Rahul M wrote:6 months.
but I think Supratik ji confused between CEA (chief economic advisor which has had people like Kaushik Basu in recent past) and FM.
the bhagwati article talks of Panagariya for CEA, not FM.
That's correct.
Rahul M wrote:6 months.
but I think Supratik ji confused between CEA (chief economic advisor which has had people like Kaushik Basu in recent past) and FM.
the bhagwati article talks of Panagariya for CEA, not FM.
Arun Jaitley in Amritsar. That would be sad.SaiK wrote:AJ?
Higher life expectancy, also fertility (though PB, HP, WB, TN, and probably GA have lower fertility rates than KL), are certainly in play. I still think emigration is the most important effect. I estimate that more than 10% of KL-born population lives in the Gelf, and probably another 5% emigrate to other states in India. The emigrants are overwhelmingly in the "youth" bracket in all likelihood.Suraj wrote:KLPD: Kerala also has among the lowest fertility rates (well below replacement at 1.7) and the highest life expectancy (OECD-standard level of 75 a decade ago, 10 years more than national average at the time). The demographic chart for Kerala is thus a bottom-heavy pear and not a top-heavy one like, say UP.
Correct. This demographic dividend is also BJP's NaMographic dividendJames B wrote:As we proceed further, more & more young voters with aspirations & without the baggage of caste/creed etc will enter the electorate and the Congress will get rejected & BJP has a very good chance to tap into this as its own vote bank by focusing on development, infrastructure & jobs. That's exactly what is happening in 2014 elections - young voters tilting the results in favour of BJP/NDA. It will be even more in future elections. BJP has care for and nurture this constituency with utmost care.
Sorry but Modi's Hindutvavadi fans may not really feel proud about this! Sure Raj Dharma may have compelled Modi to take such drastic measures, but these are points to impress on a secular crowd, who don't want to be impressed anyway!harbans wrote:Folks hearing some people saying "Don't judge Modi by 2002 riots" more to him than what happened there, including Swapan. I'm countering that condescension saying: Do Judge Modi by 2002 riots: To stop killings Guj State Cops shot more rioters dead in these riots than any known riot in Indias' history. And most shot dead were Hindu rioters.
I have written to Cameron and milliband to keep their media dogs on the leash. It was after being inspired by reading Bji's post on the academics in briturdustan writing in in dependant newspaper.Kati wrote:BRF-ites need to come up with a contingency plan to write letters, counter-letters, especially to 'furin' media once NaMo comes to power. The desi intellectuals, who are western choir boys and gals, will be unleashed against NaMo to trip him every step of the way......
...my humble 2 paise....
Enough of this character assassination! Why and who said that Sidhu is a joker? Some stupid msm media plants by D4? Or the well funded and oiled regional media machinery of the rogue ally. Sane people from the ground have been advising against allowing Delhi based folks like AJ from calling shots in Punjab. By allowing free hand to daddy-son combine the final joke is on BJP and not Sidhu. AJ has propped the most spineless Punjab BJP leadership ever and these brainless dodos are serving their master by putting him in a tough spot. The amount of cognitive dissonance of some BRF denizens is really funny in this case. Brf was ahead of the curve on this topic and that is it.Saral wrote:. I guess Punjab and Kerala are the two states unaffected by wave. And AJ could well be in serious trouble. Maybe these people will vote for a Joker like Sidhu more readily.
SaralSaral wrote:I watched only a few minutes of NaMos speech for AJ in Amritsar. The crowd was very lukewarm, couldn't connect. NaMo throat soreness continues. I guess Punjab and Kerala are the two states unaffected by wave. And AJ could well be in serious trouble. Maybe these people will vote for a Joker like Sidhu more readily.
INC fielded Captain only after they smelt blood. They are fighting a rearguard battle nationally and under the circumstances D4 et al are kosher too. Amritsar was Sidhu's to win, AJ is a POOR candidate and all Modi/dharmics should be honest enough to acknowledge the mistake in Punjab. By the way who was responsible for silencing the Punjab BJP leaders who boldly questioned and challenged daddy son combine? Things went really downhill ever since Delhi BJP ordered krystallnacht against all Pb BJP leaders who tried to check the unbridled the ally.James wrote:
If AJ was part of D4 then Congress wouldn't have made a strong candidate like Capt. Amrinder Singh to contest against AJ.
Sidhu has two positive points 1) He is perceived as THE Sikh face of BJP, by sidelining him for an outsider BJP sent the worst message possible 2) Regarding his performance there is unanimity amongst general populace that all his work and agenda was sabotaged by state government at behest of someone powerful.Saral wrote:No cognitive dissonance here. Just plain lack of awareness of the subtleties of Punjab BJP politics. Even if what you said is true, isn't Sidhu still a non-performing MP?
No, it has deeper significance than muslims would like to make us Abdul's believe. As per hadith's and islamic rule, a person wearing a skull cap is to be considered among the believers of Islam and it is not necessary for him to get converted. I.e. wearing skull cap he is allowed to pray like ummah. It also means you are follower of prophet as he used to wear it and by wearing it you follow islam. While wearing turban or himachal topi has no such deeper significance.ramana wrote:RajeshA, The skull cap is for prayer ceremony. Are those offering the cap suggesting that Modi's fast is a prayer ceremony in conformance with Koran and Hadiths?
