Atri wrote:Ramu wrote:Is there any connection between this current coup and our cancellation of talks with bakis?
No connection. Whatsoever.
Whatever happens in STFUp, its fruit of their karma. No meed to drag us and our "Akarma" in between here as the manifest destiny of STFUp is unfolding.
There is something quite interesting:
wiki wrote:Since its independence in 1947, Pakistan has spent several decades under military rule (1958 – 1971, 1977 – 1988, 1999 – 2008).
Now, in 1977, 1999, there were non-kongrez govts in dhesh. So, 1958 is the only outlier. Were the bakis expecting the kongrez to lose power in dhesh in 1958?
wiki wrote:
Unsuccessful coup attempts
There have been numerous unsuccessful coup attempts in Pakistani history. The first noted attempt was the Rawalpindi conspiracy in 1949 led by Maj. Gen. Akbar Khan along with left-wing activists and sympathetic officers against the government of Liaquat Ali Khan, Pakistan's first prime minister.[1] Prominent poet-intellectual Faiz Ahmed Faiz was suspected of involvement.[5] In 1980, a plot by Maj. Gen. Tajammul Hussain Malik to assassinate Zia-ul-Haq on Pakistan Day on March 23, 1980 was exposed and thwarted.[6][2] In 1995, a coup attempt against the government of Benazir Bhutto led by Maj. Gen. Zahirul Islam Abbasi with the support of Islamic extremists was foiled.
This is also interesting. If the army wants there will be successful coup. If the army does not want, there won't be coup. But, what is any unsuccessful coup? I guess it is to send warning to the civilians to get in line.
Now, coming the present situation:
Is it going to be a successful coup or unsuccessful coup? In short, is it a powerchange or just a warning being sent to Badmash?
I think there is confusion in the Baki army itself: maybe there are two sections: one section wants a real power change(this could be due to cousin rivalry) and another section which wants to only send warnings.
Now, 10% managed to complete his term successfully whereas Badmash never quite seems to be able to do that. So, what is the difference? It seems that 10% being a Sindhi defers to the Baki army because he doesn't have the pakjabi powerstructure behind him. On the other hand, Badmash has the Pakjabi powerstructure under him, so when he gets power, he may try to actually take control of the reins. This makes him a threat. Of course, all this is just conjecture.
Further, the bakis may believe that a military govt in bakiland is best-suited when there is a non-kongi govt in Dhesh. Now, when Bakiland has only one purpose of being anti-dhesh, its politics would also be dependent on the politics of dhesh. So, whenever there is a hawkish(anyone who doesn't indulge the bakis maybe seen as hawkish) govt in dhesh, bakis may prefer a coup in bakiland. But, this time, it seems that the opinion is divided among the army itself due to various factors.
----
BTW, history of bakiland has the following picture in wiki:
Picture of Mohenjodaro statue:
Link
Truly Earth-e-shaster. 
.........
