Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Post Reply
Aditya_V
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14778
Joined: 05 Apr 2006 16:25

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Aditya_V »

When someone wants to shoot someone, the last thing is they want shoot with a gun in Hand, they will wait to try anther alternative
Narad
BRFite
Posts: 886
Joined: 04 Jan 2010 15:15

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Narad »

EX ISI Brig. kidnapped; driver killed
October 11, 2012 PIGSHITISTAN
ISLAMABAD (DNA) – An ex ISI Brigadier was kidnapped on Thursday morning from the area of police station Sihala, a few kilo meters away from the capital city.According to a private TV channel, the retried army officer’s car was intercepted near Sihala. On resistence the abductors killed the drive and took the officer with them. The story is developing.
http://dnanews.com.pk/breaking-news-ex- ... er-killed/

I hope allah does Insha and soon we shall enjoy a new beheading video on liveleak.
Last edited by Narad on 11 Oct 2012 16:18, edited 1 time in total.
sum
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10205
Joined: 08 May 2007 17:04
Location: (IT-vity && DRDO) nagar

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by sum »

Hmmm...Wajib-ul-Cutlet?
Suppiah
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2569
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: -
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Suppiah »

This is not fair just because ISI delayed payment by a few days...bunnies should show a bit more patience towards their providers..
Suppiah
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2569
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: -
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Suppiah »

Roadside blast halals 5 in occupied Balochistan.

http://dawn.com/2012/10/11/roadside-bla ... 5-in-sibi/


Meanwhile, Pakis show crystal clear understanding of who is responsible for malala's shooting..Uniformed terrorists to finish the job started by the Murdike Street Irregular boys..
Many in the country blame the United States and the war in neighbouring Afghanistan for the violence
and who is prolonging the war in Afghanistan?

Perhaps that is why they were so outraged over the incident and showed their revulsion exclusively to Chindu...because Unkil is responsible. If it was bunnies, they would have applauded and burst crackers on the streets..
Narad
BRFite
Posts: 886
Joined: 04 Jan 2010 15:15

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Narad »

Its raining Bojitive neuj todin. And it isnt even jumma yet. :D
Suppiah
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2569
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: -
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Suppiah »

Yes pakis cup of woes and our cup of joy is overflowing...

Meanwhile, it transpires, the ISI jehadi terrorist was kidnapped by even purer jehadi terrorists from the Defense Housing Colony in Slumbad!!

http://dawn.com/2012/10/11/former-intel ... islamabad/
Brad Goodman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2443
Joined: 01 Apr 2010 17:00

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Brad Goodman »

Pakis have a big heart- We all know that thanks to ball eater afridi
paki heart is full of terror - We all know that since its inception
so what is the news here? I guess examiner & pakis just now found it out and pakis are not amused about it

http://www.examiner.com/article/brain-eating-amoeba-terrorizes-pakistan
A brain-eating amoeba is striking terror in the hearts of people in Pakistan where 10 people have already died from the fatal infection.
Aditya_V
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14778
Joined: 05 Apr 2006 16:25

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Aditya_V »

Is this ISI walla related to Talat Masood.
member_22872
BRFite
Posts: 1873
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by member_22872 »

We all know that thanks to ball eater afridi
Now a days cricket balls are made from pig skin, experimentally it has been proved that balls made from pig skin have aerodynamic lift and less drag leading good swing. Strange TSPians, especially Afridi doesn't know this simple fact. Even stranger is TSPians love playing cricket using balls made from pig skin.
Suppiah
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2569
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: -
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Suppiah »

Altaf gives 24 hr deadline to Ulemas and muftis to condemn the Malala attack..

Altaf-bhai appears to be unaware of the existence of Chindu which barely minutes after the attack reported widespread revulsion amongst the ulemas and clergy..

The 500 odd mullabaric animals that were considered 'moderate' (of course, by RoP standards) that came out in support of Qadri, should satisfy Altaf-bhai and issue a statement condemning the attack...and promptly become wajibulqatl of course...
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60273
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by ramana »

The girl is only 14 years old and is very articulate about her rights as human.

