Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
Can some Gurus expand on the unprecedented vishwas that the lower sections of the society is putting in Narendra Modi? How strong a factor is his social background for his rise (Jati + family background) versus his track record?
From the rallies and social media, it seems the upper middle class harbors the maximum portion of Modi-skeptics whereas the underprivileged are not shy of braving the sun, heat and dust for this man.
If Kalyan Singh was not sabotaged, we may have had a precursor to Modi two decades back - but he did not carry the track record of NDA rule and MP+Goa+CH+Guj development records to back on.
From the rallies and social media, it seems the upper middle class harbors the maximum portion of Modi-skeptics whereas the underprivileged are not shy of braving the sun, heat and dust for this man.
If Kalyan Singh was not sabotaged, we may have had a precursor to Modi two decades back - but he did not carry the track record of NDA rule and MP+Goa+CH+Guj development records to back on.
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
weaker economic sections will always appreciate a hard worker from a humble background. they would surely relate less to a fair skinned doon educated elite type who has NEVER faced any of their hardships in life. and it surely resonates that namo didnt use his power and position to enrich his entire clan of siblings and relatives as our "leaders" usually do, nor he is pushing a son or daughter as a successor. there are many such ancient examples of people who gave up everything to serve the state like grandsire Bheesma and many of immense power like Parashurama who were simply not interested in the trappings of power.
the underpriviledged have to deal with the sun, heat and dust everyday. just if you look at the typical village middle aged man, he looks 10 yrs older than real age due to hardship and sun exposure and his skin is blackened by years of working in the open.
these people would not know the diff between pasta and antipasti, but usually will not sell the country down the river.
the underpriviledged have to deal with the sun, heat and dust everyday. just if you look at the typical village middle aged man, he looks 10 yrs older than real age due to hardship and sun exposure and his skin is blackened by years of working in the open.
these people would not know the diff between pasta and antipasti, but usually will not sell the country down the river.
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
The upper caste party image has always been a liability for BJP. If NaMo can break the caste walls and ensure a hiondu consolidation in hindi heartland then it will change the political landscape of the country for decades to come. It will be the death knell of quota politics of SP-BSP types as well.
Having said that I haven't seen Modi using his caste as a card in this elections so far. It is a good thing too.
Having said that I haven't seen Modi using his caste as a card in this elections so far. It is a good thing too.
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
Getting U.S.-India Ties Back on Track
Ashley J. Tellis Op-Ed April 15, 2014 India Today
carnegieendowment.org | Nov 30th -0001
It is now an open secret that India-U.S. relations are in trouble. In sharp contrast to the euphoria on both sides when the nuclear deal was concluded, bilateral ties between the world’s largest and oldest democracies are today brittle and frayed. Although casual observers woke up to this reality with the debacle surrounding the Indian consular official’s arrest in New York, the truth is that ties began to lose momentum long before this unfortunate incident.
The plateauing probably began with the nuclear liability law enacted in India early during the Manmohan Singh government’s second term. This legislation chagrined India’s international champions, especially the U.S., leaving them disappointed because of the adverse impact on all private suppliers to India’s nuclear energy program. The economic downturn in India, which had begun even earlier, only made things worse: it took the bloom off the Indian success story—a hit that was only amplified later by counterproductive policies vis-a-vis taxation of foreign companies and preferential market access. Although some of these retrograde initiatives were subsequently reversed, these corrections failed to capture the headlines the way that the damning original initiatives did.
Great harm was thus done not merely to India, but also to the U.S. In Washington, dismayed policymakers watched an Indian government that had gone off the reformist rails, substituting the sensible pro-growth policies of yesteryear with new populist schemes that threatened the exchequer and unnerved the investors. Even activities that previously heralded the strength of the bilateral ties began to flag. In an ominous sign of how much Singh had lost control over his own vision, defense cooperation began to run into strong headwinds. Also, past diplomatic engagement rooted in common concerns about China began to lose steam as India seemed intent on distancing itself from Washington in an effort to chalk gains in Beijing that never came.
