Has the US stopped terrorism against India?
- No
- Yes. A resounding Yes.
- No
- No
I agree. A biased criticism should be avoided and countered. I was responding only in fear of that A_Gupta's statement should not be generalized.shiv wrote:Actually anyone can criticise anyone else. But the utter hypocrisy of this is revealed when a person is quite comfortable spells out his "fury over GoI policies" but will not tolerate a word of criticism about US of A policesabhijitm wrote:He/She can spell out his/her fury over GoI policies if he/she, an NRI, has voting rights. Do you disagree?
But Shiv who will convince pakistan that they can handle their relationship with India on their own? One of the reasons other powers are meddling in Indian Subcontinent is wh0re pakistan inviting them to do so. If not unkil then china. We only have option as whose meddling we can tolerate.shiv wrote:The US needs to get the hell out of the Indian subcontinent. India and Pakistan will find that they can handle each other and live with each other minus US meddling. Afghanistan will find a place too.
As china makes technological advances, quality of their arms will get better and better. We can afford to underestimate them for now but in long term I would be rather concerned about this.Theo_Fidel wrote:BTW China will not intervene in TSP other than selling shoddy arms for hard currency. It does not hand out hard cash. It is the hard cash the TSP state gets that keeps the problem festering. A destitute TSP will surrender in heartbeat.
US needs to get the hell out of the Indian sub-continent, not only physically, but financially and diplomatically as well i.e. stop funding, arming and supporting the PA.shiv wrote: The US needs to get the hell out of the Indian subcontinent. India and Pakistan will find that they can handle each other and live with each other minus US meddling. Afghanistan will find a place too.
Wow! eyeball to eyeball hain? Brigadier here missed one little fact that Indian movement was to respond pakistani raids in Kashmir and their constant chest thumping about war against India.Liaquat’s test of nerves and leadership came in 1951 when India deployed its forces all along the West Pakistani border in an offensive formation. Liaquat reacted promptly by ordering the army to deploy all along the border — eyeball-to-eyeball with the Indians.
The police on Tuesday arrested three persons allegedly involved in the sale of fake agriculture medicines and sealed the factory where they were being manufactured.
Theo_Fidel wrote:One area that has benefited has been the Kashmir valley.
abhijitm wrote: But Shiv who will convince pakistan that they can handle their relationship with India on their own? One of the reasons other powers are meddling in Indian Subcontinent is wh0re pakistan inviting them to do so. If not unkil then china. We only have option as whose meddling we can tolerate.
tough job shiv, tough and dangerous. In no time we will be bargaining for convincing pakis.shiv wrote:India has to do the convincing.abhijitm wrote: But Shiv who will convince pakistan that they can handle their relationship with India on their own? One of the reasons other powers are meddling in Indian Subcontinent is wh0re pakistan inviting them to do so. If not unkil then china. We only have option as whose meddling we can tolerate.
johneeG wrote: I think US physically coming to sub-continent is the best thing that happened from Indian perspective because the US has experience firsthand the paki perfidy. Of course, US may have been aware of paki's behaviour. But the impact is different when one experiences it. Now, there are definitely questions being raised by people within US as to whether a partnership or alliance with pakis is advisable in the long-run. All these developments augur well for India, in long term.
On the other hand, if the US had not come physically to sub-continent, then they would have been happily doling out the dollars and weapons without any second thoughts. Because they wouldnt have been facing any consequences of their actions. By coming here physically, they are directly experiencing the consequences and that has made many people question the wisdom of blindly supporting the pakis.
Terrorism, with hundreds of thousands of jihadis entering from Pakistan required a robust response, and India met the threat by building a powerful counter-insurgency apparatus, and by starting to fence the India-Pakistan boundary where possible.
