LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

All threads that are locked or marked for deletion will be moved to this forum. The topics will be cleared from this archive on the 1st and 16th of each month.
Post Reply
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19332
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by NRao »

But had to get the bombing kit from Israel, a country which had no strategic link with us whatsoever
There are a few dynamics that prevent either nations to interact more openly.

India and Israel have been very, very close. The topic of interest WRT to these kits from Israel is not about approaching Israel as much as approaching Israel knowing that Israel would pitch in - dependency. It is the solid relations that promoted approaching Israel.

Strategic.

There are other areas - that are not advertized as much - in which the two nations are very, very close.
Thakur_B
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2429
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by Thakur_B »

rohitvats wrote:When will the SP-1 be handed over to IAF Squadron? Same goes for PV-6/Trainer version. I'm sure there would be some ceremony to mark handover of SP-1 for active service.

Also, what is the word on the street on SP-2?
It won't. SP-1 and SP-2 along with LSP-7 and LSP-8 go to TACDE. SP-3 onwards will be received by squadrons.
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34981
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by shiv »

Read this. Let us stick to known facts - OT for this thread though
http://www.vayuaerospace.in/images1/Sel ... Kargil.pdf
. IAF Mirage
2000s were originally supplied with
Thomson-CSF Laser Designator Pods,
known as Atlis for use with Matra 1000 lb
LGBs, which were purpose-built for the
destruction of reinforced targets. These
weapons, although highly capable, are
very expensive. The IAF decided to
augment their capability by employing the
standard’ dumb’ 1000 lb bomb coupled
with Paveway II laser-guided bomb kits,
the IAF having ordered a number of these
earlier, but supplied with an incorrect
part, which was later put on the embargo
list. Unable to get the correct parts sent
as replacements, IAF technicians had to
consequently remanufacture this particular
part in order to make the Paveway
compatible for use with the Mirage 2000.
<snip>
The ‘backroom boys’, however, were
2000 kilometres away from the scene
of action, the Aircraft System Testing
Establishment (ASTE), at Bangalore, at
that time in the process of integrating the
Israeli Litening pod, a recce and target
acquisition system, onto the Mirage 2000
and Jaguar. The trials were at a reasonably
advanced stage, but the pod was still
some time away from being inducted into
service. ASTE Commandant Air Cmde
Parvez Khokar, a veteran of the 1971 war
in the western theatre and a seasoned test
pilot, called upon collective wisdom of
the professionals and the ASTE and then
offered to make the Litening pod available
to be used in Kargil
<snip>
Sufficient equipment was obtained to
clear Mirage 2000s for attack at any given
time, capable of delivering LGBs. However
enough ‘dumb’ bombs were not readily
available, so a search was made of the IAF
inventory. ‘Vintage’ 250kg bombs from
the 1970s made-in-Spain for HAL Ajeet
aircraft and since in storage were found
and made available. A one-off trial was
carried out from Jaisalmer over the Pokhran
Ranges and was deemed to be successful.
rohitvats
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 7827
Joined: 08 Sep 2005 18:24
Location: Jatland

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by rohitvats »

Marten wrote:
Thakur_B wrote:It won't. SP-1 and SP-2 along with LSP-7 and LSP-8 go to TACDE. SP-3 onwards will be received by squadrons.
ASTE Bangalore, not TACDE Viman Nagar. FOC will require ASTE approval iirc. The new board outside the HAL Tejas Assembly gate is pretty good. Never noticed it in the daytime!
TACDE is Tactics and Air Combat Development Establishment - IAF's Top Gun school in Gwalior. It is responsible for developing the flying syllabus on the aircraft and covering all the bases when it comes to combat flying in A2A and A2G roles. SP-1/2 and LSP-7/8 would be used by TACDE to develop the syllabus on Tejas.

