Bharat Rakshak Forum Announcement

Hello Everyone,

A warm welcome back to the Bharat Rakshak Forum.

Important Notice: Due to a corruption in the BR forum database we regret to announce that data records relating to some of our registered users have been lost. We estimate approx. 500 user details are deleted.

To ease the process of recreating the user IDs we request members that have previously posted on the BR forums to recognise and identify their posts, once the posts are identified please contact the BRF moderator team by emailing BRF Mod Team with your post details.

The mod team will be able to update your username, email etc. so that the user history can be maintained.

Unfortunately for members that have never posted or have had all their posts deleted i.e. users that have 0 posts, we will be unable to recreate your account hence we request that you re-register again.

We apologise for any inconvenience caused and thank you for your understanding.

Regards,
Seetal

China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

The Military Issues & History Forum is a venue to discuss issues relating to the military aspects of the Indian Armed Forces, whether the past, present or future. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 29071
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby shiv » 12 Nov 2012 05:44

ashi wrote:
Last few days there is news spread around that J-10B is entering service next year. If that is true, we will know what engine they put in production soon.

Ashi-ji, do you know why western companies do not worry about exporting engines - at least civilian ones to almost any nation. This is because
1. They make money
2. They know damn well that engines cannot be cloned

Either way these engines are on display to anyone who wants to see them. But Chinese engines do not even make it to airshows outside China. What is there to hide? I will answer that question. I think that Chinese are so hooked on not being shamed that no one wants to admit failures. And in the Chinese communist system anyone who brings shame will be punished and punishment by death or imprisonment is common for offences seen as inimical to the state. Therefore the Chinese will only gloat and boast about successes. They will never mention failures. Only Pakistanis believe that. Any nation that actually works on technology will know that there can be failures and will admit them.

There are political reasons in China that demand that the Chinese state shows only progress, prosperity and leadership. The communist party oligarchy takes credit for that. So China never has failures. All successes. Your engines are perfect. You fighters don't crash. Your nation has done in 1 year what the US took 40 years to do. Go tell that to the admiring Chinese people and your united partners in Tibet, Xinjiang, Pakistan and North Korea. They have an eager audience listening to you.

pentaiah
BRFite
Posts: 1676
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby pentaiah » 12 Nov 2012 05:46

India at this stage should worry about internal subversion than the traditional route of external aggression.

The only exception with PRC and other powers with stealth a/c nuke bums is that PRC is a commie and hand in glove with TSP and its other benefactors.
In addition we have border and consequently a dispute as well

Right now our priority would be a good nationalistic governance and catch up with PRC
But that is too much to aspire
Parklam
Aka dekha jaye

shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 29071
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby shiv » 12 Nov 2012 05:57

pentaiah wrote:India at this stage should worry about internal subversion than the traditional route of external aggression.


pentaiah ji. there is a separate thread for what India should worry about. This thread is not about India and all the worries that it should have. It is about China.

Here is a link to a thread where one can post Indian worries. Not here please
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=6459

NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14181
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby NRao » 12 Nov 2012 06:27

Not a military related topic, nonetheless related:

Economist magazine bets professor over China's future

A lot of growth is fake


Like a lot of things in China.

BUT, here is an old argument - from an economics PoV. Honesty and reality for you.

ashi
BRFite
Posts: 456
Joined: 19 Feb 2009 13:30

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby ashi » 12 Nov 2012 07:09

shiv wrote:
ashi wrote:
Last few days there is news spread around that J-10B is entering service next year. If that is true, we will know what engine they put in production soon.

Ashi-ji, do you know why western companies do not worry about exporting engines - at least civilian ones to almost any nation. This is because
1. They make money
2. They know damn well that engines cannot be cloned

Either way these engines are on display to anyone who wants to see them. But Chinese engines do not even make it to airshows outside China. What is there to hide? I will answer that question. I think that Chinese are so hooked on not being shamed that no one wants to admit failures. And in the Chinese communist system anyone who brings shame will be punished and punishment by death or imprisonment is common for offences seen as inimical to the state. Therefore the Chinese will only gloat and boast about successes. They will never mention failures. Only Pakistanis believe that. Any nation that actually works on technology will know that there can be failures and will admit them.

