Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Locked
JE Menon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7143
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by JE Menon »

>>BB was totally unaware of what was happening around her.

Except perhaps to the sound of her heart going "tick tock tick tock" for her beau Zardari - and that's a quote. Frankly, I can't for the life of me understand how they made her president of the Oxford debating society or whatever TF that is. She is basically trying to beg her way back into power, or at least into the good books of the US. Fat chance in the foreseeable future, what with Musharraf walking around on his hands and knees :D whenever Amritrage is around.
jrjrao
BRFite
Posts: 883
Joined: 01 Jul 2001 11:31

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by jrjrao »

More.

Bhutto 'rejected request to sell N-technology'
Pakistani military officials and scientists approached Benazir Bhutto several times while she was prime minister seeking permission to export nuclear technology, she said yesterday.

In an interview, the exiled prime minister, who served two terms from 1988-90 and 1993-96, said she denied them permission.

"It certainly was their belief that they could earn tons of money if they did this," she said.

"It was something that I was disabusing them of, that they could not get it. If they chose to sell it, only three countries would buy it, because it wasn't like McDonald's hamburgers that would have a huge consumer market."
jrjrao
BRFite
Posts: 883
Joined: 01 Jul 2001 11:31

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by jrjrao »

FWIW.

China brings shift on nukes to Korea talks
In semiofficial publications, in a little noticed white paper on nonproliferation late last year, and in interviews with senior Beijing sources conducted for this report, sources say the old policy of indifference, or tacit official acquiescence of sensitive technology sales by Chinese firms to states desiring a nuclear card, are ending.

An unusually full treatment in a magazine called Oriental Outlook - published by Xinhua, China's official news service - describes how the Chinese people have been ignoring the fact that China is now "surrounded by nuclear states," including Russia, India, and Pakistan. Taiwan has long held blueprints for nuclear weapons, and should North Korea collapse and unify, there would be a substantially stronger regional rival right on China's border. Japanese military leaders have in recent years broken an old taboo on discussing the possibility of nuclear accession.

Some Chinese strategists worry about nuclear terrorism, with the potential of an Al Qaeda-like cell showing up, for example, in the far west Xinjiang region.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0224/p01s02-woap.html
Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8012
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Gerard »

Sunil
BRFite
Posts: 634
Joined: 21 Sep 1999 11:31

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Sunil »

Mohan,

I was planning to start the BR Fellowship of Jalaluddin Rumi - had I known there were so many Shakespeare fans around I would have done otherwise.

I think it is almost at the end of Act 1 Scene 1.

I don't actually carry this stuff in my head. What happened was that I was watching a performance of the play recently and I was thinking about the problems of non-proliferation rather than paying attention to the play. So when Cordelia turned to her sisters to say those words - I made a connection to the non-proliferation business. Later on ofcourse I payed more attention to the play as Edmund appeared at the beginning of Scene II.

King Lear is a particularly good fit to our times.

"Legitimate Edgar, I must have your land:
Our father's love is to the ******* Edmund
As to the legitimate: fine word,--legitimate!
Well, my legitimate, if this letter speed,
And my invention thrive, Edmund the base
Shall top the legitimate. I grow; I prosper:
Now, gods, stand up for *******s!

- Edmund soliloquy at the beginning of Scene II.

"

adequately sums up the Pakistani enthusiasm.

BTW the entire play is on the internet.

http://the-tech.mit.edu/Shakespeare/lear/full.html
Sunil
BRFite
Posts: 634
Joined: 21 Sep 1999 11:31

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Sunil »

http://www.saag.org/papers10/paper931.html

"9. What has the Malaysian investigation shown?

* Firstly, that most of the Libyan order was got completed by A.Q.Khan through Tahir when Musharraf was in power.
* Secondly, under Musharraf's tenure two planeloads were airlifted to Libya from Pakistani airports---one of "enriched uranium" as Tahir has described it (Uranium hexafluoride? ) and the other of second-hand centrifuges from Kahuta.

10. The period 2001-2002 during Musharraf's tenure was also the time when a planeload of centrifuges was sent to North Korea in a plane given by the US to Pakistan and a consignment of North Korean missiles brought back from there. The Malaysian investigation has not brought out the following facts which are equally significant:

* In the 1990s, when the proliferation to Iran,Libya and North Korea started, Lt.Gen.Assad Durrani, who was the Director-General of the ISI, during Nawaz's first tenure as the Prime Minister (1990-93), was sent as Ambassador to Germany to co-ordinate the proliferation project in West Europe.
* The Pakistan Embassy in North Korea was headed by Maj.Gen.Sultan Habib, another ISI officer, who used to handle in the ISI headquarters the clandestine procurement of nuclear and missile technology from abroad.

