How strange, what happened, why did you take a break from bad mouthing Mr Sinha?Sushupti wrote:I wish rest of the supporters of Loh Purush had same foresight as Mr Sinha.

Nevertheless a good improvement.
How strange, what happened, why did you take a break from bad mouthing Mr Sinha?Sushupti wrote:I wish rest of the supporters of Loh Purush had same foresight as Mr Sinha.
This is the level of posts you guys want to make on this thread?muraliravi wrote: Yah yah u still worship advani after he sucked up to sonia and drank chai with sonia the biggest criminal in india
I don't know how to react to thisNarendra Modi can breathe a sigh of relief. Senior BJP leader and party patriarch LK Advani reportedly praised the party's poll panel chief on Sunday.
Advani said that the BJP was going in the right direction under the guidance of Modi, as per reports. He is also supposed to have said that BJP will secure a record win in the 2014 General Elections.
You missed the pun intended. Anyway, i am waiting for the day when Sushma Didi will be working hard to attract the attention of Modi, like Yashwant Sinha doing now.Sanku wrote:How strange, what happened, why did you take a break from bad mouthing Mr Sinha?Sushupti wrote:I wish rest of the supporters of Loh Purush had same foresight as Mr Sinha.
![]()
Nevertheless a good improvement.
reminds me of a Very famous Goongi Goodia.Lilo wrote: He is unquestionably a strong and efficient administrator. Gujarat has prospered under him, and given him three successive terms of office. But he is known as a man who tolerates no opposition, cuts all colleagues to size, and rules with an iron fist. Such a person will fail miserably as prime minister of a disparate coalition that can be brought down by any of several minor partners.
Top BJP leaders on Sunday exhorted central and state office bearers to focus on booth-level activity and include all sections of society to ensure the party’s victory in the coming Lok Sabha polls.
The message was clear: get back to basics to defeat the Congress and aim at “Mission 272+” (to form a majority).
“All out effort should be made to take all sections of society with the party and strengthen organisation in the next 200 days,” said Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi as he focused on his state’s efforts to include minorities in local bodies by giving them poll tickets. The idea: the BJP was including the minorities in a bottom-up manner.
BJP chief Rajnath Singh, meanwhile, disapproved of the Bihar unit naming Modi as PM candidate and said that a state unit passing such a resolution was a bit odd. Top party leaders will announce a name through proper channels, he added.
“The idea is that top leaders will announce the decision at the correct time, but the party rank and file in the states should concentrate on working from the grassroots,” the BJP leader said.
BJP patriarch LK Advani also endorsed what Modi said – referring to him two or three times in his speech – recalling how the Jana Sangh had posted a surprise victory in Delhi in 1960s because it went door-to door to reach the people.
So it is Mission 272+chaanakya wrote:+100Hari Seldon wrote:I can only hope and pray I live to see a grand temple at RJB in this lifetime.
I ask one Q to uber secularists: When have muslims even acknowledged the atrocities on the natives of India by muslim invaders?
I have no doubt that NM with 272+ can and will change the terms of the debate such that it becomes reality. The key is the 272+part only. Rest all is maya.
BJP is planning to contest on 340 seats, methinks. With hard work and with NaMo as full charge and PM nominee this might become possible but not with 3 and half friends of BJP. Since most of NDA constituents have deserted it and SS is not much liked by Bihar, it would be better if NaMo goes alone , may be with Akalis.
With 272, Game changes irreversible for others and that is what they fear most. RJB and 370 both are possible. But NaMo has not yet revealed his mind or action plan. May be at opportune time or when he collects Loha from Villages of India during his Padayatras.
This is OT here
this was tried in Gujarat by baba's congis but recd drubbing there.ashish raval wrote:There are some rumours that on the day modi is declared pm candidate by BJP, baba is going to play master stroke of giving 5 acre land per family for the people of SC/ST and other weaker sections of the society. Not sure how true but if it is UPA-3 is certain.
Land is also a state of mind.kumarn wrote:5 acre/family! Where will they find land? Is Pappu reading BRF and thinking of taking over Australia, or what?