ASTE is for testing and certifying aircraft and components - I think they will take handover of SP-1/2 and LSP-7/8 from HAL/DRDO and certify it to be all OK before passing them on to TACDE or Squadron service.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Question - The first lot of 20 Tejas a/c is going to be as per IOC-2 standard. And will hopefully be delivered by 2018 time frame. Thereafter, HAL would concentrate on manufacture of FOC version.

Is there any known timeline or plan for taking IOC-2 standard Tejas from first lot to FOC standard? Or, they will remain at IOC-2 standard level? When is this roll-over planned?
member_28108
BRFite
Posts: 1852
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by member_28108 »

The new engine used was ge-f404-in20 engine. Itseems that this engine was truied out for the first time. Not sure what the difference is compared to the older engines
tsarkar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3263
Joined: 08 May 2006 13:44
Location: mumbai

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by tsarkar »

Ramu wrote:But had to get the bombing kit from Israel, a country which had no strategic link with us whatsoever
India diverted its Dassult Ouragon (Toofani) & Mysteres fighters & spares to Israel in 50s & 60s, while they were being delivered from France. Also Centurion tank spares. Israel gave India 160 mm Finnish Tampella mortars during 1962, that were very effective in the mountains http://weaponsystems.net/weapon.php?wea ... %20-%20M66

Saudis financed Pakistani Mirage 3 and transferred naval ships in 1971, Iranians provided ex German Sabres, Jordanians F-104.

India also had ample Matra BGL stocks, however those were kept in reserve in case Kargil led to broader Indo-Pak conflict. Had key peaks not been captured, India would've escalated the war.
tsarkar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3263
Joined: 08 May 2006 13:44
Location: mumbai

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by tsarkar »

indranilroy wrote:Changes:
1. Radar.
2. New pitot tube on the Nose landing gear door
3. New clamshell parachute cap which stays on the fuselage rather than the parachute.
Surely you mean the UHF Blade antenna on nosewheel door rather than pitot tube. In earlier Tejas, the UHF blade antenna is a little behind, but now its in the LG door. Very peculiar, though. Tejas must be the only fighter with a radio antenna on its LG door.
srai
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5866
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by srai »

rohitvats wrote:...

Is there any known timeline or plan for taking IOC-2 standard Tejas from first lot to FOC standard? Or, they will remain at IOC-2 standard level? When is this roll-over planned?
AFAIK, there aren't any major structural changes between IOC-2 and FOC other than an addition of AAR. We can expect the upgrade to be relatively straight forward affair; it would mostly be limited to upgrading LRUs and software.

IMO, the first lot upgrade to FOC standard will likely take place after both IOC-2 and FOC squadrons attain operational status, which I think would be around 3 years combined. The first IOC-2 standard squadron will take around 2 years to form. The second squadron forming around the FOC standard will follow IOC-2 syllabus initially and then expand to include full capability. It would make sense that after this point IOC-2 would be upgraded to FOC standard and make use the syllabus from the second squadron.
Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21537
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by Philip »

First 2-seat trainer flight great news.With this achievement and a big push for increased production, LCA export poss. appear brighter in the future.
Indranil
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8426
Joined: 02 Apr 2010 01:21

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by Indranil »

tsarkar wrote:
indranilroy wrote:Changes:
1. Radar.
2. New pitot tube on the Nose landing gear door
3. New clamshell parachute cap which stays on the fuselage rather than the parachute.
Surely you mean the UHF Blade antenna on nosewheel door rather than pitot tube. In earlier Tejas, the UHF blade antenna is a little behind, but now its in the LG door. Very peculiar, though. Tejas must be the only fighter with a radio antenna on its LG door.
No, I genuinely thought it was a pitot tube. And I was wrong. You are right, it seems like the UHF blade antenna. Interstingly, SP1 has the antenna in the same place as the other LSPs.

Philip sahab, this is the second LCA trainer. But this is the production standard. New engines, radar and all the bells and whistles. And may I add, an absolutely gorgeous looking plane.

