Nothing stands still - that's what you seem to have a problem comprehending. Everybody loves to think their favoured technology is the only one moving - that is never the case. For you the importance of a standalone P&S may be a religious thing, for most of the consumers they couldn't care less. The question they will ask is "is my smartphone good enough for taking pics like a P&S" and the answer overwhelming is yes. Why would they pay extra few hundred dollars and lug around an extra device for benefits which are non-existent as far as they are concerned? The trends are clear, P&S is going the way of the windshield mounted PND. Even camera manufacturers are now going "WHOA!! Why don't I put my super-duper sensor/DSP into phones instead of my standalone cameras onlee?!". Much more volume, less overhead (since they typically license the IP and don't do the manufacturing or end customer sales), more margin, more profits - they couldn't give 2 shits about what some small bunch of photo hobbyists think, they gotta business to run, dude!Mort Walker wrote:P&S are evolving, just like everything else and the rest of the world doesn't stand still. There is a move to go away from the OVF, coupled with the fact of using a larger sensor. You will have a very capable small camera, that will be a P&S, but will have many of the capabilities of a DSLR. The smart phone may take the place of a $100-$200 P&S, it's not there yet, but not of a $300-$400 P&S. Another thing you can't seem to realize is that people who shoot with a DSLR, also keep a capable P&S with them most of the time. The Sony RX-100 is a good example as is the Olympus XZ-2 or Fujifilm X20 of what the near future holds for the P&S category. Yes, right now these are $500-600, but will see a 20% price drop when more are produced.

Anyhow you can choose to believe whatever you want in contrary to the facts. I will not deny you your warm fuzzy feeling which comes from curling up tightly and keeping your eyes closed imagining a pissful world of the past.
