Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Locked
VikramS
BRFite
Posts: 1887
Joined: 21 Apr 2002 11:31

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by VikramS »

I have to get this off my chest.

I support NaMo because of his dev first, India first policies. The best defense against the assault on Bharat is a strong Bharat which give space to diverse views and is strong enough to repel aggression.

While BR has educated me on the modus-operandi of the monotheistic proselytization brigade, I also realize that they are successful because they fulfill a need which Bharat has not been able to fulfill.

Anyone who wants to say it is not so, is in denial.

For Bharat to fulfill that need, a person like NaMo who can help restore self-respect and swamibhan to average Bharatiya is absolutely critical.

I have noticed several posts here about how the "core" will be upset. Frankly, if the core is so fickle and unable to make a rational decision, it does not deserve to be the "core". The "core" has not exactly done a stellar job defending Bharat so I find their protestation a bit hypocritical.

So I urge you to please take this "core" discussion to some other forum.

If NaMo is going to become the PM, he will a lot more than the "core".
Sushupti
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5198
Joined: 22 Dec 2010 21:24

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Sushupti »

Senior BJP leader and Patna Sahib MP Shatrughan Sinha added a new line to the ‘NaMo (Narendra Modi) chant’: “NaMo and SuMo :rotfl: (Sushil Modi) are together. Our SuMo is dabang.”

http://m.indianexpress.com/news/deputy- ... h/1089541/
Muppalla
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7115
Joined: 12 Jun 1999 11:31

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Muppalla »

^^^
Again the discussion is moving to what is good and what is bad. It is not about greatness of Bharat and how great Modi can do. It is a fact that electoral calculations are also important. See how Republicans or Dems calculate their bases and how they spend money to add a few more and that few more is what makes a winner. "We hate the so called hypocritical core and let us not have their votes" is very modern but not an intelligent approach to win elections.

If election winning is not that important than image of Modi then you are right.
Muppalla
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7115
Joined: 12 Jun 1999 11:31

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Muppalla »

Sushupti wrote:Senior BJP leader and Patna Sahib MP Shatrughan Sinha added a new line to the ‘NaMo (Narendra Modi) chant’: “NaMo and SuMo :rotfl: (Sushil Modi) are together. Our SuMo is dabang.”

http://m.indianexpress.com/news/deputy- ... h/1089541/
Finally seeing the light.
RamaY
BRF Oldie
Posts: 17249
Joined: 10 Aug 2006 21:11
Location: http://bharata-bhuti.blogspot.com/

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by RamaY »

Sushupti wrote:Senior BJP leader and Patna Sahib MP Shatrughan Sinha added a new line to the ‘NaMo (Narendra Modi) chant’: “NaMo and SuMo :rotfl: (Sushil Modi) are together. Our SuMo is dabang.”

http://m.indianexpress.com/news/deputy- ... h/1089541/
:)

There is the clear answer by SuMo for the NaMo biters.

Nitish Kumar didn't invite BJP for his Bikhari rally as he demanded special status for Bihar. Looks like he is trying to sell his soul to INC given DMK's warnings to UPA2 on Sri Lanka issue.

Interesting times.
Sushupti
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5198
Joined: 22 Dec 2010 21:24

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Sushupti »

This Sankarshan Thakur fellow is the most nasty journalist (Venom of Aakar Patel+cunningness of Vinod Sharma of HT + Devotion to Dynasty of MSA) i have ever seen on TV discussion panels.
Image

Image
Congress warms up to ‘secular’ Nitish

http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-new ... 27984.aspx
Last edited by Sushupti on 18 Mar 2013 07:34, edited 4 times in total.
Muppalla
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7115
Joined: 12 Jun 1999 11:31

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Muppalla »

Let us see how the mind games between JD(U), BJP and INC fiddling will end up. Interesting times.
VikramS
BRFite
Posts: 1887
Joined: 21 Apr 2002 11:31

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by VikramS »

MupallaJi:

If the "core" does not know the difference between NaMo & the Dynasty, then they deserve the dynasty. To me it is very clear that there is a wave for Namo, a very big one, which is being held back by many Dynasty Stooges, including the media. Something has to break the surface tension. And that is not going to be the "core".
Muppalla
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7115
Joined: 12 Jun 1999 11:31

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Muppalla »

RamaY wrote: There is the clear answer by SuMo for the NaMo biters.