Does anyone know what material the Su-30 radome made of?
Kartik
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5872
Joined: 04 Feb 2004 12:31

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by Kartik »

prasannasimha wrote:The new engine used was ge-f404-in20 engine. Itseems that this engine was truied out for the first time. Not sure what the difference is compared to the older engines
the F-404-IN20 has been powering the LSP single seaters for a while now

link
July 2008

New Delhi. The Indian Air Force (IAF) recently started the flight testing of the F404-GE-IN20 engine on India’s Tejas Light Combat Aircraft (LCA).

During the 44- minute flight, the engine demonstrated full aircraft system and instrumentation functionality, climbed to numerous mission altitudes, achieved Mach 1.1 speed and established the engine performance baseline for future flight-testing.
pushkar.bhat
BRFite
Posts: 458
Joined: 29 Mar 2008 19:27
Location: prêt à monter dans le Arihant
Contact:

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by pushkar.bhat »

Did they then test with the F-414. Seems very unlikely bit if yes then it will be a hooray moment. Other possibility is it was plain bad reporting.
I am expressing this possiblity because the aircraft nomenclature used was not LS but rather PV.

Can any one having chai from the chaiwalla's confirm.
Last edited by pushkar.bhat on 10 Nov 2014 11:05, edited 1 time in total.
Indranil
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8426
Joined: 02 Apr 2010 01:21

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by Indranil »

No, the reporting is correct. It is the first 2-seater AF trainer version with the F-404-IN20 engine. The previous one (PV-5) was powered by the F404-F2J3 engine.

Test planes fitted with the F404-F2J3 engine:
TD1, TD2, PV1, PV2, PV3, PV5 and LSP1

Test planes fitted with the F-404-IN20 engine:
LSP2, LSP3, LSP4, LSP5, LSP7, LSP8, NP1 and NP2

All serial produced aircraft will be fitted with the F-404-IN20 engine.
shaun
BRFite
Posts: 1391
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by shaun »

apart from the usual rona-dhona about LCA Mk1 , the design philosophy, that both ADA and HAL embarked upon for Mk-2 is interesting http://thumkar.blogspot.in/2014/11/iaf- ... uture.html
shaun
BRFite
Posts: 1391
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by shaun »

this air to air refueling requirement for LCA i think is more because of IAF's faith on western engines. I guess given a chance , IAF will replace all engines of ruski origin..!!
Kartik
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5872
Joined: 04 Feb 2004 12:31

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by Kartik »

pushkar.bhat wrote:Did they then test with the F-414. Seems very unlikely bit if yes then it will be a hooray moment. Other possibility is it was plain bad reporting.
the F-414 is meant for the Tejas Mk2..what plain bad reporting are you referring to?
Kartik
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5872
Joined: 04 Feb 2004 12:31

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by Kartik »

Shaun wrote:this air to air refueling requirement for LCA i think is more because of IAF's faith on western engines. I guess given a chance , IAF will replace all engines of ruski origin..!!
A2A refueling requirement due to western engines?? What on earth does that mean?
shaun
BRFite
Posts: 1391
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by shaun »

well i mean to say ...western engines are more efficient to be flogged for long duration .
Kartik
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5872
Joined: 04 Feb 2004 12:31

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by Kartik »

Shaun wrote:well i mean to say ...western engines are more efficient to be flogged for long duration .
and what has that got to do with air to air refueling?
pushkar.bhat
BRFite
Posts: 458
Joined: 29 Mar 2008 19:27
Location: prêt à monter dans le Arihant
Contact:

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by pushkar.bhat »

Kartik wrote:
pushkar.bhat wrote:Did they then test with the F-414. Seems very unlikely bit if yes then it will be a hooray moment. Other possibility is it was plain bad reporting.
the F-414 is meant for the Tejas Mk2..what plain bad reporting are you referring to?
I meant someone thought that F404-IN20 was being flown for the first time. But that point got clarified in a previous post. It seems that the PV5 did not fly with the F404-IN20 but rather the older cousin. So PV6 was indeed the first flight for F404-IN20 on the trainer version.
shaun
BRFite
Posts: 1391
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by shaun »

