And to boot, he addressed harvard and wharton and other ivy leagues students.


wonder what these so called ivy leagues are made up of.
Simple perception is always better than reality and pushing paper makes more money these days than real manufacturing.krisna wrote:^^^^
And to boot, he addressed harvard and wharton and other ivy leagues students.![]()
![]()
wonder what these so called ivy leagues are made up of.
Not to speak of the Overloading of Wagons that he introduced to meet Freight targets, this concept has now been institutionalised and the damage it has done to the rolling stock/tracks is something which will be a very big financial drag in the years to come.Sachin wrote:Exactly. The "Lalu magic" has now started showing its true colours. If I get it right Lalu had tweaked the books to show the pension corpus in the railways as an "asset". It should have been a provision for liability as these funds would get distributed to the railway work force when they retire.SRoy wrote:Add to the fact that Lalu manipulated the books to show that Railway was running in profit. The railway was already bleeding at that time.
The railways initially needs about Rs 3,000 crore to start the project linking about 97 km new rail connection between Jiribam and Tupul (Manipur) in the first phase. As per the approved plan, the Indian Railways will build about 350 km new route between India and Myanmar
This also saysUnder the approved plan, the project aims at connecting 28 countries through rail link. The countries likely to be linked include India, China, Myanmar, Thailand, Singapore, Pakistan, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Turkey, Russia, Vietnam, Cambodia, Bulgaria, Mongolia, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal, sources said, adding that Patna happens to be one the routes of this project.
Any idea as to how??will help India keep a close watch on the growing influence of China,
Among others like RDSO and DLW, the WDG5 has also had inputs from the Electro-Motive Diesel Inc.Zynda wrote:I think WDG5 is based on different design with increased driver comfort and first Indian loco to comply with crash regulations. There is a pic of the loco on IRFCA website gallery section (supposed to be removed in a few days though). Loco is not a dual cab like Chinese version...single cab. Very loosely looks like existing GT46MAC product (less aerodynamic front-end).
Hope this is not the "hole on the floor" kind of toilets we have in the passenger coacheschetak wrote:In a new first for the Indian Railways, this baby also boasts an attached toilet.
I imagine that the Indian Railways drivers would spread out their favorite edition of the express newspaper on the floor of the cabin and do the dirty.Sachin wrote:Hope this is not the "hole on the floor" kind of toilets we have in the passenger coacheschetak wrote:In a new first for the Indian Railways, this baby also boasts an attached toilet.. BTW I always wondered how the drivers managed without toilets this far. But one thing if I am not mistaken their actual "driving time" is around 4-6 hours shift, with at least a break for 2 hours. Does any one have any idea on whether Locos in the western countries also boast of a toilet in the loco cabin?
Theo_Fidel wrote:IIRC the WDG-5 has been worked on for 3-4 years at least with EMD based on one of their 6000 HP designs. The increased power comes from using 20 Cylinder engine vs the 16 cylinder one the WDG-4 uses. Historically there have been problems with that 20 Cylinder engine as it is very powerful compared to the Chassis. Also things were done to squeeze in the extra 4 cylinders that caused problems. Both GE and EMD had trouble in USA with that engine particularly with reliability. The lack of a second cab indicates that the engine size maybe different due to this issue.
I suspect that is what RDSO has been working on with EMD is the best combination for India.
WRT toilets the EMD Locomotives have had a Bio digester toilet for a long long time.
Any more explanation as to why this is required? Any way during the time of poor visibility (i.e night, fogs etc.) the drivers do switch on the head lights. But why is it required when going through a perfect sunny day, when there is good and clear visibility? A person who cannot see a train coming in broad day light, may not see it when just because it has switched on its head lights. My understanding is that even in Europe, trains do not have their lights on during day time.Aditya Watts wrote:I believe, and science will be with me, that it will certainly increase safety for both the driver(s) and general public.
There are use cases for using lights even on sunny days, especially in tunnels and shady sections of track (such as a track that runs through the middle of two hills.)Sachin wrote: Any more explanation as to why this is required? Any way during the time of poor visibility (i.e night, fogs etc.) the drivers do switch on the head lights. But why is it required when going through a perfect sunny day, when there is good and clear visibility? A person who cannot see a train coming in broad day light, may not see it when just because it has switched on its head lights.
But is'nt it upto the driver to decide what to do in such cases? Railways is an organisation where they have caution boards indicating when the driver should even sound the horn. So there would be some guide lines on when the drivers can switch on the head lights (the simple guide line being, switch on the head light when you cannot see any thing ahead).ArmenT wrote:There are use cases for using lights even on sunny days, especially in tunnels and shady sections of track (such as a track that runs through the middle of two hills.)