With such trends, India no longer looked like a winning proposition to politicians in Washington. Their attentions quickly shifted elsewhere, creating a vacuum that would be filled by those who cared little about the ties. The unkindest cut was levied by American business which, dismayed by both the diminishing opportunities in India and the UPA 2’s unfriendly policies, propelled the clamor of opposition to India in the press and on the Capitol Hill. In such a poisoned atmosphere, special interests—not strategic vision—came to rule the day and the “defining partnership” that U.S. President Barack Obama and Manmohan Singh had expected to seal ceased to be so.
Thankfully, not all is lost. If the relationship lost momentum mainly because of India straying off its high-growth path, recovering its economic promise will do much to repair ties. The coming elections in India will herald a new leadership. On current trends, it looks like Narendra Modi will be the new prime minister. Modi, undoubtedly, feels personally bruised by the past U.S. decision to revoke his visa. Consequently, he is unlikely to be accused of harboring fuzzy feelings towards Washington. Yet Modi is, above all, a nationalist who will do whatever is necessary to advance India’s interests. If the relationship is to be jumpstarted under such circumstances, Washington will have to extend an outstretched hand of partnership to the man—and fast.
Nothing that has happened in the past few years has erased the need for a strong India-U.S. partnership. If anything, the world around India and beyond has become more complicated. In the subcontinent, the dangers confronting New Delhi are increasing—a weakening Pakistan, a strengthening China, and a variety of unstable neighboring states. In the wider world, the threats to territorial sovereignty are still alive—both those mounted by India’s friends, such as Russia, and those levied by its rivals, such as China. The multilateral trading system on which India’s prosperity depends is changing in ways that could hurt its long-term interests. Also, the dangers of terrorism, nuclear weapons and threats to the global commons have not abated.
All these will require renewed India-U.S. cooperation. And achieving that will require, for starters, a new consensus on how the problems on India’s immediate periphery are to be managed. A Modi government will insist on New Delhi’s interests being taken more clearly into account in U.S. decisions affecting the region. Washington, in turn, will be looking for ways in which India can be an effective partner on a range of global issues. Although it is commonplace to complain about the recent deficits in the White House, South Block has not distinguished itself in contrast either. If this gap can be filled, and India’s return to economic success assured, there is enough to sustain a fruitful engagement that serves mutual interests for a long time to come.
This article originally appeared in India Today.
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Ashley J. Tellis Op-Ed April 15, 2014 Live Mint
carnegieendowment.org | Nov 30th -0001
The 2014 national elections will be a critical waypoint along the road to restoring India’s economic growth. One survey after another has suggested a deep yearning for change. The electorate—in both the cities and villages—seems seized by the need to return the country to high growth. [..]
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 1566
- Joined: 17 Nov 2008 13:10
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
+1008vic wrote: I believe that Gandhi-Nehru were the Original Kejriwals of India promoted by Anglo Saxon Jew Empire.
I'm going to spread this!
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 4536
- Joined: 31 Mar 2009 00:10
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
Guys, we are rocking. #Ananth4Namo is trending #2 in India Twitter. It jumps to #1 sometimes. Thanks for all the tweets & RTs. Lets keep going. Some Nilekani supporters are trying to highjack this hashtag by posting negative news about Ananth Kumar
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
Rajat Sharma rubs it in in style:


Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
As many of us were expecting the TV9 interview of Modi confirms his non vindictive nature. His focus is development, good governance, law and order. If at all any Jaanch of the Dynasty and it's dealings does take place, it will be done by institutional processes. NOw that is loaded in it's own way. Modi comes across a very mature and level headed person. His defense of Joshi, no ill feelings. His very down to earth humble way he handles questions on senior leaders is disarmament of those that oppose him is at the highest levels of personal evolution. The man is very highly evolved. Not seen many even on the moksha Sanyasi paths, let alone the political realms that are as highly evolved as Modi. Gives me personally better insight why Lord Krishna praised the Karma Yogi so highly in BG. Awesome.
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 1205
- Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
The MNC owners and their prime agent, Italikeni are spending money like water to ensure that Italikeni gets to Parliament. The plan obviously is to ensure that once Italikeni gets to be an MP there are only 543 people to manage to make Italikeni the PM, never mind the fact that BJP will be the single largest party. Note that Italikeni isn't a member of the INC but has been given INC ticket. So anti defection law may also not apply to him, or atleast it will go for judicial review. The EC has allowed this dubious business. Right now India's future is in the hands of the 15 lakhs electorate of Bangalore South. So please please vote for Ananth Kumar. Alternately encourage the Mainorities to vote for AAP or NOTA.
