With regards to exports, interesting to read the above followed by the following link posted earlier:Vipul wrote:Exports up 36% in Sep, imports grow 17%.
... ....
Scam 2.0: How $40 bn of exports and FII flows may be fiction
With regards to exports, interesting to read the above followed by the following link posted earlier:Vipul wrote:Exports up 36% in Sep, imports grow 17%.
... ....
But if the comparison is based on purchasing power parity, difference will be substantially reduced.gakakkad wrote:pack of 4 of a type of "fruit of the loom" in the US would cost around 20-25 (INR 1000-1200)... A similar type same sized pack of 4 (though obviously a different brand or unbranded) one in India would cost inr 200 or something like that...
The point is that a certain % of our Population which is up to no good like are lazy. They like to think each and everyone who is upper middle class/ rich is lucky and they deserve everything in life but doing nothing.Vasu wrote:Aditya, I agree. That is the point raised in favour of shifting NREGA towards farming during the harvest season where the need for labour is real. Time and again there are reports that there is not enough work in NREGA. Basically they are getting doles, which I suppose was the entire social agenda of the CONgress traitors.
Krishnan, this is what I can't understand. Are the rural workers also turning into urbanites who look down upon physical labour that they are running away from farm labour? Hasn't farm labour always been tough, and in fact, ideally should have gotten easier with the advent of better tools and machineries? I know it sounds naive but still.
I used to buy Hanes or Fruit of the Loom 6packs at $8 in Walmart. Brought one during last visit. I buy stuff of similar type (Valero) at Rs 110 a piece. Definitely expensive.gakakkad wrote:pack of 4 of a type of "fruit of the loom" in the US would cost around 20-25 (INR 1000-1200)... A similar type same sized pack of 4 (though obviously a different brand or unbranded) one in India would cost inr 200 or something like that...
Obviously true..in fact that is the very definition of purchase power PARITY .. comparing the costs of similar products..
But if the comparison is based on purchasing power parity, difference will be substantially reduced.
500-750 rupees per head is 5-star prices in India.Virupaksha wrote:Abhijeet, make a like to like comparision.
WHich like to like restaurant is cheaper in US when compared to India?
Any half decent restaurant in US is atleast 10-15 bucks for each person (without drinks), which works out to 500-750 Rs in India, which actually is more than five star prices.
I suggest you do this yourself. Milk costs us, right now, Rs. 28 per liter. Apples cost about Rs. 30 per apple.Have you really calculated the costs in milk and fruits??
Funny you stay in the most luxurious Indian hotel and then call it expensive... Even shitty ny hotels charge 150 a night....decent ones start at 400...and are not near taj...Being a kanjoos sdre , i almost always travelled economy class (the only time I took a business class ticket was when i had a very sick relative in a 12 hour long flight , who was high risk for deep vein thrombosis)...Even in India i live in moderately priced hotels... I had nothing to complain about in hotels charging 3000-4000 /night... Try staying in a hotel in north east costing 85-95 dollars... see if can manage spending a night...
Hotel stays. Esp. to clean standards in big cities. Much more than Massaland IMO. Paid $720 for 2 nights at the Taj in Hyderabad. One step above Best Western IMHO.
where on earth did you hear that ?
- Complex medical issues. Esp. Cancer treatment.
Domestic water pipes manufactured in India are simply not rated for such pressures. There is a reason copper is so popular in massaland but copper reacts unpleasantly with wet concrete ions and all of India builds with concrete plaster. Plastic type HDPE for domestic pipes is still very expensive and so most people install galvanized iron pipes that corrode in a couple of years.vera_k wrote:Some things like good plumbing with consistent water pressure @60psi are nearly impossible to find in India at any price.