Kartik wrote:
Shaun wrote:well i mean to say ...western engines are more efficient to be flogged for long duration .
and what has that got to do with air to air refueling?
air to air refueling lets you run long CAP missions , an efficient engine which drinks less( with MTBO high) unlike the ruski counterparts let you run more such mission in a more a cost effective way , reliability of engines from flame-outs when going for long missions being another factor , goes in favor of western engines. with air to air refueling ,saturns were being flogged and now sukhois are feeling the pain in their arse, quite literally ..!!

anyway I am not generalizing that because LCA have GE engines, it automatically qualify for a refueling probe, i am just citing that adding refueling probe have its advantages and when mated with western engines , brings out the best.
Last edited by shaun on 10 Nov 2014 12:04, edited 1 time in total.
shaun
BRFite
Posts: 1391
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by shaun »

so it now depends on HAL , how quickly they can supply the first 20 tejas of IOC standards so that IAF can form the squadron.
rohitvats
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 7827
Joined: 08 Sep 2005 18:24
Location: Jatland

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by rohitvats »

I'm posting in full the IE article linked by Marten to highlight some important points which have been raised here as well:
The Indian Air Force’s wait to induct the Tejas might get bit longer till the four series production (SP) aircraft roll out from the brand new hangars of Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL).

While Friday’s second initial operational clearance (IOC-2) will signal the end of a grueling wait for the IAF to officially undertake flight evaluation trials, the formation of no 45 Squadron (Flying Daggers) earmarked for Tejas might take another two more years. The same squadron last flew the MiG 21 Bison aircraft operating from Naliya (Gujarat), an airfield closer to Karachi. The Tejas squadron will eventually be operating from the Sulur Air Force base, near Coimbatore.

Sources monitoring the Tejas programme said that, HAL’s promise of delivering the first production variant of Tejas (SP-1) by March 2014 might be little far-fetched. “We hope to have the first aircraft by end by mid of 2014. The first two aircraft (SP-1, SP-2) might not meet our standards for squadron formation as the metal cutting and hardware were done before we froze the IOC-2 test points. We will raise the first Tejas squadron with four aircraft starting from SP-3 to SP-6,” a top source said. The IAF will use SP-1 and SP-2 for evaluation flight to be undertaken by the test pilots of Aircraft System and Testing Establishment (ASTE). The limited series production variants LSP-7 and LSP-8 too will be used for evaluation flights by the IAF.

The IAF has already identified the first Commanding Officer for Tejas Squadron, now part of the ASTE team, but he’s yet to fly the Tejas. More officers are expected to join the squadron soon, with only few technicians currently being trained to handle the aircraft. For IAF, the maintainability of Tejas is the most primary concern. “The hardware-related issues need to be fixed first. The software can be upgraded without much delay. The critical factor for any aircraft is its maintainability. Truly speaking, before the IOC event, all hardware must be finalised, which might not still be the case with Tejas,” the source said.A programme management team from the IAF sits at the Aeronautical Development Agency to ensure that the Tejas comes out as a ‘usable aircraft’ befitting the squadron standards. The HAL will deliver first 20 aircraft in IOC configuration and another 20 more in the final operational clearance format.
First - while HAL was claiming in December 2014 that SP-1 will be delivered by end March 2014, there were people who had sounded contrary opinion. And these people have been proved correct. SP-1 is late by more than 6-months. And I'm yet to hear a single news item about SP-2.

Second - Maintainability is being highlighted as the key factor. This is the single most important factor professionals are concerned about at this stage.
shaun
BRFite
Posts: 1391
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by shaun »

^^^^^

yup , the question i pointed earlier , if hall supplies within time than wont it be imperative for IAF to accept tejas ?? Here the situation is not merely about seller and buyer relation as some have cited ,if IAF accepted IOC standard tejas than why did HAL failed to supply ??

just how much big this issue of maintenance is some thing i am not privy to but maintenance issues were there with foreign platforms too and it got ironed out after their induction with IAF
Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21537
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by Philip »

Hard truth.HAL needs competition!
Indranil
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8426
Joined: 02 Apr 2010 01:21

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by Indranil »

rohitvats wrote:I'm posting in full the IE article linked by Marten to highlight some important points which have been raised here as well:
The Indian Air Force’s wait to induct the Tejas might get bit longer till the four series production (SP) aircraft roll out from the brand new hangars of Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL).

While Friday’s second initial operational clearance (IOC-2) will signal the end of a grueling wait for the IAF to officially undertake flight evaluation trials, the formation of no 45 Squadron (Flying Daggers) earmarked for Tejas might take another two more years. The same squadron last flew the MiG 21 Bison aircraft operating from Naliya (Gujarat), an airfield closer to Karachi. The Tejas squadron will eventually be operating from the Sulur Air Force base, near Coimbatore.

Sources monitoring the Tejas programme said that, HAL’s promise of delivering the first production variant of Tejas (SP-1) by March 2014 might be little far-fetched. “We hope to have the first aircraft by end by mid of 2014. The first two aircraft (SP-1, SP-2) might not meet our standards for squadron formation as the metal cutting and hardware were done before we froze the IOC-2 test points. We will raise the first Tejas squadron with four aircraft starting from SP-3 to SP-6,” a top source said. The IAF will use SP-1 and SP-2 for evaluation flight to be undertaken by the test pilots of Aircraft System and Testing Establishment (ASTE). The limited series production variants LSP-7 and LSP-8 too will be used for evaluation flights by the IAF.

The IAF has already identified the first Commanding Officer for Tejas Squadron, now part of the ASTE team, but he’s yet to fly the Tejas. More officers are expected to join the squadron soon, with only few technicians currently being trained to handle the aircraft. For IAF, the maintainability of Tejas is the most primary concern. “The hardware-related issues need to be fixed first. The software can be upgraded without much delay. The critical factor for any aircraft is its maintainability. Truly speaking, before the IOC event, all hardware must be finalised, which might not still be the case with Tejas,” the source said.A programme management team from the IAF sits at the Aeronautical Development Agency to ensure that the Tejas comes out as a ‘usable aircraft’ befitting the squadron standards. The HAL will deliver first 20 aircraft in IOC configuration and another 20 more in the final operational clearance format.
First - while HAL was claiming in December 2014 that SP-1 will be delivered by end March 2014, there were people who had sounded contrary opinion. And these people have been proved correct. SP-1 is late by more than 6-months. And I'm yet to hear a single news item about SP-2.

Second - Maintainability is being highlighted as the key factor. This is the single most important factor professionals are concerned about at this stage.
All the more reason why orders should be given so that unabated serial production can continue! IAF has to own up this project, like it owned up Su-30. Forget first 2, first 30-odd were not production standard, and even they were multiple years late!

Okay, ADA/HAL are not perfect, so what do now? Problems need to be fixed. So either stop LCA Tejas production, because nobody else can produce it now. Or find out how to make ADA/HAL work. Clearly, not ordering Tejas in the numbers it should be ordered in, is not the solution!

@Shaun, at the moment you are speaking gibberish. Please stop.
Kartik
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5872
Joined: 04 Feb 2004 12:31

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by Kartik »

Shaun wrote: air to air refueling lets you run long CAP missions , an efficient engine which drinks less( with MTBO high) unlike the ruski counterparts let you run more such mission in a more a cost effective way , reliability of engines from flame-outs when going for long missions being another factor , goes in favor of western engines. with air to air refueling ,saturns were being flogged and now sukhois are feeling the pain in their arse, quite literally ..!!

anyway I am not generalizing that because LCA have GE engines, it automatically qualify for a refueling probe, i am just citing that adding refueling probe have its advantages and when mated with western engines , brings out the best.
A2A refueling is a useful feature, no matter which engine powers the airplane. SFC (Specific Fuel Consumption) and MTBO have little to do with air to air refueling, which provides flexibility to take off with higher payloads and then tank up later on when the internal fuel is partially consumed.