Yet CNN keeps calling her a young woman implying she is much older.

Shooting girl is even more heinous.
Suppiah
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2569
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: -
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Suppiah »

ramana wrote:The girl is only 14 years old and is very articulate about her rights as human.

Yet CNN keeps calling her a young woman implying she is much older.

Shooting girl is even more heinous.
Perhaps by American standards she is a young woman, by now would have had a few 'partners', an abortion or two and perhaps even a child..
Anujan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7900
Joined: 27 May 2007 03:55

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Anujan »

Another thing is that she has been shot vis a vis education and not blasphemy. Suddenly everyone in Pakistan finds enough testimonials to issue condemnation and express support.

Such bravery and compassion was not seen in the case of two other girls accused of blasphemy.

This is a "safe to condemn" case. Expect much manufactured outrage and opeds in foreign newspapers about how Pakistan itself victim of terrorism.

Would have been fun to spread rumor that she was shot for blasphemy and suddenly hear crickets chirping when all commotion dies down.
Suppiah
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2569
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: -
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Suppiah »

Droneacharya halals 16...sweet!

But the most important thing is here...
The attack was aimed at the compound of Maulana Shakirullah, who is the commander of the Hafiz Gul Bahadur group of the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP),” officials said. The militant wing run by Shakirullah has been linked with the Haqqani network and Al-Qaeda
So it is VERY clear. TTP is NOT the enemy of Pakistan. Pakistan army funds it, because they work together with Haqqani, which is ISI's branch office, to attack Afghanistan..

And yet we have WKKs pretending in this country that Kayani is changing his spots and wants to go after terrorism...you have to be as dumb as Unkil to believe that....
vdutta
BRFite
Posts: 682
Joined: 08 Nov 2002 12:31
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by vdutta »

Donkey Bomb!!! have you ever heard about it?

http://tribune.com.pk/story/450045/8-ki ... kzai-blast
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34981
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by shiv »

arun wrote:
arun wrote:Here is one possible reason why the Islamic Republic of Pakistan has been vociferous in claiming that checking cement by India constitutes a non-tariff barrier (NTB) :wink: .

Besides heroin, ammunition has also been detected:

101 kg heroin found in Pakistani cement bags in Amritsar
:roll: :

Pakistan's googly: Drugs, arms may have been loaded on train in India

More on the story from TOI:

Lahore custom collector make strange claim
Actually I suspect that the smugglers have held a gun to the Lahore customs guys head and put the cargo right in front of his eyes. He must have known about it because if he sings he will be shot. So he will blame India.
Anujan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7900
Joined: 27 May 2007 03:55

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Anujan »

Imran apparently called war in Afghanistan as jihad.

He is making sounds with his mouth that is known to attract drones.
nakul
BRFite
Posts: 1251
Joined: 31 Aug 2011 10:39

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by nakul »

He is UQ's pet. Obama is not known for being pro British. He might 'want to take care' of Im to prevent UQ influence in Pakista.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60273
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by ramana »

Suppaiah, US might be doing a favor for TSPA by going after the TTP. Its extra to the release of funds prohibited by Kerry-Lugar legislation.
Nandu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2195
Joined: 08 Jan 2002 12:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Nandu »

Anujan wrote:Imran apparently called war in Afghanistan as jihad.

He is making sounds with his mouth that is known to attract drones.
RCase
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2600
Joined: 02 Sep 2011 22:50
Location: Awaiting the sabbath of Fry djinns

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by RCase »

vdutta wrote:Donkey Bomb!!! have you ever heard about it?

http://tribune.com.pk/story/450045/8-ki ... kzai-blast
Are you sure it was not a slip of the tongue/pen by the reporter to refer to a jihadi abdul? :rotfl:
RCase
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2600
Joined: 02 Sep 2011 22:50
Location: Awaiting the sabbath of Fry djinns

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by RCase »

Anujan wrote:Another thing is that she has been shot vis a vis education and not blasphemy. Suddenly everyone in Pakistan finds enough testimonials to issue condemnation and express support.