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
Hain jee, why can't Sonianandan get in through RS ?
Here, in old fotu, he is with his buddies, only Deepak Parekh looks visibly uncomfortable amidst the gang of Kongi parivar - Aruna Roy, Nitish Kumar, Sunita Narain and Jairam Ramesh

http://www.timescontent.com/syndication ... narai.html
Here, in old fotu, he is with his buddies, only Deepak Parekh looks visibly uncomfortable amidst the gang of Kongi parivar - Aruna Roy, Nitish Kumar, Sunita Narain and Jairam Ramesh

http://www.timescontent.com/syndication ... narai.html
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 882
- Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
Devi Shetty of Narayan Health: Narendra Modi can deliver - has clear vision on how India should be run
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opi ... ms?curpg=3
I think there is an inconsistency between the two points raised on page 3 i.e. the answer to
"In healthcare sector, what are the immediate reforms the new government could look at" is not consistent with his answer to "Are you favouring a "for-profit" education system?". It is possible I misunderstood.
In case you don't know Dr. Devi Shetty, you can find information at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devi_Shetty
Dr. Shetty was also a guest on Amir Khan's show Satyamev Jayate (episode on Medical Profession)
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opi ... ms?curpg=3
I think there is an inconsistency between the two points raised on page 3 i.e. the answer to
"In healthcare sector, what are the immediate reforms the new government could look at" is not consistent with his answer to "Are you favouring a "for-profit" education system?". It is possible I misunderstood.
In case you don't know Dr. Devi Shetty, you can find information at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devi_Shetty
Dr. Shetty was also a guest on Amir Khan's show Satyamev Jayate (episode on Medical Profession)
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
Does anyone know more about "Health assurance" versus "Health insurance"? Is there a real policy difference or is there any difference in what is promised? Modi is the population who has ventured to talk in the most detailed manner about health-nutrition. Modi seems to have used some thought process reflected in Dr.Hegde's 4 minutes video. But any elaboration on this would be great to communicate on SM.
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
what are predictions of 5forty3 wala ? I do not want to pay for dreaming in HD.. I do that for free, any ways..
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 882
- Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
I suppose the idea is to provide clean drinking water, clean (unpolluted) air and encourage a healthy life, so that people dont easily fall sick. This could also include for example incentives for regular exercising and nutritious food.prahaar wrote:Does anyone know more about "Health assurance" versus "Health insurance"? Is there a real policy difference or is there any difference in what is promised? Modi is the population who has ventured to talk in the most detailed manner about health-nutrition. Modi seems to have used some thought process reflected in Dr.Hegde's 4 minutes video. But any elaboration on this would be great to communicate on SM.
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 882
- Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
Got this on WhatsApp:
Zindagi agar pasand nahi to kabristan chale jao
Modi agar pasand nahi to Pakistan chale jao
Translation:
If you don't like life, go to the graveyard
If you don't like Modi, go to Pakistan.
Zindagi agar pasand nahi to kabristan chale jao
Modi agar pasand nahi to Pakistan chale jao
Translation:
If you don't like life, go to the graveyard
If you don't like Modi, go to Pakistan.
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
the BJP candidate for Mysore, journalist Pratap Simha is quite young! only in his mid 30s. must be the youngest of the KA pool looking at the photos in todays TOI.
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
Health assurance >> Healthy living > Good food, water, air + Good sanitation + preventive checkup > Better life + Longer life + Lower costprahaar wrote:Does anyone know more about "Health assurance" versus "Health insurance"? Is there a real policy difference or is there any difference in what is promised? Modi is the population who has ventured to talk in the most detailed manner about health-nutrition. Modi seems to have used some thought process reflected in Dr.Hegde's 4 minutes video. But any elaboration on this would be great to communicate on SM.
Health insurance >> Treatment after you've screwed up your health > Hospitals + treatment + medicine > Diseased life + shorter life + Societal cost like lower productivity, etc + more expensive
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 9374
- Joined: 27 Jul 2009 12:47
- Location: University of Trantor
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
Among all the institutions of state that the UPA has subverted, the CBI alone emerges unscathed. #Respect.


Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
ex-editor and US citizen back in action in Firstpost:
Forget riots apology Modi saheb, tell us about Kodnani instead
Forget riots apology Modi saheb, tell us about Kodnani instead
by Siddharth Varadarajan
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
er No . another officer has found his voice, seeing the trends...if u recall before UPA, whenever a sensational crime took place, people would demand a cbi enquiry over the local cops. that was when cbi was not used as a tool to hunt political opponents.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/indi ... 792797.cms
NEW DELHI: Former West Bengal governor Gopalkrishna Gandhi on Tuesday stunned the CBI brass, describing the agency as 'department of dirty tricks (DDT)' which had gained disrepute for being the "government's hatchet", clothed in opacity with a perfume of mystery.
Gandhi's remarks came while he delivered the 15th D P Kohli Memorial Lecture for CBI on "Eclipse at Noon: Shadows Over India's Conscience" with nearly 3000 officers of the agency in the audience.
"It (CBI) is seen as the government's hatchet, rather than honesty's ally. It is often called DDT — meaning not the dichloro diphenyl trichloroethane, the colourless, tasteless, odourless insecticide it should be, but the department of dirty tricks," said Gandhi.
Named after one of its chiefs, the lecture organized by the CBI every year is among the important events on the calendar of Delhi's power elite. However, few among the hosts would have anticipated the candid criticism they were subjected to by Gandhi who, undeterred by the hospitality, forthrightly highlighted all the perceived shortcomings — susceptibility to political pressure to overreach in cases involving senior bureaucrats — which have dulled the lustre of the agency.
A former bureaucrat himself, Gandhi echoed the recent criticism of the agency for its cases against some senior civil servants. "There is justified criticism of CBI highhandedness and lack of sensitivity to loss of reputation of senior members of the bureaucracy against whom needless inquiries can get initiated ... there is a temptation to bring down reputation of civil servants through unethical leaks to the media in real time during the course of the investigation," he said. "This is despicable."
He advised the CBI director and its officers not to get swayed by sensationalism and that they should resist the temptation of 'leaks'. He said at times the CBI is used as a tool to force civil servants to fall in line. "No political party is a saint in this matter. But the CBI cannot afford to be complicit in this capriciousness. It must resist the unethical overtures," he said.
Gandhi's comments have come against the backdrop of CBI's controversial decisions to launch preliminary enquiries against former SEBI chief C B Bhave and former SEBI full-time member K M Abraham, and lodge an FIR against former coal secretary PC Parakh .
Bhave has demanded an apology from CBI if the enquiry ends in a closure while Parakh has lashed out at the agency.
If Gandhi took him by surprise, CBI director Ranjit Sinha did not show it. He described Gandhi's speech as "scintillating". "I always welcome healthy criticism. What Mr Gandhi has said is an opinion. We have taken it in the right spirit," said Sinha.
In his 45-minute speech, Gandhi advised CBI officers to say no to "in-service lollipops or a post-retirement cookie". "The CBI director should be a phenomenal instrument, not a self-operating robot. He and his bureau should be guardians of the law, never a law upon themselves," said the 69-year-old former bureaucrat, who is now chairman of Indian Institute of Advance Studies (IIAS).
Gandhi also opposed the decision to keep CBI outside the purview of RTI Act. "This is a great pity. The CBI is about investigations into corruption and certain crimes. It is not security or intelligence agency," he said.
He favoured a "spectacularly autonomous" and not "sensationally autonomous" CBI. "I would like the CBI not to be under the government for then it would have no autonomy, but I would like it to be accountable to the Republic ... I would like the CBI to be under the Lok Pal, just as the Army is under the defence minister ... the Director of the CBI, like an Army or Air Force or Navy Chief, should be totally independent professionally but not a loose cannon," he said.
Gandhi also targted the Reliance Industries, dubbing it a "parallel state" that exercised prower brazenly over natural and financial resources.
"We used to talk of black money as a parallel economy and so it continues to be. But Reliance is a parallel State. I do not know of any country where one single firm exercises such power so brazenly, over the natural resources, financial resources, professional resources and, ultimately, over human resources as the company of the Ambanis," said Gandhi.
