
JP and Modi neck to neck.
Nitish Kumar and his diabolical mind at work here.Sushupti wrote:
Modi cannot lead India effectively: NYT editorial board
by Newest, timesofindia.indiatimes.com
October 27th 2013
NEW YORK: Narendra Modi, BJP's prime ministerial candidate, cannot hope to lead India effectively if he inspires "fear" and "antipathy" among many of its people, New York Times has commented in an unusual move.
"Mr Modi has shown no ability to work with opposition parties or tolerate dissent," the editorial board of New York Times said in a stinging editorial on the 63-year-old BJP leader.
The editorial said that Modi has already "alienated" BJP's political partners when Janata Dal (United), an important regional party broke off its 17-year alliance with the "party because it found Mr Modi unacceptable."
India was a country with multiple religions and "Mr Modi cannot hope to lead it effectively if he inspires fear and antipathy among many of its people," it said while recalling that nearly 1,000 people died in the 2002 riots in Gujarat.
The editorial, published yesterday, also questioned Modi's economic track record in Gujarat.
The "economic record in Gujarat is not entirely admirable, either," it said.
"Muslims in Gujarat, for instance, are much more likely to be poor than Muslims in India as a whole, even though the state has a lower poverty rate than the country," the editorial said.
"His rise to power is deeply troubling to many Indians, especially the country's 138 million Muslims and its many other minorities," said the 19-member editorial board, headed by India-born Andrew Rosenthal, the editorial page editor of New York Times.
Narendra Modi’s Rise in India
by THE EDITORIAL BOARD, nytimes.com
October 26th 2013
In 2002, rioters in the western Indian state of Gujarat savagely killed nearly 1,000 people, most of whom were part of the Muslim minority. Now, barely a decade later, Narendra Modi, who was the chief minister of Gujarat at the time and still holds the office, is a leading candidate to become prime minister of India.
Mr. Modi, a star of India’s main opposition party, the Bharatiya Janata Party, would become prime minister if the party won enough seats in parliamentary elections next summer with support from its political allies. His rise to power is deeply troubling to many Indians, especially the country’s 138 million Muslims and its many other minorities. They worry he would exacerbate sectarian tensions that have subsided somewhat in the last decade.
Supporters of Mr. Modi argue that an investigation commissioned by India’s Supreme Court cleared him of wrongdoing in the riots. And they insist that Mr. Modi, who is widely admired by middle-class Indians for making Gujarat one of India’s fastest-growing states, can revive the economy, which has been weakened by a decade of mismanagement by the coalition government headed by the Indian National Congress Party.
There is no question that the Congress Party has failed to capitalize on the economic growth of recent years to invest in infrastructure, education and public institutions like the judiciary. And instead of trying to revive itself with new ideas and leaders, it is likely to be led in the coming election by Rahul Gandhi, the inexperienced scion of the Nehru-Gandhi family.
But Mr. Modi’s strident Hindu nationalism has fueled public outrage. When Reuters asked him earlier this year if he regretted the killings in 2002, he said, if “someone else is driving a car and we’re sitting behind, even then if a puppy comes under the wheel, will it be painful or not? Of course it is.” That incendiary response created a political uproar and demands for an apology.
Mr. Modi has shown no ability to work with opposition parties or tolerate dissent. And he has already alienated political partners; this summer, an important regional party broke off its 17-year alliance with the B.J.P. because it found Mr. Modi unacceptable.
His economic record in Gujarat is not entirely admirable, either. Muslims in Gujarat, for instance, are much more likely to be poor than Muslims in India as a whole, even though the state has a lower poverty rate than the country.
India is a country with multiple religions, more than a dozen major languages and numerous ethnic groups and tribes. Mr. Modi cannot hope to lead it effectively if he inspires fear and antipathy among many of its people.
anmol wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
Modi cannot lead India effectively: NYT editorial board
by Newest, timesofindia.indiatimes.com
October 27th 2013
NEW YORK: Narendra Modi, BJP's prime ministerial candidate, cannot hope to lead India effectively if he inspires "fear" and "antipathy" among many of its people, New York Times has commented in an unusual move.
"Mr Modi has shown no ability to work with opposition parties or tolerate dissent," the editorial board of New York Times said in a stinging editorial on the 63-year-old BJP leader.
The editorial said that Modi has already "alienated" BJP's political partners when Janata Dal (United), an important regional party broke off its 17-year alliance with the "party because it found Mr Modi unacceptable."
India was a country with multiple religions and "Mr Modi cannot hope to lead it effectively if he inspires fear and antipathy among many of its people," it said while recalling that nearly 1,000 people died in the 2002 riots in Gujarat.
The editorial, published yesterday, also questioned Modi's economic track record in Gujarat.
The "economic record in Gujarat is not entirely admirable, either," it said.
"Muslims in Gujarat, for instance, are much more likely to be poor than Muslims in India as a whole, even though the state has a lower poverty rate than the country," the editorial said.
"His rise to power is deeply troubling to many Indians, especially the country's 138 million Muslims and its many other minorities," said the 19-member editorial board, headed by India-born Andrew Rosenthal, the editorial page editor of New York Times.Narendra Modi’s Rise in India
by THE EDITORIAL BOARD, nytimes.com
October 26th 2013
In 2002, rioters in the western Indian state of Gujarat savagely killed nearly 1,000 people, most of whom were part of the Muslim minority. Now, barely a decade later, Narendra Modi, who was the chief minister of Gujarat at the time and still holds the office, is a leading candidate to become prime minister of India.