There are political reasons in China that demand that the Chinese state shows only progress, prosperity and leadership. The communist party oligarchy takes credit for that. So China never has failures. All successes. Your engines are perfect. You fighters don't crash. Your nation has done in 1 year what the US took 40 years to do. Go tell that to the admiring Chinese people and your united partners in Tibet, Xinjiang, Pakistan and North Korea. They have an eager audience listening to you.


How many failures happened before don't matter. Success is all it counts.

I remembered a decade ago that forum members here used to dismiss every photo of J-10 as photoshop products, when J-10 finally flew in public, "oh it flew like a cargo plane" "Oh it is crap". This is being repeated for j-20 and j-31,and the future new products. Something is just never changed here, but I enjoyed reading that...

Can't wait for another decade. :-)

KrishnaK
BRFite
Posts: 747
Joined: 29 Mar 2005 23:00

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby KrishnaK » 12 Nov 2012 07:10

shiv,
point acknowledged.

Kanson
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2849
Joined: 20 Oct 2006 21:00

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby Kanson » 12 Nov 2012 07:26

ashi wrote:I remembered a decade ago that forum members here used to dismiss every photo of J-10 as photoshop products, when J-10 finally flew in public, "oh it flew like a cargo plane" "Oh it is crap". This is being repeated for j-20 and j-31,and the future new products. Something is just never changed here, but I enjoyed reading that...


Like the way Chinese forums treated F-35 and LCA . hmm....? We too are watching.. :wink:

shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 29071
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby shiv » 12 Nov 2012 07:40

ashi wrote:How many failures happened before don't matter. Success is all it counts.

I remembered a decade ago that forum members here used to dismiss every photo of J-10 as photoshop products, when J-10 finally flew in public, "oh it flew like a cargo plane" "Oh it is crap". This is being repeated for j-20 and j-31,and the future new products. Something is just never changed here, but I enjoyed reading that...



"Failures of the past don't matter. Success is what counts" explains exactly what i am trying to say.

Chinese failures in the past are well known despite denials.

Chinese successes are in the future (for which you are going to wait a decade)

It is the present that I am talking about, with a history of failure in the past and success still in the future. I believe in enjoying the present moment, and will watch you squirm for a decade after which we will know what else is failing. I am sure you will enjoy reading everything here. Keep coming back. :D

Kanson
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2849
Joined: 20 Oct 2006 21:00

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby Kanson » 12 Nov 2012 07:51

KrishnaK wrote: If that point is valid for judging the performance of Chinese aircraft, surely it must stand for judging Shukla's integrity or the lack thereof. He might just have access to information we lack.

You must be knowing that Stealth (as referred to 5th gen a/c) is more than mere external shapes. If you are wondering what is being referred here, it was reported Rafale which India planning to purchase performed 'exceptionally well' against F-22, only stealth fighter in service and publicized to be unmatched to existing fighters. So Stealth has several aspects than mere shapes and even F-22 is vulnerable to a lowly 4+ gen fighter like Rafale.

So if the J-31 just flew after taxi trials, how can anyone can tell, "but would certainly be outclassed by the stealthy J-31 whenever it enters service." Shukla used 'outclassed' and not 'outmatched'. Is it not just stupid at this stage to use that phrase..... It is up to your judgement.

Kanson
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2849
Joined: 20 Oct 2006 21:00

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby Kanson » 12 Nov 2012 07:58

Samay wrote:
Unable to copy it, China tries building own jet engine
(Reuters) - China has designed nuclear missiles and blasted astronauts into space, but one vital technology remains out of reach. Despite decades of research and development, China has so far failed to build a reliable, high performance jet engine.

This may be about to change. China's aviation sector is striving for a breakthrough that would end its dependence on Russian and Western power plants for military and commercial aircraft.

Beijing is evaluating a 100 billion yuan plan to galvanize a disjointed and under-funded engine research effort, aviation industry officials say. :eek: The giant, state-owned Aviation Industry Corporation of China AVIC.L, China's dominant military and commercial aviation contractor, has been lobbying hard for the extra money, officials familiar with the details say.

AVIC, with more than 400,000 employees and 200 subsidiaries including 20 listed companies, has already set aside about 10 billion yuan of its own funds for jet engine development over the next three years.

The engine financing plan is under high-level discussion in Beijing, said Zhao Yuxing, an official at the securities office of Shanghai-listed Xi'an Aero-Engine Plc (600893.SS), a key military engine-making unit of AVIC. "What we know is our company has been included in the strategic programme, which is designed to greatly develop and support the engine industry," he said by phone from his company's headquarters in the northwestern city of Xi'an.