Nitish Kumar didn't invite BJP for his Bikhari rally as he demanded special status for Bihar. Looks like he is trying to sell his soul to INC given DMK's warnings to UPA2 on Sri Lanka issue.

Interesting times.
DMK are the biggest pussies of the times. They will not do anything and we have already seen several of their bombastic threats.
Muppalla
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7115
Joined: 12 Jun 1999 11:31

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Muppalla »

VikramS wrote:MupallaJi:

If the "core" does not know the difference between NaMo & the Dynasty, then they deserve the dynasty. To me it is very clear that there is a wave for Namo, a very big one, which is being held back by many Dynasty Stooges, including the media. Something has to break the surface tension. And that is not going to be the "core".
I hope you are right. So far none of the surveys are giving such a landslide. If we have either an election that is purely between two candidates or if we have a presidential forms then definitely we will have the luxury of such undertaking.

Large scale waves of JP or VP singing still did not defeat INC comprehensively. All they achieved are a simple majority and a coalition. Now you put any number of calculations, Modi's wave is not even reaching 180 for BJP even after assuming every thing rallies around Modi.

Just to give you a very simple example - in the midst of the Modi wave, BJP lost HP and that to a chargesheeted person. That is the nature of India's democracy.

Added later:

Don't misunderstand that I am opposing Modi's latest speech. It is fantastic. Couple of first times in his speeches as compared to his past are just interesting.
RamaY
BRF Oldie
Posts: 17249
Joined: 10 Aug 2006 21:11
Location: http://bharata-bhuti.blogspot.com/

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by RamaY »

Muppala garu,

You need to tell us how NM can achieve 272+ what are the low hanging fruits that are above the assured 140+
Muppalla
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7115
Joined: 12 Jun 1999 11:31

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Muppalla »

RamaY wrote:Muppala garu,

You need to tell us how NM can achieve 272+ what are the low hanging fruits that are above the assured 140+
I actually created a baseline state-by-state with a friend of mine. I will post it in couple of days on the other thread. BJP at the current level is hovering around 167 but INC is at about 100. BRF can critically pierce through it. Give me couple of days.
Sushupti
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5198
Joined: 22 Dec 2010 21:24

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Sushupti »

Did people notice the difference between print media coverage to Namo and Nitish?
pentaiah
BRFite
Posts: 1671
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by pentaiah »

Absence of light means more moss and algae, some what like well water with black colored algae
In good old days they used drop one or two tortoise into wells to keep water clean and they long life too
disha
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 8423
Joined: 03 Dec 2006 04:17
Location: gaganaviharin

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by disha »

Yes.

Namo has been blacked out in media. Personally I was expecting it, but not so soon.

The game its afoot.
Hari Seldon
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9374
Joined: 27 Jul 2009 12:47
Location: University of Trantor

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Hari Seldon »

^^^IN the english media, yes. Expected. The angrezi media people have the option of net access. Am more interested in the coverage it may (or maynot have) received in the vernacular press.
member_23629
BRFite
Posts: 676
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by member_23629 »

pentaiah wrote:Absence of light means more moss and algae, some what like well water with black colored algae
In good old days they used drop one or two tortoise into wells to keep water clean and they long life too
Will this also be true for fresh running water in a canal?
Sanku
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12526
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 15:57
Location: Naaahhhh

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Sanku »

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/bihar ... /1089695/0
"I have 35 years of association with Narendra Modi right from my ABVP days. It is the media that has been trying to create difference between me and Modi. We know that 2014 is going to be a battle between the BJP ideology and a Congress family. We are ready to go to the polls under the leadership of Narendra Modi if the party decides so," said the Bihar Deputy Chief Minister.
Media does try to create differences, ably assisted by ostensible Modi fan-boi's.

