Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): 29 March 2012

Paul · Post by **Paul** » 02 Apr 2012 11:11

As I said in the forum many years ago, it is the Gujral doctrine that will be marked as the start of the unravelling of the onion that is Pakistan...with the RAPES as the footsoldiers for advancing India's interests. Again, a classic example of the the left liberal wing though working for Indian interests.

Vikas · Post by **Vikas** » 02 Apr 2012 11:59

^ How so Paul ? Pls care to explain How Gujral doctrine helped ?

harbans · Post by **harbans** » 02 Apr 2012 13:41

Paki onion is not unraveling in any way as yet and the Gujral doctrine is one of weakness we displayed to a new generation of Paki leaders who thought they could get away this time by violence. Hence the violence unleashed including War on us..as they percieved we were weaker due to Gujral Pappi Jhappi syndrome. Now the very same generation of leaders/ dictators etc realize that India is stronger than what they assumed. This cycle of Pappi Jhappi throughout history India-Pak has led to a Porki thinking India is weak and launching an attack/ terror or war..thinking it will work this time around.

What can unravel us is however the Gujral doctrine. While we do well and Poaks go down the flush, we embrace them, give them opportunity..just like the sage and the scorpion story crossing the river..they will come back to bite us only.

The Pappi Jhappi doctrine will first allow RAPES to come in and monopolize left wing cocktail circuits, influence media and allow them to make money here which they cannot now in the West or in Porkistan. Other countries have almost halted issuing visas of any kind to Paki's.

Next step in the Pappi Jhappi project will be to open border districts to small scale trade and issuing work permits for thousands of Paki;s. NExt comes Paki's in border districts marrying off locals and increase in mosques, conversion rates through settlements etc. All in the name of Pappi Jhappi ofcourse. 3 decades of census will show the border districts are majority Porki and millions would have obviously slipped into other places.

We are walking into a Pappi Jhappi minefield here.

nvishal · Post by **nvishal** » 02 Apr 2012 14:32

VikasRaina wrote:^ How so Paul ? Pls care to explain How Gujral doctrine helped ?

The Gujral doctrine is a psychological strategy that prevents tit-for-tat.

A pakistan that doesn't get the opportunity to fight with india is a pakistan that fights with itself.

@harbans
Pakistan is a good source for agro essentials. What you're talking about is bankrolling pakistans economy. That's not going to happen.

harbans · Post by **harbans** » 02 Apr 2012 14:55

The Gujral doctrine is a psychological strategy that prevents tit-for-tat.

Not following G Doc is not going Tit for Tat. There's a big defference between being polite/ curt and doing a Pappi Jhappi to the level A Roys are ready to physically take a Brahmos if Hindoo terrorists launch on the so innocent Poaks. The difference is also not fine.

Paki's are not going down because India has not done tit for tat or India did tit for tat what would happen is unknown..though always alleged. Paki's are going down because they have exhausted all means of taking India down except nukes as of now. They've gone down because the PA/ISI and RAPE elite has eaten away the resources claiming threats from India.

Gujral doctrine has nothing to do with Porkistan going down the toilet. This is a society that will kill their love to protect their false sense of honor. Pappi Jhappi is a love syndrome..that they will understand love is a tall order. It's never been proven till date. So though i too am not keen on a tit for tat thing, i cannot understand how GD helps unravel the Paki onion. The Paki will do it all by himself. You think the Poak is in the deepest trench? Try giving him a spade not your hand to get the Poak out.. Cause you give your hand, Poak will pull it, cut it and use it as a spade..

Roperia · Post by **Roperia** » 02 Apr 2012 15:26

Militants storm Pakistan checkpoint in Mohmand

Four soldiers of Islamic Republic of Bakistan and ten students of Islam (Taliban) killed over a fight of who is more Sharia compliant.

Vikas · Post by **Vikas** » 02 Apr 2012 16:42

nvishal wrote:
VikasRaina wrote:^ How so Paul ? Pls care to explain How Gujral doctrine helped ?
The Gujral doctrine is a psychological strategy that prevents tit-for-tat.

A pakistan that doesn't get the opportunity to fight with india is a pakistan that fights with itself.

@harbans
Pakistan is a good source for agro essentials. What you're talking about is bankrolling pakistans economy. That's not going to happen.

