Note things literally get crazy after August 5th, 2011.
Good old stock market rigging by the Federal Reserve.

http://news.yahoo.com/mf-global-judge-e ... 47769.html
Funny part is that even with so-called Greece's partial implementation of the austerity measures, it has an unemployment figure of close to 20%, its economy sank by 6% in the calendar year 2011 and its budget deficit is still about 10%.Greece Rebuffed on Aid Over Austerity Vote --- Bloomberg wrote: “In short: no disbursement without implementation,” Luxembourg Prime Minister Jean-Claude Juncker said in Brussels late yesterday (i.e. on 9-Feb-2012)
...
...
“We can’t live with this system while promises are repeated and repeated and repeated and implementation measures are sometimes too weak,” Juncker said.
Think of CDS, think of what happened post-Lehman, when AIG failed to honour its obligations which actually led to the great financial freeze across the world.Greece Rebuffed on Aid Over Austerity Vote --- Bloomberg wrote: Greece “must get this deal agreed really within the next few days to enable them sufficient time and have the new bailout money dispursed before that bond is due,” Tony Stringer, Fitch’s managing director of global sovereigns, said in an interview in Singapore. “If they don’t manage to achieve that, then it could be in the realm of a disorderly default.”
And if heaping insult on injury is not enough we even have thisGreece bailout: Eurozone ministers set tough conditions --- BBC wrote: The Greek parliament must by Sunday ratify the 130m bailout package agreed by Greece and the "troika" of the European Commission, the European Central Bank and the IMF.
And in addition to the further 325m-euro spending cuts, Mr Juncker sought "strong political assurances from the leaders of the coalition parties on the implementation of the programme".
"These three elements," Mr Juncker said, "need to be in place before we can take decisions".
Greece bailout: Eurozone ministers set tough conditions --- BBC wrote: While the official view is still that Greece must be saved, he says there is more and more talk on the margins that a Greek default would not be a disaster.
Greece Rebuffed on Aid Over Austerity Vote --- Bloomberg wrote: Fitch Ratings today reiterated its view that Greece will default even with the rescue package.
Why Greece won't go away --- BBC wrote: A debt default would also be catastrophic for the Greeks themselves. It would cut off their one source of cash - rescue loans from the EU and IMF to the Greek government, and from the ECB to the Greek banks. Without these, the government would be unable to pay for basic functions of the state.
....
....
The four statistics that really matter:The first tells us that Greek workers cannot compete inside the euro without big wage cuts (or big wage rises in Germany).
- since joining the euro in 2001, Greek unit labour costs (a measure of wage competitiveness) have risen 32% compared with Germany
- Greece's current account deficit was running at 10% of GDP
- Greek households and companies withdrew 28% of the deposits they held in Greek banks in the three years to November last year
- Greece's economy shrank 5.5% last year, has shrunk a cumulative 12% since 2008, and is expected to shrink another 2.8% this year
....
So Greek workers have priced themselves out of the market.
....
The second statistic is a symptom of that loss of competitiveness. It tells us that Greece is spending far more buying things from abroad than it earns from selling things to the rest of the world.
....
The debt deal may help cut that figure down a bit - perhaps by about two percentage points.
....
In the meantime, the Greek economy as a whole must continue to fund its 10% overspend by attracting an equivalent amount in financial investments - mainly in the form of lending - from the rest of the world.
....
International lenders are not simply worried that the Greek government cannot repay its debts. They are worried that Greece will leave the euro. If that happens, then all Greeks - not just the government - will either default on their debts, or - if it is legally feasible - will convert their debts into new drachmas that are likely to lose over half their value against the euro.
....
Our third statistic makes clear that Greece has seen a slow run on its banks, as companies - and increasingly ordinary Greeks - take their money out in cash, or move it to the safety of a bank account in Germany. So the problem is not just that money has stopped flowing into Greece. Now money is actually flowing out of the country.
....
The final statistic. Greece is in a deep economic slump. The banks aren't lending. Companies aren't investing.
....
Either the pain of spending cuts - by all Greeks, not just the government - continues for years into the future. Or else Greece takes the nuclear option and leaves the euro - the quickest and surest way of regaining competitiveness and eliminating its current account deficit - but also an extremely painful one. Which brings us to one final statistic.
An opinion poll conducted in November found that over three-quarters of Greek voters still support membership of the eurozone.
