CRamS wrote:SSridhar wrote:
It must not be simply 'timing'. There should be no contact at all. How can we allow terrorists, saboteurs and separatists to meet with their handlers?
SSJi, I just saw Sartaj whatever with Bakara. Contrary to what this Rahul dude is peddling, Sartaj never showed an iota of a remorse. Matter of fact, he says that TSP fully supports the "Kashmiri leaders" when Bakara referred to the harried pigs as separatists. All he said was may be the timing was a bit awkward. Seems to me that TSP just threw a dog bone at India, and is hoping that there will be enough pressure from US and its lackeys in India as a result of that to resume talks.
Coming to taks, weren't TSP RAPE like Hajam Soothi, Sehzaad cowdung etc bragging that TSP can live without talks? Why are they so desperate for resumptions of talks now?
In the DNA of kabila paki culture, 'tis written thus:
"We are predators and we will keep attacking infidels till infidels decide they can't win and ask for talks for the attacks to end, i.e., they are asking the attacker for terms of surrender and vassalhood. So, agreeing for talks in TSP mind is the same as agreeing to surrender. This brings the attacker lots of echandee among other things. RAPEs will always say that they can live without talks, because the talks that bring them echandee are talks that their beaten foe begs for. We can live without talks but never without echandee, it is our khat, horse, pcp all rolled into one."
So, for pakis, if India agrees to have talks, it triggers the echandee receptors in the paki reptilian brain and generates a high. Since pakis are in no position to actually have a war, beat down India and make India come for talks, they go for the sequence which is just as good from the point of view of their addicted echandee receptors: they just beg / demand that India come for talks, so that they can get their echandee fix. That's the end goal, Cashmere, Afghanistan, nukes etc etc. are all just means for that fix--they think they have to do those things to get that fix, but if they can get it without all those, that is ok too.
Every government in India and every south block babu knows this instinctively, including under the much-maligned UPA, which played the role of drug dealer, by promising "uninterrupted and uninterruptible talks" but still cutting off or suspending talks for very little provocation from the paki pov--a drug addict is not given to reflect on the gravity of the crimes he commits in pursuit of his fix. And because the Indian babus and politicos' behavior is instinctive, and mostly not self-aware, it didn't matter whether they were fire-breathing anti-pakis or papi-jhapi types, or different ones at different times; instinct + lack of self-awareness means that instinct always wins in determining the overall behavior pattern. The talks when they happened, and whether they were secretary-level or track zillion talks, were all fakes chai-biskoots, meant to supply pakis with empty echandee. On the rare occasions when something concrete like easy visa regime or MFN came out of the talks, pakis themselves would do something to sabotage its implementation, since they would be uncomfortable in a non-fake, real-life zone.
UPA as the drug dealer didn't much care about the echandee addict or his harmful impact on himself and India. So, meeting the hurriyat leaders or not meeting them, or even occasional terrorist attacks, none of them meant much to them--their instinctual role was to supply pakis with the echandee fix, while retaining the power to cut off the drug supply at any time for any length of time.
Modi is doing something radically different. He has cut off the supply of echandee through chai-biskoot talks, and is introducing the language of responsibility to the echandee addict; now "talking responsibility" is the only key to curing addiction, and for that reason, the addict hates it like poison and rages against it. Because by definition, the echandee addict is incapable of taking responsibility on his own, he has to be taught by "a higher power" in this case India through Modi. Teaching is done by visiting on the addict the consequences of bad behavior, with unmistakable action-consequence causal pairing (foreign secretary talks cancellation after meeting hurri-rats), along with laying out very specific expectations for which the addict is asked to take responsibility (Modi's UN speech: 1 take responsibility to actually end terrorism, and 2. don't whine to the UN any more).
Modi is of a very different character than most of us on this forum. He doesn't want to see pakis destroy themselves and their shitty little country as he is not a hater like us. He is the real deal, an actual humanitarian, and genuinely wants to cure Pakistan and bring it into the family of humanity as a more or less functioning member. His approach and clarity in carrying this out are, to be honest, not common ways to resolve problems, certainly not by Indians. I suspect that Modi, a voracious reader, has educated himself on the techniques of cognitive behavioral therapy, and is convinced that it will work not just on individuals but also on countries like Pakistan.
Pakis demand talks on the basis of equality (or equity as they keep calling it). But that train has already left the station in many different ways: an addict can never be equal to his therapist, while a humane and effective therapist will always maintain respect for the addict as another human, all the while remaining strict with him in correcting his behavior. This is Modi's personal leadership style, something that our status-addled but otherwise empty-headed media elite also recognize and hate.