There is no linkage between the engine being more reliable/having higher MTBO and air to air refueling. Again, there is no linkage between SFC and Western/Russian engines. There are Russian engines out there with decent SFCs as well. That connection you've made between A2A refueling and any maintenance issues with the AL-31FNs is disingenous at best.

And once again, there is no "brings out the best" due to A2A refueling on a fighter with a Western engine. IMO, the one platform that needed it the most and benefitted the most from A2A refueling is the MiG-29, which was perenially short on internal fuel and had serious flight envelope and weapons use shortcomings with the centerline drop tanks. The MiG-29UPG addresses it in two ways, adding more internal fuel and also the A2A refueling probe. Now, the RD-33 engines on the MiG-29 don't have the best SFC (its not that bad either) and has a poor MTBO, but those factors won't impede the maximum possible endurance for the MiG-29UPG.
shaun
BRFite
Posts: 1391
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by shaun »

i mentioned MTBO to highlight the efficiency of engines not as a reason for having refueling probes and that's why it is in bracket. Fair enough , the scenarios you cited are true. there was some idiocracy from my part :D
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66589
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by Singha »

livefist.blogspot.com

MoD STATEMENT: The Light Combat Aircraft(LCA) Tejas Programme witnessed yet another milestone today with the first flight of its trainer PV6. The two-seater version took to the skies at 1336 hrs and was piloted by Gr Capt Vivart Singh along with Gp Capt Anoop Kabadwal. This is the 16th Tejas variant to have flown as part of the project.

The aim of this flight was to check the twin cockpit functionality which is similar to series production two- seater aircraft. All systems functioned as expected during the 36 minute flight. PV6 is the second two- seater and has the capability to deliver all air to air and air to ground weapons as required by the Indian Air Force for the Final Operational Clearance.

The PV6 has absorbed all the major design modifications undertaken during the last 2500 plus flights in the programme. This is the final prototype leading to series production trainer.

Test Director Commander Jitendra Raturi, Safety Pilot Ritu Raj Tyagi, ADA Director P.S. Subramanyam, NFTC Chief Test Pilot Cmde J.A. Maolankar and LCA Navy Project Director Cmde C D Balaji (Retd) were present at the telemetry monitoring centre.
shaun
BRFite
Posts: 1391
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by shaun »

Indranil sir , the first 30 sukhois were production "K" standards, by then they already had su-37 flying and doing regular air shows with canards and TVC incorporated. su-30 acquisition by IAF is a completely different thing than acquiring LCA. The russians had different prototypes for different needs and customers and we just picked the one we needed ofcourse with some electronics and avionics of our and foreign make.
pushkar.bhat
BRFite
Posts: 458
Joined: 29 Mar 2008 19:27
Location: prêt à monter dans le Arihant
Contact:

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by pushkar.bhat »

Shaun wrote:Indranil sir , the first 30 sukhois were production "K" standards, by then they already had su-37 flying and doing regular air shows with canards and TVC incorporated. su-30 acquisition by IAF is a completely different thing than acquiring LCA. The russians had different prototypes for different needs and customers and we just picked the one we needed ofcourse with some electronics and avionics of our and foreign make.
:rotfl: :rotfl: You make it sound so simple.. go to the site -> drop into shopping cart -> add options and -> checkout. I guess the Dell would have been in the business of selling fighter aircrafts.. on a lighter note.
shaun
BRFite
Posts: 1391
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by shaun »

i made it sound simple for the sake of simplicity :D
Cain Marko
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5571
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 10:26

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by Cain Marko »

indranilroy wrote:I'm posting in full the IE article linked by Marten to highlight some important points which have been raised here as well:
The Indian Air Force’s wait to induct the Tejas might get bit longer till the four series production (SP) aircraft roll out from the brand new hangars of Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL).

