Anujan wrote:For photographers, atleast a APS-C size sensor is essential. After a point, it simply is an equation of amount of light captured by the sensor. P&S, high end cameras an SLRs will take the same kind of picture under ideal lighting. It is the tricky shots that SLRs blow everything out of water. And trust me, there are a lot of such tricky shots.
IOW, a P&S is like the F-16. Hassle free, small, affordable, and eight times out of ten, will do exactly what you expect of it. It's for those rare but tricky situations that you feel the need for an MKI or Rafale.
Yogi_G, a bridge camera (Like the Nikon P510 or Canon SX-50HS) is not a bad idea, provided you understand what its limitations are. Like Anujan said, it needs good light to work properly. So if you're taking outdoor shots during daytime, it works very well. But take the same camera into a dimly lit room, and you start facing problems. You either need to keep the ISO high (1600+), which results in a noisy photo; else you need a tripod or flash. Carrying a tripod around everywhere is a hassle, and the flash will often make your photo look flat. Also, the shutter lag is greater for a P&S, and depth of field cannot be made as shallow as that of DSLRs.
The choice ultimately comes down to what you want to do with the camera in the first place. I personally chose a bridge over a DSLR for two reasons: I needed the focal length for taking pictures of
birds and
animals; and with my limited budget, a DSLR plus a good lens was not an option. Indoor photos are mostly
blurry or
grainy, but those aren't a priority for me. So far, I'm very happy with my choice, but can see why it may not work for many.