Afghanistan News & Discussion

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21537
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by Philip »

Very true Garg.India should never get involved militarily in Afghanistan.We learnt our mistakes in not detailing out our strategic objectives long ago in Sri Lanka,where the IPKF ended up fighting the LTTE. We can however provide the Afghan govt. with much needed material and civilian assistance.The US too wants to extend their Afghan holiday for a few more years and why not? Let them enjoy the salubrious bracing mountain air of the country and watch the daily firework displays and the "music" of the band of "Al Q & the Taliban"!

Deal with Iran but no deal with Karzai.

Hamid Karzai refuses to sign US-Afghan security pact

President's call for delay stuns US and assembly he convened to approve deal critical to paying Afghan army and police salaries
Emma Graham-Harrison in Kabul
theguardian.com, Sunday 24 November 2013

Hamid Karzai tells the Loya Jirga, that the US-Afghan security deal should not be signed until after presidential elections in April. Photograph: S Sabawoon/EPA

A security pact with the US, which is critical to Afghanistan's ability to pay its soldiers and hold off the Taliban, is in limbo, after President Hamid Karzai shrugged off the recommendations of a national council that has approved the deal and said he would continue talks with Washington.

After a year of negotiations, the Loya Jirga, or grand assembly, of 2,500 delegates approved the agreement to keep US troops in the country after the current combat mission ends in 2014.

But Karzai stunned US diplomats and many of his own security officials when he told the opening session of the jirga that the bilateral security agreement should not be signed until after presidential elections in April.

Washington quickly announced that a deal had to be agreed by the end of the year, but on Sunday Karzai said that the US had to prove its good intentions by keeping its soldiers out of Afghan homes, ensuring the vote was transparent and promoting peace talks with the Taliban.

"If I sign and there is no security, then who is going to be blamed for it?" he told delegates, who interrupted his speech several times to both question and support him.

The agreement will allow US soldiers to stay on at nine bases, mentoring the still ill-equipped and patchily trained Afghan police and army, and pursuing al-Qaida and linked groups.

It is politically sensitive for many reasons, not least because it undermines Afghanistan's reputation as the "graveyard of empires", with the ignominious withdrawal of Soviet forces referenced several times in jirga speeches on Sunday.

But without a deal, the US is unlikely to part with the $4bn (£2.50bn) a year needed to pay the Afghan army, or provide the helicopters and other equipment promised.

Many Afghans feel that the imperfect deal is the only protection they have against powerful neighbours. One of Karzai's security advisers warned parliament that without the agreement the country would be isolated "among wolves", and his military chief asked opponents of the deal to say where else they would come up with police and army funding.

At the end of the Loya Jirga, which has no legally binding powers, a string of delegates came up to the podium to commend the deal, some to ask for small changes, but the majority to urge Karzai to sign the agreement by the end of year.

Karzai chose to ignore those requests, warning his audience that "Afghanistan has always won the war but lost in politics". He added that he planned to carry on with negotiations because the US had broken previous commitments to protect the country and support the peace process.

"Lack of trust is the core of the problem," his spokesman, Aimal Faizi, said before the speech, adding that Karzai thought American officials were bluffing when they warned of a total pullout by the US. "We don't believe there is a zero option," he said.

But many in Washington and Afghanistan fear Karzai is underestimating the exhaustion of both the US public and the Obama administration with a long and costly war, and that he is taking a huge risk by delaying the deal.

After Karzai finished, Sebghattulah Mojaddidi, the chairman of the gathering, took to the podium again to give an emotional speech aimed at the leader who he said is like "my own child".

Afghanistan had kicked out a superpower before, Mojaddidi said, and could do the same if they did not stick to their side of the deal. "This is good for us. If the Americans don't follow the agreement, I will be responsible."

Mojaddidi warned that he would go into voluntary exile if Karzai did not sign the deal.

The US embassy in Kabul declined to comment on the status of the agreement. "We are studying the president's remarks. We continue to believe that concluding the agreement as soon as possible is in the interests of both nations," a spokesman said.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60287
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by ramana »

Interesting turn of events.
Also if Afghanistan relies on $4B/year from US to arm its army it will be forever a banana state. The funds can be cut at the whim of some politician under Paki payroll.
Agnimitra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5150
Joined: 21 Apr 2002 11:31

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by Agnimitra »

Hiten
BRFite
Posts: 1130
Joined: 21 Sep 2008 07:57
Location: Baudland
Contact:

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by Hiten »

Fact: India Trains The 2nd Highest Number Of Afghanistan's Military Personals
Playing its role towards building a peaceful, empowered neighbourhood, safeguarding flanks.

Gen-Bikram-Singh-Indian-Army-US-Visit-01-R

Indian Army Chief, General Bikram Singh, who is, presently, on an official visit to the United States of America, was honoured with the 'Legion of Merit' award, the 6th highest military honour in the U.S. Reporting the award ceremony, it was stated that, under Gen. Singh's tenure, India has risen to the second position in the number of Afghan National Security Forces it has trained, surpassing the European countries, whose military is currently based in Afghanistan.

"United States Army Chief of Staff, Gen. Ray Odierno and Gen. Bikram Singh, Indian Army Chief of Staff, stand by for the reading of orders for the Legion Of Merit during a Full Honors Ceremony in honor of Gen. Bikram Singh, Chief of Army Staff of the Indian Army at Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall, Va., on December 5, 2013. Gen. Bikram Singh helped the Indian Army to become the second largest trainer of Afghan national Security Forces following the United States."

- Indian Army Chief of Staff visits with Gen. Ray Odierno

As commendable as the distinction is, knowledge, without tools & resources, however, is knowledge that can't be utilised. After being rebuffed the first time, the Government of Afghanistan reiterated its requirement of India to provide it with military equipment & support needed to bolster Afghan security, fending off the onslaught from the Islamist Taliban militia, receiving state patronage from the neighbourhood. A stable Western sector & access to the Energy-rich Central Asian Republics [CAR], critical to India's economic growth, requires India to have a friendly & peaceful Afghanistan. Its time India stop pandering to the irrationals & step up resolutely to meet the challenge of protecting its interests.

Some more pictures of the award ceremony.

click on the images to view them in larger size
Gen-Bikram-Singh-Indian-Army-US-Visit-02-R
Gen-Bikram-Singh-Indian-Army-US-Visit-03-R
Gen-Bikram-Singh-Indian-Army-US-Visit-04-R

Godspeed

Also Read: Civilians Flying In Conflict-ridden Afghanistan - South African Experience
via http://www.aame.in/2013/12/india-trains ... er-of.html
svenkat
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4727
Joined: 19 May 2009 17:23

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by svenkat »

http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/india-helping-in-having-our-own-army-karzai/article5461450.ece
India and Afghanistan have agreed to deepen defence and security cooperation to increase the operational capabilities and mobility of the Afghanistan National Security and Defence Forces (ANSDF).

Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai said his talks with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, especially in military training and equipment, were “very productive, resulting in satisfaction for the Afghan side.”
In an interaction with journalists and strategic affairs experts here on Saturday, he said, “We hope to have an army to defend Afghanistan through its own resources and its own citizens. To that objective we are being helped by India.”