China's military industry as a whole has suffered from Tiananmen-era bans on the sale of military equipment from the United States and Europe. Moreover, foreign engine-makers have been loath to transfer technology. That has prevented China from taking its usual route to closing a technology gap: copying it.

Some Chinese aviation industry specialists forecast that Beijing will eventually spend up to 300 billion yuan on jet engine development over the next two decades.

"China's aircraft engines have obviously been under-invested," said Wang Tianyi, a defence sector analyst with Shanghai's Orient Securities. "One hundred billion yuan is not a huge amount of money in the engine world."

JEALOUSLY GUARDED SECRETS

While AVIC's long term priority is to develop high performance engines for military aircraft, it is also trying to design power plants for passenger aircraft in the world's fastest growing civil aviation market. Based on projected demand from Western aircraft manufacturers, engines for new passenger aircraft delivered in China could be worth more than $100 billion over the next 20 years.

"Historically, all major players in aerospace have possessed both airframe and engine design capabilities," said Carlo Kopp, the Melbourne, Australia-based founder of Air Power Australia, an independent military aviation think tank. "Until China can design and produce competitive engines, the performance and capabilities of Chinese aircraft designs will be seriously limited by what technology they are permitted to import."

....

That's an overkill
300 bn Yuan is a huge sum of money for engine tech only.
Given the fact that in case of china, its reported after it had already started (WS series was declared a no go much earlier,so that means re-engineering efforts must have started somwhere near 2009.) , they would have completed initial models by now.
This sum of money they are willing to invest will be nearly $50 bn by 2025, that's the half of the spending on arms we will be doing by then,given the pace .
It also means that they want to enter in export quality civilian/military aircraft market by 2025 or earlier and also that they dont want to rely on any supplier in war like situations..
These concerted efforts are in the area of quality improvement only..
Whatever we are ranting here about their quality and technological depth , such is going to change rapidly in the next decade, because the data speaks for itself. ?


Heard about infamous Chinese accounting practices ?

ashi
BRFite
Posts: 456
Joined: 19 Feb 2009 13:30

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby ashi » 12 Nov 2012 13:15


Will
BRFite
Posts: 481
Joined: 28 Apr 2011 11:27

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby Will » 12 Nov 2012 20:44

Well if there is one thing that the activity of this thread proves , it is that India is finally moving from being obsessed with Pakistan to being obsessed with China. Not an entirely bad thing.Its good that the country realises that Pakistan is just a rash which wont go away but if India dreams of great power status , China is the one that should be focused upon.Not the dhoti shivering kind of focus ofcourse :)

Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14887
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby Philip » 12 Nov 2012 21:12

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/ar ... b10c48.221

Chinese sub-launched nuclear deterrent at hand-report

(AFP) – 2 days ago

WASHINGTON — For the first time China is close to reaching a "credible" nuclear deterrent based on land-based, submarine-launched and air-dropped nuclear weapons, a draft US report warned Friday.

The report by the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission said China's military, the People's Liberation Army, "continues to modernize and expand its nuclear stockpile."

"China is now on the cusp of attaining a credible nuclear triad of land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles, submarine-launched ballistic missiles, and air-dropped nuclear bombs."

AFP obtained a draft of the annual report, scheduled to be delivered to the US Congress on Wednesday.

China has had "a symbolic ballistic missile submarine capability" for decades, based on a single aging submarine, but it is now close to having its first "credible, near-continuous at-sea strategic deterrent," the report said.

Two JIN-class submarines capable of launching missiles have already been deployed and three more are planned.

They will be equipped with JL-2 intercontinental ballistic missiles -- a program still in development that "may reach initial operating capability within the next two years," the report said, quoting the US Department of Defense.

China has been a nuclear power since 1964, and the country currently has between 50 and 75 land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles.

China also has some 20 long-distance aircraft able to deliver nuclear bombs, according to the Federation of American Scientists (FAS), also cited in the report.

The report cautioned that the Asian giant "has disclosed little information about the size, composition, and disposition of its nuclear forces, which yields uncertainties about the size and characteristics of its warhead inventory."

"Outside assessments from western observers, which generally range from about 100 to 500 warheads, but cluster around 240, rely heavily upon assumption," the report said.