Similarly SuMo and NK are very close. This entire drama is scripted. :mrgreen:
disha
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 8423
Joined: 03 Dec 2006 04:17
Location: gaganaviharin

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by disha »

varunkumar wrote:
pentaiah wrote:Absence of light means more moss and algae, some what like well water with black colored algae
In good old days they used drop one or two tortoise into wells to keep water clean and they long life too
Will this also be true for fresh running water in a canal?
Yes and It does not matter. This are freshwater canals meant for irrigation and drinking water. Just like you get piped water from far off places, this are semi open irrigation canals, you will not find much life in that water to worry about. Yeah maybe a crocodile or two for the congI or the baki but not much more. I think further discussion on the "environmental impact of cutting of sun to the irrigation waters" is pointless. Just my vho.
VikramS
BRFite
Posts: 1887
Joined: 21 Apr 2002 11:31

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by VikramS »

MuppalaJi

By wave I mean BJP being able to try and make the govt. nothing more.
VikramS
BRFite
Posts: 1887
Joined: 21 Apr 2002 11:31

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by VikramS »

BRaman batting for the Italian Marines on Twitter
member_20292
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2059
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by member_20292 »

SwamyG wrote:Tibet? Good one. Nehru lost Tibet for us, Tibet and this World. There is no more Tibet, it is a Chinese province.

Thriving military-industry complex of Western countries is what has been causing so much takleef all over the World. And now we want India to do the same. All good onlee.

SwamyG saar. I dont know about the details of the military industrial complex and how good or bad it is for the rest of the world. But I do know that;

a. the world works on survival of the fittest. strongest. sexiest.
b Our army follows this rule. It knows that it will get slaughtered if it does not buy the best arms. So they do buy them (along with commissions and bribes...but some of the best arms DO get bought)
Chandragupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3469
Joined: 07 Dec 2008 15:26
Location: Kingdom of My Fair Lady

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Chandragupta »

Me thinks NaMo was consciously less aggressive in his entire speech. His aggression came out forcefully when he responded to that Jehadi Javed. I think the dhimmis must be shivering in their pants.

This was a speech tailored for the audience, I would not read much in his so called 'compromises' and references to Abrahamic faithfools. Let him ascend the throne, till then he needs to steer clear of letting the dhimmi media paint a target on his back for being communal & losing the secular kool aid drinking Hindu vote.
Hari Seldon
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9374
Joined: 27 Jul 2009 12:47
Location: University of Trantor

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Hari Seldon »

Sri Rahul meanwhile unveils grand plans to usher in meritocracy and winnability in the ticket distribution for the 2014 polls. No, really. Check this report out from india today:

Rahul Gandhi puts in place new system of selection of candidates for 2014 Lok Sabha polls

Here's the lowdown on the process:

Image
Chandragupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3469
Joined: 07 Dec 2008 15:26
Location: Kingdom of My Fair Lady

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Chandragupta »

Hari Seldon wrote:Sri Rahul meanwhile unveils grand plans to usher in meritocracy and winnability in the ticket distribution for the 2014 polls. No, really. Check this report out from india today:

Rahul Gandhi puts in place new system of selection of candidates for 2014 Lok Sabha polls

Here's the lowdown on the process:

Image
But who gets to screen the Italian chorni & her dumbfu*k son? Oops, I forgot these vermin are above all processes, rules & regulations.
vijayk
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9419
Joined: 22 Jun 1999 11:31

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by vijayk »

VikramS wrote:I have to get this off my chest.

I support NaMo because of his dev first, India first policies. The best defense against the assault on Bharat is a strong Bharat which give space to diverse views and is strong enough to repel aggression.

While BR has educated me on the modus-operandi of the monotheistic proselytization brigade, I also realize that they are successful because they fulfill a need which Bharat has not been able to fulfill.

