

just joking
rahulm wrote:The Mahindra XUV500 is launched in Australia
It has received an ANCAP 4 star rating which is a great result for the first iteration. The detailed report
Oz is a mature and knowledgeable SUV market. All the best to Mahindra and wish it does well although an automatic transmission option will make their job easier.
With only a manual transmission and the price point, the XUV may fare well in the rural market and unlike in the Indian and even European scene, where it is mostly used a a people mover, in Oz it will actually be made to work hard including frequently towing laden trailers and earn its XUV tag. Hope the engineering, plastics and importantly the suspension pass muster.
So far Mahindra have not indicated the XUV's towing capacity, and this for a market where a great majority of vehicles have a towbar fitted.
I just hope they refined the vehicle to the point your teeth don't chatter & the gear shift does not re-arrange your knuckles when the engine is idling.
Mahindra is actually the 2nd Indian auto company to launch in Australia. Many years ago, TATA was the first and completely botched up their TATAMOBILE launch. There were many reasons for the debacle including the product which simply disintegrated before your eyes in a years time. TATA ultimately withdrew completely from the market.Then, they did not own Jaguar and LandRover.
Lets hope Mahindra has learned from TATA and does better.
I don't know about all Indian buyers, but certainly the Punju variety likes flashy crap like chrome, big chunky designs like XUV, loud colours - mostly farmer mentality - people who have got big money by selling their land to developers.rahulm wrote:Indian buyers and cars want to be more Khan'ish with in your face stickers and shiny bits and bobs of Chrome. The look at me, I am here kind of stuff.
[/quote]pandyan wrote:I had posted in the ind-aus thread few days back about xuv500 lauch. I honestly dont understand what the title means![]()
![]()
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/ipad/the-in ... 6387997415The Indian is summoned, sir
welcome to India. It is like these people do not even know that there is a lo beam and that's what they are supposed to be on when they are in city lights, vehicles oncoming and in front of you.anishns wrote:Nothing to do with Autos but driving in India...
Last October I was in Mumbai and was shocked to notice that everyone in the city from taxis, to rickshaws to cars and to bikes, drives around with high beams ON
That maybe true out of the cities. But inside the city, there are lights on the road and there really is no need for a hi beam to spot potholes etc. Besides, it is really useless when the other guy is also hi beaming on you..when you can't see any damn thing because of the glare, what is the point in hi beam.hnair wrote:So a high beam becomes a mental crutch that makes the driver feel s/he can see an obstacle a long way off. Purely a lack of confidence in the consistency of road infrastructure inside cities. No one can enforce this without push back.
sounds good by its own, but do add the following:Gus wrote: That maybe true out of the cities. But inside the city, there are lights on the road and there really is no need for a hi beam to spot potholes etc.
Driving on a rainy night in an Indian urban road is a nightmare, despite all the sodium lamps. There are no reflectors marking dead-end walls or even posts that are left in the lanes after the last widening, for example.hnair wrote:roads are dug up or big potholes are allowed to deepen over months and years. There are no warning flashing lamps to mark the perimeter of road construction zones in most small towns (and even bigger cities). So people die at night, especially those on two wheels. The news article will mention the fact that they hit something in the dark.
bhy phor ingrezisation of this phamous muhawrarahulm wrote:After all, in the words of the one and only Mr. Jaffery, ghost of the kicks not listening to the talks
Well, the Nano has a balance shaft precisely for that. The Nano's engine is actually pretty smooth, if you have driven it, you will immediately know it. In fact smoother than the 3 cylinder 800 derivatives found in the Alto etc and better than the 3 cylinder in the Hyundai Eon I think.Most likely a cost cutting move. Since the pistons move together, they need single fuel injection system and a single ignition system. Possibly simpler crankshaft design. Tradeoff is vibration and odd engine nois
My neighbour's nano was quiet initially on but sounds like a 80's tempo now.vina wrote:Well, the Nano has a balance shaft precisely for that. The Nano's engine is actually pretty smooth, if you have driven it, you will immediately know it. In fact smoother than the 3 cylinder 800 derivatives found in the Alto etc and better than the 3 cylinder in the Hyundai Eon I think.Most likely a cost cutting move. Since the pistons move together, they need single fuel injection system and a single ignition system. Possibly simpler crankshaft design. Tradeoff is vibration and odd engine nois
The 3 cylinder K10 derivatives (the K10 on Swift/Ritz are 4 cylinder) on the Alto and A-Star are okay. The 4 cylinder ones are great. Notice, the K10 series has a design, where the crank and the cylinder bore are "offset" . The other engine that uses such an offset cylinder bore is the Honda Unicorn's engine.I have been on a alto k10 3 cylinder; it is a gem of an engine.