BS, I mean with all due respect, this is BS of highest order.
Is this one of those urban myths in making ? Pakistan has been in a state of war with India since 14th Aug 1947 despite the spin that some of us try to put on it. We just ended up calling them Kabali's, local uprising, Mujhahids, Jehadis, Non-state actors blah blah.
What you are essentially saying is that Pakis keep slapping us while we in the name of no tit-for-tat keep offering them the other cheek. Gujral was a big failure and thats pretty much it. Nothing about his so called doctrine is worth appreciating or remembering. It should have been confined to the dustbin of history along with the owner.
India in all seriousness got lucky that Pakis got so much influenced by the Jehadis that they ended up biting the hand that fed them. India did nothing to encourage Pakis on this path of self destruction. If Gujral was PM today, we probably will be hosting Pakis all over India and that too for free. Pakis are too down the road of hatred to understand papi-jhappi.

Hari Seldon · Post by **Hari Seldon** » 02 Apr 2012 17:02

Yup, like someone mentioned on twitter, the jihard factories spewing out non-state actors (now slowly turning into anti-state actors the moment they get any independence or leeway) is like pak's auto-immune system gone wrong and attacking its own body politic. This acquired immunity deficiency syndrome is far from reaching critical mass but pak's body politic rejecting amreeka-donated organs is a good start....

JwalaMukhi · Post by **JwalaMukhi** » 02 Apr 2012 18:12

Thanks to Shri PV Narasimha Rao, India has been able to withstand all the non-sense like aman ki tamasha, "first right to resources" type blunders. Not to mention peacenik Gujaral doctrine, lahore bus trip nonsenses too.

India is strong enough to tolerate and come out ok with SES and other assorted blunders, but it is yet to build a formidable defense against paki-jholawalla and desh-jholawalla combined mentality. It will take a few years to build immunity even to that. Have enough confidence in the paki-closet jihadis to not snatch the opportunity provided by the white flag waving crowd in Delhi.

SBajwa · Post by **SBajwa** » 02 Apr 2012 19:22

Had Pakistani army been destroyed in 1948 we could have saved all the wars and lives.
Had Pakistani army been destroyed in 1965 more lives saved.
Had Pakistani army been destroyed in 1971 more lives saved and no Nuke Pakistan.
Had Pakistani army been destroyed in 1999 more lives saved and few nukes.
If we destroy Pakistani army and rest of armed forces now more lives will be saved in future.

Pakistan is an unfinished job and should be completed as soon as possible the delay will only increase the complexity to finish this job in future.

Helping pakistan to become an economically strong is just like feeding milk to a King Cobra who will come back to bit the same hand that feeds him. (Saanp ko doodh pilana)

dada · Post by **dada** » 02 Apr 2012 19:46

#Sbajwa

Fortunately there is no chance of any person from erstwhile pakistan who will be PM of India from next elections onwards. Same case with Pakistani leaders with indian roots/connections. both will view each other with a more/totally detached manner without bringing in concepts like bhai bhai, same culture bla bla etc .so wait for another 3 yrs.

brihaspati · Post by **brihaspati** » 02 Apr 2012 20:23

Muslims have always fought against themselves! That did not ruin them at all - starting right from the days of the pious caliphs - its one bloody long history of blue on blue. It does not detract a single bit from the overall agenda of civilizationophobia inherent in the theology, and detracts nothing from destroying at every possible opportunity all that is positive in human civilizational accummulation.

Its the same case with Pak. Heck Ottomans became ottomans by mauling the gulf caliphate. Look at how the Sauds foisted themselves on the peninsual in the 19th and early 20th century.

Pointing out these internecine conflicts to project the self-destruction is a false and dangerous delusion. The replacement of such internal destruction is not a non-Islamic more porgressive regime - but an equally hardcore and parasitically genocidal one.

Roperia · Post by **Roperia** » 02 Apr 2012 20:43

Three pissful brotestors were killed, while another six injured in the Lyari area of Karachi.

Three hand grenades were thrown and a rocket was also fired at policemen.

Lyari violence: Rockets, hand grenades used during clashes

shiv · Post by **shiv** » 02 Apr 2012 21:25

brihaspati wrote: Look at how the Sauds foisted themselves on the peninsual in the 19th and early 20th century.