Anyone who wants to say it is not so, is in denial.

For Bharat to fulfill that need, a person like NaMo who can help restore self-respect and swamibhan to average Bharatiya is absolutely critical.

I have noticed several posts here about how the "core" will be upset. Frankly, if the core is so fickle and unable to make a rational decision, it does not deserve to be the "core". The "core" has not exactly done a stellar job defending Bharat so I find their protestation a bit hypocritical.


So I urge you to please take this "core" discussion to some other forum.

If NaMo is going to become the PM, he will a lot more than the "core".
Most of the people won't ever understand this. I will write about this more. I will show how these things work. The right wing needs to understand this. They just don't get it.
RajeshA
BRF Oldie
Posts: 16006
Joined: 28 Dec 2007 19:30

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by RajeshA »

Sagar G
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2594
Joined: 22 Dec 2009 19:31
Location: Ghar

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Sagar G »

Bihar Deputy CM Sushil Kumar Modi sounds warning for Nitish Kumar
As the JD(U) held 'Adhikar Rally' at Delhi on Sunday, reiterating its demand for special category status, Bihar Deputy Chief Minister Sushil Kumar Modi said "those who will board the sinking ship of the Congress will sink automatically". He was speaking at the state BJP executive here. He also said the state unit was ready to contest the 2014 elections under Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi.

The two-day state executive meeting that issued message of solidarity on Saturday with senior party leader Arun Jaitley asking for a united NDA show and also praised Nitish Kumar for Bihar's makeover, appeared to have changed its tone and tenor on Sunday.

"I have 35 years of association with Narendra Modi right from my ABVP days. It is the media that has been trying to create difference between me and Modi. We know that 2014 is going to be a battle between the BJP ideology and a Congress family. We are ready to go to the polls under the leadership of Narendra Modi if the party decides so," said the Bihar Deputy Chief Minister.

He said the BJP and the JD(U) fought hard to defeat Lalu Prasad and brought the state on the path of progress. "The Congress now has become a sinking ship and those willing to ride it will sink automatically," said Modi.


Senior BJP leader and Patna Sahib MP Shatrughan Sinha added a new line to the 'NaMo (Narendra Modi) chant': "NaMo and SuMo (Sushil Modi) are together. Our SuMo is dabang." :lol:

Meanwhile, the party decided to postpone its "Hunkar rally" to October 27 from April 15. Shifting the rally's date to demand special status for Bihar and alleged discrimination of the state by the Centre was announced by Bihar BJP president Mangal Pandey.

The rally was touted as a big event as previous state BJP chief C P Thakur had said Narendra Modi would be invited in the rally.
RajeshA
BRF Oldie
Posts: 16006
Joined: 28 Dec 2007 19:30

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by RajeshA »

Published on Mar 15, 2013
Irfan Pathan invites Narendra Modi for brother Yusuf's wedding: DNA
Cricketer Irfan Pathan on Friday called on Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi to invite him to his brother and fellow India player Yusuf Pathan's wedding.

Irfan, who is currently out of the Indian team following an injury, also congratulated Modi on becoming Chief Minister for the fourth time, a state government release said.

Irfan had taken part in one of the election rallies of Modi last December.
member_23686
BRFite
Posts: 176
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by member_23686 »

NaMo Mantra & IndiaToday's Shameful Conduct

Ever seen the fine print in a public contest advertisement? There is always a clause that reads somewhat like this: “The following persons are not eligible to participate in the contest: (a) employee(s) of any company in XYZ Group and close relations of such employee(s), and (b) the employee(s) of companies that provide direct sponsorship of the contest”. This is to prevent any malpractice through insider information in the contest. This clause should be applicable to some aspects of the Summits and Conclaves that our media often holds. This is where I consider the recent India Today Conclave 2013 (ITC) quite shameful in its process. If the purpose of debates and discussions in these conclaves is to bring out new ideas and thoughts then ITC is a major sham. I cannot list even one new idea it has brought forth from any of its participants, except Narendra Modi. But then Modi doesn’t need ITC to throw up ideas anyway. All that the rest of ITC does is peddle more of the same mindless crap and nobody is any wiser.