Afghanistan had given a wish list of military equipment and also sought greater cooperation in building up a battle-capable ANSDF. India was wise to carefully weigh the implications of greater defence cooperation, he said.

Besides defence and security, Dr. Singh and Mr. Karzai on Friday agreed to work with Iran for developing new routes to facilitate trade and transit to Afghanistan and beyond. One of these is a land route beginning from the Iranian port of Chah-bahar. It enters Zaranj on the Afghan border from where India has built a road feeding into the garland highway connecting major Afghan cities. A spur connects Afghanistan to Central Asia, thus opening up further prospects for India’s trade and economic drive in non-traditional markets.

Mr. Karzai said both Kabul and New Delhi had applied for land at Chah-bahar to set up administrative and trade facilitation offices. He wanted Central Asian countries also to also participate in this endeavour.

The President was confident of India going ahead with $11-billion Hajigak iron ore project, but pointed out that the Afghans were being very cautious about opening up the country’s mineral resources for exploitation to prevent them from becoming a source of trouble as it happened in some African countries.
http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/west-must-recognise-that-we-are-also-human-beings/article5461451.ece
President Hamid Karzai on Saturday narrated the story of a four-and-a-half-year-old Afghan girl with “no face’’ left after a bomb went off, to make the point about a more considerate presence of Western troops in his country after a bulk of them withdraws next year.

“The West must recognise that we are also people. We too have homes, families and children,’’ he said to repeated questions during a meeting with journalists and strategic affairs experts here on Saturday about differences between Afghanistan and the United States over the terms and conditions for signing a Bilateral Security Agreement (BSA). The pact will cover placement of 15,000 U.S. and NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation) troops in nine locations in Afghanistan for 10 years.

Mr. Karzai said Afghanistan refused to sign the pact though it was approved by the Loya Jirga because the U.S. was not prepared to agree to conditionalities that would check wanton attacks and indiscriminate operations by its troops.

To make his point, he spoke in detail about the child he visited in a U.S. hospital. She was found barely alive in the remnants of a vehicle bombed by western troops.

“I went to see her and thought why are they keeping her alive; a child who is without a mother or a face? I asked the doctors if she will ever have a face again and they said she will not really have a face, ever. I have been pleading with the U.S. to respect Afghan homes. They do not have the right to kill an entire family in pursuit of a Taliban fighter who is in the same bus. It is this I will try to stop. People shouldn’t suffer so hugely and tragically,’’ he said when asked about his opposition to the BSA.
Mr. Karzai described the Afghan quandary through a paraphrased Hindi couplet, delivered with a faultless accent. “You must have heard the couplet: Dua dete hain jeene ki; dava dete hain marne ki (they pray for our wellbeing but give medicines that kill us). I think the U.S. attitude can be put as: Dua dete hain jeene ki; dava dete hain theek na hone ki (they pray for our wellbeing but given us medicines that will never make us well again).’’
The President was candid about his relationship with the U.S. “The U.S. doesn’t trust me and I don’t trust the U.S. You saw what they did in 2009 [backed Mr. Karzai’s rival], have caused civilian casualties. We are not a sophisticated country. We are very simple people and see only black and white. There is no grey. You are either a friend or a foe. We want to be friends.’’


The President began his address by personally meeting each person in the conference hall. “A great newspaper,’’ he said about The Hindu .

gunjur
BRFite
Posts: 602
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by gunjur »

U-19 Cricket World Cup: Underdogs Afghanistan stun Australia
Afghanistan continued to make giant strides in the world of cricket as their Under-19 side caused a major upset to beat Australia by 36 runs in a Group B encounter in Abu Dhabi on Monday. Not very long ago in 2013, the senior team from the war-ravaged nation put all their personal strife in the politically volatile surroundings behind themselves and played their hearts out to qualify for the next edition of the World Cup in 2015.

Winning the toss and electing to bat first, Afghanistan opener Mohammad Mujtaba (75) and number three batsman Ihsanullah (63) laid the foundation for the Afghanistan innings with a 126-run stand for the second wicket. Further contribution from Hashmatullah Shaidi (57) helped Afghanistan post a total of 253.

In reply, Australia had a rocky start, losing two early wickets. A couple of good partnerships between Jaron Morgan and Jake Doran (37 for the third wicket) and Jake Doran and Damien Mortimer (70 for the fourth wicket) kept Australia alive.

However, Afghanistan's right-arm medium pacer Abdullah Adil broke the vital fourth-wicket stand, after which the Australians collapsed. Adil finished with figures of four for 45 in nine overs while Sharafudding Ashraf picked up three for 55 as Australia folded for 217, 36 runs short of the Afghanistan total.
Agnimitra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5150
Joined: 21 Apr 2002 11:31

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by Agnimitra »

Interesting article to appear in an Afghan news publication:

Pakistan’s mysterious love for Indian anti-corruption crusaders
Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 23387
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by Austin »

President Karzai hails USSR for 'efficient' economic help to Afghanistan

Afghan President Hamid Karzai appreciates the economic help provided by the former Soviet Union to his country in the past. "The Soviet money went to the right place. They were efficient in spending their money and doing it through the Afghan government," Karzai said in an interview.
The Washington Post newspaper, which had the interview with the Afghan leader, said that the Russian government had drawn up a list of 140 Soviet-era projects which it would like to renovate. One is the Kabul House-building Factory constructed in the early 1960s by Soviet specialists, which received a consignment of new equipment worth $ 25 million from Russia last autumn.

The Washington Post quoted the head engineer of the house-building factory as saying that "what the Soviets did here was really fundamental. They were thinking about the long term."

It also noted that the number of students studying Russian at the Kabul University had doubled over the past two years, and Russia had doubled the number of grants to Afghan students.

Meanwhile, the situation with a deal envisioning an unidentified number of US troops staying in Afghanistan after the total NATO troops withdrawal by the end of 2014 is still unclear.

Last week, in his final address to Afghanistan's parliament President Hamid Karzai told the United States its soldiers can leave at the end of the year because his military, which already protects 93 percent of the country, was ready to take over entirely. He reiterated his stance that he would not sign a pact with the United States that would provide for a residual force of US troops to remain after the final withdrawal, unless peace could first be established.

The Afghan president has come under heavy pressure to complete a Bilateral Security Agreement with a council of notables, that he himself convened, recommending that he sign the pact. The troops left behind would train and mentor Afghan troops, and some US Special Forces would also remain to hunt down al-Qaida.

All 10 presidential candidates in the April 5 election have said they would sign the security agreement. But Karzai himself does not appear to want his legacy to include a commitment to a longer foreign troop presence in his country.

Karzai was brought to power in the wake of the 2001 US-led invasion and subsequently won two presidential elections in 2004 and again in 2009. In recent years though he has espoused a combatative nationalism, his hour-long speech on Saturday being no exception.

"I want to say to all those foreign countries who, maybe out of habit or because they want to, interfere, that they should not interfere," he said.