Next Punjab elections are going to be held around January 2016, in about one and half years. I hope there can be some new mixing of the cards.munna wrote:A lot of myths are being quoted about Punjab's Hindu voters in this thread, traditionally INC attracts SC vote and SAD Panthic Jat vote, urban vote is often the tie breaker for both groupings, BJP in Punjab is currently running on hope and prayer. Khanna may win Gurdaspur, other two seats are in dicey zone.
Next Punjab Elections will be in Jan-Feb 2017. Your line of action is very valid, actually fears of SC vote consolidation around BJP prompted the Delhi ordered purge on the insistence of an insecure ally. In 2012 elections BJP-SAD won all seats in the district of Jalandhar because of yet another BJP victim of the great purge, just like Sidhu. The poor chap is cooling his heels and watching the state of affairs from the sideline. If BJP wins 3/3 in Punjab then its tera-peta-maha tsunamo, a mere tsunamo wont just cut it ....RajeshA wrote:Next Punjab elections are going to be held around January 2016, in about one and half years. I hope there can be some new mixing of the cards.munna wrote:A lot of myths are being quoted about Punjab's Hindu voters in this thread, traditionally INC attracts SC vote and SAD Panthic Jat vote, urban vote is often the tie breaker for both groupings, BJP in Punjab is currently running on hope and prayer. Khanna may win Gurdaspur, other two seats are in dicey zone.
Secondly I am expecting BJP to give a new push to capture SC votes. There have been theories floating around that the next BJP CM face for UP could be Udit Raj. Many BJP leaders have been threatening that Akhilesh Yadav govt would be dismissed soon after NDA wins LS polls. If UP elections are fought with a Dalit BJP CM candidate, it would have an effect on Punjab.
I personally think that a loss for Arun Jaitley in Amritsar may even be good, as it would give BJP some more leverage and motivation to look for alternatives and leadership independent of the Badals.
Should SAD+BJP combo lose the 2016 elections, at least BJP would come out of this junior partnership! But in order to come out of this junior partnership, BJP would have to first win over a larger chunk of Congress SC votebank.
I have never seen a single word from these "intellectuals" about 60 people who were burned alive. Hindu blood is very cheap.RajeshA wrote:Sorry but Modi's Hindutvavadi fans may not really feel proud about this! Sure Raj Dharma may have compelled Modi to take such drastic measures, but these are points to impress on a secular crowd, who don't want to be impressed anyway!harbans wrote:Folks hearing some people saying "Don't judge Modi by 2002 riots" more to him than what happened there, including Swapan. I'm countering that condescension saying: Do Judge Modi by 2002 riots: To stop killings Guj State Cops shot more rioters dead in these riots than any known riot in Indias' history. And most shot dead were Hindu rioters.
There are plenty of such images on the net. However they are at the Wailing Wall of the Jews. He also wears a turban like Sudanese.SaiK wrote:they all say barrack hussain obama is a muslim. why doesn't he wear a skull cap?
Need to add a third point. 'Social engineering'Suraj wrote:
That is why, as I've stated, the BJP must focus on satisfying their concerns first, if they're elected. That's not to suggest they should ignore everything to do with their cultural revivalist agenda. I support their acting on two items at the earliest - a) no government control of temples or temple finances and b) auditing and taxation of all inward religious money. If the money coming in to build a factory faces scrutiny, so will money coming in to build a mosque or church. But otherwise I hope GoI focusses on economy, and specifically on job creation, executing projects and building infrastructure.
Something unusual happened to the exhausted, jaded, effete Indian National Congress the other day. After years, somebody in the party had a bright new idea -- of fielding Priyanka Gandhi as its Lok Sabha candidate against Narendra Modi in Varanasi in Uttar Pradesh.
That would have instantly changed the entire complexion of the current election, electrified not just the Poorvanchal region (eastern UP) and adjoining parts of Bihar, but the whole nation, and qualitatively changed the character of today's political game.
Whatever reservations one may have about the unhealthy, probably crippling, effect of the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty on the Congress, there can be little dispute that Priyanka would have been best placed to defeat Modi, or at least give him a run for his money.
Priyanka, reports The Times of India, was keen on fighting Modi because she believes he is 'bad for the country'. Most other parties in the fray in Varanasi, say credible reports, would have withdrawn their candidates in her favour.
An agreement 'in principle' was reached on fielding a strong common candidate in informal discussions between the Congress, Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party. This reveals the strength and pervasiveness of the hostility Modi evokes from other parties irrespective of their ideology or social base.
A straight contest against Priyanka would have punctured Modi's '56-inch-chest' hubris, put him on the defensive, and curtailed his campaigning trips by forcing him to concentrate his attention and energy on Varanasi.
Indeed, Priyanka would have had a far higher chance of defeating Modi than would her mother (who has proved a very capable and respected leader), leave alone her brother (who has not, despite being offered many opportunities on a platter).
Libtard is being a servant to the DIEnasty and he is blaming Indians for that. Priyanka or unka baap ... very few people care.It may not speak of acutely discriminating judgment or great maturity on the part of the Indian electorate that it should be taken in by factors such as physical appearance, glamour, family lineage, and other ingredients of charisma, which make Priyanka resemble her grandmother Indira Gandhi in the eyes of many people. It is sad to see them being obsequious towards individuals who exude power.