What is worse is the less than honest conduct of the event by Rahul Kanwal and Aroon Purie. Pathetic! And we’ll see why. I’m not going to discuss the scratch-my-back type discussions or the Bollywood masala that is usually part of such events. Let’s cut straight to the panel discussion on March 15. The topic was something like ‘Future of democracy and youth’. Participants were Manish Tiwari, RPN Singh, Harsimrat Kaur Badal, Aaditya Thackeray, Smriti Irani and Arvind Kejriwal. All are politicians so they are on the same page. The panel discussion was fine but it’s when the Q&A session started that I had to be suspicious. Naturally, a bit later I tweeted a single word: “Fixed”.

In a democratic debate I personally consider it a crime to bring in a communist as a questioner. The ideology of communists does not fit into the democratic philosophy at all. It’s therefore that I consider it our country’s unique misfortune that much of our media is controlled by commie ideology. But why in the world would ITC get an absolute Commie like Kavita Krishnan to ask questions of a democratic discussion. The dishonest part about ITC and Rahul Kanwal is that they passed her of as a social activist. The introduction should have clearly mentioned that the woman is a member of the CPI (ML) and therefore her contempt and disgust for Hindutva and Right-wing parties must be seen in that light. KavitaK had questions for none but Smriti Irani and Thackeray. The CPI (ML) of which KavitaK is a member of the central committee is a known supporter of violent movements, Maoists and separatists. I called it “fixed” but I’m not the only one to see the deception. There were many as this tweet of Smita Barooah shows.

True to form KavitaK peddled nonsense like suffering at the hands of YuvaSena (to Aaditya Thackeray) when such a unit did not even exist in the time period she was referring to. But well, it didn’t stop there. It started all over again after Narendra Modi finished his speech. Whether you’re a BJP supporter or not only an extreme fool will deny that NaMo is an extraordinarily inspirational speaker. He speaks extempore with facts and figures at his finger-tips. He makes sense. What was the topic? It was supposedly “Namo Mantra for India”. What should the questions relate to? What’s the job of the host or moderator? This is where both Rahul Kanwal and Aroon Purie failed miserably and conducted themselves shamelessly and most unprofessionally. (Watch the video)

In the opening para I mentioned that members of the host organisation shouldn’t be allowed to participate in the process of an event. However, considering this is not a contest this too is fine. So who is the person allowed to ask the first question to Modi? PunyaPrasun Bajpai, a guy who has recently returned to the IndiaToday group. Modi immediately asks if this is some kind of press conference and Kanwal laughs and denies and even denies there’s any “fixing”. Aha! No match fixing? So what was the BS question by Bajpai? It was about what’s holding Modi’s license to the road to Delhi. Now, does the question relate to the topic or Modi’s speech at all? Nope! So the moderator should have said “Sorry Bajpai, don’t fool around, stick to the topic”. Although Modi answered and even ridiculed the moron, the hosts should know how unprofessional and incompetent they are to allow such foolish questions which don’t even relate to the speech, topic or agenda of the conclave.

So the IT group people got to ask the most questions. Sandeep Bamzai asked another one and then the worst to come was from a moron who passes off as editor at IT. His name is Javed Ansari. What does he ask? He goes back to the 2002 riots and the apology theme. This is criminal “fixing” by Rahul Kanwal and Aroon Purie. If it wasn’t “fixed” they should have honourably disallowed the question stating it is “off topic”. If calling Modi to every event on a different topic and then allowing questions to invariably lead to the 2002 nonsense is the agenda, then it is nothing short of “fixing”. Modi was naturally forced to retort that he knew and had seen the “games” of the media many times over and is not bothered about the hidden agendas of the media insiders asking these questions.