Likewise, China's process of authorizing the use of a nuclear weapon also remains obscure.

"Questions remain about whether China has a 'two-man rule' or other provisions in place to ensure that, with emerging mobile platforms, launches can take place only with authorization," the report said.

Also worrisome to US officials is the relationship between China's civilians and their military.

"What worries me most are the disconnects that tend to occur between (China's) government and their military," said former US Joint Chiefs of Staff vice chairman James Cartwright in testimony to the commission.

The report pointed to China's 2007 anti-satellite demonstration, and the 2011 test flight of its J-20 fighter aircraft that took place as US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates was visiting China, "both of which may have caught China's civilian leadership off guar

yantra
BRFite
Posts: 177
Joined: 28 Jul 2010 03:46

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby yantra » 13 Nov 2012 03:22

Not sure of the authenticity of this content here, but posting it for what it is worth:

http://tiananmenstremendousachievements ... sterpiece/

1. [Report by huanqui.com reporter Li Zongze] According to speculation by Radio Voice of Russia’s website, China’s second type of fifth-generation fighter J-31 is a “pirated copy” of US F-35 fighter.

According to the report, it has been very clear since the appearance of the first batch of photos of J-31 where the designers of Shenyang Aircraft Corporation got their inspiration. The batch of photos on the first flight of J-31 displays the aircraft from various angles and shows that undoubtedly the type of aircraft is a copy of US F-35 fighter. It can be said that the fact that the Chinese fighter has been developed according to a prototype of F-35 is not a surprising piece of news. (Source of the photo: Mutha of top81.cn)

2. According to the report, in 2009, hackers from China broke into the net of a company taking part in developing F-35 fighter and then entered the website of the Pentagon and stole lots of information about that type of aircraft. That fact has been widely known. It was believed earlier that the information though substantial in amount is not enough for making a copy of F-35 fighter, still it enables quite a detailed understanding of its shape and capability and is enough for developing the methods to counter the fighter. (Source of the photo: Mutha of top81.cn)

3. The report quotes The Russian strategic analysis and technology center expert Vassily Kazi’s words that we cannot yet say that the Chinese have entirely copied F-35. In order to copy it, they have to master various technology for aircraft engine, and the electronic radar and operation system of the aircraft. The technological level in those and other aspects exceeds by far the technological capability of Chinese industry. Judging by the flight of J-31 prototype, the plane must be installed with the Russian RD-93 engine, which China uses in equipping its FC-1 fighters for export. (Source of the photo: Mutha of top81.cn)

4. If that is the case, the power plant of China’s newest type of fighter does not come from the equipment of the most excellent fourth-generation fighter that began to enter Russian air force in 1983. For years China has been developing its WS-13 Tianshan type of engine by reference to RD-93 engine. However, perhaps that project has not yet been completed. So far China does not seem to have mastered some important technology of the fifth-generation fighter such as active phased array radar. (Source of the photo: Mutha of top81.cn)

5. Therefore, both J-31 and J-20 that conducted its test flight one and a half years ago seem to be prototypes for technological display. It takes a long time to provide the parts and systems they need. It seems that at the very beginning, some of the parts and system have to be imported and then there will be gradual transition to domestic production of them. On the other hand, if J-20 as a whole can be regarded as the structure of a unique design, J-31 is entirely a copy of foreign aircraft whether in its appearance, major technical index or even other series of design schemes. (Source of the photo: Mutha of top81.cn)

6. Vassily Kazi believes: “Under the circumstances where designers obviously lack creativeness, J-31 will become a conspicuous mark of the final arrival of the era of computer spying.” In spite of the approximately 30 years since the emergence of computer spying, quite a few people still regard this type of spying as an abstract concept. Now, we have been able to tell those who regard computer spying as fantastic talks that this method to obtain technology has been quite mature.

This page consists of one photo of J-31 and one of F-35 to make a comparison between the two.

7. In addition, Vassily Kazi believes that for China, such act of copying foreign technology is not entirely desirable. It is unavoidable to rely for development on purchase or stealing of technology at a certain stage of development, but that approach shall not be regarded as a long-term strategy for success. The habit of drawing in technology will restrain a country’s potential of creation and hinder the progress of independent implementation of complicated projects. With its huge capability of technology spying, the Soviet Union also vigorously stole Western technology. However, when copying foreign prototypes become the major approach of development in a certain area, the Soviet Union always fell behind the West in that area of technology.