As the Indian strategy proved effective, jihadis started getting eliminated in increasing numbers, and the average life-span of a jihadi-terrorist entering India from Pakistan was reduced to weeks or months rather than years (130). One Indian army major is quoted in an interview as saying (131):
Once somebody picks up the gun then his family knows that it is only a matter of days before they hear that he has been killed in an encounter. We put the average lifespan of a terrorist at two-and-half years. Within this period we are bound to eliminate him.
This seems to have had a significant effect on the morale of Pakistan's army backed jihadi-terrorist apparatus, because the Pakistani government started protesting against the presence of large numbers of Indian counter-insurgency personnel within India, and diplomatic protests grew shriller as Indian security forces chalked up success after success.
In many areas, terrorists from Pakistan were unable to enter India at all or were able to infiltrate through in the smallest numbers. A backlog of violent, trained and indoctrinated terrorists built up in Pakistan, and gradually, these terrorists began to target other nations of the world.
Once again, the only country that tried to alert the world about the global terrorist threat emanating from Pakistan's jihad factory was India, but Indian information fell on deaf ears, until the September 11th 2001 terrorist attacks on the US. That woke up the intelligence communities of the world with a jolt. Since then terrorist links leading back to Pakistan have been found in countries like Burma, Nepal, Chechnya, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Yemen, Mongolia, Kuwait, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Russia, Turkey, Latvia, Australia, UK, Canada, Indonesia and the Philippines. (119,132).
Abhijit the fear you express here is not of Pakistan, not of the USA but of India and Indian inability. A ripe subject for you know which thread. But we have to do it. The only way we can rise in this world is to push out the real competitors and the US is one of them.abhijitm wrote: tough job shiv, tough and dangerous. In no time we will be bargaining for convincing pakis.
There are two streams of thoughts here to deal with pakistan. One is to tactically engage (in other words, convince pakis), and another disengage and let them rot in hell. MMS is doing former and I am skeptical whether it will bear any fruit. For e.g. aid to flood/earthquake victims scored no brownie points, pakis don't reciprocate for our opening of trade. Key here is paki army. Unless they come to term with the reality we should disengage and let them rot.shiv wrote:Abhijit the fear you express here is not of Pakistan, not of the USA but of India and Indian inability. A ripe subject for you know which thread. But we have to do it. The only way we can rise in this world is to push out the real competitors and the US is one of them.abhijitm wrote: tough job shiv, tough and dangerous. In no time we will be bargaining for convincing pakis.
Millions pushed into child labour in Pakistan
Pakistan spends less than 2 percent of its gross domestic product on education, which translates into a lack of skills amongst the younger population, pushing them onto the street in search of work.
By comparison , just over 17 percent of 2011-12 state spending went to defence, though some experts put the figure at 26 percent.
This lost hope has to do with "Indian intransigence" over Kashmir and India's failure to oblige by losing Punjab.SSridhar wrote:I don't visit that forum. But, you are spot on about the hopelessness. My interaction with the Pakistanis convinced me even a dozen years back (before 9/11) that they had already lost all hopes.svenkat wrote:While there is much that is wrong in India,there is handwringing and whining,the essential tone is of confidence and hope.
Unless one has discussed why Pakistan does not want to neogtiate with India we wont know the whole story.abhijitm wrote:
tough job shiv, tough and dangerous. In no time we will be bargaining for convincing pakis.
Abhijit the fear you express here is not of Pakistan, not of the USA but of India and Indian inability. A ripe subject for you know which thread. But we have to do it. The only way we can rise in this world is to push out the real competitors and the US is one of them.
There are two streams of thoughts here to deal with pakistan. One is to tactically engage (in other words, convince pakis), and another disengage and let them rot in hell. MMS is doing former and I am skeptical whether it will bear any fruit. For e.g. aid to flood/earthquake victims scored no brownie points, pakis don't reciprocate for our opening of trade. Key here is paki army. Unless they come to term with the reality we should disengage and let them rot.
