


Well not entirely unnecessary. From US perspective, It gave them an alternate base in the middle east other than Saudi and closer to Iran. Heavy profits to oil, private security and defense giants and future sales customer and thereby securing jobs. As for number of soldiers killed, US police kills 5x times more number of people in US in shootings, so it is not massive price to conquer a land with 20 percent world oil. America can easily absorb the cost of war by printing of dollars which it never intends to pay back to the world buying it.Gus wrote:who is usashish raval wrote:Looks like it to laymen like me. He did manage to keep us safe during his tenure and nearly wipe Qaeda dogs out.![]()
cheney by pushing for iraq war, and letting the afg war play out as it did (letting off osama, outsourcing to pak, paying pak billions for shooting at and killing americans), the trillions wasted etc - he is the worst of the lot when it comes to the bush administration idiots who drove america into the ditch.
how stupid can one get. "keep us safe". what about the 1000s of american soldiers dead and maimed in iraq in an unnecessary war.
unbelievable to see this kind of nonsense in BRF.
In Syria they are reluctant ally to Qaeda under pressure from Saud's and allies. Libya had tiny percentage which they can live with as top leadership and subsequent army will flush or sideline trigger happy morons at bottom. I don't believe Ukraine has it. Americans will not allow Qaeda to have foothold in European Union and Nato aspirant nation.RamaY wrote:Did he?ashish raval wrote: Looks like it to laymen like me. He did manage to keep us safe during his tenure and nearly wipe Qaeda dogs out.
Now AQ is the non-state actor of US in Syria, Libya and Ukraine.
Yes, the effect will be two fold. Discourage new intrusions and encourage voluntarily deporting themselves. 10 million even if over a period of 5-10 years can and should be done.VikramS wrote:Hitesh:
To set a perspective. During the 1971 war, about 10 million refugees had come to India.
Most of them went back.
Where there is a will there is a way.
Even if 10-20% are repatriated it will have a huge impact on limiting new intrusions.
why ? you think NE people dont deserve a competent minister ?SaiK wrote:thatha ji can get the ministry of NE region.
Three guess theories from my side:SwamyG wrote:Just triple checking with gurus here. Varanasi is a guaranteed win for Modi right? Is the drama for the rest of UP?
meanwhile:BJP is threatening to stop pro-poor schemes if they come to power: Sonia Gandhi News Flash: http://goo.gl/vH4mnO
There was some twitter chatter about health related issues for SS.Dilbu wrote:Stakes are high for SS in this game. She is maintaining radar silence anticipating a back door entry on to the stage at some point later. Is a cabinet position assured to her if NDA wins?
As the Arabs say, better to have the camel inside the tent peeing out instead of outside peeing in. At least in the beginning, this may be important.abhijitm wrote:MMJ has requested RSS to ensure respectable portfolio will be given to the 'veteran' leaders. I say let those leaders rot w/o any post. You got what you wanted in 1999. This time you must earn. Understant?
he was the person who offered his house-keys to amit shah when he was forced out of gujarat by SC.AjayKK wrote:Is AJ totally indispensable in the current scenario, he is simply everywhere. If Smriti Irani rises to take over reins from Sushma, isn't there another person who can replace AJ as well?
arnab doed not deserve it. Anyway why show today instead of 11th?SPattath wrote:There is an Modi interview with Arnab tonite at 9pm IST on Times Now.
Pramod Mahajan had his own PM ambitions. He would not have backed Modi. In fact, he would have been a far more formidable rival of Modi inside the BJP than the D4 have been.Narayana Rao wrote:We are truly missing Pramod Mahajan. With all his faults, had he been there to support NM we might be looking at 400 plus. In fact even 2009 might have a different result.
NikhilB wrote:Three guess theories from my side:SwamyG wrote:Just triple checking with gurus here. Varanasi is a guaranteed win for Modi right? Is the drama for the rest of UP?
1. It's to ensure that EC remains on toes especially for eastern Bengal region and avoid rigging. It's kind of OUT appeal to Umpire to ensure Umpire doesn't give undue Wide ball. If you constantly hammer EC about being biased, they have to at least show that they are unbiased for remaining phase.
2. It's to ensure that NaMo remains in news despite rally from Pappu. NaMo has managed to steal show on almost every election day. Momentum can pick up.
3. Third is Dhoti-shiver theory. BJP might have come to know that the numbers are less than expected, so this is kind of honorable acceptance strategy to justify low number of seats on May 16 by saying "see, I told you so earlier. CEC is compromised"
Mihaylo wrote: Three guess theories from my side:
1. It's to ensure that EC remains on toes especially for eastern Bengal region and avoid rigging. It's kind of OUT appeal to Umpire to ensure Umpire doesn't give undue Wide ball. If you constantly hammer EC about being biased, they have to at least show that they are unbiased for remaining phase.
2. It's to ensure that NaMo remains in news despite rally from Pappu. NaMo has managed to steal show on almost every election day. Momentum can pick up.
3. Third is Dhoti-shiver theory. BJP might have come to know that the numbers are less than expected, so this is kind of honorable acceptance strategy to justify low number of seats on May 16 by saying "see, I told you so earlier. CEC is compromised"
I saw some excerpts of the talk. Arnab specs in musicians"A" scale in a subdued tone like a cat.SwamyG wrote:I wish Modi b-slaps Arnab, and poor Arnab the little bully goes to his mommy crying.
I think this is a bad move by Modi. So late in the game. No use, no benefits. Except the providing perverse pleasure of Modi molesting doorknob.
at the cost of self re4spect? No onder that semi terrorist JD(U) guy Sabir Ali was being taken inCosmo_R wrote:It's an old, old practice. It started in the US during the early 70s. Each day anew soundbyte to dominate that evening's new cycle.
Marketing 101: dominate the conversation through ubiquity and predispose the audience to recognizing your product on the shelf.