They hardly did that on their own. They had "allies", who by coincidence are the same allies that Pakistan has. The Saudi Royal family was helped by the Brits as they took down the Caliphate. The Americans stepped in later for the oil. Pakistan itself has everything to do with "Great power" manipulation of brainless half wit Islamic regimes to serve imperial interests.

Whatever the grand plan of Islam, it cannot be accused of producing intelligent or great leaders. They have always made great slaves for Imperialist white European Christians - at least in the last 150 years. Only Indians insist that Hindus were slaves of Muslims, or alternatively insist that they will soon be enslaved by Muslims. So that is one plus point I guess.

Lalmohan · Post by **Lalmohan** » 02 Apr 2012 21:31

shiv - the al sauds have risen and fallen to rise again. the initial rise was entirely done on their own in a space the ottomans had little interest in - they were then eventually almost extinguished by the egyptians when they got too big for their boots. the british were supporting the hashemites (who managed the holy mosques) until the oil was found so the al sauds were wandering the desert again before being elevated into pole position. giving them the mosques AND the oil rights was a strategic mistake that the goras didn't anticipate back then.

shiv · Post by **shiv** » 02 Apr 2012 21:44

Lalmohan wrote: giving them the mosques AND the oil rights was a strategic mistake that the goras didn't anticipate back then.

It was always a "game" and it was always "balancing" one against the other and having one "ally" against another or setting up one against the other. That is exactly what Pakistan has benefited from. If India looks weak wrt to Islamic fundamentalism it is at least in part because Hindu minds have been beaten to a pliable pulp by a combined assault of Islamic zealots allied with covert Christian imperialists that have convinced a large proportion of Indians that

Islam brought them civilization
Britain created a nation
Hindus are responsible for the egregious caste system and bride burning and widow shaving
Islam is egalitarian
Britain/USA are always wise and just
Hindus never recorded any history

Even Indians do not see India as strong and the dhoti shivering is continuous. By many accounts India is a "loser state". That of course fits in well with what others say about India too, not least by Pakistan. There is no such thing as Indian pride. indians will never say "Indian exceptionalism" and Hindus feel like losers and talk like losers.

But It's not Islam alone that has beaten Hindus into submission. The imperial powers aided that task and Hindus now represent the biggest collection of "we are losers" mindset on earth.

Lalmohan · Post by **Lalmohan** » 02 Apr 2012 21:45

possibly, though the arabs are also quite self inflictedly defeatist

shiv · Post by **shiv** » 02 Apr 2012 21:52

Lalmohan wrote:possibly, though the arabs are also quite self inflictedly defeatist

Funnily enough the average American who has half a mind thinks Saudis are losers. Saudis are the butt of endless American jokes. But Indians are seen as losers primarily by Indians themselves. No Indian plan of action leading to a positive outcome can work. Nothing can go right for India. India is doomed because it is full of people with some kind of faulty mindset or attitude. India is always predicted to be on a downward path heading for defeat, occupation and subjugation. History (not written by moronic Indians) comes in handy here. So many names of traitors who sold India down the line. And they are still there, still selling and we are still losing. Losers'r'us.

ManuT · Post by **ManuT** » 02 Apr 2012 22:53

nvishal wrote:
VikasRaina wrote:^ How so Paul ? Pls care to explain How Gujral doctrine helped ?
The Gujral doctrine is a psychological strategy that prevents tit-for-tat.

A pakistan that doesn't get the opportunity to fight with india is a pakistan that fights with itself.

@harbans
Pakistan is a good source for agro essentials. What you're talking about is bankrolling pakistans economy. That's not going to happen.

I never knew Gujral was a guru who foresaw this yahoo on yahoo contest, and by his grand Gujral doctrine directed this paki yahoo-ness inwards!

No tats prevented tits? That's new.

Anujan · Post by **Anujan** » 03 Apr 2012 00:50

http://www.voanews.com/english/news/asi ... 74375.html

Pakistani Court Convicts bin Laden's Widows

A court in Pakistan on Monday jailed former al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden’s three widows and two of his daughters for illegally staying in the country and hiding their identity from authorities. The women were sentenced to 45 days in jail.

ramana · Post by **ramana** » 03 Apr 2012 00:58

Werent they already in jail since OBL got shaeed?

So Pak courts are not interested in finding out how they came to stay "illegally" in TSP?