Karzai said the war in Afghanistan had been "imposed" on his nation, presumably by the 2001 invasion, and told the United States it could bring peace to Afghanistan if it went after terrorist sanctuaries and countries that supported terrorism, a reference to Pakistan.
Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 23387
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by Austin »

Source: New public holidays may appear in Ukraine :rotfl:
New law project proposed by minister of culture. Cancels celebrating 8 March, 1 May, and 9 May

Instead introduces new holidays: 20 february - day of freedom (day of recent putch), 8 July - day of Ukranian army (celebrating Konotop battle against russia), 30 June - day of restoring statehood to celebrate Bandera's Declaration of Ukranian State, puppet state during nazi invasion in 1941.
8 May is now mourning date - Day of Soviet Occupation
http://ria.ru/world/20140322/1000651124.html
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25387
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by SSridhar »

AFGHANISTAN: Critical Cusp - Ajit Kumar Singh, South Asian Intelligence Review
With less than a fortnight to go for the all important Presidential Elections scheduled to be held on April 5, 2014, a wave of terror strikes has enveloped the length and breadth of Afghanistan. In the most recent of major incidents (each resulting in three or more fatalities) at least nine persons, including four foreigners and five Afghans (including two children and two women), were shot dead by Taliban terrorists inside the luxurious Serena Hotel complex in national capital Kabul, in the night of March 20, 2014. The attackers managed to smuggle pistols past security checkpoints and then hid in a bathroom, eventually springing out and opening fire on guests and hotel guards. All the four terrorists were killed in the subsequent operation by the Security Forces (SFs). The attack took place despite recent security reports rating Serena Hotel, guarded round the clock by dozens of security guards armed with assault weapons, among the highest-risk locales in the city. The hotel is frequented by foreign officials and the Afghan elite.

In another incident earlier in the day, Taliban terrorists killed at least 11 people, including the Police Chief of Jalalabad District, and wounded another 22, in a suicide bomb attack and gun battle at a Police Station in Jalalabad city, Nangarhar Province. The assault began with two explosions just before dawn targeting the Police Station and a nearby square, close to compounds used by international organizations, including the United Nations. The initial attack was carried out by two suicide bombers, one of them driving a three-wheeler vehicle. Afghan SF personnel, with the help of International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) helicopter gunships, launched retaliatory fire. The ensuing gun battle lasted for over three hours, at the end of which six Taliban terrorists, all of them wearing suicide vests, were killed.

On March 18, 2014, a suicide bomber riding a rickshaw blew himself up outside a checkpoint near a market in Maymana, the capital of Faryab Province, killing at least 15 civilians and injuring another 46. The explosion took place some 200 metres away from the Provincial Governor’s residential compound.

On January 17, 2014, at least 21 persons, including 13 foreigners and eight Afghans, were killed in a suicide bombing by the Taliban, at a Lebanese restaurant, Taverna Du Liban, in Kabul. Wabel Abdallah, the International Monetary Fund’s Resident Representative in Afghanistan, was among the dead. Three attackers were also killed. The restaurant, popular among foreigners and wealthy locals, is located in an area that houses several diplomatic missions.

According to partial data compiled by the Institute for Conflict Management’s (ICM's) South Asia Terrorism Portal (SATP), since the beginning of 2014, a total of 682 persons, including 141 civilians, 101 SF personnel and 440 terrorists, have been killed in terrorism-related incidents across Afghanistan (data till March 23, 2014). The country has recorded at least 45 major incidents in 321 deaths during this period. More worryingly, 21 out of these 45 incidents were suicide attacks, accounting for 132 killings.

Violence recorded a significant escalation through 2013. SATP data indicates that at least 6,363 fatalities were recorded through 2012, including of 2,754 civilians, 893 SF personnel and 2,716 terrorists, rising to 7,074 fatalities in 2013, including 2,959 civilians, 1,413 SF personnel and 2,702 terrorists - an increase of 11.17 percent in overall fatalities.

More worryingly, civilians continued to face the brunt, with civilian fatalities increasing by 7.44 percent in 2013. According to United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA), the number of civilians killed through 2013 surpassed civilian fatalities in all the previous years since the beginning of war in 2001, barring 2011, when the civilian fatalities stood at 3,021. UNAMA, however, started compiling data only from 2007, in which year 1,523 civilian deaths were documented across Afghanistan.

Other parameters of violence, includng suicide attacks and improvised explosive device (IED) attacks also witnessed an increase in 2013, as compared to the previous year. As against 101 suicide attacks in 2012, year 2013 recorded 107 such attacks, according to UNAMA. 73 of 107 suicide attacks in 2013 targeted civilians, killing 255. Throughout 2013, the use of IEDs remained the leading cause of civilian deaths and injuries. 962 civilian deaths and 1,928 injuries occurred in 2013 due to IED explosions, as compared to 868 civilian deaths and 1,663 injuries in 2012.

Indeed, varying media sources estimate that the Taliban, which lost power in 2001 as the US and its allies launched Operation Enduring Freedom in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, has regrouped and now dominates an estimated 40 to 60 per cent of Afghanistan.

More than 50,000 ISAF combat troops who are still in Afghanistan are due to leave by the end of the year. Afghan Forces now control almost 93 per cent of their territory and lead 97 per cent of all security operations across the country. They are also responsible for over 90 per cent of their own training activities. Afghan National Security Force (ANSF) troops have demonstrated their capabilities in a number of successful operations, but difficulties persist, as is evident in the failure to stall the rise in violence. US Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, thus told the Senate Armed Services Committee on February 11, 2014, that, on the battlefield, Afghan Forces often score tactical victories against Taliban insurgents, but had difficulties holding cleared territory, particularly when Police units were involved. Clapper also observed that the Afghan National Army (ANA) had, improved but still suffered from “extensive desertion problems”. About 30,000 Afghans deserted from the ANA in 2013, out of a total strength of 185,000, Clapper disclosed. The head of the US Defence Intelligence Agency, Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, added, at the same forum, that Afghan troops had made “modest progress”, but still needed international assistance with logistics, air transport and intelligence.

Clearly, the current situation demonstrates tremendous vulnerabilities in the ANSF, and the need for a continued and significant presence of ISAF troops, if the state is to retain its structure and dominance in future engagements. Nevertheless, the process of the premature drawdown of ISAF Forces continues to accelerate. On March 16, 2014, the United Kingdom (UK) handed over another two bases to Afghan Forces. From 137 UK bases in the country, there now remain just two bases - Camp Bastion, which is the main base for UK personnel, and observation post Sterga 2, both of which are in Helmand Province.

On February 25, 2014, the White House announced that US President Barack Obama had ordered the Pentagon to prepare for a possible complete withdrawal of troops, following Afghan President Hamid Karzai's refusal to sign a Bilateral Security Agreement (BSA) with the US, despite the US and Afghanistan agreeing to details of the BSA and the agreement being endorsed by a council of 3,000 Afghan tribal elders, the Loya Jirga. Karzai has stated that he will only sign the BSA if the US publicly starts a peace process with the Taliban and ensures transparent elections this year. Indeed, according to a February 3, 2014, media report, President Karzai has been engaged in secret contacts with the Taliban. Aimal Faizi, Karzai's spokesman, characterized the contacts as among the 'most serious' the presidential palace had with the Taliban since the war, adding, “The last two months have been very positive. These parties were encouraged by the President’s stance on the bilateral security agreement and his speeches afterwards.” Despite coalition reservations, the Karzai Government has also gone ahead with its decision to release detainees at Bagram Prison in Bagram District, Parwan Province. It has so far released 120 detainees – 55 on March 20, 2014, and 65 on February 13, 2014. The US Forces had handed over the prison at Bagram Air Base to full Afghan control on March 25, 2013.