Remember, even in the Hindustan Times Summit of 2007 Modi was called to speak on State & Centre relations. There too Rajdeep Sardesai who was the host and anchor veered from the topic to disgusting comments about Modi. Since then Modi has won more elections and grown in stature while Rajdeep has now degenerated into a full-fledged troll and hate-monger. If these morons wanted to talk about PM candidate and 2002 their topic should have read “NaMo’s PM candidature & 2002”. Was that the topic? There were many important points that Modi made in his presentation and speech that have high value and relevance for India and her future. But do these hate-mongers and gossip-mongers at IndiaToday care about India? Their questions had no relevance to the topic and the speech. They really don’t give a damn about the future of India or NaMo’s or anybody’s mantra for India. Do they? If I were to ask Rahul Kanwal or Aroon Purie how India benefited from this Conclave in a single paragraph, I guarantee you they won’t be able to answer. Because they really don’t give a damn!

I would not be wrong in considering Rahul Kanwal, Aroon Purie and Javed Ansari continuing the trend of others in the media of “fixing questions” and “planting questioners” to fuel hatred for Modi and his party, while living off the crumbs that the TRPs his presence and speeches generate. While Smriti Irani, Aaditya Thackeray and Narendra Modi came off with flying colours from the event the IndiaToday group came off a shameless “fixer”. The joke of it all is Kanwal tweets that they had invited RahulG too but he had declined. IT and other shameless media groups forget that it takes courage to do what Modi does. These same people crawl and lick the ground on which RahulG walks and catch the spit of SoniaG before it hits the ground. If they had any decency or morals left in them they would ask many questions of the Gandhis. But the cowards will not. IndiaToday’s conduct of these two episodes in the event was most unprofessional and far from honest. Shame on the whole group!
harbans
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4883
Joined: 29 Sep 2007 05:01
Location: Dehradun

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by harbans »

Anyone following Amaresh Mishra's twitters threatening Modi?
Amaresh Misra ‏@AmareshMisra

@vrajendranandan BHOSDEE KE KUCH KARR TO NAHEE PAAYE! MAIN AARAM SE BAITHA MODI KA SAR MAANG RAHA HOON! EK SIPAHEE TAK KA PHONE NAHEE AAYA.


Amaresh Misra ‏@AmareshMisra

@amareshrandva Do din bhadve! Voh bhee kyunkee main bahar hoon! Teri behen ko chodne ki film banakar twitter par post kar doonga!
Details
19h Amaresh Misra Amaresh Misra ‏@AmareshMisra

@amareshrandva apnee behen se pooch! Apna lund uske munh men diya thaa!
Details

Amaresh Misra Amaresh Misra ‏@AmareshMisra

@amareshrandva Bolee laga betichod madarchod Modi ka sar kitne me?
https://twitter.com/AmareshMisra
Sushupti
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5198
Joined: 22 Dec 2010 21:24

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Sushupti »

What Dilli finds hard to digest is what is drawing Bharat to NaMo

Now that Modi has overcome the doubt of Indian governance too, Dilli is trying the method of nitpicking to invent a new set of doubts. However, to doubt is the prerogative of the elite. The unwashed poor masses cannot afford the luxury of doubt. It is this simple rule that Dilli always forgets.

Millions upon millions of people travelled hundreds of miles to the Kumbh Mela because they have unflinching faith. Tens of thousands of us elites did not go to the Kumbh because we had doubts and questions: Isn’t the Sangam water dirty? Where will we stay at night? How long will we have to walk?

In the course of my visit to the Kumbh, I interviewed and interacted with tens of hundreds of ordinary people from various parts of India. Readers would be surprised to know that based on my snap poll, I concluded that almost 5 out of 10 people I interacted with did not even own a mobile phone (majority of them were women)! Yet, each and every one had heard of Narendra Modi — that is how fast the message of good governance travels across India. A large number of these village folk didn’t know much about Modi, but their faces lit up the moment one mentioned that 4-lettered word.