Meanwhile, speaking of grace, poise etc., sushmaji's body language belies her great confidence at not getting upstaged by this regional upstart from the boondocks...Reacting to Modi's claim to woo minority voters, Congress leader Rashid Alvi said that only two Muslim voters in the whole country may cast their votes in Narendra Modi's favour. One belongs to Bihar (Shahnawaz Hussain) and another to Allahabad (Mukhtar Naqvi)
In an interesting observation, Modi said there are different segments within the Muslims like Shias, Sunnis, Bohras and others and they can be reached out with promises of redressing their specific grievances.
Modi and Leader of the Opposition in Lok Sabha Sushma Swaraj underscored the need for strengthening the party at the booth level.
BJP spokesperson Shahnawaz Hussain later told reporters that "One booth, ten youth" would be the aim of the party.
he is shushupt agint, will carry out guerrilla attacks loike the "Vadra Gate" attack last weekSushupti wrote:I wish rest of the supporters of Loh Purush had same foresight as Mr Sinha.
babaji will have to attack tibet & TSP and take it over to get so much land. masterstroke indeed - if he can pull it off , even brf would vote for his govt!kumarn wrote:5 acre/family! Where will they find land? Is Pappu reading BRF and thinking of taking over Australia, or what?
I disagree. SA Iyer is worth listening to when it comes to economics - but when it comes to politics he is much an idiot as his brother.Sanku wrote:The fact of the matter however is, that SA Iyer, is not talking hot air. There is resistance to Modi amongst others. He DOES NOT have ABV like authority and figure. Heck ABV had to be pulled out by BJP because Advani the man primarily responsible for the work that culminated in 1998 was not acceptable.
Lets accept the reality as it is folks, even if unpalatable. These are REAL challenges before NaMo. Why pretend otherwise?
This however does not mean that like ABV/Advani, NaMo should not, and will not spare a single possible effort in making sure BJP wins, and hopefully a PM which the BJP party wants and as by rights should be.
amul/farex baba.devesh wrote:which baba? ramdev?
Kushwaha backs Narendra Modi's prime ministerial candidature
Jehanabad (Bihar): Upendra Kushwaha, who quit the JD(U) to launch his own political party in March, on Sunday praised Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi saying his party would support BJP to ensure defeat of the UPA in the next general elections.
"We will work together with the BJP if it decides to contest the next general elections under the Gujarat Chief Minister's leadership and wrest power from the UPA," he said.
"Coming from the Extremely Backward Caste background that he does, Modi is the right choice for the prime minister's post given his credentials as an administrator," Kushwaha told reporters here during his party's conclave.
Asked whether his Rashtriya Lok Samata Party (RSLP) would merge with the BJP or enter into pre-poll alliance in Bihar, Kushwaha refused to divulge his cards saying he would decide after consulting party colleagues and BJP leadership.
On Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar's antipathy towards Modi, the RSLP president said he "harbours ill will towards any EBC leader who dreams big".
This is the first time that Kushwaha, an ex-Rajya Sabha MP and known Nitish-baiter, announced that he would back Modi's prime ministerial candidature.
The RLSP's support to Modi came a day after Bihar BJP adopted a resolution urging the party's central leadership to declare Modi as its prime ministerial candidate without delay.
Nitish Kumar severed ties with the BJP-led NDA after Modi's elevation as the poll panel chief two months ago.
http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/ku ... 69955.html
Modi’s ‘allied worldview’: Realpolitik or Gandhian folly?
by Radha Rajan
Is the BJP merely replacing Advani with Modi and will Modi replace good governance with ideology? Hindu nationalists cannot jump on the Modi bandwagon without answers to this fundamental question.
Modi made laudatory reference in Hyderabad to Jayalalithaa’s good governance model which, Modi told Hyderabadis, is worthy of emulation. We do not know which individual from Tamil Nadu fed Modi with selective information about Jayalalithaa’s good governance, but because Modi has held out his hand to Jayalalithaa hoping their personal friendship will lead to political alliance in 2014, other lesser-known facts about her good governance need to be placed in public domain; just three facts which raise serious doubts not only about what Modi-led BJP will stand for in 2014 if the BJP continues to woo the likes of Jayalalithaa and Chandrababu Naidu (and horror of horrors, Mamata Banerjee?) but also about Jayalalithaa as a political ally of the BJP were Modi to assert Hindu nationalism over good governance.