The final word on the BSA, however, will only be heard after the Presidential Elections of April 2014. Indeed, soon after Obama’s telephonic conversation with Hamid Karzai on February 25, 2014, the White House issued a statement noting, “We will leave open the possibility of concluding a (security agreement) with Afghanistan later this year. However, the longer we go without a (deal), the more challenging it will be to plan and execute any U.S. mission.” Crucially, all the nine candidates who are in fray for the President's post have supported the signing of the BSA, though none of them have stated this openly, with the exception of Abdullah Abdullah, who was the runner up to Karzai in the disputed 2009 elections. Abudllah observed, “It is in the interest of Afghanistan to sign the BSA.” The pact would allow the US to keep as many as 10,000 troops in the country to focus on counterterrorism and the training of Afghan security forces.

The BSA alone, however, cannot ensure peace in Afghanistan. Unless the Taliban's safe sanctuaries and infrastructure of support in Pakistan are dismantled, Pakistan-backed Islamist extremists will continue to wreak havoc in Afghanistan. In his final address to Afghanistan’s Parliament on March 15, 2014, Karzai declared, in an obvious reference to Pakistan, that the US could bring peace to Afghanistan if it went after terrorist sanctuaries and countries that supported terrorism. Similarly, Major General Stephen Townsend, who commands US and NATO Forces in eastern Afghanistan, noted, "Until the Pakistanis do something about the safe havens, that's going to be a problem. (Terrorists) can recruit and train and equip and prepare to launch in Pakistan."

The most immediate concern is, of course, conducting a free and fair Presidential election. Indeed, in 2004, the fatalities during the campaign period (September 7 to October 7) stood at 196. The elections, which were conducted on October 9, 2004, were by and large fair. As a result, violence in the post-election period remained low. On the other hand, in 2009, a total of 1,173 persons were killed during the campaign period (June 16 to August 18), and the elections, which were held on August 20, 2009, were marred with controversy so much so that a runoff election was declared on November 7, 2009, which was finally called off on November 2, when second runner up Abdullah Abdullah decided, on November 1, not to contest, citing the “inappropriate actions of the Government and the election commission”. The violence and lack of transparency in the elections catalyzed the growth of the Taliban. Present developments indicate that this process might well be repeated in the present round of polls. Since the beginning of the campaign on February 2, 2014, 534 persons have already been killed in Afghanistan, till March 23. The campaign will last till April 2. Unless this rising violence is contained at the earliest and an environment where free and fair elections can be conducted can be established, the outcome could bode ill for the future of Afghanistan.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25387
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by SSridhar »

Taliban Attacks Afghan Election Office - The Hindu
Taliban militants attacked the headquarters of the Independent Election Commission of Afghanistan on Saturday in Kabul, opening fire on the compound with rocket-propelled grenades and heavy machine guns from a house outside its perimeter wall, according to police.

It’s the latest in a series of high-profile attacks that come as the Islamic militant movement steps up a campaign of violence to disrupt presidential elections, which are due to be held in a week.

A spokesman for the Independent Election Commission said security had already been increased around the compound because an attack had been widely expected, and no casualties have been reported.

Explosions were heard when the attack started, according to the spokesman Noor Mohammed Noor, but he did not know what caused them.

Kabul police chief Mohammad Zahir Zahir said three or four attackers were holed up in a neighbouring house that had been empty when they occupied it. He said the house is about 800 meters away from the headquarters, which is inside a walled off compound guarded by a series of watch towers and checkpoints.

Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid claimed responsibility for the attack but described what would have been a much more ambitious assault, claiming a suicide bomber and gunmen had stormed the IEC compound. He said there was a meeting between the IEC and election observers, including foreigners, at the time of the attack. The Taliban frequently exaggerate in their statements and a meeting could not immediately be confirmed.

It would have been extremely difficult for the attackers to penetrate the tight security, but the Taliban have staged a number of assaults aimed at showing they are able to strike at will.

On Tuesday, the Taliban also struck another IEC office on the edge of Kabul, with a suicide bomber detonating his vehicle outside while two gunmen stormed into the building, killing four people and trapping dozens of employees inside.

The Taliban also have stepped up attacks on foreigners in the Afghan capital, suggesting that they are also shifting tactics to focus on civilian targets that aren’t as heavily protected as military and government installations.

The Taliban targeted an American charity, the Roots of Peace, and a nearby day care center late Friday in the Afghan capital, sending foreigners including women and children fleeing while Afghan security forces battled the gunmen. Officials said two Afghan bystanders were killed a girl and a driver.

Gunmen slipped through security last week into a luxury hotel in Kabul on March 20, 2014 with pistols and ammunition hidden in their shoes, then opened fire, killing nine people, including two Afghan children who were dining in the restaurant.

A Swedish journalist was shot to death on the street in a relatively affluent area earlier this month, and a Lebanese restaurant popular with foreigners was attacked by a suicide bomber and gunmen in January.
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21234
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by Prem »

Gupp yaan Such

British sniper in Afghanistan kills six Taliban with one bullet: report
LONDON- A British sniper in Afghanistan killed six insurgents with a single bullet after hitting the trigger switch of a suicide bomber whose device then exploded, The Telegraph reported.The 20-year-old marksman, a Lance Corporal in the Coldstream Guards, hit his target from 930 yards (850 metres) away, killing the suicide bomber and five others around him caught in the blast. The incident in Kakaran in southern Afghanistan happened in December but hasonly now been disclosed as Britain moves towards the withdrawal of all combat soldiers by the end of the year.Lt Col Richard Slack, commanding officer of 9/12 Royal Lancers, said the unnamed sharpshooter prevented a major attack by the Taliban, as a second suicide vest packed with 20kg (44lbs) of explosives was found nearby. The same sniper, with his first shot on the tour of duty, killed a Taliban machine-gunner from 1,465 yards (1,340m). Several hundred British and Afghan soldiers were carrying out an operationin December when they were engaged in a gun battle with 15 to 20 insurgents."The guy was wearing a vest. He was identified by the sniper moving down a tree line and coming up over a ditch," said Lt Col Slack. "He had a shawl on. It rose up and the sniper saw he had a machine gun. They were in contact and he was moving to a firing position. The sniper engaged him and the guy exploded. There was a pause on the radio and the sniper said, 'I think I've just shot a suicide bomber'. The rest of them were killed in the blast." It is understood the L/Cpl was using an L115A3 gun, the British Army's most powerful sniper weapon.
sanjaykumar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6593
Joined: 16 Oct 2005 05:51

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by sanjaykumar »

Oh man... I think my mind has been contaminated with all this violence. I am a pacifist if anything but the first thing that came to mind was...congratulations. :|
Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21537
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by Philip »

"Mission accomplished!",says a Taliban jihadi in a cartoon,as he watches a British soldier parking up to leave Helmland and Afghanistan.