I am actually more talking from the outsider's point of view and the driver's point of view is more secondary for this issue.Sachin wrote:Any more explanation as to why this is required? Any way during the time of poor visibility (i.e night, fogs etc.) the drivers do switch on the head lights. But why is it required when going through a perfect sunny day, when there is good and clear visibility? A person who cannot see a train coming in broad day light, may not see it when just because it has switched on its head lights. My understanding is that even in Europe, trains do not have their lights on during day time.Aditya Watts wrote:I believe, and science will be with me, that it will certainly increase safety for both the driver(s) and general public.
Trains in India do not run as fast as their counterparts in Europe. Secondly in India, many accidents happen purely because of negligence. In very many cases accidents happen not because the train was not seen on time. The people tried to cross the track, or move their vehicles across the tracks hoping that the train would NOT hit them. For such folks, putting on the head lights etc. is not going to make any difference. In India, there are clear cut areas where people and vehicle can cross the tracks. And the drivers know such places. Caution boards are placed at the right location asking the driver to blast the horn.Aditya Watts wrote:I am especially in favor of this because of the fact that the number of personal mishaps in India is out of proportion. Just see how many accidents at for example railway crossing occur. I am not saying it will solve all problems, but will definitely help in reducing them.
Within limits this too can be accommodated. See below. Note that pedestrians cross anywhere anytime. This is correct engineering. Rubble strip/bollards keeps vehicles in a very slow pattern forcing them into grade separated arterial streets. 90% of road space is given to pedestrians to whom the streets should belong. Fat cats/mem-sahibs in cars rightly have last priority.Bade wrote:^^^ But the Indian requirement ethos, is pedestrian should also be able to climb into and out of a vehicle at grade from anywhere and at any time. This leads to compromise and we had discussions even in nukkad or was it the inferiority thread about why Indian expectations of cows and people and vehicles at grade was absolutely right and optimal. Also add railroad to the above list. We are meeting the spec already, with loss of lives in bargain.
Yeah this is what I was referring to. Thanks for making it more clear. Your points on urban engineering are also really interesting.That combined with Sachin's view on mentality problem should be tackled for a safer railway system.Theo_Fidel wrote:Aditya,
What you are talking about is spatial recognition.
90% plus of run over accidents happen due to misjudging the speed/distance of approaching train. No amount of Honking gives people information on how fast train is going and how far it is. That is a major reason for keeping the lights on. If you notice the lights are usually paired, kept at low level and both are turned on. This pairing allows for instant distance/speed judgement. What might take 4-5 seconds can now be done by the brain in .25 seconds. Or the difference between life and death. If we were a bit wealthier and less lackadaisical about population safety, there would be research and testing of this information which is well known in advanced countries.
Yes Indians are shoddy and lazy. But it is not like the built environment helps them live their lives. As Rahul says the conflict areas are well known. When we have the resources all these areas will be redesigned to keep pedestrians at grade and move the railways either above or under. This business of pedestrian over bridges is cheap-a$$ design solution that is a stand in for real engineering.
Basis of design for all traffic. Pedestrian always has right of way and must be kept at grade. Always.
I believe what saip was referring to was a freight train and not passenger trains. And if its doing 75 mph that translates into 120 kmph. None of our freight trains go so fast.Theo_Fidel wrote: Trains in India do run fast. Several of the Shatabdi's & Rajadhanis are in the 150 kmph peak range. ~ 90 mph. When you stand on the track a 50 kmph train and a 150 kmph train coming down the line look the same. Hard to judge distance.
Sirjee, the three diesel engines together hauling the freight train didn't give you a clue?saip wrote:Recently I was driving in CA route 99. I saw a long freight train with something like three diesel engines running on the track next to the road. Even though I was driving at 75+ it kept up with me. If these freight trains can go that fast how come even our superfast trains do not go that fast?
2 paise suggestion.Singha wrote:due to lack of dedicated tracks (even a single dedicated line with two way freight trains) , passenger trains are given priority in India on 2-track and 1-track sections always. the avg speed of goods train due to all these enforced stops cannot be more than 40kmph.
the Delhi-kolkata and delhi-mumbai industrial corridor I think is supposed to fix that issue by putting in a additional line on each route. in other areas with sparse passenger trains like in our mining belts of eastern india, goods trains might have a freer run.
Surfing the Internet in trains without using data card seems to be a distinct possibility now as the Railways have got the much-awaited clearance from space agency ISRO for using the satellite for the purpose.
The Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) has given the clearance for using the frequency from KU band for using the satellite for Internet, said a senior Railway Ministry official, adding it will be for the first time that Internet will be operational in moving trains through satellite.