Anujan · Post by **Anujan** » 03 Apr 2012 00:58

nvishal wrote: The Gujral doctrine is a psychological strategy that prevents tit-for-tat.

A pakistan that doesn't get the opportunity to fight with india is a pakistan that fights with itself.

The Gujral doctrine helped us in a different way, just not with the Pakis. The problem with the Pakis is that they look at mirages and concluded that the SDREs are dhoti shivering and are going to lose. It started in 65, (Oh the SDREs got walloped by the Chinese, we can drive upto Amritsar) and in 71 (Oh we won on the negotiating table!!) and in 98 (Oh the SDREs are tired of counter insurgency, we will walk in and take Siachen).

Pakis do not understand the language of compromise, they only understand the language of power. Gujral doctrine, which is essentially unilateral concessions hasnt won us anything and never well. Even as recently as S-e-S, Pakis are equating Mumbai attack with "Indian meddling in Balochistan".

On the other hand, what has helped us is threefold.
1. A nice barbed wire fence in JK with floodlights and snipers to keep the Yahoos in
2. Pakistan's economy going to pakistan so the lower-level abduls are out on the streets rioting
3. Unkil in Pakistan's backyard so most Paki yahoos are concentrated there.

Tell me one way in which Gujral doctrine helped us? Did it, or the conciliatory gesture by ABV prevent Kargil? Or Mumbai? In fact, probably the time period Pakis were preparing for Kargil coincided with Gujral.

Gujral Doctrine is useful against other less-rabid and more sane neighbors. I wish to see more economic integration with Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka and Myanmar with their students studying in our universities with free movement of goods and road and rail connections.

Gus · Post by **Gus** » 03 Apr 2012 01:00

well, whether Gujral's doctrine worked or not (or even whats happening now was an intended aim)..whatever maybe causing it, we ARE seeing a lot of green on green action, regular singles and doubles that result in more deaths in peeland than peelander caused deaths in India. Back in mid 90s, every day in the paper I would read about one or two fatal incidents in Kashmir. Nothing was reported in peeland except some sectarian stuff around festival time. What has been happening there in the past few years maybe 'usual stuff' to us now, but when it started out, it was a very new phenomenon.

ramana · Post by **ramana** » 03 Apr 2012 01:07

Gus, Its festival time all the time in TSP with IED mubaark nowadays!

Anujan · Post by **Anujan** » 03 Apr 2012 01:08

How much of it is due to better reporting and internet? Green on Green always existed. Have you heard of the Shia massacre in Chitral led by one Brigadier Mush? And their retaliation in Punjab? Or the pitched battles fought in Karachi with AKs? Or the Aerial bombing and artillery attacks in Balochistan? And their retaliation?

Green on Green has just kept pace with the population. And we are getting more news of it because of the internet, instead of one small column in the Indian express here and there. Another reason is that the Civvies have recognized the value of beards as vote-pulling musclemen and are supporting one faction against the other (in return for votes during election). So instead of just one army-pasand faction, we have many factions each with its own political party. Think of it as fifty Hezbollahs.

Violence has been truly democratized in Pakistan and India cannot claim all credit for it. Democratizing barbarity is their own invention.

ramana · Post by **ramana** » 03 Apr 2012 01:21

You mean equal opportunity violence.

Prem · Post by **Prem** » 03 Apr 2012 01:29

Zardari to ask for recognition of SindhDesh

President Asif Ali Zardari will meet Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in the Indian capital, Delhi, on 8 April, his office has announced.Mr Zardari will visit, in a private capacity, the shrine of a famous Sufi Muslim saint, in north-west Rajasthan state, his spokesman said.He will meet Mr Singh for lunch before visiting the shrine in Ajmer city.This will be the first visit to India by a new head of state . The visit comes as tensions ease between the nuclear-armed neighbours amid efforts to improve mutual trade over the last few months, correspondents say.Late on Sunday night, presidential spokesman Farhatullah Babar said Mr Zardari had accepted Mr Singh's invitation for lunch and would stop by in Delhi on way to Ajmer, the Times of India reports.Reports from Ajmer said the administration was preparing for Mr Zardari's visit and that the entire shrine area was expected to be closed to other devotees during the president's visit.Earlier on Sunday, the presidential office said that an India visit was on the cards and the date and details of the trip were being worked out.This would be Mr Zardari's first visit to India since he took over as president in 2008.