It sums up the last disastrous British Afghan War.The neo-imperialist Brits,learnt nothing from their earlier wars with the Afghans.The great imperial poet,Kipling knew the truth and put it beautifully in his famous poem,the "Young British Soldier". The last verse sums up thr futility of fighting the Afghans.
When you're wounded and left on Afghanistan's plains,
And the women come out to cut up what remains,
Jest roll to your rifle and blow out your brains
An' go to your Gawd like a soldier
.
Thus do the British retreat yet again,tail well tucked between its legs,desperately trying to salvage anything worthwhile of the equipment brought into the country at great cost,which they can sell at a future flea market to the turd world. They fled from Basra,leaving it ot the Yanquis to pick up the pieces in Iraq,but here,even the Yanquis are fleeing from the beardies of the Taliban,who must be sacrificing in joy to their god of war another suicide bomber on the road of their retreat!

How the mighty have fallen.The Yanquis and the Brits beating the retreat,back to the barracks.A nation of peasants defeated the Yanquis in Vietnam,a nation of camel drivers defeated them in Iraq,and a nation of poppy growers have defeated them in Afghanistan! NATO,came saw and were conquered! NATO has also fled in style,leaving early ,so that it may live to retreat another day,this time in the badlands of Europe,Russia's "near abroad",starting with the Ukraine!

Wait for the next batch of Russian potato farmers to thrash the living daylights out of the neo-Napoleonic and neo-Nazi forces of NATO and O'Bumbler of the White House,should they dare do more than sabre rattle!

PS:The tall tale of thw sniper pales into significance with the bloody achievements of Yanqui drone jockeys.With just one push of a button,they've killed dozens of innocent women,children and livestock in a single strike!
sanjaykumar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6593
Joined: 16 Oct 2005 05:51

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by sanjaykumar »

I don't about that Philip, but I am not sure what strategic or even military objectives have been met by US/Britain/NATO. What was the point of it all?
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21234
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by Prem »

sanjaykumar wrote:I don't about that Philip, but I am not sure what strategic or even military objectives have been met by US/Britain/NATO. What was the point of it all?
Jaan Bacchi So lakho Payye, Laut Ke Buddhu Ghar ko Ayye?
sadhana
BRFite
Posts: 218
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by sadhana »

http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/05/world/asi ... elections/

Afghans flock to vote for new president despite threat of Taliban violence
Afghan lawmaker Shukria Barakzai, at a polling station in Kabul, told CNN she felt proud and happy because "today is the day ... when the people of Afghanistan can go and vote freely."

She said the turnout was a slap in the face for the Taliban and terrorists who have sought to obstruct the elections.

"See, wonderful people are coming to practice democracy," she said. "We are not afraid of the threats. As much as they kill us, we get more stronger. As much as they killed our children, our journalists and innocent women, we say no, we will go and vote because we are fed up. We want to see real change, we want to enjoy our democracy."
Plenty of photos of long lines and healthy turnout all over Afghanistan, even Khandahar. Just posting this proforma news report to mark the occasion on this thread.
sadhana
BRFite
Posts: 218
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by sadhana »

'Pakistanists' in US/UK policy community might have to think up new arguments for their favorite spoilt child. It seems they have realized this:
http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/02/opinion/b ... elections/

What if the Afghan elections actually work?
By Peter Bergen, CNN National Security Analyst

The United States made a fundamental error when it conceived that real peace in Afghanistan, which has been wracked by three decades of war, centered on doing some kind of deal with the Taliban. As a result, well-intentioned U.S. officials put a great deal of diplomatic effort into trying to negotiate some kind of peace deal with the Taliban. Absolutely nothing has come of this multiyear effort, which was always a pipe dream, as I predicted in this space three years ago.

The negotiations with the Taliban were known in Washington circles as "the reconciliation process." In fact, the real reconciliation process is what you will see in Afghanistan on Saturday: Huge turnout by voters across the country voting across ethnic lines for seasoned politicians who have partnered with leaders of other ethnic groups.

This isn't the predicted civil war; it's more like a civics love fest. If only we could try to import some of this spirit into the U.S. Congress.

Agnimitra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5150
Joined: 21 Apr 2002 11:31

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by Agnimitra »

Oma Ali's blog 'Brown Pundits':
Afghanistan Election 2014: Death Knell of Pakistani Strategic Depth?
Afghanistan has voted. And wow, what a lot of voting there was! Millions of Afghans turned out and voted in an election where a vote for anyone was a vote against Mullah Umar and his backers. Now it may be that the results will not be accepted, that the winners will fight each other or that the good feeling will evaporate as some future Taliban offensive shakes the state. But if the results are credible and are accepted, then it may well be (to quote journalist Tahir Mehdi) that April 5th 2014 will be to strategic depth what December 16th 1971 was to the two-nation theory.

Of course, one may then point out that the Two Nation theory has had a very healthy Zombie existence since 1971. But even the healthiest Zombie is still a Zombie. Dying is forever.

One can always hope.

This question came up on twitter: was this election a success because Afghan security forces and ISAF did a fantastic job and the Afghan people rejected Mullah Umar? or because Pakistan was paid (and paid well) and agreed to permit a peaceful election? I suspect a bit of both. But either way, it does not alter the significance of the event. Whether Pakistan's Taliban allies are just not strong enough to disrupt elections or whether Pakistan has sold them out for money. its all the same as far as strategic depth is concerned. Its over.

PS: I have already heard from people on twitter that this will not lead to milk and honey and a civil war is coming. But please note, I said nothing about those things. All that may be true. But strategic depth was a different story. The story was that Afghanistan is waiting for Americans to leave and then our boys walk in and eject the "mayor of Kabul". That doesnt seem to be the story at all. "Our boys" didnt look as strong as advertised. And unless they are the dominant and strongest party, strategic depth is dead and strategic nightmare awaits.
Johann
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2075
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by Johann »

sanjaykumar wrote:I don't about that Philip, but I am not sure what strategic or even military objectives have been met by US/Britain/NATO. What was the point of it all?
There was never any long lasting consensus on how the mission of securing Afghanistan was to be achieved. The actual mission plan kept drifting reactively.

The team managing the war should have stayed small, experienced and tightly focused but with access to the full range of state and international resources. That is why the Taliban was so quickly dislodged. It was run by people who understood the politics and history of the place, and were allowed to manage a military campaign tailored to fit it.

They did not get to continue to run the Afghan war, which eventually shifted to much larger bureaucracies filled with conventionally minded people who did not know or understand the country, or know and understand the political nature of insurgency. They in turn were advised by people who deliberately understated the risks and costs to persuade reluctant politicians to commit to big campaigns working on the logic that *something* done is better than nothing. They secured big commitments, but not big enough or long enough to actually win a war.

The Bush administration was in denial for the 4 years between the invasion of Iraq and Rumsfeld's resignation at the end of 2006. The Obama administration has been divided and confused, failing to lead and co-ordinate from the top for most of the last 6 years.

This is not an intelligence failure, it is a governance failure that has everything to do with the way governments 'think' and operate. Without a clear and consistent mission, realistic appraisals and the resources to match, its not possible to achieve major results.
devesh
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5129
Joined: 17 Feb 2011 03:27

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by devesh »

Johann wrote:
sanjaykumar wrote:I don't about that Philip, but I am not sure what strategic or even military objectives have been met by US/Britain/NATO. What was the point of it all?
There was never any long lasting consensus on how the mission of securing Afghanistan was to be achieved. The actual mission plan kept drifting reactively.

