Levant crisis - III

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Bhurishravas
BRFite
Posts: 680
Joined: 02 Sep 2016 18:25

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by Bhurishravas »

In the first version of this thread I was posting how US and UK were financing FSA and engineering regime change in Syria. How there were no `moderate rebels`.
And how Syrian Observatory for human rights was a one man show working from coventry.

And here after some years we are.
IndraD
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9365
Joined: 26 Dec 2008 15:38
Location: भारत का निश्चेत गगन

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by IndraD »

Bag daddy still in Iraq - Iraqi intelligence

We believe he is now in Biaj, west of Mosul, hiding in an underground bunker. He changes his location all the time, and he also changes his appearance," said Barwari, adding that as Baghdadi was detained by Iraqi authorities ten years ago Iraqi forces "have enough information to track him

According to official statements by the US department of defence, Baghdadi was detained at the notorious Abu Ghraib and Camp Bucca in 2004 for a number of months before he was released having been deemed a "low-level [risk] prisoner".

A number of other high-ranking IS officials were interred at Camp Bucca which has been called the "birthplace" of IS.

More than 100,000 men are estimated to have passed through the camp between 2003 and 2009
Farooq
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 29
Joined: 06 Nov 2016 16:10

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by Farooq »

Bhurishravas wrote:In the first version of this thread I was posting how US and UK were financing FSA and engineering regime change in Syria. How there were no `moderate rebels`.
And how Syrian Observatory for human rights was a one man show working from coventry.

And here after some years we are.
I am not sure what you are getting at mate but if quoting only a particular type of tweets is an issue than well, there are other sources to either back that up or dispel the myth. Right? You may post your versions. No one is stopping that.

Syria was / is >75% Sunni. The Sunni population has a division - Urban and Rural. That much is certain. Most SAA recruitment was from Sunni population, even that much is certain.

If however, one is not inclined to view SAA as the pro regime tweeples say SAA or Tiger forces are, then there is this link which is at complete odds. But this could well be an American propaganda. Who would you believe and why should I believe this narrative and not the alternative? http://warontherocks.com/2016/08/the-de ... you-think/

Demography of Aleppo (forget the part on contemporary war) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleppo. Similarly, check wiki for Syrian Demography.

(BTW, are you Satya Anveshi from the first Levant thread?)
Bhurishravas
BRFite
Posts: 680
Joined: 02 Sep 2016 18:25

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by Bhurishravas »

I am talking of "confirmed US drones helping and guiding ISIS in Palmyra" type of tweets.
And "NATO members caught" type of links.

And please dont give demographic data. I never said that Syrian Sunnis arent supporting Assad. I only said that the numbers are not 95% and 70%.
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66589
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by Singha »

strong tfta nato tank >> weak small russi tank discovery/natgeo narrative falling apart due to syrian events...see the comments
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bd5_1482005442
TSJones
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3022
Joined: 14 Oct 1999 11:31

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by TSJones »

you can't make tanks static targets and expect them to survive. any tank.
habal
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6922
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 18:46

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by habal »

maytham ‏@maytham956

Again the terrorist groups are breaching the agreement and are burning the buses that should evacuate the civilians from Kafaria & Fouaa

Image

Aldin Abazović ‏@Ald_Aba

Evacuation of civilians form Fouaah and Kfarya on hold due to security concernes after rebel group burned buses intended for evacuation.


Image

https://www.reddit.com/r/syriancivilwar ... d_kafraya/
IndraD
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9365
Joined: 26 Dec 2008 15:38
Location: भारत का निश्चेत गगन

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by IndraD »

SAS troops will be out on streets in UK for Christmas & new year eve after warning that 100s of IS fighters have returned back.
IndraD
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9365
Joined: 26 Dec 2008 15:38
Location: भारत का निश्चेत गगन

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by IndraD »

Both Singapore & Malayasia are tightening borders at the prospect of IS entering and disappearing into their countries. Both had meetings recently after heat is turned on IS in Mosul & Aleppo.
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66589
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by Singha »

One bus driver was killed by nusra and co

https://mobile.twitter.com/sayed_ridha/ ... 61/photo/1
Y. Kanan
BRFite
Posts: 931
Joined: 27 Mar 2003 12:31
Location: USA

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by Y. Kanan »

Bhurishravas - I have an idea, why don't you and TSJones start an "American success thread" where you and other like-minded gora lovers can celebrate and salivate over every Russian, Syrian and Iranian killed by the heroic freedom loving rebels of Syria and Iraq. Don't forget to celebrate Indian deaths in Azad Kashmir while you're at it. You might as well be consistent.
Bheeshma
BRFite
Posts: 592
Joined: 15 Aug 2016 22:01

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by Bheeshma »

No need to celebrate anybody's death.But I don't see the need to identify with hezbollah, IRGC or other assorted sectarian militias either. They are not our allies and frankly we have no common interests with them. They are religious fanatics of a different sect of religion of piece and if they all keep fighting each other good for the rest of the sane world. Russia should have simply armed and provided support to SAA instead of putting their soldiers life at risk.Indian interests both economic and military are more with GCC than any levantine "arabs".
Bhurishravas
BRFite
Posts: 680
Joined: 02 Sep 2016 18:25