G,I merely said that the cost of living in India is cheaper than that of the US
Is Mumbai considered a class apart or too shitty to be considered?Singha wrote:munna to munna fair comparison would be cost of living in : bay area/NJ/DC/boston/RTP vs NCR/pune/blr/hyd/chennai. these 5 cities end as r2i source and destination for many.
http://thenextweb.com/in/2011/10/14/pay ... -in-india/PayPal has been wrangling with legal issues in India over the past year and has had to bow to several demands of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), chief among them being imposing a per-transaction limit of $500 on Indian users. Today, however, the company announced that said limit had been raised to $3,000, according to a post by Pluggdin.
The PayPal announcement reiterates that all Indian users need to add their Permanent Account Number (PAN) and Purpose Code and hook up their bank account to PayPal in order to continue using the service. The daily withdrawal requirement that it imposed last month also remains in place.Despite the continuing restrictions, however, the significantly increased per-transaction limit must come as a relief to exporters of goods and services in India who rely on PayPal to receive payments from overseas. Hopefully, the eBay-owned company will aggressively work on its issues with the RBI and lift its other restrictions as well.
Indian stds have not been inmposed in the industry.RamaY wrote:Theo ji
That is very educating post. I learn something new everyday on this forum. Thank you.
One thing I see lacking in India is lack of standardization when it comes to construction and infra. Probably the rules do exist but we dont see them followed in real life. Need to get my hands on the building code in india.
NEW YORK (Trefis) -- According to Starbucks' (SBUX_) spokesman Corey duBrowa, Starbucks' talks with the Tata group are "moving forward" and it hopes to make an announcement about the partnership soon. The partnership aims to take advantage of the various businesses running under the Tata group.
The group's business spans across hotels, retail chain, steel, chemical, tea, software and automobiles among others. This partnership could provide Starbucks instant access to Tata's vast presence throughout India. Starbucks' competitors in the broader market for specialty coffee include
Theo,In India my dad fills his 40,000 liter overhead tank & his 40,000 liter ground sump every night when water comes.
Dileep wrote:Let me make a MACRO level comparison. I live almost the same way here as I did in massa. I used to spend average $2.5 to 3K including rent. Here I spend around 60-70K adding a rent component, which is half in absolute terms.
There is no capital component in either expenses. No loan payment. No mortgage. Nothing. All are just regular expenses onlee.
I happen to make around 70% of the income I had in massa here in absolute terms. So, I see that here it is 30% cheaper than massa. But, the bigg anomaly is that it is just a play of luck that I landed in the current gig (which is coming to an end in a few months as I read the tea leaves). I would only make HALF of the current amount when I move on. ie it will be only 35% of the massa income. THEN, I would find that this place is 40% more EXPENSIVE.
So, the verdict is, India is EXPENSIVE for an ITVty mullah.
Jaspreet,Jaspreet wrote:Theo,In India my dad fills his 40,000 liter overhead tank & his 40,000 liter ground sump every night when water comes.
Your post is informative but are you sure about this 40,000 litre figure? A tank with 40,000 litre capacity will be huge, huge, huge.
I don't think Delhi gets any special treatment in this respect. The water pressure in the locality I lived in is so weak that a motor has to be used to pump it up to the first floor (using the Indian convention of GF, FF, 2ndF, etc.)Keep in mind that in Chennai the water pressure is so weak...Dilli billi
The country must urgently draw up contingency plans to shield itself from the imminent global financial crisis
Shyam Saran / September 21, 2011, 0:50 IST
The coming global crisisRecent developments in the US, the euro zone and even China hold out the depressing prospect that the global economy may be heading towards another financial and economic crisis, perhaps even more serious than that of 2008. In the United States, massive stimulus packages totalling over $1.5 trillion in the past three years, coupled with a negative real rate of interest, have failed to kick-start growth in the economy and unemployment remains at a disappointing nine per cent level. These economic woes are exacerbated by a political gridlock in Washington, with a beleaguered President Obama unable to provide effective and credible leadership.