"From (B R) Ambedkar who spoke of economic democracy to Ambani who represents a techno-commercial monopoly of unprecedented scale, is a far cry indeed," he said.
Talking about the economic health of the country, Gandhi said the economy had seen some phenomenal successes with many homeless getting houses and other items of necessity. "Our economy is startling if you do not want to see its other side. If you see that side, you will see it is schizophrenic. Corporate greed has crossed all bounds, as has corporate tastelessness," he added.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/indi ... 792797.cms
NEW DELHI: Former West Bengal governor Gopalkrishna Gandhi on Tuesday stunned the CBI brass, describing the agency as 'department of dirty tricks (DDT)' which had gained disrepute for being the "government's hatchet", clothed in opacity with a perfume of mystery.
Gandhi's remarks came while he delivered the 15th D P Kohli Memorial Lecture for CBI on "Eclipse at Noon: Shadows Over India's Conscience" with nearly 3000 officers of the agency in the audience.
"It (CBI) is seen as the government's hatchet, rather than honesty's ally. It is often called DDT — meaning not the dichloro diphenyl trichloroethane, the colourless, tasteless, odourless insecticide it should be, but the department of dirty tricks," said Gandhi.
Named after one of its chiefs, the lecture organized by the CBI every year is among the important events on the calendar of Delhi's power elite. However, few among the hosts would have anticipated the candid criticism they were subjected to by Gandhi who, undeterred by the hospitality, forthrightly highlighted all the perceived shortcomings — susceptibility to political pressure to overreach in cases involving senior bureaucrats — which have dulled the lustre of the agency.
A former bureaucrat himself, Gandhi echoed the recent criticism of the agency for its cases against some senior civil servants. "There is justified criticism of CBI highhandedness and lack of sensitivity to loss of reputation of senior members of the bureaucracy against whom needless inquiries can get initiated ... there is a temptation to bring down reputation of civil servants through unethical leaks to the media in real time during the course of the investigation," he said. "This is despicable."
He advised the CBI director and its officers not to get swayed by sensationalism and that they should resist the temptation of 'leaks'. He said at times the CBI is used as a tool to force civil servants to fall in line. "No political party is a saint in this matter. But the CBI cannot afford to be complicit in this capriciousness. It must resist the unethical overtures," he said.
Gandhi's comments have come against the backdrop of CBI's controversial decisions to launch preliminary enquiries against former SEBI chief C B Bhave and former SEBI full-time member K M Abraham, and lodge an FIR against former coal secretary PC Parakh .
Bhave has demanded an apology from CBI if the enquiry ends in a closure while Parakh has lashed out at the agency.
If Gandhi took him by surprise, CBI director Ranjit Sinha did not show it. He described Gandhi's speech as "scintillating". "I always welcome healthy criticism. What Mr Gandhi has said is an opinion. We have taken it in the right spirit," said Sinha.
In his 45-minute speech, Gandhi advised CBI officers to say no to "in-service lollipops or a post-retirement cookie". "The CBI director should be a phenomenal instrument, not a self-operating robot. He and his bureau should be guardians of the law, never a law upon themselves," said the 69-year-old former bureaucrat, who is now chairman of Indian Institute of Advance Studies (IIAS).
Gandhi also opposed the decision to keep CBI outside the purview of RTI Act. "This is a great pity. The CBI is about investigations into corruption and certain crimes. It is not security or intelligence agency," he said.
He favoured a "spectacularly autonomous" and not "sensationally autonomous" CBI. "I would like the CBI not to be under the government for then it would have no autonomy, but I would like it to be accountable to the Republic ... I would like the CBI to be under the Lok Pal, just as the Army is under the defence minister ... the Director of the CBI, like an Army or Air Force or Navy Chief, should be totally independent professionally but not a loose cannon," he said.
Gandhi also targted the Reliance Industries, dubbing it a "parallel state" that exercised prower brazenly over natural and financial resources.
"We used to talk of black money as a parallel economy and so it continues to be. But Reliance is a parallel State. I do not know of any country where one single firm exercises such power so brazenly, over the natural resources, financial resources, professional resources and, ultimately, over human resources as the company of the Ambanis," said Gandhi.