Even Pawkkhii dont doubt the Indian will and abilty to kill and eliminate the Jehadi Junk. Few months ago, i ran into a Peshawari Pakjabi ( Claimed his father side is Rajout and mother side Moghul) whose younger brother was SSG. Per him, his brother spend almost 2 years in the valley and aged fast and opted out becuase he was afraid of IA catching him. His brother came to 2 conclusions, rather commit suicide than enjoying IA hospitality and there is no way Jehadi can win the battle. This old man started talking as in his own words he was afraid of Pushtuns fighting "dirty" with Pakjabis.shiv wrote:Abhijit the fear you express here is not of Pakistan, not of the USA but of India and Indian inability. A ripe subject for you know which thread. But we have to do it. The only way we can rise in this world is to push out the real competitors and the US is one of them.abhijitm wrote: tough job shiv, tough and dangerous. In no time we will be bargaining for convincing pakis.
I don't visit that forum. But, you are spot on about the hopelessness. My interaction with the Pakistanis convinced me even a dozen years back (before 9/11) that they had already lost all hopes.[/quote]KLNMurthy wrote:="SSridhar"="svenkat"]While there is much that is wrong in India,there is handwringing and whining,the essential tone is of confidence and hope.
Pakjabi from Peshawar. 2 of My Maternal uncles were from Peshawar. My guess was that his family was facing the Pushtun heat becuase of his brother and he wanted a sympathetic response . It was not hard to see the fear/worry /disappointment in his eyes. Moral is really down among them. My young son was with me and he asked what does he means by being Rajput.ramana wrote:What is a Peshawari Pakjabi?
A thought came to mind as I stepped out of a shoe store. I had just spent more money on a pair of shoes than a large portion of Pakistanis have to survive on for a month.ome of these people we know well. They cook for us, they drive us around, they clean our homes and take care of our every whim. These are the very same people who suffer the most from the skyrocketing inflation and the rise in food prices, but who also see the lifestyles of the people they serve improving.It’s a thought that’s been bugging me constantly since I returned to Pakistan. I’ve found it hard to come to terms with the extent of inflation in the country and the explosive gap between the rich and poor.Wealth is a main determinant of power in Pakistan, where entrenched corruption of one sort or another is a way of life and where the wealthiest either see the poverty around them as a nuisance or are simply oblivious to it.When Salman Taseer was tragically murdered by a member of his own security detail, a certain segment of the population championed Mumtaz Qadri as a torch bearer for those protecting Islam.But there exists an element to Taseer’s murder that few people would like to admit, but it’s nonetheless worth considering. In my experience of talking to some of these people, a good portion of them admitted, in albeit in hushed tones, that it was also the symbolism of a poor man killing a rich man that appealed to them.I wonder if that kind of class resentment resides in a much large portion of the masses. Rather, the question is how can it not?Those who don’t pay attention to history are destined to repeat it. The irony will be that if our country allows this go on — if ‘we’ let this go on — we’ll be culpable in our own demise, and we will have deserved it.
If you dig deeper you might find Shiv is right.Theo_Fidel wrote:Shiv,
Take a look at what the charts say. No comment.
http://pragmatic.nationalinterest.in/wp ... lities.jpg
This is the very graph I had in mind in addition to others, but I do have some comments. You need to look at this graph in conjuction with terrorist attacks within India that took off and peaked in 2008.Theo_Fidel wrote:Shiv,
Take a look at what the charts say. No comment.
Hasan dubbed the military’s role in the province as brutal, and an occupying one. He clarified that the HRW took no position on the issue of the independence of Balochistan. He argued that the US and UK had made enforced disappearances possible by allowing them during the war on terror, which has led to the military doing the same. Christine Fair added that Pakistan’s abuse of human rights have served the US’ interests.
In his testimony, analyst Ralph Peters called Pakistan a supporter of terrorism, and said that Pakistan had made the US complicit too by launching attacks against India such as the Mumbai attack.
