Kudos, NLCA team.
She is daughter of LCA...I name her Sonakshi Sinha

Judging by the "No retraction of Landing Gear" rule on the Naval, it appears to me that the ADA/HAL/NFTC folks are almost looking at this as a whole new plane and not just another variant/Production item of the LCA program. They seem to have taken the same precautions they would have taken for the TD-1. I agree better safe than sorry. What I am sorry about is the PR and Media management by HAL but I guess I have to eat my pinch of salt...merlin wrote:Actually IIRC LSP-7 on its first flight did retract its landing gear - so confidence on the landing gear of the AF variant is high. Not so for the Navy variant.
Per the long winding statement published by Shiv Aroor, the landing test facility is not ready and wont be until end of 2012. The take off areas are ready though.Quick question, Why wasn't the tail hook installed on the NP-1?? In none of the pictures, is the hook visible..
Well the LSP-7 landing gear had worked well for almost 1800 flights prior to the LSP-7's first flight. A good comparison would be TD-1's first flight where the LG wasn't retracted either IIRC.merlin wrote:Actually IIRC LSP-7 on its first flight did retract its landing gear - so confidence on the landing gear of the AF variant is high. Not so for the Navy variant. All in good time.
Rahul M wrote:>> A good comparison would be TD-1's first flight where the LG wasn't retracted either IIRC.
yup.
What are you speaking of sirjee ... This is TD-1s second flight ... AT 1:14 you can see the MLG being extracted!anishns wrote:For that matter so was the PAK-FA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mZM1y8rcyE
Rahul M wrote:>> A good comparison would be TD-1's first flight where the LG wasn't retracted either IIRC.
yup.
He is talking about the TD-1 (LCA)indranilroy wrote:What are you speaking of sirjee ... This is TD-1s second flight ... AT 1:14 you can see the MLG being extracted!Rahul M wrote:>> A good comparison would be TD-1's first flight where the LG wasn't retracted either IIRC.
yup.
This is the footage as released by Sukhoi of TD-1s maiden flight ... The landing gears are in retracted position between 0:49 to 0:55.
You have to be kidding - the Pakfa is an entirely new design, I could understand the above statement for say a Su-35, but the Pakfa?Raveen wrote:Moreover, the Pak-FA being so similar to the Su-30 family they need not worry about landing gear design which in all probablilty is a slightly modified carryover.
So your claim is that it is a clean sheet design?Cain Marko wrote:You have to be kidding - the Pakfa is an entirely new design, I could understand the above statement for say a Su-35, but the Pakfa?Raveen wrote:Moreover, the Pak-FA being so similar to the Su-30 family they need not worry about landing gear design which in all probablilty is a slightly modified carryover.
I know what Rahul M was saying ... I did not get what Anish ji is sayingRaveen wrote: He is talking about the TD-1 (LCA)
Moreover, the Pak-FA being so similar to the Su-30 family they need not worry about landing gear design which in all probablilty is a slightly modified carryover.
Asit P wrote:Sushil Kumar also joins the list of qualifiers for London Olympics
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/spor ... 903572.cms
he thinks soshiv wrote:Asit P wrote:Sushil Kumar also joins the list of qualifiers for London Olympics
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/spor ... 903572.cmsAnd this is related to the LCA?
Nice pics. kudos to whoever taken the pics.shiv wrote:Courtesy Sanjay Simha
http://i1116.photobucket.com/albums/k56 ... G_8190.jpg[/img]
http://i1116.photobucket.com/albums/k56 ... G_8206.jpg[/img]
http://i1116.photobucket.com/albums/k56 ... G_8212.jpg[/img]
The naval prototype (NP-1) of Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) completed a glitch-free 21-minute maiden flight here on Friday, after almost two years since its roll out on July 6, 2010.
The flight test was carried out at the HAL Airport with Commodore J A Maolankar at the controls and Wing Commander M Prabhu co-piloting the aircraft within the designated flight envelope and successfully carrying out the planned tests.
The aircraft which was scheduled to take off at 10 am was delayed by two hours and ten minutes with bad weather preventing the sortie. At 12.08 pm the LCA Tejas (IAF version) screamed past the runway, taking off into the skies amid whistles and cheers but that was only the chase aircraft.
The real moment came two minutes later, at 12:10 pm, when the LCA-NP 1, the naval prototype of the aircraft became air-borne.![]()
A hawk aircraft also did the sortie as a stand-by.
The aircraft became airborne and reached an elevation of 10,000 feet above the sea level at 450 kmph and flew about 30-km from the base before returning for the landing.
Maolankar said that they carried out various checks and observations during the sortie and that a lot of data has been collected, which will now be analysed.
Deputy Chief of Naval Staff Vice Admiral Satish Sonim who was also present on the occasion said that Team LCA should put their heads down and get to the initial operational clearance (IOC) stage by 2014 so that the process of induction could be expedited.
The LCA Navy programme, initiated in 2003, envisages building two prototypes.
SuryaG Saar, two nitpicks:suryag wrote:Commodore Maolankar seems to have put on some weightTwo navy pilots apart from Commodore Maolankar at NFTC is a good sign.