Such bravery and compassion was not seen in the case of two other girls accused of blasphemy.

This is a "safe to condemn" case. Expect much manufactured outrage and opeds in foreign newspapers about how Pakistan itself victim of terrorism.

Would have been fun to spread rumor that she was shot for blasphemy and suddenly hear crickets chirping when all commotion dies down.
Err... weren't the bunnies claiming that she was spreading "obscenity", which is against the moral code for all generations, all times as prescribed in their book. Per the bunnies, she was committing blasphemy by defying the code of conduct for women laid out in the book.
vishvak
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 5836
Joined: 12 Aug 2011 21:19

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by vishvak »

60,000/- for every militant killed in Kashmir
Per the last answer. Notwithstanding other propaganda, any idea how such large amounts are provided to to Jamaat?
joygoswami
BRFite
Posts: 523
Joined: 11 May 2010 19:08
Location: Destination Moon For 5yrs with Zaid Hamid

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by joygoswami »

The whole nature of this unfortunate incident seems really fishy and more of a Psy-Ops to me so that Bakistan can call itself biggest victims of terrorism. Why did the Bunnies target this poor and frail girl now, and let her live ? Seems like Deep State has something on their mind, or something they are trying to project. First Rimisha and now this, are they trying to show a United Bakistan majority, who is tolerant and condoms such activities ? Are they trying to show that Bakistan is a moderate Islamic state ? This is where it does not go well with us. Someone once said here, that Bakistan needs Islam, more and more of it. Islam cannot survive without Bakistan, world cannot survive without Islam. Bakistan needs Islam, Bakistanis must be more Islamic.
Rangudu
BRFite
Posts: 1751
Joined: 03 Mar 2002 12:31
Location: USA

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Rangudu »

Anujan wrote:Would have been fun to spread rumor that she was shot for blasphemy and suddenly hear crickets chirping when all commotion dies down.
I remember a wise soul once (fake) tweeting about a Karachi TSPian 'liberal' book fair people condemning Mumtaz Qadri and the immediate spate of denials by all the 'liberals' realizing their risk of being cutlet-ized :rotfl:
Anujan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7900
Joined: 27 May 2007 03:55

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Anujan »

In twitter? I remember seeing that.
krisna
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5881
Joined: 22 Dec 2008 06:36

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by krisna »

Suppiah wrote:<snip>

Perhaps by American standards she is a young woman, by now would have had a few 'partners', an abortion or two and perhaps even a child..
Islam does not allow killing children. Also killing of an innocent human being means killing humanity.
By mullah standards she is fit to be married and have children.

Hence by lahori logic, she is not a child, not innocent, an adult woman and a non muslim now because she has been shot. :(

So the killer apdul goes to jannat when he is shaheeded later to get his 72.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25382
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by SSridhar »

ramana & Suppiah, I doubt if the drone attack was with the knowledge of the PA or to help the PA. Hafiz Gul Bahadur of North Waziristan, whose commander is Maulana Shakiruulah, has always been a good Taliban. He is the grandson of the famous jihadi Faqir of Ipi who was used by Jinnah & the Muslim League in the creation of Pakistan. Gul Bahadur and his 10000-odd North Waziris provide support and protection to the Haqqani network in these areas. In c. 2006, the PA signed a peace deal with Gul Bahadur thereby formally acceding to the Taliban rule there. Along with Maulana Nazir Ahmed of South Waziristan, Gul Bahadur was used by the PA to de-stabilize the Mehsud clout (Nek Mohammed, Baitullah Mehsud et al). They were encouraged to form an exclusive ‘Wazirir Alliance’ known as ‘Muqami Tehreek-e-Taliban’ to contain specifically the growing popularity of Baitullah Mehsud. The clannish enmity between the Ahmedzai Wazirs (of Maulana Nazir Ahmed) and the Uthmanzai Wazirs (of Gul Bahadur) with the Mehsuds goes a long, long way back in a region where revenge is never forgotten.