The situation in Europe is worse. In the euro zone, the financial and banking crisis has been followed by much more dangerous sovereign debt crisis, with several governments on the verge of default. What began as a problem affecting the smaller peripheral economies of Ireland, Greece and Portugal is now buffeting Spain and Italy, with even France facing investor anxieties. The disconnect between a single European currency, the euro, a single European Central Bank and a fragmented fiscal arrangement, comprising 17 sovereign and independent governments, has now reached an inflection point. Either the European Union (EU) moves rapidly towards a de facto fiscal union or else abandon the single currency. So far, EU countries and its most powerful members, Germany and France, have avoided confronting this challenge head-on by various Band-Aid solutions such as bailout packages for Ireland, Greece and Portugal. However, if Italy, whose exposure to the global banking system is $262 billion, also needs to be bailed out, there will simply not be enough cash to go around.
China appears to be in relatively better shape with a GDP growth rate near the 10 per cent mark, booming exports and still rising foreign exchange reserves. The latter are now near the $3 trillion mark. But China’s vulnerabilities are real even if they are masked by these impressive figures. Inflation is officially around five per cent but the real rate is estimated to be much higher. This is partly the result of a massive $600 billion liquidity injected into China’s economy in 2008 to avoid a major deceleration in its growth following the global economic downturn. Non-performing assets of banks are reportedly rising quite rapidly, while spare capacity in the real estate sector, a major engine of growth over the past several years, is said to be as high as 30 per cent in metropolitan cities like Shanghai. China’s economy continues to be largely export-driven and any major disruption in the major export destinations such as the US and Europe will inevitably have knock-on effects on China. Were the US dollar to decline steeply in value, as is being predicted by several analysts, much of China’s largely dollar-denominated assets would evaporate into thin air.
It is true that China’s foreign trade with Asian, African and Latin American countries has been increasing rapidly in the past few years. If there were a gradual and steady decline in China’s trade with the traditional Western markets, the incremental rise in trade with newer markets would facilitate a relatively smooth transition. In the short run, however, decoupling is simply not realistic, whether for China or for other emerging economies.
Why is the next round of global financial and economic crisis likely to be more serious than the previous one? This is because the armoury of monetary and fiscal tools available to governments of key economies now lies virtually empty. Most of the arrows were fired in the immediate aftermath of the 2008 crisis, in a desperate attempt to avoid a catastrophic meltdown. This succeeded to some extent, particularly in view of the urgent and co-ordinated response which was launched by G20. Were another crisis to hit tomorrow, there is simply too little policy space available for countries to launch another massive rescue operation. Added to this grim reality is the fact that today confidence in the ability of governments to deal effectively with persistent economic problems is at an all-time low. And G20 is nowhere in sight.
What does this mean for India? There is satisfaction over the demonstrated resilience of the Indian economy after the 2008 crisis and early recovery of rapid growth. But we need to be cautious in drawing conclusions from the post-2008 experience. One, the huge stimulus injections into all the major economies of the world, the US, EU and China, meant that demand for Indian exports in these markets could recover their trend line quite rapidly. Two, India adopted its own stimulus package by allowing fiscal deficit to rise to nearly six per cent, though this led to severe inflationary pressures in the economy. If another crisis hits the global economy, the cushions available in 2008 no longer exist. If western economies are unable to reflate, our exports will be severely affected. Given the already high level of inflation, any increase in fiscal deficit may be harmful to the economy and politically risky. A steep decline in our GDP growth rate may be unavoidable.
It is sometimes argued that India is better prepared to ride out a global downturn because it is still a mostly domestic-demand driven economy. This is only partially true.
India’s foreign trade in goods and services is already over 50 per cent of its GDP. We have seen recently how sensitive Indian securities and currency markets are to global cues. We are not as insulated from global developments as we would like to believe.
To face the next crisis, some urgent contingency planning is essential, including thinking of the unthinkable, such as a collapse of the US dollar or the break-up of the euro zone and how these may impact the Indian economy both in the short and the long run. Perhaps China may emerge as an even more serious competitor. Government and business will need to work together to draw up co-ordinated strategies to minimise adverse consequences. The crisis may even provide an incentive to fast-track long-pending economic reforms which are, in any case, critical to sustaining the long-term growth prospects of the Indian economy.