The team managing the war should have stayed small, experienced and tightly focused but with access to the full range of state and international resources. That is why the Taliban was so quickly dislodged. It was run by people who understood the politics and history of the place, and were allowed to manage a military campaign tailored to fit it.

They did not get to continue to run the Afghan war, which eventually shifted to much larger bureaucracies filled with conventionally minded people who did not know or understand the country, or know and understand the political nature of insurgency. They in turn were advised by people who deliberately understated the risks and costs to persuade reluctant politicians to commit to big campaigns working on the logic that *something* done is better than nothing. They secured big commitments, but not big enough or long enough to actually win a war.

small team? consisting of Powell, Rumsfeld, Bush, etc? this same team ran the later campaign in Iraq and Afghanistan until the arrival of Gates 5 years later. hubris and bad policy are to an extent valid excuses. but these reasons only seem plausible if we assume that destruction of Taliban was their envisioned goal. I don't think this ever was the goal, or will ever be. the objective was always to punish the Taliban for daring to go the ultimate step of "invasion" of American soil and striking at the heart of Western finance (although I doubt the validity of that belief; London is more likely) and economic triumphalism. and conveniently, it would also open up a base into the "soft underbelly" of the ever feared Russian Bear. the "West" always keeps a weary eye on Russia, and the opportunity to once and for all open up direct military boots-on-ground contact with CA-Iran-China right under the Bear's nose must have been extraordinarily tempting, even if those reasons were more hidden than the overt causes given for the invasion.

The Bush administration was in denial for the 4 years between the invasion of Iraq and Rumsfeld's resignation at the end of 2006. The Obama administration has been divided and confused, failing to lead and co-ordinate from the top for most of the last 6 years.

This is not an intelligence failure, it is a governance failure that has everything to do with the way governments 'think' and operate. Without a clear and consistent mission, realistic appraisals and the resources to match, its not possible to achieve major results.

intelligence/governance failure are misnomers. it can only be a "failure" if there ever was a clear goal of fundamentally destroying the Taliban. right from the beginning (letting the Taliban escape to the favorite munna: pakistan), the actual war progress shows that there never was any intent or commitment to destroy the Taliban. I don't think the West/USA views Jihad as an enemy in the most basic sense of that word. It's more of an attitude taken towards a "rival", not an enemy.

my response highlighted in Red.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25387
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by SSridhar »

sanjaykumar wrote:I don't about that Philip, but I am not sure what strategic or even military objectives have been met by US/Britain/NATO. What was the point of it all?
Leave NATO out of this. The US and its side-kick, the UK, had to act after the 9/11 incident. They also realized if a lasting solution was to be found, they had to deal severely with their ally, Pakistan, which bothered them a great deal. So, they decided to do a hotch-potch job and exit (dis)honourably. They have left the region and the world in a greater mess than before, as is their wont.
Agnimitra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5150
Joined: 21 Apr 2002 11:31

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by Agnimitra »

X-post from TSP thread:
partha wrote:http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/opinion/10 ... tta-s-gall
“When the Taliban took Kabul days later, the first thing they did was drag Najibullah through the streets and string him and his brother up on Ariana Square...The first ring of Taliban fighters controlling the gawping crowds were Urdu-speaking Pakistanis. Some of them dark-skinned and wearing sunglasses, Abdul Waheed Wafa, a colleague who was there, told me. The ISI’s demand had been met,” writes Carlotta Gall, virtually indicting Pakistan’s intelligence agency for the murder of the former Afghan president who had asylum at the UN compound at the time. Pakistan is clearly miffed at the New York Times correspondent Carlotta Gall’s new book, The Wrong Enemy: America in Afghanistan 2001-2004, that was just released.

Ms Gall’s account of Dr Mohammed Najibullah’s lynching, a war crime by any standard, matches what many Afghans and Pakistan’s Pashtun nationalist leaders have said all along. She also chronicles that the ISI gave orders to kill Dr Najibullah to a Taliban commander Mullah Borjan, who had travelled to Quetta before the imminent fall of Kabul in 1996. Borjan, like many other Taliban, was hesitant to carry out this particular order but confided to a Pakistani journalist that he had come from the ISI offices and that “They are insisting that the first thing we do is kill Najibullah. If I don’t, I am not sure what will happen to me.” Borjan’s Kashmiri guard killed him on his way back to Afghanistan. Someone clearly did not trust Borjan’s vacillation and had a backup plan in place to eliminate him and Dr Najibullah both.
Dr Najibullah was not the only Afghan leader that was killed. Ms Carlotta Gall, again like many Afghans, Pashtuns and analysts, has pinned the responsibility on Pakistan for commissioning a decapitation campaign against the Afghan leaders. She notes that the two Tunisians pretending to be journalists who killed the veteran anti-Taliban leader Ahmad Shah Massoud in a suicide bombing — the first ever in Afghanistan — two days before the 9/11 attacks, had been issued one-year, multiple-entry visas on forged Belgian passports by the Pakistan embassy in London. The assassins travelled from Pakistan to Kandahar to what was a high profile reception by the Taliban there. “The ISI undoubtedly knew of their trip,” Ms Gall has concluded. Ahmed Shah Massoud, like Dr Najibullah, had the appeal and national standing that stood in the way of Pakistan’s plans.