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by Bhurishravas »

Y. Kanan wrote:Bhurishravas - I have an idea, why don't you and TSJones start an "American success thread" where you and other like-minded gora lovers can celebrate and salivate over every Russian, Syrian and Iranian killed by the heroic freedom loving rebels of Syria and Iraq. Don't forget to celebrate Indian deaths in Azad Kashmir while you're at it. You might as well be consistent.
I have a better idea. Why not start a `stupid posts thread`.
You will score faster than Kohli.
dnivas
BRFite
Posts: 497
Joined: 05 Dec 2008 05:54

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by dnivas »

Can we just ban this dunce and get it over with. All he does is crib . He does not want to believe tweiiter accounts that Habal and Singha have been quoting for more than a few years now. What those accounts have been "claiming" is now fact

His beloved NYT, Wapo, BBC have been discredited since 2001. They are being discredited on a daily basis and yet he persist with his snide remarks
UlanBatori
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14045
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by UlanBatori »

Allo dnivasji:
Pls kindly do not deny us our meager daily entertainment, hain?
That "stupid posts thread" is a fabulous idea. I need to increase my post count too.
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66589
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by Singha »

More on the nato contractors captured thing

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/12/17 ... in-aleppo/
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66589
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by Singha »

The now vanished white helmets and bana alabed must have been their creations. For a city at war they sure had slick social media trolls. Advise on how to use limited resources to make hell cannons and propane gas ammo etc could be part of skills portfolio.

I guess they got trapped when tigers suddenly took mallah farms
Bheeshma
BRFite
Posts: 592
Joined: 15 Aug 2016 22:01

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by Bheeshma »

Why ban people for posting something others don't agree with Then all the chinese 50 cent-er'swill have to be banned too.
habal
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6922
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 18:46

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by habal »

Just because a Saudi national has been caught, doesn't mean he is not passing on information to nato. Saudis can easily speak in arabic and converse in english with nato handlers. They can also work on behalf of sas or do air intelligence spotter type work while seemingly integrated into rebel ranks. The forces bombing aleppo & DeZ have always been nato. Sometimes they say belgium bombed, then australia, sometimes they say dutch warplanes bombed. So basically illegal bombing runs were carried out by nato.
habal
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6922
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 18:46

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by habal »

Bheeshma wrote:No need to celebrate anybody's death.But I don't see the need to identify with hezbollah, IRGC or other assorted sectarian militias either. They are not our allies and frankly we have no common interests with them. They are religious fanatics of a different sect of religion of piece and if they all keep fighting each other good for the rest of the sane world. Russia should have simply armed and provided support to SAA instead of putting their soldiers life at risk.Indian interests both economic and military are more with GCC than any levantine "arabs".
In wars, there is no just or unjust, only those who win. And allies of convenience are imperative for winning wars. It is very indic nowadays to view world in black & white, basically we have no option but to work with what we got at hand and move ahead from there. When syrian arab regime made friends with disparate groups of allies, they started winning. When they were alone and by themselves, they were losing.
habal
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6922
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 18:46

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by habal »

In a future war with pakistan, we may ally with TTP, BLA, SLA, it doesn't mean they are all good people. It just means they are on our side in that cause. Krishna had no qualms of seeking mayasura's help when it came to building hideout for pandavas.
Y. Kanan
BRFite
Posts: 931
Joined: 27 Mar 2003 12:31
Location: USA

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by Y. Kanan »

But is it not logical to conclude, that for the foreseeable future, the Russian-led "Shia bloc" is our ally of convenience? Is it not also true that the "Shia bloc" for lack of a better term is more secular or modern in their worldview? Note the support the Russians/Syrian gov.t have been getting from the Egyptian govt and generally enjoying from moderates in the Arab world, while the US/GCC bloc is all Wahabbi/Salafi types -the same ideology at war with us for the last 40+ years.So why should any patriotic Indian root for that side? I have no problems with muslims killing muslims but why pick the "badder" muslims over the "less bad" ones? Some on this forum seem all too eager to swallow the US narrative which even their own citizens don't believe anymore. Fascinating.
habal
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6922
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 18:46

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by habal »

apparently CNN 'doesn't know' who burned them buses.

what CNN knows is that buses were burnt in territory with 'strong al-qaeda presence'. Maybe the buddhists or myanmarese then who did it.
krisna
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5881
Joined: 22 Dec 2008 06:36

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by krisna »



truth about western media and their govts. no ifs buts or whatever. as clear as daylight unless one is blind.
:mrgreen: :((
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66589
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by Singha »

Unknown "residents" burned the buses shouting death to the shia pigs. Fsa has "condemned" aur kari ninda ki hai this incident
UlanBatori
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14045
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by UlanBatori »