While Friday’s second initial operational clearance (IOC-2) will signal the end of a grueling wait for the IAF to officially undertake flight evaluation trials, the formation of no 45 Squadron (Flying Daggers) earmarked for Tejas might take another two more years. The same squadron last flew the MiG 21 Bison aircraft operating from Naliya (Gujarat), an airfield closer to Karachi. The Tejas squadron will eventually be operating from the Sulur Air Force base, near Coimbatore.

Sources monitoring the Tejas programme said that, HAL’s promise of delivering the first production variant of Tejas (SP-1) by March 2014 might be little far-fetched. “We hope to have the first aircraft by end by mid of 2014. The first two aircraft (SP-1, SP-2) might not meet our standards for squadron formation as the metal cutting and hardware were done before we froze the IOC-2 test points. We will raise the first Tejas squadron with four aircraft starting from SP-3 to SP-6,” a top source said. The IAF will use SP-1 and SP-2 for evaluation flight to be undertaken by the test pilots of Aircraft System and Testing Establishment (ASTE). The limited series production variants LSP-7 and LSP-8 too will be used for evaluation flights by the IAF.

The IAF has already identified the first Commanding Officer for Tejas Squadron, now part of the ASTE team, but he’s yet to fly the Tejas. More officers are expected to join the squadron soon, with only few technicians currently being trained to handle the aircraft. For IAF, the maintainability of Tejas is the most primary concern. “The hardware-related issues need to be fixed first. The software can be upgraded without much delay. The critical factor for any aircraft is its maintainability. Truly speaking, before the IOC event, all hardware must be finalised, which might not still be the case with Tejas,” the source said.A programme management team from the IAF sits at the Aeronautical Development Agency to ensure that the Tejas comes out as a ‘usable aircraft’ befitting the squadron standards. The HAL will deliver first 20 aircraft in IOC configuration and another 20 more in the final operational clearance format.
First - while HAL was claiming in December 2014 that SP-1 will be delivered by end March 2014, there were people who had sounded contrary opinion. And these people have been proved correct. SP-1 is late by more than 6-months. And I'm yet to hear a single news item about SP-2.

Second - Maintainability is being highlighted as the key factor. This is the single most important factor professionals are concerned about at this stage.
All the more reason why orders should be given so that unabated serial production can continue! IAF has to own up this project, like it owned up Su-30. Forget first 2, first 30-odd were not production standard, and even they were multiple years late!
Okay, ADA/HAL are not perfect, so what do now? Problems need to be fixed. So either stop LCA Tejas production, because nobody else can produce it now. Or find out how to make ADA/HAL work. Clearly, not ordering Tejas in the numbers it should be ordered in, is not the solution!

@Shaun, at the moment you are speaking gibberish. Please stop.
Indranilji, while it seems as though it would be a great idea for the AF to handhold ADA/HAL, wasn't this exactly the iaf complaint - not enough authority to do so, responsibility SANs authority ? Weren't they asking to put one of their own in the top position at HAL.

Secondly, Will an additional order automatically mean that HALs delivery speed is going to be expedited? For that matter , since IAF has already promised over 100 mk2, and the mk2 is supposedly not that different from the mk1 and the same line will be used, why this insistence on another order of mk1. if HAL reaches the requisite rate of 12-14 birds per annum around say 2014, and the mk2 is nowhere in sight as promised, I am sure the IAf will order more mk1s. How much lead time is needed by HAL to accept additional orders for an already running line? 4 years seems rather much.

This is exactly how it happened with the mki, first order was for 40, followed three years later with another ten, and finally in year five a big batch of 140 was ordered.