Mr. Modi, a star of India’s main opposition party, the Bharatiya Janata Party, would become prime minister if the party won enough seats in parliamentary elections next summer with support from its political allies. His rise to power is deeply troubling to many Indians, especially the country’s 138 million Muslims and its many other minorities. They worry he would exacerbate sectarian tensions that have subsided somewhat in the last decade.
Supporters of Mr. Modi argue that an investigation commissioned by India’s Supreme Court cleared him of wrongdoing in the riots. And they insist that Mr. Modi, who is widely admired by middle-class Indians for making Gujarat one of India’s fastest-growing states, can revive the economy, which has been weakened by a decade of mismanagement by the coalition government headed by the Indian National Congress Party.
There is no question that the Congress Party has failed to capitalize on the economic growth of recent years to invest in infrastructure, education and public institutions like the judiciary. And instead of trying to revive itself with new ideas and leaders, it is likely to be led in the coming election by Rahul Gandhi, the inexperienced scion of the Nehru-Gandhi family.
But Mr. Modi’s strident Hindu nationalism has fueled public outrage. When Reuters asked him earlier this year if he regretted the killings in 2002, he said, if “someone else is driving a car and we’re sitting behind, even then if a puppy comes under the wheel, will it be painful or not? Of course it is.” That incendiary response created a political uproar and demands for an apology.
Mr. Modi has shown no ability to work with opposition parties or tolerate dissent. And he has already alienated political partners; this summer, an important regional party broke off its 17-year alliance with the B.J.P. because it found Mr. Modi unacceptable.
His economic record in Gujarat is not entirely admirable, either. Muslims in Gujarat, for instance, are much more likely to be poor than Muslims in India as a whole, even though the state has a lower poverty rate than the country.
India is a country with multiple religions, more than a dozen major languages and numerous ethnic groups and tribes. Mr. Modi cannot hope to lead it effectively if he inspires fear and antipathy among many of its people.
Rajeev Mantri @RMantri 21m
Hey @nytimes, do you think a million people came out of "fear and antipathy" today for a @narendramodi's rally? pic.twitter.com/QFE7CDMQMw
Sucheta Dalal @suchetadalal 54m
@alok_bhatt whether of not NaMo becomes PM, clearly US has to eat humble pie on Modi Visa issue! Surely egg on many diplomat faces!
Sucheta Dalal @suchetadalal 56m
Waiting for #wikileaks on what #stratfor, US embassy advised abt Namo! Problem of listening 2 compromised thinktanks & mediaheads!
Sucheta Dalal @suchetadalal 1h
Is the US spy machine watching #hunkar rally? Will some heads roll among US diplomats for being so wrong on reaction to @narendramodi ?
To catch Hindu terrorists. After all this is the only expertise NIA has. The disbanding of NIA should also be a priority for Namo.anchal wrote:Per ANI, 5 people dead! Sad news coming in, wonder why the probe has been given to NIA in such a swift manner
+1. Kudos to Namo for controlling the situation through his speech. There were more than 5 lakh people in rally and had they become a mob, they could have marched directly to Nitish Kumar's residence and dismantled it to the last brick.kapilrdave wrote:NM has raised few notches up in my eyes today. If he wanted he could have cached in the agner of people for blasts. But he put people's lives ahead of politics. Salam sir. Take a bow.
+1 I also saw the speech live and it was evident he diluted his speech. In fact, he changed his speech impromptu so as to keep an atmosphere of peace and calm. This is a mark of a true leader and statesman.kapilrdave wrote:NM surely changed and diluted his speech. There were too less jibes against anyone today. This was definately not the speech for first rally in Bihar attended by 10L+. He did this purposely. The situation is very fragile in Patna and there are just too many people there. They were already angry on Nitish for the blasts. Had he gave more agressive speech there could have been riots. Even still the danger is not over. Dynasty would not leave any single opportunity to hold NM responsible for this and stop doing him gigantic rallies. That is the reason he did not utter even a word in about the blasts in speech. He also deliberately urged hundu/muslims to come together to fight powerty. This was necessary given the mood of the croud (from what I saw in tv). I think his appreciation for the crowd's patience will come by tonight. And he will console the dead and injurd. The speech was the worst time to do it.
But you are using it right now.Sagar G wrote:The language of invaders just like English.Sushupti wrote:Urdu is second official language in UP and Bihar
Don't change the fact. Nothing to feel proud of.Pranav wrote:But you are using it right now.Sagar G wrote: The language of invaders just like English.
warned for using invader's language.Sagar G wrote: The language of invaders just like English.
+1kapilrdave wrote:NM has raised few notches up in my eyes today. If he wanted he could have cached in the agner of people for blasts. But he put people's lives ahead of politics. Salam sir. Take a bow.
This is probably a new record.niran wrote: this time counting went south due to over whelming numbers the estimates were no more than
eight hundred thousand but all the system broke down at one million after the blast security had more priority
to counting numbers NaMo appeal for peaceful return at the end helped a lot, no untowardly incident reported,period.