anupmisra · Post by **anupmisra** » 03 Apr 2012 01:40

US announces $10 million bounty on Lashkar chief's head

...apart from Saeed, his brother-in-law and co-founder of Lashkar Abdul Rehman Makki now carries a bounty of $3 million on his head.

sanjaykumar · Post by **sanjaykumar** » 03 Apr 2012 01:46

How much has India priced him at?

brihaspati · Post by **brihaspati** » 03 Apr 2012 02:08

shiv wrote:
brihaspati wrote: Look at how the Sauds foisted themselves on the peninsual in the 19th and early 20th century.
They hardly did that on their own. They had "allies", who by coincidence are the same allies that Pakistan has. The Saudi Royal family was helped by the Brits as they took down the Caliphate. The Americans stepped in later for the oil. Pakistan itself has everything to do with "Great power" manipulation of brainless half wit Islamic regimes to serve imperial interests.

Whatever the grand plan of Islam, it cannot be accused of producing intelligent or great leaders. They have always made great slaves for Imperialist white European Christians - at least in the last 150 years. Only Indians insist that Hindus were slaves of Muslims, or alternatively insist that they will soon be enslaved by Muslims. So that is one plus point I guess.

As Lalmohan ji has pointed out - the initial rise was by the illustrious twin sword of flesh and steel [not my coinage but his affectionate followers] on its own. The Brit help came along onlee after they saw the potential - as they watched for the most ruthless shark among sharks, the shark of sharks so to speak, to back up against the Ottomans.

People have been trying to eliminate rats for millenia. Rats have developed their own strategy to cope with it, and they are thriving. Have the rats produced a super rat leader? A global leader of supreme intelligence who has coordinated all ratty moves against human attempts to wipe them off?

Once again we imagine and model others as ourselves. Success comes from intelligence and leadership. Maybe, but in what context? What matters here is whether the group or entity has evolved a repertoire of responses built on a better understanding of us than we have of them - in the crucial aspects of survival, multiplication, expansion, parasitic digestion of substrate, and continuing the cycle.

The primary insight that Islamists have is that the greatest weakness in human civilization is the institutionalization of empathy - from which stems all the other "virtues" of civilization. The theology disrupts this natural flow of empathy and subsumes it on a conditional sense of guilt controlled by the theocracy. Empathy is made conditional and not universal as in regular human civilizations.

Paki's could be non-intelligent, but even their most stupid mullah or tactician or leader understand this fundamental insight of Islamism about human empathy. They have used it before and they are using it now and they will use it in the future to extract either extension of lease of life, or breathing space, as well as resources, to survive with their basic agenda - expansion, genocide, and parasitic digestion of substrate.

Given the current experience - they have been pretty successful at extracting what they need and what they want.

Prem · Post by **Prem** » 03 Apr 2012 02:23

Gillani Find something bigger than the Book
Gilani urges Asian leaders to join hands for economic-based regional "harmony"
(Must appreciate the Paqqui genius in finding the fancy ways of begging)

Prime Minister Syed Yusuf Raza Gilani Monday urged the Asian countries to establish regional harmony and sustainable development through increased trade and economic growth. “If we do not establish a regional harmony based on trade, investment and economic growth, we fear we will remain hostage to the past. We can break free of this past,” the Prime Minister said while addressing Asia’s top leaders, corporate executives and academics at Boao Forum for Asia’s annual conference here in China.he Prime Minister said the 21st century is the “Asian Century” and mentioned that Asia’s role in global economic order had changed rapidly. He said China’s role in Asia, and Asia’s economic, political and strategic importance was central.He said by 2050, Asia was expected to account for more than half of the global economy, restoring the world’s largest continent to its former position of economic primacy.“In short, we may well be witnessed the birth of a new world,” he said.He said the war on terror has impacted the region severely, has created a negative perception and made harder for Pakistan to attract investment.Prime Minister Gilani also mentioned the massive floods that wiped out 2% growth of Pakistan’s GDP and caused damages estimated at US $ 10 billion.He said Pakistan’s efforts to create jobs for young people and bring prosperity to citizens have been hampered, however the government has taken bold and politically difficult decisions.