This page also consists of one photo of J-31 and one of F-35 to make a comparison between the two.

The photos can be seen at:

http://mil.huanqiu.com/mlitaryvision/20 ... 71523.html


member_23694
BRFite
Posts: 732
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby member_23694 » 14 Nov 2012 10:28

Austin wrote:Engine Tech, Cyber-Espionage Key To China’s Progress


Good for us that they are facing problem with engine development :D , and probably also with cutting edge avionics.
But then China is now trying to get SU 35 from Russia, how does it compare with SU 30 MKI.

Also we make noises about US providing arms to Pakistan, but if Russia provides Su 35 to China then it will have
serious impact on our security. Should we not raise the issue with Russia regarding arming of China with all these
cutting edge tech.
Any opinions ?

Singha
Forum Moderator
Posts: 50112
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: I stood eye to eye with The Beast and he told me everything...

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby Singha » 14 Nov 2012 11:27

su35BM spec is much superior to su30 in a2a t:w regime atleast. its t:w is superior to any fighter barring the raptor. it features a bigger and more powerful engine and being 1-seater does not have 2nd pilot and cockpit weight penalty.
armed with the new crop of MRAAM and LRAAM Rus is developing, the Irbis-E and perhaps side looking X-band panels backported from the PAKFA, it should be fit enough to devastate almost anything out there...combined with the trademark massive combat radius of the flanker family.

it is in a sense the ultimate evolution of the noble Flanker bloodline...the last and greatest black stallion of the herd.

that being said, Rus might not be so keen to sell it right now, unless PAKFA production and tech stabilizes.

member_23694
BRFite
Posts: 732
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby member_23694 » 14 Nov 2012 20:09

Singha wrote:that being said, Rus might not be so keen to sell it right now, unless PAKFA production and tech stabilizes.


In the link (http://idrw.org/?p=15621#more-15621) it suggests that Russia is more interested in selling large numbers of Su 35 to China rather than a few which could be used for reverse engineering.
If that is the case then Russia is ready is in a way to arm China with a capability to neutralise Su 30 MKI and this will not be a good option for Indo-Russian relation.
Does India try to pursuade Russia to prevent such sales ? How much of India's request/concerns are taken into consideration by Russia while making decision on Arms sales ( Though Russia is sensitive for weapon sales to Pakistan but it does not seem to be the case with China).

How much concern should we be if China is in a position to deploy Su 35BM in the near future and what are our options. TIA

RamaY
BRF Oldie
Posts: 17260
Joined: 10 Aug 2006 21:11
Location: http://bharata-bhuti.blogspot.com/

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby RamaY » 14 Nov 2012 20:18


Combining these two and knowing where India is in these two aspects, looks like India is not that far behind China in MIC development. Good going.

RamaY
BRF Oldie
Posts: 17260
Joined: 10 Aug 2006 21:11
Location: http://bharata-bhuti.blogspot.com/

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby RamaY » 14 Nov 2012 21:08

ashi wrote:Can't wait for another decade. :-)


I think this is the truth.

The J-20 was one of the stealth fighter programs under the codename J-XX that was launched in the late 1990s. Now we are in 2012. I am sure this plane will reach operational levels in another decade say 2022-2025.

So we are looking at a 30 year duration between conception and operationalization.

I hope Chinese will use chindigeneous engines in this flight when it goes into production.

Boreas
BRFite
Posts: 316
Joined: 23 Jan 2011 11:24

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby Boreas » 15 Nov 2012 01:29

dhiraj wrote:
Singha wrote:that being said, Rus might not be so keen to sell it right now, unless PAKFA production and tech stabilizes.


In the link (http://idrw.org/?p=15621#more-15621) it suggests that Russia is more interested in selling large numbers of Su 35 to China rather than a few which could be used for reverse engineering.
If that is the case then Russia is ready is in a way to arm China with a capability to neutralise Su 30 MKI and this will not be a good option for Indo-Russian relation.
Does India try to pursuade Russia to prevent such sales ? How much of India's request/concerns are taken into consideration by Russia while making decision on Arms sales ( Though Russia is sensitive for weapon sales to Pakistan but it does not seem to be the case with China).

