kiranA wrote:Suraj wrote:
Excuse me for being blunt, but you're being a troll when you use deaths or disruption during the DeMo process as proof of its failure. By that line of thinking lets ban childbirth, since many women and babies die during it. No need to even bother making stupid arguments like 'lets ban entrance exams since kids kill themselves during that time' - start right out and end the chain of life at the beginning.
Please stop peddling your ideas about private individuals doing any societal good by pursuing commerce using black money, and that the fault lies wtih the government alone. You're transacting an arguably necessary evil and that's the furthest claim you can make. Further efforts to push such societally corrosive claims will invite moderator action. If you're so intent on pushing such perspectives, find yourself another place to do it in.
A woman suffers for childbirth because there is a clear realisible benefit of that suffering - the birth of her child.
So what ??!! Childbirth causes DEATHS! It's not an inconvenience!! It should be banned!
Sounds silly ? Yeah, that's because that's how YOU sound when you try to dance around talking about deaths and demonetization.
You don't like the demonetization act ? Fine. It inconvenienced you. It affected business plans maybe. You think it's unfair that government is corrupt. Regardless, everyone's black money became equally useless on Nov 8 2016.
kiranA wrote:And its own promise " To pay the bearer". And despite such massive suffering there is nothing to show for it .
Your opinion. Not a fact. This thread has shown repeatedly that those who squeal loudest and resort to the most histrionics typically end up admitting they had their own fingers burnt.
kiranA wrote:I did not say using black money is good. But its clear many people who may have black money are very productive people and extremely useful to society. Not paying tax is ofcourse a crime but its not a sin.
It's not your choice to decide whether or not it's a sin. When a person chooses to avoid paying taxes or disclosing income, they have no further claim to asserting what the nature of their act is, or making up definitions of crime and sin as you go along.
The most respectable position you can take is to assert that you concealed income or didn't pay taxes because you fundamentally feel the government will mismanage it, and that you are willing to accept the consequences of that action. That means you're willing to accept the burden of punishment for your act to make your point. Any further verbal embellishment of your actions is an insult to other peoples' intelligence. If you want to receive *some* respect, just say you broke the law because you believe the law to be unfair. Even I can respect a person to an extent for being willing to accept the consequences of his voluntary choice in order to make a point. But don't run around saying nonsense like how someone died standing in a line therefore DeMo is bad, or 'crime but not a sin'. That sort of noise gets people banned.