Ms Carlotta Gall traces the tragic journey of another prominent Afghan, the former mujahideen commander Abdul Haq, back into Afghanistan right after 9/11 only to be assassinated on the direct orders of the Taliban interior minister Mullah Abdul Razzaq. She notes, “His brothers blamed the CIA for pushing Haq into Afghanistan when conditions were still too dangerous. Those close to him claimed to see the hand of Pakistan in his assassination, too, since the interior minister was especially close to the ISI, and Haq was a strong charismatic leader who opposed Pakistan’s policies toward Afghanistan.” Ms Gall has accurately noted that Abdul Haq and his two associates were unarmed at the time. It may be worthwhile for her to probe into who denied arms to Abdul Haq starting in the settled areas of Pakistan, across FATA and in Afghanistan. Abdul Haq’s brother Haji Qadeer, who was a vice president under Mr Hamid Karzai, was gunned down nine months later.
The most recent victim of the decapitation spree against the Afghan leadership was Ustad Burhanuddin Rabbani, the former president of the country and the incumbent chair of the Afghan High Peace Council. Ustad Rabbani’s assassination in a suicide bombing was again blamed on the ISI, Ms Gall writes. This time around, Afghan intelligence caught the bomber’s accomplice and under interrogation he revealed that two Pakistani men in Quetta, whom he only knew as Mahmoud and Ahmed, had plotted the attack and sent him in with the suicide bomber. President Hamid Karzai himself has narrowly escaped several attempts on his life, including in his home province of Kandahar. Ms Gall is on the money that someone has clearly wanted the independent Afghan leadership eliminated or bombed into submission.
Ms Carlotta Gall makes a case, and has taken flak for it already, that Pakistan not only wanted these Afghan leaders dead but has all along harboured their killers, including Mullah Omar, Osama bin Laden and Ayman al Zawahiri. She writes that in 2005 Zawahiri crossed over from FATA into Kohat where “he negotiated to stay for one month in the governor’s home”. Her assertion that a special ISI desk handled Osama bin Laden’s sanctuary, including in Abbottabad, has already appeared in her article last month. She has a point that such operations are by design covert and planned for maximum deniability, thus precluding hard evidence of foul play, but it would have been helpful to see more supporting information in the book about both the al Qaeda leaders and Mullah Omar. It is unlikely though that she would convince any naysayer unless a directive signed in ink is produced, which obviously never happens in the murky world of clandestine wars. The onus, however, should not be on Ms Carlotta Gall to release more information but on Pakistan to officially release its own inquiry report into the raid that netted Osama bin Laden, which hopefully does not imply something more sinister than the incompetence plea Pakistan has taken. The terrorist lynchpin was found in Pakistan’s, not Carlotta Gall’s, front yard, after all.
The book is organised into 14 chapters that move in chronological order from the Taliban’s 2001 surrender through the ‘Pakistan protégés’ unleashing hell on Afghanistan courtesy the ‘suicide bomb factory’ that Pakistan’s tribal areas have become, to culminate in the people of Kandahar finally rebelling against the Taliban in 2013. Ms Gall, who has covered the region from Wakhan to Pashtunabad, Quetta, and has a Rolodex second to none, has stated at the outset, “I do not pretend to be objective in this war. I am on the side of the victims.” The account, delivered in a veteran war reporter’s flawless but unassuming language, stays true to the title drawn from the late US diplomat Richard Holbrooke’s concern that “we may be fighting a wrong enemy in the wrong country”.
The enemy, as the Afghans continue to lament, is not in the villages of Afghanistan but remains headquartered across the Durand Line in Pakistan. Why has the US failed to confront the actual threat is a question asked throughout the work. Squashing the vipers without draining the pit seems like a self-defeating exercise. Ms Gall’s conclusion, like President Karzai’s, seems to be that the US is reluctant to confront a nuclear-armed large country despite the latter’s continued backing of cross-border jihadist terrorism due to geopolitical expediency. She rightly resolves that the Afghans do not necessarily want the foreign troops but need continued assistance, training and support in both civil and military sectors if the second coming of the al Qaeda-Taliban is to be averted. Many in Pakistan are not miffed at Carlotta’s gall just for probing Zawahiri and bin Laden’s whereabouts but because she has chronicled their malicious, hegemonist behaviour pattern towards Afghanistan accurately.
With people of Afghanistan showing Taliban the middle finger in recent elections, I hope Taliban forgets Kabul and establishes an Islamic emirate in Pakistan with Peshawar or Quetta as the base. Inshallah.

Does anyone know if the author Dr Mohammad Taqi is Pashtun?
Yagnasri
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10541
Joined: 29 May 2007 18:03

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by Yagnasri »

Quote:

Of course, one may then point out that the Two Nation theory has had a very healthy Zombie existence since 1971. But even the healthiest Zombie is still a Zombie. Dying is forever.

One can always hope.

"end quote"

This is the best description of Paki land.
member_25399
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 67
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by member_25399 »

No post on the afghan presidential elections here .... strange :shock:
Agnimitra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5150
Joined: 21 Apr 2002 11:31

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by Agnimitra »

Tolo TV, Afghanistan's most popular commercial channel, will begin screening controversial Turkish series "Valley of the Wolves" dubbed in Dari. If you recall the news a few years ago, this teleseries has a lot of Islamist, anti-American sentiment, and especially anti-Israel sentiment. It contributed to the dwindling spiral in Turko-Israel ties. The teleseries depicts Israeli soldiers kidnapping and trafficking Muslim babies, for instance. Also depicts heroic jihadi recruits shooting at and killing US personnel in different jihad theaters such as Iraq, etc.

Tolo TV is run by a media company HQ'ed in Dubai - started by an Afghan emigrant living in Australia.
vijaykarthik
BRFite
Posts: 1169
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by vijaykarthik »

looks like its a fight between Abdullah and Ghani now. Abdullah^2 apparently in the lead and says he will not mind joining hands [however, also says that doesn't imply he is willing for coalition. So what exactly does he mean by that?]
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60287
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by ramana »

He means Ghani as VP so that there is unity govt.
Looks like a statesman.
member_25399
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 67
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by member_25399 »

Abdullah - 2 at the helm seems to be the best option for India. Alongside, it would be great if could bring back Amrullah Saleh in his cabinet. He will at least piss the pakis 8)
I wonder, if our incompetent GOI is doing anything about it :-?
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60287
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by ramana »

GOI doesnt have many cards. So the best card is to support the govt in Kabul that has been legitimately in power. Such a govt will see the Paki snakes for what they are and not mistake them for earth worms.
member_25399
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 67
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by member_25399 »

^^^
Well ramana saar, not too sure about what all GOI can do and also if they have the stomach for it. I i remember correctly, it was GOI who left Abdullah mid way last time.
This is the kind of approach that cost us Maldives where we believe that we can deal with anyone who is in power.
In AF particularly, we need a headstrong president who can push the pakis and more importantly resist uncle sam , who will always abide by his devil kid.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60287
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by ramana »

Not Abdullah. It was Najibullah for whose blood everyone in shalwar and suits were baying. Read Carollta Gall who had the nerve to write it after ~25 years!

His family migrated to India and leads a useful life.
Vikas
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6828
Joined: 03 Dec 2005 02:40
Location: Where DST doesn't bother me
Contact:

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by Vikas »

and yet no one was punished for dragging the man out of UNO compound and murdered and we still want to trade for a seat on UN high table.
Whosoever comes to rule in Kabul even if it is Taliban, They will turn anti-TSP since such is the nature of this scorpion called TSP. On top, no Afghan respects Pakis or their self proclaimed martial genes.
India should start picking sides in the countries in the neighborhood if we want to maintain any influence. Afghan legitimately falls under Indian sphere of influence and is part of extended Indian borders (Just like Maldives or Burma), we must have a say in what transpires in that country.
vijaykarthik
BRFite
Posts: 1169
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by vijaykarthik »

Ok latest update. Looks like Abdullah^2 is critical of Ghani. Makes jokes of him and currently says "Ghani has just one role. And that's to be the oppsn leader. That's also a way to show loyalty to Afghanistan"
LOL

Looks like it will head to a runoff. Prelim results on / before April 24th. Final results by mid of May. Abdullah^2 sending feelers to Rassoul and perhaps doesn't mind an unity govt if Rassoul [who is basically a Karzai puppet?] accedes. So basically, it will mean Karzai has a controlling stake and Abdullah can lead? That way atleast Ghani can be limited from consideration. I am still assuming that US will prefer Ghani. So, ideally, Karzai will root for Abdullah^2 or so I think.
gunjur
BRFite
Posts: 602
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by gunjur »

Apologies if already posted

Abdullah Leads in First Official Results From Afghan Vote
Initial election results put Afghan opposition figure Abdullah Abdullah in the lead on Sunday, but with less than 10 percent of votes counted and widespread allegations of fraud, there was no clear indication of who would succeed Hamid Karzai.

Results based on 10 percent of votes from 26 out of 34 provinces showed Abdullah with 41.9 percent and Western-leaning academic Ashraf Ghani second with 37.6 percent. A third candidate, Zalmay Rassoul, backed by two of Karzai's brothers, trailed far behind with 9.8 percent.