"From (B R) Ambedkar who spoke of economic democracy to Ambani who represents a techno-commercial monopoly of unprecedented scale, is a far cry indeed," he said.
Talking about the economic health of the country, Gandhi said the economy had seen some phenomenal successes with many homeless getting houses and other items of necessity. "Our economy is startling if you do not want to see its other side. If you see that side, you will see it is schizophrenic. Corporate greed has crossed all bounds, as has corporate tastelessness," he added.
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
Yes, he is from Hassan though. Not from Mysore. Some people in Mysore are not happy that an "outsider" is chosen because Mysore in general is cliquish. Congress may be using this issue. My old classmate met Simha at an event and put up pictures on FB. He is 38 and my friend he is very down to earth.Singha wrote:the BJP candidate for Mysore, journalist Pratap Simha is quite young! only in his mid 30s. must be the youngest of the KA pool looking at the photos in todays TOI.
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 9374
- Joined: 27 Jul 2009 12:47
- Location: University of Trantor
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
Heh.

Added later:GAURAV C SAWANT @gauravcsawant 5h
Maneka Gandhi jumps to son @varungandhi80 's defence. Asks Priyanka to reveal husband Robert Vadra's ideology first. @ElectionExpress

Last edited by Hari Seldon on 16 Apr 2014 16:02, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
Have you noticed Reliance owned media has been the hardest on Modi and supporting Kejri?sum wrote:ex-editor and US citizen back in action in Firstpost:
Forget riots apology Modi saheb, tell us about Kodnani instead
by Siddharth Varadarajan
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
^^^ Once Modi comes to power, he should deny this Vardharajan dude a visa to visit India. Put him on an Entry Control black list. These people don't understand any other way.
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 9374
- Joined: 27 Jul 2009 12:47
- Location: University of Trantor
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
And hand him undeserved H&D to flaunt and milk abroad? No, sir.SanjayC wrote:^^^ Once Modi comes to power, he should deny this Vardharajan dude a visa to visit India. Put him on an Entry Control black list. These people don't understand any other way.
SidV should be tried for violating Indian law by taking up editorship of an Indian national daily while being a foreign national. Ask Subbu swamy, he'll know some sub-clause in the fine print that'll allow for the case to go to trial. And since there're national security implications, try under the non-bailable NSA. only.
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

I bet there are people advising NaMo on his wardrobe. Rose-Pink must have been to subconsciously appeal to women, making him agreeable, non-aggressive, lotus-petal soft!

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
Modi forces Bollywood troublemakers to show their hands....This is a good list for future reference and also for BRFites to decide on future movie outings: An appeal to voters
Imtiaz Ali (Writer-Director: Highway, Jab We Met)
Vishal Bhardwaj (Writer-Director: Omkara, Maqbool)
Govind Nihalani (Director: Tamas, Ardh Satya)
Saeed Mirza (Director: Albert Pinto Ko Gussa Kyon Aata Hai)
Zoya Akhtar (Writer-Director: Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara)
Anand Patwardhan (Documentary Film-maker: Jai Bhim Comrade)
Vijay Krishna Acharya (Director: Dhoom 3)
Kabir Khan (Director: Ek Tha Tiger)
Kundan Shah (Director: Jaane Bhi Do Yaaro)
Nandita Das (Director-Actress: Firaaq, Fire)
Hansal Mehta (Director: Shahid)
Anjum Rajabali (Writer: Raajneeti, Satyagraha)
Shubha Mudgal (Singer-Musician)
Swara Bhaskar (Actor: Raanjhana, Tanu Weds Manu)
Aditi Rao Hydari (Actor: Murder 3, Rockstar)
Mahesh Bhatt (Director-Producer: Saaraansh, Jannat)
Anil Mehta (Cinematographer: Lagaan, Jab Tak Hai Jaan)
Saket Chaudhary (Writer-Director: Shaadi Ke Side Effects)
Rakesh Sharma (Documentary Film-maker: Final Solution)
Vinay Shukla (Writer-Director: Godmother)
Kamlesh Pandey (Writer: Rang De Basanti)
Robin Bhatt (Writer: Chennai Express, Krish 3)
Aneesh Pradhan (Tabla Maestro)
Sanjay Chhel (Writer: Rangeela, Yes Boss)
Sameer Anjan (Lyricist: Dhoom 3, Kuch Kuch Hota Hai)