Singha wrote:Unknown "residents" burned the buses shouting death to the shia pigs. Fsa has "condemned" aur kari ninda ki hai this incident
Spontaneous Combustion a la Godhra.
Bheeshma
BRFite
Posts: 592
Joined: 15 Aug 2016 22:01

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by Bheeshma »

habal wrote:In a future war with pakistan, we may ally with TTP, BLA, SLA, it doesn't mean they are all good people. It just means they are on our side in that cause. Krishna had no qualms of seeking mayasura's help when it came to building hideout for pandavas.
Except hezbollah and IRGC are not allies of convenience for syria. They literally depend on them. IA will certainly not ally with TTP or any other garbage. BLA and SLA are freedom fighters and not religious islamic terrorists so lets not put them with TTP.
Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 23387
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by Austin »

habal wrote:apparently CNN 'doesn't know' who burned them buses.

what CNN knows is that buses were burnt in territory with 'strong al-qaeda presence'. Maybe the buddhists or myanmarese then who did it.
Yes I saw the CNN Narrative of the incident very funny indeed :rotfl:
habal
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6922
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 18:46

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by habal »

Bheeshma wrote:
habal wrote:In a future war with pakistan, we may ally with TTP, BLA, SLA, it doesn't mean they are all good people. It just means they are on our side in that cause. Krishna had no qualms of seeking mayasura's help when it came to building hideout for pandavas.
Except hezbollah and IRGC are not allies of convenience for syria. They literally depend on them. IA will certainly not ally with TTP or any other garbage. BLA and SLA are freedom fighters and not religious islamic terrorists so lets not put them with TTP.
As I said, in a war you are not at liberty to choose your allies. You have to make do with what you get.

TTP comes in enemy of the enemy 'maybe' my best friend category. TTP plays foosball with paki head, and repays them in same coin what we should have been doing in first place, but we do not do because we hire smart young kids from middle class families with dharmic values who lead boys into battle and do what is courageous and what is right.

SAA does similar things in Syria. It hired smart young kids from liberal families who didn't have any malice for Sunnis or any particular sect in special. They were 'core soldiers' and did the proper soldier thing and went to battle in neat formations and followed orders of their commanders. To their misfortune their enemies who had the resources to study battle formations and weak links in conventional battle plans in dedicated 'war colleges' and 'state universities' and 'think tanks' had studied in depth these formations and basically wrote books on modern war formations which was the basis for modern armies and exploited the weak links to the fullest. When hezbollah came into picture they did not follow any conventional battle plans and did what they understood from experience, that was the first blow for the state sponsors of terror. From there, it was downhill.

So if you think conventional armies can successfully deter unconventional wars. Kindly think again and keep revising methodologies because enemy is not static.
Last edited by habal on 19 Dec 2016 10:44, edited 1 time in total.
abhik
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3090
Joined: 02 Feb 2009 17:42

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by abhik »

Our interests lie neither with the Shia nor the Sunni block, it lies in keeping both fighting against each other. Best case scenario for us will be the battlefield shifting from the Shia areas (Iraq and Syria) to the GCC and Turkey.
Bheeshma
BRFite
Posts: 592
Joined: 15 Aug 2016 22:01

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by Bheeshma »

GCC area has 1 million plus Indians. So no it is not good for us. Now if it shifts to Saudi Jordan and turkey its a different matter.
habal
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6922
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 18:46

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by habal »

we are not running towards any alliance with shia block sire. We are studying these phenomenon on brf think tank.

In war there are no permanent allies, only permanent interests.

case in point, saudi relations with USA and saudi relations with pakistan.
habal
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6922
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 18:46

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by habal »

Yusha Yuseef@MIG29_
Clashes between Nusra Front and Ahrar Al-Sham terrorist groups in the vicinity of Foua & Kefraya lead to burning five of the buses
habal
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6922
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 18:46

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by habal »

Image
Rammpal
BRFite
Posts: 290
Joined: 23 Sep 2016 12:21

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by Rammpal »

habal wrote:

So if you think conventional armies can successfully deter unconventional wars. Kindly think again and keep revising methodologies because enemy is not static.
Post Mahabharata, does such a concept even, exist, i.e.: conventional vs unconventional war ?

Align war strategies in keeping with evolving technologies, a definite yes!
habal
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6922
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 18:46

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by habal »

Image

What is not mentioned is they are also trained in communications and eavesdropping and secure data transfers and come back to syria with expensive secure communication equipment provided by nato.
habal
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6922
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 18:46

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by habal »

peacefool protestors in Idlib claiming bus caught fire by itself.

habal
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6922
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 18:46

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by habal »

if true above actions wrt to erdogan ji makes sense.

Uncomfirmed report that Turkey ordered the burning of the buses

https://twitter.com/JohnDelacour/status ... 4922762240

Also unconfirmed report that Iranian vice president cancelled visit to Ankara

https://twitter.com/JohnDelacour/status ... 2533301249
habal
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6922
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 18:46

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by habal »

bus driver reportedly burnt alive by Jund-al aqsa in Idlib

Image
habal
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6922
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 18:46

Re: Levant crisis - III

Post by habal »

Image
Post Reply