"I want to make clear that the results could change in future, as we announce the results with additional percentages of the vote, and this is not the final result," said Independent Election Commission (IEC) chairman Ahmad Yousuf Nuristani.

Afghanistan's allies praised the April 5 vote as a success because of a high turnout estimated at 60 percent of 12 million eligible voters and the failure of the Taliban to stage high-profile attacks.

But widespread fraud could undermine the legitimacy of an election meant to usher in Afghanistan's first democratic transfer of power, as Karzai steps down after more than 12 years in power and as Western forces prepare to leave.

If no candidate secures more than 50 percent of valid ballots, the top two will go into a run-off.

Abdullah has said he had already discussed joining forces with other candidates for a run-off, including Rassoul.

"Our program will be to form an inclusive government ... We should use any capacity that exists in this country," Abdullah told Reuters on Sunday.

"So we are in contact not with just one candidate, but also other candidates and politicians in the country."

Ghani said it was far too early to talk about a victory for his rival as the partial results were not significant.

"We are in a 100-minute game and we have only done 10 minutes ... the result will change," he said.

The United Nations, which administers the fund that is paying for the election commission and the complaints body, said it was still too early to call the election.

"Until the final results are announced by the IEC, stakeholders should be careful in drawing premature conclusions so as not to create inaccurate expectations," said U.N. special envoy Jan Kubis.
gunjur
BRFite
Posts: 602
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by gunjur »

Apologies if already posted.

Afghanistan: as China forges new alliances, a new Great Game has begun - By William Dalrymple
As the disappearance of flight MH370 dominated the headlines across China, a party of senior US officials and AfPak experts arrived in Beijing last week for discreet talks with their Chinese counterparts. They were there as part of a little reported but crucial new Sino-American dialogue on Afghanistan, discussing the role China could play there after the US withdrawal. It is an important development in the new Great Game that is already realigning the delicate geopolitical balance of the region.

The public standoff between the world's two greatest military powers in the South China Sea over the Senkaku/Diaoyu islands has disguised a growing detente between them both over central Asia. "The Chinese are very much aware that we are now on the same page in Afghanistan," I was told by a senior state department official with the delegation. "Our interests are now in almost complete alignment there."

The fledgling dialogue received a huge boost earlier this month when China suffered what one newspaper affiliated with the party described as "China's 9/11". A knife attack by a group of eight militants at Kunming station in Yunan province left 29 dead and 140 injured. The authorities stated that the assailants were Uighurs, the Turkic-speaking Muslim minority, many of whom want independence for the northwest region of Xinjiang – or East Turkestan, as Uighurs call it.

Tensions between Uighurs and Han Chinese have been simmering for years. The Chinese have bulldozed great swaths of Kashgar, the historic Uighur capital, and drafted hundreds of thousands of Han Chinese into the sensitive border region. Like the Tibetans, the Uighurs now find themselves a minority in their own homeland.

In 2009 riots between Uighurs and Han in the regional capital of Urumqi left more than 100 dead. In October 2013, a vehicle carrying three Uighurs ploughed into pedestrians near Tiananmen Square, killing two and wounding 40. The Chinese authorities said the attack was the work of the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (Etim), a militant Uighur group they say has links to the Taliban and Pakistani jihadi networks. Last week there were was much gossip in China of a possible Etim hijacking in the case of flight MH370.

This may well prove illusory, and American intelligence does not believe that the Uighur militant presence in Afghanistan or Pakistan is very large: "There must be some Uighurs there," I was told by a US delegation member last week. "But the Chinese overdo it. The Uighurs are certainly not as significant a presence as the Uzbeks, who are definitely there and are genuinely a threat." The primitive nature of the Kunming attack – using knives not guns or bombs – would seem to confirm that the Uighurs may be angry but they remain largely untrained and unarmed.

Nevertheless, the perceived Pakistan link to Uighur militancy has become the crucial factor in changing the Chinese approach to Afghanistan. Five years ago the Chinese viewed the country primarily as a source of hydrocarbon and mineral deposits – trillions of dollars of the oil, gas, copper, iron, gold and lithium that China will need if its economy is to expand. In 2008 Chinese Metallurgical Group and Jiangxi Copper Co bought a 30-year lease on the site of Mes Aynak in Logar for $3bn, which they estimated to be the largest copper deposit in the world. But after Taliban attacks the mine remains dormant, and Beijing now views Afghanistan more as a security problem than an economic opportunity: "Driving Chinese policy in Afghanistan now are concerns on terrorism," said the state department official.

In September 2012, the then Chinese public security chief, Zhou Yongkang, visited Kabul, the first such visit by a Chinese minister – and announced a major turnaround in policy. China began security co-operation with President Hamid Karzai's regime, training 300 Afghan police officers. Since then the US and China have collaborated in training Afghan diplomats, health workers and agricultural engineers, the first time China has ever co-operated with a third party in another country. Ambassador James Dobbins, Obama's special representative for Afghanistan, now has thrice-yearly meetings with his Chinese counterpart to discuss future areas of co-operation.

Barnett Rubin, who recently stepped down as adviser to Obama's special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, told the Jaipur Literature Festival that China and America "have a growing convergence of interests in the areas to the west of China. Taliban militants attacking Chinese mining activities in Logar province are coming from Pakistan. Uighur militants in western China are being trained in Pakistan, and are going back to China. China has found that Pakistan is not effectively stopping those people. This has really affected China's attitude to Pakistan, which it no longer considers a reliable ally. This is one of the reasons why Chinese-Indian relations have started to warm, and that China is seeking co-operation with the US in Afghanistan."

While China is pressing its old ally Pakistan to do more to contain militant groups, it is also mending fences with India, an old rival. It has pulled back its troops from disputed border areas in the Himalayas and is entering into talks with India on security co-operation in Afghanistan. Last month China became India's biggest trading partner. The China-Pakistan alliance, for 50 years the crucial relationship between south and east Asia, is now looking increasingly past its sell-by date. :?: :?:

Much of what happens next will be determined by events in Afghanistan. Elections will be held, Karzai will step down, and Nato and the US will both withdraw. Sadly, the stability and integrity of Afghanistan during that process is something that even the growing power of China cannot guarantee.
Johann
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2075
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by Johann »

Gunjur, thanks for posting that.

On top of the fact that now all major regional powers - India, China, Iran, Russia and the US have an interest in preventing the Taliban from returning to power, Karzai made real gains in persuading the Saudis to back him instead of the Taliban.

The Pakistani Deobandis refused to co-sponsor an ulema peace conference with the Afghan government last year, but the OIC did. The result was to essentially confirm Karzai as a legitimate Muslim government, conversely making armed rebellion against the government something much less easily justified.

The kind of larger international configuration that brought about Najibullah's fall just doesn't exist at this point with the Kabul government.
svenkat
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4727
Joined: 19 May 2009 17:23

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by svenkat »

The kind of larger internationa us/paki/british configuration that brought about Najibullah's
Where was all the respect for diplomacy,human dignity etc we see being bandied about in ukraine.
Vikas
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6828
Joined: 03 Dec 2005 02:40
Location: Where DST doesn't bother me
Contact:

Re: Afghanistan News & Discussion

Post by Vikas »

^ Because he wasn't 'Our Ba$tard'
Post Reply