Imteyaz Husain (Writer: Parinda)
Rajesh Dubey (TV Writer: Balika Vadhu)
Vinod Ranganath (TV Writer: Shanti, Swaabhiman)
Jalees Sherwani (Lyricist: Dabang)
Amitabh Shukla (Film Editor: Lagaan)
Sukant Panigrahi (Art Director)
Surabhi Sharma (Documentary Film-maker)
Anusha Khan (Producer)
Bishwadeep Chatterjee (Sound Designer: 3 Idiots)
C.K. Muraleedharan (Cinematographer: 3 Idiots)
Dr Manasee Palshikar (Screenwriter-Teacher)
Jyoti Dogra (Actor:
Joy Sengupta (Actor)
Kauser Munir (Lyricist: Dhoom 3)
Mazahir Rahim (Screenwriter)
Nishant Radhakrishnan (Film Editor: Satyamev Jayate)
Preety Ali (Producer)
Priyanka Borpujari (Screenwriter)
Rajashree (Filmmaker-Teacher)
Ruchika Oberoi (Film-maker)
Rukmini Sen (Screenwriter and TV Journalist)
Sameera Iyengar (Theatre activist)
Sharad Tripathi (Screenwriter)
Shivani Tibrewala Chand (Playwright)
Siminatini Dhuru (Activist)
Sona Jain (Film-maker)
Tushar Gandhi (Activist)
Teesta Setalvaad (Activist)
Javed Anand (Activist)
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
Health assurance can also mean incentives for those that practice Yoga, meditation and other Indic well being and holistic practices.
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
https://twitter.com/ANI_news/status/456330082789765121
Quite true! So did Modi plan these interviews such as to provoke another loud and obnoxious news cycle on 2002 riots. There are many ways to play the secular card .. No...ANI @ANI_news 4h
#ModiToANI if the media would not have worked to malign Modi then who would know Modi today? (On media relations post 2002 riots)
Last edited by pankajs on 16 Apr 2014 16:33, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
Instead of anti jinxing, you guys are all jinxing constantly.
Wait for the 16th. After a night of celebration, then start your plans and list your expectations. Life offers no guarantee and it is pretty unfair.

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
https://twitter.com/timesnow/status/456328677110714369
Bhaaaaattttttt!!!! I was given to understand that there was no development in Gujarat. It was all PR wonlee. All medium and small scale industries where closed, farmers were suiciding, no bijli, pani or sadak ...TIMES NOW @timesnow 4h
Gujarat's development is due to people and not Narendra Modi: Rahul Gandhi #India2014
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
Bhaaattt!!! You mean for all of last 60 years of your party's rule you had kept doors of Colleges & Universities closed for ur children!Priti Gandhi @MrsGandhi 4h
Going to? So what were you doing until now? "@INCIndia: We are going to open doors of Colleges & Universities for ur children :Rahul Gandhi"
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
Namo will lose onlee




-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 17249
- Joined: 10 Aug 2006 21:11
- Location: http://bharata-bhuti.blogspot.com/
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
Done!SaiK wrote:RamaY, why don't you send a message direct to Modi himself?
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
He denied having any staff to choose his clothing. His answer was something like, " somehow, whatever I choose doesn't look too bad on me."RajeshA wrote:
I bet there are people advising NaMo on his wardrobe. Rose-Pink must have been to subconsciously appeal to women, making him agreeable, non-aggressive, lotus-petal soft!
Similar to my replies on this matter.


Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
Will review naming of 650 Congress schemes after Gandhi family, BJP says
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home ... 26954.cms?

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home ... 26954.cms?
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
Salman Khan’s father Salim Khan launches Urdu website on Modi
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home ... 826192.cms
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home ... 826192.cms
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
Actor Vijay To Meet Narendra Modi In Coimbatore
http://entertainment.oneindia.in/tamil/ ... 36769.html
http://entertainment.oneindia.in/tamil/ ... 36769.html
Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India
Why the West finds Modi’s rise inconvenient
http://www.niticentral.com/2014/04/16/w ... 12384.html
http://www.niticentral.com/2014/04/16/w ... 12384.html