
BJP could do without these controversies.
Zee News @ZeeNews 11m
Restore plaque with Savarkar's quotes at Andaman memorial: BJP http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/re ... 35632.html …
Latestabhijitm wrote:Omar Abdullah is India's original kejriwal.
BJP has started mind game on 370. They have released a cat among pigeons. Singh said, took back, RSS jumped in. All good. Cong so far has not fallen for it. Omar did or cong is using Omar to counter. So far I am happy with BJP's tactics here. Here it seems Modi and his 'core gang' is in full control.
TIMES NOW @timesnow 18m
The development of Jammu and Kashmir could not take off due to #Article370: Nitin Gadkari #370Debate
and credibility of the image?SaiK wrote:yea yeah yah! but why lie on document is the question mr. bond is asking
Ajayendar Reddinho @ajayendar 5h
"The poorest State in India is Bihar, but today Kashmir gets 11 times more Central assistance than Bihar." http://www.indiandefencereview.com/inte ... d-article/ …
And in case Smriti has signed a false affidavit, she should be tried for perjury.abhijitm wrote:and credibility of the image?SaiK wrote:yea yeah yah! but why lie on document is the question mr. bond is asking
I have elaborated my POV in some detail in earlier posts of the thread. would love to have your reasoned critique of the same.merlin wrote:As is the fallacy that getting someone less educated will not fix the problem.Rahul M wrote:there might be some reason that the PM chose smriti for this role, but frankly I cant see it.
even modi is due one mistake I guess.
p.s. the logic that the past HRD ministers with degrees didn't do much is a major fallacy, that in no way implies getting someone less educated is the solution.
We have proved using many examples that qualification really doesn't matter. What matters is the courage and mettle to make the required changes. Rest is all humbugShe is not qualified enough
The posters can pool such things under 'constitution failings' thread so a coherent picture emerges and can also be sent to the Govt. as suggestion.SanjayC wrote:I remember reading somewhere that a member of the constituent assembly, when he saw the final shape of the constitution, threw the document down in front of everyone in disgust, calling it a "manual for oppression of the Hindus." Most constituent assembly members were Hindus, and there was no pressure on them from anyone. Then how could they come up with such diabolic anti-Hindu provisions in the constituent on their own will? The answer could be that they were all Cong members and, as Savarkar observed, it had become a through and through anti-Hindu and anti-national institution since the entry of Gandhi and it was true to its agenda in drafting the constitution.abhischekcc wrote: And yes, minority institutions (all religions) can start schools where they allow only their co-religionists to study and promote their own religion, and STILL receive government subsidies. Only Hindus are not allowed to start their own religious based schools and colleges.
"cooking and bi*ching:" is an essential part of BR. Look at the threads.Shamlee wrote: Unfortunately I don't have many female friends. In any case most females are more interested in jewellery, clothes, their kids, cooking and bi*ching etc. In short, not the type to join BRF.
Cosmo_R wrote:"cooking and bi*ching:" is an essential part of BR. Look at the threads.Shamlee wrote: Unfortunately I don't have many female friends. In any case most females are more interested in jewellery, clothes, their kids, cooking and bi*ching etc. In short, not the type to join BRF.
Dilbu wrote:I have seen the carrot now I am waiting to see a hint of the stick. I am more than happy if India finally decides to have a stick, forget using it. So I have decided to wait and watch.
NaMo will fail to deliver onlee.![]()
![]()
Rahul M, The biggest fallacy is equating degree with education(which is what you are doing). Education is about learning and Smriti Irani was pretty good at it wrt her field(acting/entertainment).Rahul M wrote:there might be some reason that the PM chose smriti for this role, but frankly I cant see it.
even modi is due one mistake I guess.
p.s. the logic that the past HRD ministers with degrees didn't do much is a major fallacy, that in no way implies getting someone less educated is the solution.
Bery secKoolar too. 3 out of 7 are minority and another is married to a "smallest" minority.Saral wrote:Yep.. Make it inclusive onlee.SaiK wrote:How about wimmen empowerment thread?
Link to postSridhar wrote: I know that there are some people obsessed with what is taught in history books, but there are huge issues to be dealt with in the administration of our education system at all levels that are of much greater importance.
Actually make it four, technically Smriti is Parsi(married a Parsi)abhik wrote: Bery secKoolar too. 3 out of 7 are minority and another is married to a "smallest" minority.
I believe the stick is Doval as NSADilbu wrote:I have seen the carrot now I am waiting to see a hint of the stick. I am more than happy if India finally decides to have a stick, forget using it. So I have decided to wait and watch.
NaMo will fail to deliver onlee.![]()
![]()
This is a very easy fulltoss for the bjp govt hit the "liberal" gumbal for a six. Get the criminalisation removed and watch them flounder trying to explain itsaravana wrote:This is a pretty significant statement from RSS, though I don't know if their stand was otherwise earlier
The remark by RSS spokesperson Ram Madhav that the criminalisation of homosexuality is debatable appears to be among the remarkable surprises that the BJP-led NDA government has on offer. According to a report by Times of India, Madhav has reportedly said that “while he did not glorify certain kinds of behaviour covered by Section 377, it was debatable whether they should be considered a crime.”
Read more at: http://www.firstpost.com/politics/rss-s ... ef_article
Looking at RSS reaction, "liberals" have already put the statement as weak. If you look the world over, it is not over until full marriage + child-adoption + other tax benefits are not enabled.Prasad wrote:This is a very easy fulltoss for the bjp govt hit the "liberal" gumbal for a six. Get the criminalisation removed and watch them flounder trying to explain itsaravana wrote:This is a pretty significant statement from RSS, though I don't know if their stand was otherwise earlier
+100000Singha wrote:I call this disease among indians as KhujliDharmacitis.
its symptoms are that any number of wrongdoings of the bad guys are acceptable and expected and ok.
but the 'good guys' have to conform 101% to some inflated sense of dharma that not even Lord Krishna with his jayadratha, shikhandi, ashwathama tricks did not fully pursue. and they will be beaten savagely for any failure instead of spending cycles burning the roofs of the bad guys.
we saw it in ABV era , he had to be more sikular than JLN himself to be "accepted" as a PM ....
there is an additional layer of IIX (X=T,M) educational snobbery in our society on top of it.
dont fall for the trap...atleast in BR.
truth be told most of the successful entrepreneurs and SME owners in india are not that well educated. many do not have any great degree but they are wise and smart people who get things done. among the big cos, the scions went abroad and got degrees through fathers money, but its not the degree which makes them failures or successes.
The "minorities" of the west who have to be talked about every second out of some sense of ==. Seriously I am tired of being spammed by some email or link or the other being "sensitive" to gays or the like every other day. I mean, fine - treat them equally and all, but the way the western media /establishment seems to be going overboard ..prahaar wrote:Looking at RSS reaction, "liberals" have already put the statement as weak. If you look the world over, it is not over until full marriage + child-adoption + other tax benefits are not enabled.
They'll always cry saar. But ultimately what also matters is benefits to people who can't get any right now. Same with the transgender folks. Now I think GoI recognises them as a third gender and even has a third option for sex. marriage licenses and adoption protocol changes are far in the future. Personally I don't see anything wrong with it, but society takes time.prahaar wrote:Looking at RSS reaction, "liberals" have already put the statement as weak. If you look the world over, it is not over until full marriage + child-adoption + other tax benefits are not enabled.Prasad wrote: This is a very easy fulltoss for the bjp govt hit the "liberal" gumbal for a six. Get the criminalisation removed and watch them flounder trying to explain it