Of course, Gul Bahadur, Nazir Ahmed & Baitullah Mehsud also came together for a brief period in mid-2009 when they felt that the PA was going dangerously close with the Americans and might launch a combined attack on them. Hafiz Gul Bahadur formally revoked on June 29, 2009, the peace treaty he had signed earlier with the Pakistani Army. Just a day before, June 28, 2009, Gul Bahadur attacked a Pakistani Army convoy killing 40 soldiers and immediately thereafter Maulvi Nazeer Ahmed rocket-attacked the Frontier Corps’ camp in Wana. Gul Bahadur justified the scrapping of the peace deal citing the US drone attacks in North Waziristan as well as PA action in Bannu which is under the control of Gul Bahadur. It later turned out that a more ominous reason for the united efforts of these three warlords was because of the US push in Helmand . The US wanted the Pakistan Army to prevent the Taliban from crossing the porous Waziristan borders and move into Helmand. The TTP pre-empted that through its action. I would charitably guess that the PA instructed Gul Bahadur and Nazir Ahmed to attack itself so as to cite that as a reason to escape the US pressure to move troops into North Waziristan and seal the border.

When the PA launched Op. Rah-e-Nijat (Path to Salvation) in South Waziristan in October 2009 (barely 3 months after the attack on the PA by Gul Bahdur & Nazir Ahmed), both of them 'decided' to remain neutral allowing Baitullah to his own fate. The PA has been suggesting that South Waziristan must be divided into two regions, one for the Waziris and the other for the Mehsuds. For almost five years now, PA has successfully deflected huge US pressure to act in North Waziristan saying it would do so at a time & place of its choice. That time has not yet come. On the whole, therefore, the PA cannot let go of the Haqqanis and Gul Bahadur.
Suppiah
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2569
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: -
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Suppiah »

SS garu, isn't TTP supposed to be the bad taliban? or are there two bunch of green warriors going by that name, one that nearly killed Malala and one that works with Hafiz Gul Bahadur, who is the 'good' taliban? Is this a side effect TSPA is happy to live with, given the strategic benefits that can accrue in Afghan theatre?
Virupaksha
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 3110
Joined: 28 Jun 2007 06:36

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Virupaksha »

It was by Majorlyprofound on Karachi literature fair. Up until there were articles that these TFTAs were defying taliban and so on. Once the major tweeted, these "liberals" issued denails faster than they down hill skiied at kargil

http://indiansinpakistan.blogspot.com/2 ... eetar.html
Suppiah
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2569
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: -
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Suppiah »

50 mullas miss the point and declare themselves bull-cattle

It should be pretty obvious the Taliban knows its Quran...mullahs are quoting stuff out of context and end up making errors..that may cost them their life..
Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) had regarded the sanctity of Muslim’s life and property more important than the sanctity of the ‘Kaaba’ (sacred Muslim place)
firstly we have to thank the mullas for clarifying that only Muslim life is sanctified and by inference, kufrs' aren't and they can be killed at will. Furthermore, as Taliban would rightly point out, the girl is not Muslim anyway due to her actions..
TTP spokesman Ehsanullah Ehsan had argued that it is “not just allowed … but obligatory in Islam” to kill such a person involved “in leading a campaign against Shariah and (who) tries to involve whole community in such campaign, and that personality becomes a symbol of anti-Shariah campaign.”
Precisely...at least this guy is not a hypocrite who sugar-coats the message to suit western audience..he knows his book. Us dhimmis should have no quarrel with this philosophy, if they are applying it to TSP which is the citadel of Islam...
Last edited by Suppiah on 12 Oct 2012 07:41, edited 1 time in total.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25382
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by SSridhar »

Suppiah wrote:SS garu, isn't TTP supposed to be the bad taliban? or are there two bunch of green warriors going by that name, one that nearly killed Malala and one that works with Hafiz Gul Bahadur, who is the 'good' taliban? Is this a side effect TSPA is happy to live with, given the strategic benefits that can accrue in Afghan theatre?
Suppiah, the below is what I posted earlier here.
The 'good Taliban' and 'bad Taliban' play the 'good cop' and 'bad cop' role respectively. There is no division between them, save for the internecine tribal differences that go back centuries. Haqqani always mediated when things got out of control between the Waziris and the Mehsuds. The PA tried to exploit the differences to its advantage. This is akin to the mujahideen's jihad against the USSR. They were again disparate and had to be marshalled by the ISI. The ISI wanted to have a similar role between the 'good' and the 'bad' Taliban. It did not pan out that way.

