Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

All threads that are locked or marked for deletion will be moved to this forum. The topics will be cleared from this archive on the 1st and 16th of each month.
member_20453
BRFite
Posts: 613
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Postby member_20453 » 05 Oct 2015 13:11

Karan M wrote:Thanks brar.

In short IAF needs a ~40K PGM inventory for just TSP and PRC to feel comfortable..


I think IAF needs a stock of around 80K PGMs for TSP/PRC to have enough contingency.

Breakdown:

Cruise Missiles: Nirbhay 2000, Brahmos 1-1000, Brahmos Mini-1000, Brahmos-2-1000

LGB kits: 20K

GPS/Glidebombs: 20K

Home Made Cluster Munitions: 10K

CBU-105SFW: 2000

Dumb Bombs: 10K

Nag style medium range air to surface missiles: 10K

rohitvats
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 7572
Joined: 08 Sep 2005 18:24
Location: Jatland

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Postby rohitvats » 05 Oct 2015 14:08

shiv wrote:<SNIP>I post this in the context of a discussion about why Akash cannot be ported to Siachen and used there instead of air defence guns. The manpower and support required to take such a system up into the mountains can be imagined with a few miliseconds of contemplation.<SNIP>


Google Earth is a fantastic tool and people wanting to understand military matters should spend some time looking up areas they're commenting upon. Understanding military geography is one of the basic requirement.

Coming to Siachen and Missiles - as PAF, I would be more interested in taking out the Siachen base camp, Thoise AFB, disrupt the Khardung La pass and take out other such high value targets. What do I gain by attacking IA pickets on Saltoro sitting on razor edge ridges and which would be extremely difficult to detect in air? Kargil taught us the difficulty of attacking such high altitude targets from a greater height still. An a/c attempting such an action is vulnerable to MANPAD and ZSU-23 which we use on Siachen.

A system like Akash is suited for deployment in the relatively open area of Shyok Valley where it meets Nubra river. From where it can cover the entire sector in 360 degree. Even here, given the distance of Thoise and base camp from LOC (under 80 kms as crow flies) and the fact that Shyok Valley is flanked by very high and very steep mountains, the detection of incoming a/c on time will be a challenge (the light weight radar developed by DRDO would come handy). And reaction time will be very low. A QRSAM is likely to make more sense here.

Link to location of confluence of Shyok and Nubra: https://www.google.co.in/maps/@34.579935,77.5846431,10148m/data=!3m1!1e3

Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16688
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Postby Karan M » 05 Oct 2015 14:48

SSridhar wrote:This is big news.


The media being what it is, is yet to pick it up. Such is the wonderful state of journalism in our nation.

I am not sure if Honeywell's TALIN navigator is already integrated into Mk. 1 or it will be available only in Mk. II. The US agreed to share this technology with India & TATA SED was designated to receive it.

The 6 squadrons are already known. Their induction started in August 2014 and they are intended for Tezpur, Bagdogra & Hasimara - India-China border.


TALIN I think can be installed on Mk1 itself as a substitute for the SAGEM Sigma-95 RLG-INS. US would have agreed seeing our own RLG-INS was flying on Agni and the Sagem Sigma-95N is being assembled at HAL.

Indranil
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7185
Joined: 02 Apr 2010 01:21

Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion - June'14

Postby Indranil » 05 Oct 2015 20:37

Page limit reached. Thread locked. Link to first post of next incarnation.


Return to “Trash Can Archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests