in a fragmented polity.
It all starts from there. Even the points quoted above are essentially symptoms of that.
Both the first-past-the-post system and dynastic politics are core issues - far more so that probably the 'right to reject / recall' proposed by Anna.
Dynastic politics cannot be completely solved even if one brings in two-stage / runoff elections to resolve the first-past-the-post problem. For example - the whole issue of Party President having far more power and authority than the PM is directly related to family control, and runoff for top 2 does not resolve this particular issue.
Arjun; dynastic politics survive primarily on the basis of creating loyalists, that is a small minority who would stick with you come what may, even at the cost of majority intrests.
If you take that perspective, dynasty politics is nothing but a subset of "minority appeasement politics" -- viz choosing subsets within India carefully and pandering to their narrowest crassest impulses to gain their blind support.
Now as we already know, minority appeasement or power group politics works because of majority fragmentation and disunity -- and in terms of systemic solutions and problems :
Majority fragmentation and disunity is
enshrined by first past the post in a fractured multi-polar polity.
Thus, it is that is the root cause, a run-off which sees the minority sidelined, over and over time and again would rather quickly put an end to a dynast's dreams. Heck the boot-polishers would quickly abandon the dynast seeing how a dynast cant survive by handing out pelfs and privileges in a arbitrary manner.
A first past the post system axiomatically becomes a majority democracy in a non-fragmented polity; in a fragmented one, we need other systems to capture the real voice of people and have true democracy.
The axiom here is of course no dynast can survive in a true democracy, if however a dynast can indeed establish himself democratically, he is no longer a dynast but a Appointed kingly ruler in the old Indian mold (a Indian king would also often win elections on popularity quite easily) -- even if born in a family.