On the broader canvas of opposition to the Yahuds, Hanuds and the Nasaras, as well as the establishment of the Caliphate through Pakistan, the two Talibans are together along with a large section of the Pakistani Army itself. The 'good Taliban' appear 'good' to the Pakistanis because for the time being, they are fighting the Americans in Afghanistan. The 'bad Taliban' appear 'bad' to the Pakistanis because they have been concentrating on Pakistan. For the discerning though, these are the twin objectives of the AQAM. There is no contradiction in their approach.

A time will come though when the 'good Taliban' will also turn 'bad'.
Suppiah
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2569
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: -
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Suppiah »

Thanks...I guess one extra common good bonus re both Taliban, good and bad, is that by using Islam as a unifying force, they keep Pashtun as well as Balochi/Sindhi nationalism in check, and in that respect become useful to TSPA..
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25382
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by SSridhar »

At one point of time, when Baitullah was ruling the roost, the strength of TTP was estimated at over 50,000 men comprising of Hakimullah (Orakzai and Kurram with 8,000 men), Rehmanullah and Hazrat Ali (Khyber, 1,200 and owing allegiance to Hakimullah), Umar Khalid (Mohmand, 5,000), and Faqir Muhammad (Bajaur, 5,000). Baitullah himself was estimated to possess 30,000 warriors, supplemented with Tahir Yuldashev’s 4,000 Uzbeks and other “foreigners”.

Note that this estimate did not include the 'good' Taliban Hafiz Gul Bahadur & Maulvi Nazir Ahmed.
Hari Seldon
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9374
Joined: 27 Jul 2009 12:47
Location: University of Trantor

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Hari Seldon »

vishvak wrote:60,000/- for every militant killed in Kashmir
Per the last answer. Notwithstanding other propaganda, any idea how such large amounts are provided to to Jamaat?
Let the IA rejoice in the fact that each pakroach they dispath in J&K also bleeds some of the jamaat's coffers. Hope the IA causes millions in monetary losses to the Jammat only.
Pratyush
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12686
Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Pratyush »

60000 is peanuts :(( . What is done in 60000. They need to pay more then 10 times of that :((
pralay
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 529
Joined: 24 May 2009 23:07

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by pralay »

RCase wrote:
vdutta wrote:Donkey Bomb!!! have you ever heard about it?

http://tribune.com.pk/story/450045/8-ki ... kzai-blast
Are you sure it was not a slip of the tongue/pen by the reporter to refer to a jihadi abdul? :rotfl:
Read the comments,
Everyone is worried about the donkey :rotfl: :rotfl: ROFL
Noone cares for the bakis...
I hab launched brotest.... :rotfl: :rotfl:
Suppiah
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2569
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: -
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Suppiah »

Pratyush wrote:60000 is peanuts :(( . What is done in 60000. They need to pay more then 10 times of that :((
Raa should offer Rs.61,000 if they go back and kill their sponsors...like Angel Eyes does in the Good/Bad/Ugly movie..
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25382
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by SSridhar »

Pakistani Military Ready for any Sacrifice to Eliminate Terror - DAWN
Excerpts
A top general, who was not authorised to officially speak, while sharing the military’s assessment said: “The situation is ripe, people are themselves asking for operation in North Waziristan.”

He, however, noted that a political decision would be required before initiating the operation.

Military had long avoided involving itself in a campaign in North Waziristan on the pretext that it was engaged in other parts of the tribal region. Now with no major operation taking place except for Orakzai Agency, the army may think it to be feasible to go into the area it had long avoided.

The Rawalpindi kidnapping of a retired brigadier with intelligence background may be yet another indication of things moving fast towards the ultimate face-off.
Post Reply