I have seen hope in the eyes of ordinary Indians when asked about Modi. It is this hope that will drive India into the arms of NaMO, no matter how many new sets of doubts Dilli tries to invent.

Let me try and elucidate my idea of hope with an example. A large extended family of 30 members had travelled all the way from Andhra Pradesh to the Kumbh. Needless to say, they were big fans of the late YS Rajashekhar Reddy, for he had apparently done a lot for “us village folk, unlike Naidu”. When I conversationally raised the issue of Modi, in came the quick retort from almost the entire group, “Electricity is our big problem babu, we go days without power. Modi will solve that.” How or why have these simple villagers made that connect between bijlee and Modi gives us an idea regarding India’s hopes.



http://www.niticentral.com/2013/03/18/w ... 56555.html
Sushupti
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5198
Joined: 22 Dec 2010 21:24

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Sushupti »

harbans wrote:Anyone following Amaresh Mishra's twitters threatening Modi?
Amaresh Misra ‏@AmareshMisra

@vrajendranandan BHOSDEE KE KUCH KARR TO NAHEE PAAYE! MAIN AARAM SE BAITHA MODI KA SAR MAANG RAHA HOON! EK SIPAHEE TAK KA PHONE NAHEE AAYA.


Amaresh Misra ‏@AmareshMisra

@amareshrandva Do din bhadve! Voh bhee kyunkee main bahar hoon! Teri behen ko chodne ki film banakar twitter par post kar doonga!
Details
19h Amaresh Misra Amaresh Misra ‏@AmareshMisra

@amareshrandva apnee behen se pooch! Apna lund uske munh men diya thaa!
Details

Amaresh Misra Amaresh Misra ‏@AmareshMisra

@amareshrandva Bolee laga betichod madarchod Modi ka sar kitne me?
https://twitter.com/AmareshMisra

Image

This what i call a typical cow-belt "Lotta": Dhimmified, suffering from self-shame, filled with hatred for anything Dharmic and
abusing Hindus his daily ritual. Ultimate fruit of Nehruvian grand vision.
Sushupti
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5198
Joined: 22 Dec 2010 21:24

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Sushupti »

Protest in Wharton on 23rd outside WIEF venue

Buses are being planned from key areas in Central and North Jersey and New York.

http://whartonprotest.blogspot.in/
Neela
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4134
Joined: 30 Jul 2004 15:05
Location: Spectator in the dossier diplomacy tennis match

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Neela »

In defense of Loomba

I have read it and read it and read it and trying to make sense of it.
:-?
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60277
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by ramana »

Sushupti, That Pravin Patil is a moron. A four letter word has negative connotation and to use it in context of Narendra Modi's name is quite telling as to his mindset.
Yayavar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4852
Joined: 06 Jun 2008 10:55

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Yayavar »

Sushupti: not sure if Amaresh is Dhimmified or just a politico power drunk on what he can steal and grab. Pankaj Mishra is an example of dhimmified, anti-bharatiya lotta.
Neela
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4134
Joined: 30 Jul 2004 15:05
Location: Spectator in the dossier diplomacy tennis match

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Neela »

Folks,
A simple search on Amaresh Mishra leads to quite damning and frankly very puke-worthy articles and incidents.

This lunatic deserves no bandwidth here.
Hari Seldon
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9374
Joined: 27 Jul 2009 12:47
Location: University of Trantor

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Hari Seldon »

^^+1. Amaresh moron is an attention wh0re. And we're giving it to him, unwittingly.
Sanku
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12526
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 15:57
Location: Naaahhhh

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Sanku »

Hari Seldon wrote:^^+1. Amaresh moron is an attention wh0re. And we're giving it to him, unwittingly.
Oh no, Sushupti is up to his usual games of picking up one really black sheep among a group and then basically using that to vent against the full group.

It is as if one picks up one corrupt service official and starts "this is a good example of these dandawallas"

Agenda is clear.
Locked