One of those statistics will have to give.
Jhujar wrote:
Economic balance shifts over Middle East
http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/featur ... 65210.html
( Indian National Insitutions like security, Judiciary,Law Enforcement,Election are constantly undemined by Political class/ present dispensation)Looking at the world economy from the Middle East, one can see economic power shifting from west to east. This is not the first time in history that we see a shift in global economic power, but we have to go back centuries to find something similar. Five hundred years ago, Asia dominated the world. China and India together represented about 50% of world gross domestic product. Western Europe and North America accounted for only 20%. But the industrial revolution changed the balance of power.By 1950, western Europe and North America accounted for 50% of the world's production. China and India combined had fallen to as low as 8%, and Japan was about to take over their role of the Asian economic power. By 1980, the world was dominated by the advanced economies.
But then a transformation started. Population growth had declined in rich economies but remained large in emerging markets. China and India saw their GDP per capita levels grow at very high rates, pushing them closer and closer to the advanced economies. Today, China is the second-largest economy in the world and together with India they already account for 20% of the world's GDP. In a few decades - and if recent trends continue - they will regain the status they had back in the year 1500 and account for half of the world's production. And they will do so at the expense of the economic powers that have dominated the world since the industrial revolution: Europe, the US and Japan.Danny Quah, a professor at the London School of Economics, has calculated the economic centre of gravity of the world by using GDP as a measure of the mass or weight of a country and thinking of a world map as a physical object.In his calculations, the centre of gravity in 1980 was in the Atlantic Ocean. Today the centre of gravity is over the Middle East. But four decades from now, it will be on the border of India and China. From the perspective of countries in the Middle East, it is natural to shift focus from declining advanced economies toward Asia. But how sure are we that this trend will continue over the coming decades? What are the risks? As much as this recent trend is solid - and there are many reasons to believe that it will continue in the decades ahead - there are also reasons to be cautious.This is not the first time in history that we see emerging markets doing well for a good number of years before a serious crisis stops their development.This change involves a substantial transformation of the political and societal institutions of these countries. This second step is harder, and we have seen economies in the past stagnating when they reach this level. A good example is the former Soviet Union, which managed to perform well until it reached a level of development that required that second step of institutional change. At that point, the economy stagnated, and was followed by a collapse of its institutions and even the country as a political entity. Will China and India be able to engineer a smooth transition towards a different set of institutions? Time will tell, but if history is an indicator of what to expect, one should at a minimum be cautious and
Singha wrote:military domination, wiping out any competing economic power, rapacious and hassle free access to boundless natural resources of S.america, africa and asia were also major factors. spain for example would have been a basket case had it not been for the tin , silver and gold they stole on a industrial scale from its colonies. they never really had the industrial revolution of northern europe or italy. n.america was also targeted for exploitation but being white settlers at same level of technology, they could eventually fight back, go feral and setup their own shop.
only a few odd cases like brazil and thailand escaped the noose relatively lightly. india and china being productive economies and resource rich were brutally exploited.
Rick Santorum is a right wing nut case. If he becomes president then neo conservatives will take over and Bush's disasterous policies will return. US will definitely attack Iran. I am hoping and praying Obama gets second term.ramana wrote:Rick Santorum the Republican candidate for party nomination wrote in his book that women in workforce is a result of feminism and but for that the US wouldnt have the jobs problem.
Next it will be immigrants.
Greece's parliament has passed a controversial package of austerity measures, demanded by the eurozone and IMF in return for a 130bn-euro ($170bn; £110bn) bailout to avoid default.
Coalition parties expelled over 40 deputies for failing to back the bill.
The vote came amid some of the worst violence seen in Greece in years.
Protesters outside parliament threw stones and petrol bombs, and police fired tear gas. Several people were injured and buildings were set on fire.
Theo_Fidel wrote:Ramana... or have Seven kids like Santorum and propose to triple child tax credit... ..Socialist Religious state Conservatives every last one... NYTimes has a wonderful write up about the states that depend the most on Federal help are the most denigrating of government and most faithfully Rebublican. Almost like a death wish. There are a couple of counties near me that get 40% of their income from the government but show up at all the small government tea parties.
I'm struggling through mine and the amount I have to pay is not funny... That said when I compare GOI to GOTUS I'd gladly pay double what I'm paying for the level of service you get in US.