How much concern should we be if China is in a position to deploy Su 35BM in the near future and what are our options. TIA


long long long time ago.. it was like Rus-China = brothers, Rus-India = friends

long long timme ago.. Rus-China = border fight >> suspicion >> china-US frnds, Rus-India = best friends

long time ago.. Rus-China = friends again, Rus gave a lot of weaponery, china started to create carbon copies, Rus-India = best friends, India got weaponery, started to license produce them

Some time ago Rus-China = friend +suspicion, china rich, Rus sold latest minus one technology to them, Rus-India = Time Tested Partners, latest plus one technology

Present Rus-China = future allies against USofA, re-negotiations are ON, Rus-India = friends+pressure tactics, gorki curse, lot of joint projects on stake

Future Rus-China = friends, with all out sharing, china copying again, but Rus not minding, Rus-India = frnds+suspicion, delayed joint projects, India-US = more and more timely delivered machines, Rus-Pakistan = direct sale of stuff like helicopters and troop carriers

Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19035
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby Prem » 15 Nov 2012 01:51

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2 ... =obnetwork
5 Things the Pentagon Isn't Telling Us About the Chinese Military
1. What are China's long-term defense spending plans?
2. What is China's nuclear strategy?
3.What is the Chinese navy up to?
4. What kind of space capabilities is China developing?
5. Paper tiger or fire-breathing dragon?

( Long article , all five points are discussed)

ashi
BRFite
Posts: 456
Joined: 19 Feb 2009 13:30

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby ashi » 16 Nov 2012 22:34

More WZ-10

Don
BRFite
Posts: 412
Joined: 09 Dec 2002 12:31

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby Don » 16 Nov 2012 23:36

ashi wrote:More WZ-10

Wow....thats awesome. There are 4 squadron or 48 machines in service already with production commencing.
Last edited by Don on 17 Nov 2012 20:13, edited 3 times in total.

ashi
BRFite
Posts: 456
Joined: 19 Feb 2009 13:30

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby ashi » 17 Nov 2012 11:12

J-10 show

shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 29071
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby shiv » 17 Nov 2012 16:22

ashi wrote:J-10 show


Bah. What a bore. What's it with Chinese camerapersons? Are they incapable of showing one complete aircraft performance from beginning to end? Out of 4 minutes - there is only one square loop with rollover at the top shown fully. Everything else is like coitus interruptus. What is the point in showing takeoff in slow motion?

Brando
BRFite
Posts: 676
Joined: 26 Feb 2008 06:18

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby Brando » 17 Nov 2012 18:59

^^ It doesn't really matter what we think, if they have an aerobatics team based on the J10 platform then they must be very confident of it's ability and reliability. That is an achievement for any nation that is building its own fighters from scratch.

member_22872
BRFite
Posts: 1873
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby member_22872 » 17 Nov 2012 19:08

But then, why wont they have confidence with Russian engines? without engines what they have is an unflyable airframe, so the confidence is driven by engines, which they can't make, so they can make N designs, without the confidence of the ability to make indigenous engines, and the airframes are copies of Russian or American planes, what is so inspiring?, what is from scratch?

Don
BRFite
Posts: 412
Joined: 09 Dec 2002 12:31

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby Don » 17 Nov 2012 19:56

shiv wrote:
ashi wrote:J-10 show


Bah. What a bore. What's it with Chinese camerapersons? Are they incapable of showing one complete aircraft performance from beginning to end? Out of 4 minutes - there is only one square loop with rollover at the top shown fully. Everything else is like coitus interruptus. What is the point in showing takeoff in slow motion?

I agree boring....

shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 29071
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby shiv » 17 Nov 2012 20:01

Brando wrote:^^ It doesn't really matter what we think, if they have an aerobatics team based on the J10 platform then they must be very confident of it's ability and reliability. That is an achievement for any nation that is building its own fighters from scratch.


Hmm yes. Like Romania and Yugoslavia in the 60s. Indigenous jet fighters used for aerobatics.

Don
BRFite
Posts: 412
Joined: 09 Dec 2002 12:31

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby Don » 17 Nov 2012 20:10

ashi wrote:More WZ-10

Z-10 High end and Z-19 will form low end. There are 3 squadron of Z19 in service or 36 machines with production continuing.

Image
Image
Last edited by Don on 17 Nov 2012 20:16, edited 2 times in total.