“

brihaspati · Post by **brihaspati** » 03 Apr 2012 02:25

On the Paki thread - it is not useful to lambast Indians for supposedly shivering their dhotis - making Indians==Hindus, since Islamic culture everywhere on the subcontinent specifically associates dhoti with Hindus, and mocks it at every possible chance, and takes great pain and care to distinguish the Islamic by dress from that much mocked dhoti. The Brits mocked it too - associating it with the meek and dissimulating "baboo" again specifically associated with the "Hindu".

If Pakiness combines both Islamism and Britism - then its mocking the dhoti which brings in the quintessential of Pakiness.

However, more relevant for the thread is the fact that - one may possess the greatest of weapons, the best army in the world, and apparent confidence of being invincible and still fall miserably and in shocking surprise - because it allowed its own propaganda about invincibility to delude itself. Myths and pseudo-myths and better-known history all point out ample examples. Ravana thought and for all practical purposes was really invincible. The Trojans thought so too. Surely emperor Asoka was extremely confident that his peace campaign had brought permanent dividends. The descendants of Cyrus thought so. Jayachand thought so. Nazis and Germany under him thought so.

None of the defenses and weapons and armies that India boasts of, is of any strength if the will to use them in coordination for the permanent elimination of a known threat is lacking. If there is hesitation and lack of evidence of will to eliminate, erase, destroy, finish, uproot to the very foundations - that should not be implied on the shoulders of the aam dhoti wearer. There are too many honest and genuine brave hearts wearing the garment to be insulted in this way by dhoti-bashing more expected from Paki tirade.

ramana · Post by **ramana** » 03 Apr 2012 02:31

sanjaykumar wrote:How much has India priced him at?

India will buy an extra P-8I to make up for the bounty.

Prem · Post by **Prem** » 03 Apr 2012 02:45

BJSir ji,
Paki have first hand experience of 47 Chittar parade. They dont doubt our capability and will to apply useful methods. By now Paki know they are no match in mind or money. As a good neighbor, Indians must keep reinforcing these ideas in Poakheads that Social Cultural Ritualistic practices have caused such backwardness. Medieval Rituals have caused the inhumanity thus unfit to live in current era , inbreeding the loss of brain and culture of laziness, begging is the cause of present Ecomicalonomical achievements.

Prem · Post by **Prem** » 03 Apr 2012 02:54

ramana wrote:
sanjaykumar wrote:How much has India priced him at?

Union of Sindhu Desh and Balochistan. He knows , staying in Paqqijab will earn him only Urn while BalochSindhstan will earn him and his family great daam and name for long time. Paqqi cant swallow him or let go, he is the original Korkirli in their throat.

anupmisra · Post by **anupmisra** » 03 Apr 2012 03:34

Na Khape, Na Khape, pa'astan Na Khape

Ravi Karumanchiri · Post by **Ravi Karumanchiri** » 03 Apr 2012 03:39

Two Year Sentence for Man Accused in Pakistan Spy Plot

by Kim Barker
ProPublica, March 30, 2012, 6:09 p.m.

http://www.propublica.org/article/2-yea ... n-spy-plot

A Kashmiri-American accused of funneling money from Pakistan’s main spy agency to American politicians in a scheme to influence U.S. policy on Kashmir was sentenced to two years in federal prison Friday.

Syed Ghulam Nabi Fai, 62, of Fairfax, Va., had pleaded guilty in December to conspiracy and tax violations in connection with moving at least $3.5 million from Pakistan’s government and the Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate, or ISI, mostly through his charity, the Kashmiri American Council. <SNIP>
......

Anujan · Post by **Anujan** » 03 Apr 2012 04:38

The Onion sums up the reaction to the Bin Laden widow's sentencing perfectly:

http://www.theonion.com/articles/bin-la ... ced,27829/

It’s good to see Pakistan’s refusing to harbor terrorists’ widows.

So the punishment for living in Pakistan illegally is being forced to stay there? ****, Pakistan, get some self-esteem.

Prem · Post by **Prem** » 03 Apr 2012 05:44

Jiye muhinji sindh by Ahmed Mughal
watch it !
O Sindh Watan ke Logo, Jarra aankh mei bharr lo Paani
Iss Paak Dharti parrr, koi rahe na Paqqjabi Harami.
[youtube]L2RNChGhvV0&feature=related[/youtube]

abhishek_sharma · Post by **abhishek_sharma** » 03 Apr 2012 06:41

India set to cut sensitive list of Pak imports by 30 per cent

A first for Pakistan's third gender