Three less-known facts about recent events in Tamil Nadu which Modi should know because they best exemplify Jayalalithaa’s Politics of Minority-ism:
1. Tamil Nadu government and Innocence of Muslims
2. Tamil Nadu government announcing memorials for “freedom fighters” Tipu Sultan and Hyder Ali
3. Tamil Nadu government embarrassing the Director-General of Police in the exact same manner and for exact same reasons as the UPA government embarrassed the Army Chief after the Poonch ambush
http://www.vijayvaani.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?aid=2914
Surprisingly, for an Englishman who was knighted by the British monarchy in 2002, Tully was less than enthusiastic about the growing status of English as an aspirational language of the Indian middle class. "Learning English is an economic asset," he said. "But the problem is its impact on regional languages. English is a mark of India, not Bharat," he added.The response prompted Thapar to ask Tully the reason behind his fascination for India. "It will be an absurd proposition if I try to become more Indian than an Indian," Tully said. "My ancestors have all lived in India. Having lived in India, I too have started to believe in Karma," he replied philosophicallySushupti wrote:Sonia Gandhi is a problem for governance, says Mark Tully
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/mark ... 60848.html
Thinking about it when travelling., two things come to mind:Sanku wrote: ... Given that Sadhu Yadav is pure poison -- why did Modi meet him and open himself up to such a self goal? ...
Let us go with FAREX baba. Amul is a good ol' Indian brand.Singha wrote:amul/farex baba.devesh wrote:which baba? ramdev?
Sad that many of the prominent voices speaking out strongly against dynastic politics in India are Western. Seriously - this kind of tawdry vaudeville over 5 generations would NEVER have been tolerated in any Western democracy...Sushupti wrote:Sonia Gandhi is a problem for governance, says Mark Tully
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/mark ... 60848.html
Just a wisecrackmuraliravi wrote:Yah yah u still worship advani after he sucked up to sonia and drank chai with sonia the biggest criminal in india
Are all ugly people bad?SwamyG wrote:NaMo will attract attention from good, bad and the ugly. NaMo should keep company with the good and shun the other two.
Quite a saikological gem! Full marks to you SaikJi!!SaiK wrote:... btw, did MMS ban USA kerry and obama gang for wisconsin shootings on sikh community?....
Wrong on both counts.Arjun wrote:Sad that many of the prominent voices speaking out strongly against dynastic politics in India are Western. Seriously - this kind of tawdry vaudeville over 5 generations would NEVER have been tolerated in any Western democracy...Sushupti wrote:Sonia Gandhi is a problem for governance, says Mark Tully
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/mark ... 60848.html
I have argued against both of your objections so many times on this forum, that I have lost count.disha wrote:Wrong on both counts.
Journos and (in general) public are deferential to "whites" does not mean desis are dumbos who have not raised this earlier. And "western democracy" is either American democracy or French "libertainism"., and look no further than "Jeb Bush".
Don't doubt it...and I am simply too tired to detail out my logic for the 25th time or thereabouts.disha wrote:Arjunji, simple - if your arguments had logic., it would have won me over!!
I agree with the above, howeverArjun wrote: While both have some kernel of truth in them - there are a series of assumptions built into both statements that are obvious to any intelligent person and the counter-arguments are also quite obvious to the intelligent.
There is also a third option, that he has examined all the probabilities and is now taking a bet on the future -- he may be wrong or right, but one is entitled to take a bet. He knows what the stakes are, his credibility will be impacted if NaMo is PM, there will be many quite willing to use this to rub his nose into mud, which they should.For SA Iyer to arrive at a definitive stance like he did in his article, rather than to a nuanced conclusion like any intelligent person would from the data - shows the working of an agenda-driven and / or intellectually deficient mind.
Maybe he is taking a bet. But I would question the logic /agenda of anyone taking a bet so early in the game when elections have not even been announced.Sanku wrote:There is also a third option, that he has examined all the probabilities and is now taking a bet on the future -- he may be wrong or right, but one is entitled to take a bet. He knows what the stakes are, his credibility will be impacted if NaMo is PM, there will be many quite willing to use this to rub his nose into mud, which they should.
However, just to remind ourselves, the bet is not closed. It is NOT a foregone conclusion. Let us call him an idiot, BY making sure that he has been proved wrong, that would be far more satisfactory I think.