Don
BRFite
Posts: 412
Joined: 09 Dec 2002 12:31

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby Don » 17 Nov 2012 20:11

double post

Brando
BRFite
Posts: 676
Joined: 26 Feb 2008 06:18

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby Brando » 17 Nov 2012 20:16

shiv wrote:Hmm yes. Like Romania and Yugoslavia in the 60s. Indigenous jet fighters used for aerobatics.


Yes, just like the Surya Kiran's with the HJT-16...........

shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 29071
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby shiv » 17 Nov 2012 20:50

Brando wrote:
shiv wrote:Hmm yes. Like Romania and Yugoslavia in the 60s. Indigenous jet fighters used for aerobatics.


Yes, just like the Surya Kiran's with the HJT-16...........

My OT response in the appropriate thread for this
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=6459&p=1365068#p1365068

NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14181
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby NRao » 17 Nov 2012 21:31

That is an achievement for any nation that is building its own fighters from scratch.


Since Chinese planes/helos are copies I will sleep well.

Relative to where they were it is an "achievement". Else it is a trap. Stagflation.

Unless of course they are able to steal more.

asprinzl
BRFite
Posts: 408
Joined: 08 Sep 2004 05:00

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby asprinzl » 17 Nov 2012 22:29

Helicopter gunships are impressive toys for counter insurgency (where you don't need air superiority) and ground combat against another military force (with the help of fighter jets giving you cover). So, as much gymnastics the chopper make but without air superiority from allied air force it is as good as sitting ducks from enemy fighter jets.
Avram

Selamat Pagi
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 51
Joined: 05 Apr 2011 09:53

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby Selamat Pagi » 17 Nov 2012 23:35

shiv wrote:
ashi wrote:J-10 show


Bah. What a bore. What's it with Chinese camerapersons? Are they incapable of showing one complete aircraft performance from beginning to end? Out of 4 minutes - there is only one square loop with rollover at the top shown fully. Everything else is like coitus interruptus. What is the point in showing takeoff in slow motion?


This video is better. At 0:39 four J10 turn on its axis simultanousely in formation. At 1:45 and at 2:00, there is also a difficult manoeuvre. One J10 loop around another flying straight.

Or
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jj5KzOGC_9Y

disha
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 4954
Joined: 03 Dec 2006 04:17
Location: gaganaviharin

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby disha » 18 Nov 2012 02:45

Selamat Pagi wrote:This video is better. At 0:39 four J10 turn on its axis simultanousely in formation. At 1:45 and at 2:00, there is also a difficult manoeuvre. One J10 loop around another flying straight.


Are you watching any planes flying for the first time?

Check this out - Chinese transport performing scary maneouvres : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fTO54Kt9tk

gnair
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 76
Joined: 19 Aug 2008 03:15

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby gnair » 19 Nov 2012 00:41

Z-10 High end and Z-19 will form low end. There are 3 squadron of Z19 in service or 36 machines with production continuing.

sorry...but they look like Dauphin SA-365 knock off's, especially the fenestron tail rotored ones. Dauphins are licence built in the PRC by Shenyang or Avic or one of them, so no need there for extended multi layered industrial theft.
Dauphins are great sturdy platforms though. ONGC uses them back and forth to the Bombay High fields.

Don
BRFite
Posts: 412
Joined: 09 Dec 2002 12:31

Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011

Postby Don » 20 Nov 2012 03:59

There are about 18-21 in service with China currently plus ten more coming soon..

http://www.interfax.co.uk/russia-milita ... -to-china/

Rosoboronexport to deliver ten Il-76 transports to China

ZHUHAI, China. Nov 19 (Interfax-AVN) - Russia will deliver ten Ilyushin Il-76 transport aircraft to China following overall repairs, said Sergei Kornev, a deparatment head with the Russian state arms trader Rosoboronexport.

"Under a contract signed with China we will deliver ten Il-76 aircraft from the stock available, and we have already selected seven of the ten," Kornev told reporters at Air Show China in Zhuhai, where he had arrived as leader of the Rosoboronexport delegation.

The contract deals with military transports already used and put through overall repairs, he said.

Asked whether China had been offered the upgraded IL-476 to be produced in Ulyanovsk, he sad, "it would be premature to speculate before the plane has gone through the entire testing program."

The plane has been deeply upgraded and got new engines, wing and avionics, he said.

"We will promote this plane as it has a good export potential," Kornev said.


Return to “Military Issues & History Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ani_sharma, nash, rohiths, shravanp and 58 guests