That is a cool video. The gold obsession is essentially a Hindu religious/cultural thing. That is a good thing. In a world with unlimited printed fiat paper money gold is the only hedge against hyperinflation. One day in future fiat money will disappear but gold will be there as long as earth is alive. Those in India holding gold in whatever form will be protected.yogi wrote:India's Love Affair with Gold - CBS 60 mins piece. Very interesting!
1) THE RISE OF THE MIDDLE CLASS
By 2050, half of the global middle class as defined by OECD will live in those two countries. But there are still considerable risks. Food inflation in India and a precarious housing market in China threaten to destabilize both country's fantastic ascents.
TRADE IS EVERYTHING
Rising neighbors in Asia, Africa, and Latin America may seek to engage with the global markets but, rather than opening everything overnight and letting Westerners conquer their entire economies, protect and grow domestic firms that can compete internationally and will funnel money back into development. But the West can learn as well. As free markets -- especially financial markets -- fail and fluctuate, free marketeers in Washington and London and elsewhere may want to ask if a bit more state intervention and regulation is worth considering
STATE CAPITALISM WORKS
Only one of the four BRIC economies could be considered free: India. The other three are deeply capitalist, sure -- finding success on international markets has been a big part of their rise -- but their version of capitalism includes the strong guidance of the government. State capitalism means state-owned firms like the massive China National Petroleum Corporation or Gazprom, but it also means heavy regulation, frequent intervention, and sometimes a degree of state control over markets and firms that doesn't look so capitalist. But this a statist means to a capitalist ends, designed to maximize long-term growth and encourage development. It doesn't always work out that way, but their success is hard to ignore, especially as the great free market stalwarts -- the U.S., Europe, Japan -- fall on increasingly hard times. But the West can learn as well. As free markets -- especially financial markets -- fail and fluctuate, free marketeers in Washington and London and elsewhere may want to ask if a bit more state intervention and regulation is worth considering
CORRUPTION IS THE KILLER
Free-market India is not immune from corruption's terrible effects, either. As investment money rushes in, politicians who feel little-constrained by the country's weak oversight and legal system are cashing in. In 2008, Indian government officials were bribed to sell cellphone bandwidth rights for far below market rates, effectively robbing the state of the $40 billion dollars by which it under-sold to telecom companies. A national protest movement, led in part by activist Anna Hazare, is channeling the country's collective outrage at corruption. But the movement has so far achieved little.
STRONG ECONOMIES NEED STRONG STATES AND STRONGER SOCIETIES
state capitalism is the BRICs' greatest strength, and corruption their greatest weakness, then the lesson may be that healthy government-led economies require healthy governments. That means a state that will manage the economy responsibly and selflessly, something that's not so easy when the only powerful institutions in a country are the state and the industries it must manage. At some point, the relation gets a little too cozy, and the intended beneficiaries -- the actual population of the country -- get forgotten. The best way to keep that from happening, or at least the best way that anyone has come up with so far, is for civil society to become a player in it's own right, strong enough to assert its interests and to pressure both the state and industry to behave responsibly. Civil society is very weak in China and Russia, it is large but struggling in India, and it is relatively successful in Brazil. This may help explain why, of the four BRICs, Brazil seems to enjoy the greatest stability. Compared to China's looming threats from inflation or a transition trap, Russia's demographic crisis, and India's rampant corruption, Brazil is downright boring. Its economy is lightly but competently managed, the hyperinflation crisis of the 1980s is behind it, and both the state and market seem to work in some kind of benign concert. The country has the greatest political rights and civil liberties of the four BRICs, according to the latest rankings from Freedom House, and its civil society actively participate in politics (unlike in India, where citizens vote but often have few other outlets, such as unions, for participation). It's not a cure-all to solve the problems of a developing economy, but a strong and free civil society seems like a good way to at least deter them from getting too bad.
Feb. 17 (Bloomberg) -- Italian anti-mafia prosecutors said they seized a record $6 trillion of allegedly fake U.S. Treasury bonds, an amount that's almost half of the U.S.'s public debt.![]()
Nowadays many big health organisations are consoildating their hold over the market. They take over the independent practices and employ the docs and staff.gakakkad wrote:plenty of docs are retiring early . Its cheaper that way .
http://money.cnn.com/2012/01/05/smallbu ... iid=HP_MPM