The Brigadier was heading the ISPR for a long time and hence is lying 'in a good Muslim cause'.abhijitm wrote:Army and the birth of an insecure state — II —A R SiddiqiWow! eyeball to eyeball hain? Brigadier here missed one little fact that Indian movement was to respond pakistani raids in Kashmir and their constant chest thumping about war against India.Liaquat’s test of nerves and leadership came in 1951 when India deployed its forces all along the West Pakistani border in an offensive formation. Liaquat reacted promptly by ordering the army to deploy all along the border — eyeball-to-eyeball with the Indians.
pankajs wrote:Shiv saar, how do we talk to a country which defines itself in opposition to India? How do we talk to a suicide bomber (pukeland)?
House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, Baluchistan, Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA), Chairman - Hearing WebcastBaloch have seen little development from their gas resources. Rep. Rohrabacher
Baloch are denied proper education. Rep. Rohrabacher
Pakistan is making the developments to attract Punjabis into Balochistan. Rep. Rohrabacher
Pakistan is using brutal force including extra-judicial killings. Rep. Rohrabacher
Iran has also ruthlessly treated Baloch in Iran. Rep. Rohrabacher
We are going to learn from this hearing. Rep. Rohrabache
It is congress' job to make sure we're getting the return for all the US investments in Pakistan Rep.
Pakistan is bisected by Indus River East of Indus river, and West of indus river, West is an occupied territory RalphPeters
Pakistani government is neither our friend nor the friend of Baloch. Ralph Peter
People of Balochistan have been going through torture for many years, world refused to look at them leave alone Pakistan TKumar
Pakistani intelligence agencies and Army is like a terror machine to the people of Balochistan TKumar
NO US weapon should be used in Balochistan. Mr. T Kumar
Balochistan was divided into 3 parts by the British into british india and Afghanistan HosseinBor
4000 thousand Balochs disappear in Balochistan from 2001 .hussain borr
In Balochistan there are many perpetrators but highest amongst them is Pakisatni military AliDayan
An Independent Baluchistan would pretty much solve our supply route problem.
Pakistan has made us complicit in terrorism RalphPeters
We've been manipulated for a long time by Pakistan
'Such an issue must be addressed on bi-partisan basis. We should deal it as American. Ralph Peters
'If plebiscite held tomorrow, it would leave Pakistan.' Ralph Peters
'Maintaing borders, drawn by colonial powers, by sending US forces is not consistent with US values & interests.' Rohrabacher
Balochs are secular and they are against Pakistan Taliban alliance..M.Hussain Bor
different take on it.Pranav wrote:There are numerous reports of LeT cadres actually fighting in Afghanistan, because Pakjabis can no longer rely on Pashtuns. So to the extent that the US presence has provided the jihadis with a diversion, it is useful. IMHO the fencing, radars etc have played the more significant role.
ISLAMABAD, Feb 8: A meeting of senior military officials of Pakistan, Afghanistan and coalition forces based in Afghanistan held on Wednesday for discussing border security and coordination marked the formal resumption of military contacts with the US and Nato after months of estrangement in the aftermath of Nov 26 strikes on Pakistani border posts.“Representatives of Isaf, ANA and Pakistan Army met at Border Coordination Centre (BCC) in Torkham today under tripartite engagement format to discuss and improve various coordination measures on Pak-Afghan border,” a militaryofficial said.The officers at the Torkham meeting discussed tactical level coordination and the problems they routinely confront in different areas,” the official explained.
The meeting has taken place amid signs of a thaw in Pakistan-US relations. US Centcom Commander Gen James Mattis is expected to meet Army Chief Gen Kayani some time later this month for discussing investigations into border attacks.The date for Gen Mattis’ visit is likely to be announced once the parliament completes its review of relations with Washington.The Parliamentary Commission on National Security that had been tasked with formulating recommendations for redefining terms of engagement with the US has completed its job. But, a joint session of parliament is yet to be convened for ratifying the recommendations.
The tripartite meeting happened hours after a drone attack in North Waziristan left 10 people dead.