Problem here is not one of hand holding, it of accountability in terms of timeline; IAF can't plan for the future based on the lca if nobody knows when the planes are going to be available. I can see increasingly why they are pushing for the mrca. Because with Dassault and not HAL being held accountable, the delivery should be much better. And if there are delays from the HAL facility, more can be ordered direct or skd form via France, as was done with the flanker. The issue here is not as though iaf is some reluctant mother unwilling to feed its baby. It is doing exactly what it has done with its other kids.

My take from observing statements from top honchos on both sides.
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19332
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by NRao »

The way I see things is is the IAF committed to the MK-II? With all the delays, etc ................. I mean really committed, knowing it has real value.

IF so, then invest in the MK-I, else do not bother. And invest in the AMCA, in which everyone - so far - seems to have a great deal of trust.
Cain Marko
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5571
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 10:26

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by Cain Marko »

Another point to note on this matter: while forumers demand increased orders for the mk1, I have not really heard any such demand from HAL or the ADa, basically these folks would have been raising this issue in public fora if it was such a basic point. We don't have capacity to produce at required rate because IAF has not ordered enough quantity. What at am I missing?
eklavya
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2182
Joined: 16 Nov 2004 23:57

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by eklavya »

^^^^
MoD/IAF/ADA/HAL know very well where Mk 1 stands compared with the ASR, and the need therefore for the Mk 2.
shaun
BRFite
Posts: 1391
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by shaun »

White papers should come out for all projects of national importance that are behind schedule.This will stop the blame game once and for all.

One thing that is noticeable is, areas ( in defense ) where there is denial of technology or items which cant be purchased outright like missiles , nuclear or space technologies , we actually have become master of it. But for a simple assault rifle ( simple when compared to our home grown satellites, etc )we actually import .
Indranil
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8426
Joined: 02 Apr 2010 01:21

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by Indranil »

CM sahab,

Please use Indranil.

You have raised two excellent points.
1. Why was HAL averse to having a head deputed by IAF?
My views: At the time when this proposition came through, even I was in favour of it. However, at that time I also believed that a strong Ombudsman is the answer to all problems regarding accountability. Right now I am not so sure. Anyways, here are some other counterpoints.
a. What would be the motivation of the management inside HAL to work if they can't go to the top. Wouldn't they gang up on the IAF head and marginalize him?
b. Does ownership mean that a IAF person heads HAL. This is certainly not the case with other projects with IAF and HAL or for that matter most other places in the world. The forces oversee projects that they adopt. Rarely do they lead it.
c. Suppose that the IAF heading HAL led to a dead-end. Is that the end of IAF's ownership? My way or the highway?

By the way, as we talk IAF has taken some very good steps regarding integrating with HAL regarding Tejas. The incorporation of IAF Deputy Chief Air Marshal S B Sinha in the HAL board is a positive sign along with the visits of the Air Chief to Tejas flight simulator.

2. HAL hasn't openly asked for more orders.
HAL can't afford to say anything in the open. You will see the occasional outburst like the washing of the linen at AI'13, but those will be the exceptions to the rule. You will have to read between the lines. Why does Tyagi have to repeatedly say in every interview that he has the capability to produce 16 aircraft per annum? Why does HAL have to comfort the suppliers, stick with us, more orders will come! These are dead giveaways!

By the way, I have a huge bone on why HAL has no respect for deadlines.
member_20292
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2059
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by member_20292 »

Marten wrote: PS: we're paying twice as much to upgrade the M2Ks. And they're awesome birds, right?
The electronics and software costs are HYUGE these days.

Come to think of it, the airframes of even the Boeings from the 707s to the modern 777s, hasn't changed to as large an extent as the electronics.
member_20292
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2059
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: LCA News and Discussions, 22-Oct-2013

Post by member_20292 »

indranilroy wrote:
By the way, I have a huge bone on why HAL has no respect for deadlines.

Because CEMILAC will not allow uncertified planes to fly.

Each minor part needs a lot of certification.

etc. etc.
Post Reply