ShankarCag wrote:For want of a better thread let me post here. For starters please read Rudradevji's post in the Namo interview poll thread. One abiding notice that I get from RaGa's interview is that the destructive, for Hindu society, IrBM (Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage) bill will be brought in to catch urban women votes for the congress. So in addition to caste and class warfare (as exemplied by AAP) we will also have gender warfare. Note that as per provisions of IrBM while both sides can claim US style no fault divorce woman can veto man's demand if she feels it will impact her financially. Additionally explicit sections have been inserted into the act to allow courts to give away not only a man's self acquired property, irrespective of whether it was acquired before or after marriage, but also a man's share in his ancestral property. As is the nature of other dhimmi laws in India, similar provisions of man claiming share of woman's property, acquired or inherited is not there. So man's property will be divided but not woman's. Intelligent BRF readers are advised to read this in conjunction with the US press report saying that a woman's economic lot improves with conversion to Christianity to see where all this is leading too.
The real danger of such acts is break down of marriage system. Why will men want to be part of a system that is completely biased in favor of women which can be used to blackmail and impoverish them? Why not simply go for live-in relationship or dating or maybe gay relationship? And there will be some opportunist women or bad apples that will want to take advantage of such unilaterally biased laws.
Already the dowry laws are really bad. Many men have been victimized due to them unfairly. These laws are even used to threaten them. So, basically, to make the marriage easy to break and unstable or atleast unhappy by pitting the husband against the wife. When the marriage is so easy to break, unstable and unhappy, who would want to get married?
Combine this sort of laws with the psyops being conducted by the media. One show by Aamir tried to portray that women are at a threat from men(their husbands in particular).
Once the marriage system is broken, everyone will be vulnerable. Both men and women. They will just nothing more than glorified labour working for the corporations and then spending that money to buy from corporations. Labours and clients. Many a times clients are labours and labours are clients for a conglomerate(including the sarkaar).
And they do this to only Hindhus!
I think its about time for people to stop claiming Hindhu legal status and simply claim legality of either caste, region or sect and demand special provisions based on these identities just as extended to Mo-ists and X-ists.
According to law, Hindhu legal status is just not worth it. Its better to lay claim to being a dalith, Brahmin, OBC, Vaishnava, Shaiva, North-Bhaaratheeya, South-Bhaaratheeya, or some such thing.
How can anybody and their uncle introduce any changes to Hindhu marriage act or inheritance acts without having any discussion or debate with Hindhus or Hindhu leaders? But the same cannot be done about Mo-ist or X-ist marriage or inheritance laws!
