In a year or two from now, you get a new phunwa, that's what happens.

All in all good review.
Do any phones besides the two PureView ones have that?Raja Bose wrote:^^^Does it have real (as in HW) OIS or just the SW crap?
OIS is in h/w. Poorly implemented in my opinion, and interestingly enough Sammy I believe does it better in s/w. The low light capability comes at an expense of loss of detail and white balance.Raja Bose wrote:^^^Does it have real (as in HW) OIS or just the SW crap?
In a year or two from now, you get a new phunwa, that's what happens.![]()
All in all good review.
Ballmer running around stage dripping sweat while Ms.Mayer desperately ran around trying to avoid him ?Anujan wrote:Imagine what would have happened if M$ yahoo deal had gone through.
Its too early to say he is doing fine and preliminary indicators are not exactly great. Like I mentioned before, currently FruitCo is still moving under the momentum of stuff which happened under the Mahdi. This is common behavior in large corporations. They don't just collapse and die suddenly one day except in rare occassions....its a gradual decline. What have the Bawarchi's achievements been after he became CEO and was no longer under the Mahdi's gaze? And FruitCo is not Sammy or GB, so its supply chain, retail operation all depend on the desirability of its product more than the other companies. If that falters, FruitCo dies. Plain and simple onlee. And the Bawarchi is no products guy like the Mahdi and the same Ive who made the iPhunwa/iPadwa made grey boxes under Amelio before the Mahdi came - that is the primary concern.Anujan wrote:Not sure why this huge hate for Bawarchi. He is doing just fine.
Suraj wrote:Ballmer running around stage dripping sweat while Ms.Mayer desperately ran around trying to avoid him ?Anujan wrote:Imagine what would have happened if M$ yahoo deal had gone through.
They already do that, no? Thats probably the biggest change which went under the radar - all of Mickey's stuff is now in the cloud, has UX as good as the native versions and works well across all major browsers. The boys & gals at Gmail need to take a lesson from that - the UX there is going from bad to worse and sleazy G+ tactics by VickyG is not winning Chacha any friends among consumers.Anujan wrote: Instead they could have worked on their cloud offering, made sure their services ran on all platforms and had installable software as well.
Wasn't there another company which said exactly the same thing, we have an ironclad grip in the enterprise, especially in a niche that is incredibly important and no other product ever (including as of now) does that particular niche as well as that offering , and guarantees a vitally important thing in enterprise, namely security. They were smug, saying Fruit etc, is just Bull*it.Anujan wrote:Their lock-in is on corporates (not consumers) and thats why the businesses are stable, high margin and long term (remember that FruitCo lock-in is on consumers, who are typically very fickle and can change their buying habits very fast)
haan.Singha wrote:who is he? some ex-spetsnaz type now in omon leadership?
Okay. What is Chipzilla , but exactly that ?Singha wrote:but BB was a one trick pony in a niche -
ChipZ has the advantage that what it makes has a high barrier of entry for other folks. And it is not 500% secure there also....look at all the chipanda cos churning out processors left, right and center. If the Wintel stranglehold is broken, ChipZ is no less vulnerable.vina wrote:Okay. What is Chipzilla , but exactly that ?Singha wrote:but BB was a one trick pony in a niche -
I wonder if the author ever heard of the dotcom bust?When he took control, in 2000, Microsoft was one of the most powerful and feared companies in the world. It had a market capitalization of around five hundred billion dollars, the highest of any company on earth.
It has become a functional org from a divisional org. That means sales/marketing/revenue is centralized (rather than split out as server & tools, business etc) and all products are cross functional. It is a good thing and a bad thing. Good thing because divisions will stop sniping at each other. Bad thing because it is easy for divisions to run many products each -- but becomes much harder for a functional org to run many products -- each product cuts across functions. Very few orgs the size of M$ is run as a functional organization -- because very few orgs the size of M$ produces few products. FruitCo is a notable exception. Instead you have companies like General Electric, which is more like a loose conglomerates of several different companies, each of which know their target audience well and decide on their own products and timelines.Raja Bose wrote: Frankly, I don't know if the reorg by itself changes anything since all their business units are intact except WinPhone got merged with Windows which is logical since technology-wise their code base is getting more and more merged and WinPhone was existing as a special division for quite a while without any reason.