* The Pakistani High Commission in Kuala Lumpur was headed by Lt.Gen. Naseem Rana, another former DG of the ISI. Ten days after sacking Nawaz and seizing power on October 12,1999, Musharraf appointed Rana as the Defence Secretary and made him responsible, inter alia, for supervising the work of the nuclear and missile establishments. Later, he sent him as High Commissioner to Kuala Lumpur when Malaysia became a new epicentre for the clandestine procurement activities of A.Q.Khan and his associates.

* Tahir's family was closely connected with Dawood Ibrahim, the Indian mafia leader living in Pakistan, who had helped the nuclear and missile establishments of Pakistan in their clandestine procurement and shipping activities. The Dawood group is well-entrenched in Singapore and Malaysia. Its activities in Singapore include: Investment in real estate; a shipping company (name not known) and hawala operations to South India. Among the hawala operators of Singapore allegedly associated with Dawood is a company called the Abdul Gafoor and Company. Before Musharraf visited India in 2001 for the Agra summit, the ISI secretly sent away Dawood to Malaysia through Singapore with the help of one Rakesh Tulshiyan and Shahid Sohail. He stayed in Malaysia as a guest of Tahir's family. He returned to Karachi later. Dawood is believed to have extensive mining interests in Malaysia from where he and his group indulge in the smuggling of silver into India via Nepal.

11. The stronger the accumulating evidence against Musharraf, the tighter the US closes its eyes and continues to see no evil, hear no evil and speak no evil about him. "
daulat
BRFite
Posts: 338
Joined: 09 Oct 2002 11:31

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by daulat »

if the libyans did their purchasing this late, do you think that gadaffi was working undercover for unkil in order to sting mushy/xerox to expose their dirty dealings? after all, the lockerbie negotiations and hague trials have been on for roughly the same time frame?

so unkil's deal with libya goes something like this... give us some cash for the grieving families, but thats not enough - cos we be real mad and we is real bad, you see this whole WMD thingy, well... lets sting mushy and get all this dirty laundry out in the public, without us having to do it! you do this and we let you off the hook, and we get ariel to back off and let you do deals with my friend silvio your neighbour

you no play, you get saddamised. oh and double bonus: we can expose the iranian and north korean thingys too, blame xerox, close the supply chain, save mushy and get OBL in time for the elections

my paranoid conspiracy theories are getting more vivid... :)
Roop
BRFite
Posts: 756
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Roop »

If people are taking suggestions for a BR replacement for the term "non-proliferation mullahs", I would like to suggest "Nuclear Apartheid Goons" (abbreviated NAGs). However, that's only if people really want to replace "non-proliferation mullahs", which I don't see the need to do.
Rye
BRFite
Posts: 1183
Joined: 05 Aug 2001 11:31

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Rye »

Now Hindustan Times has a link to the MIIS website in its main page. I am amazed at how deep MIIS's claws have reached into the world of the Indian moron DDM.
Nandu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2195
Joined: 08 Jan 2002 12:31

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Nandu »

Talk of the Nation on NPR is talking about this right now.

Call early. Call often.

(800) 989-8255

http://www.npr.org/programs/totn/totn_call_in.html
Rangudu
BRFite
Posts: 1751
Joined: 03 Mar 2002 12:31
Location: USA

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Rangudu »

I called in and asked the NP Jihadis about China which they ignored. Milhollin said that it was in the past, but I asked him, how about China and N.Korea. Conan intervened and said - "Good question, let's move on ". :roll:
Tim
BRFite
Posts: 136
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: USA

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Tim »

Gaurav Kampani has just posted a very detailed article on the MIIS website that is worth a read. It's a compilation of news reports on this issue that I think will be of great interest.
parusarama
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 6
Joined: 13 Feb 2004 12:31

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by parusarama »

Ananda
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 11
Joined: 03 Feb 2004 12:31

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Ananda »

Originally posted by Daulat:
if the libyans did their purchasing this late, do you think that gadaffi was working undercover for unkil in order to sting mushy/xerox to expose their dirty dealings? after all, the lockerbie negotiations and hague trials have been on for roughly the same time frame?

so unkil's deal with libya goes something like this... give us some cash for the grieving families, but thats not enough - cos we be real mad and we is real bad, you see this whole WMD thingy, well... lets sting mushy.....my paranoid conspiracy theories are getting more vivid... :)
Actually you may be onto something here. Libya was pretty desperate to get out of the straitjacket of sanctions. And there is an additional motivation: Gaddafi has no love for the Pakistani military establishment, which had hanged his friend Bhutto.
Rangudu
BRFite
Posts: 1751
Joined: 03 Mar 2002 12:31
Location: USA

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Rangudu »

Tim,

What's the word you're hearing in academic and govt circles on China regarding the recent revelations?
member_1109
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 1
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 05:32

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by member_1109 »

Benazir, it's about kim chi, not hamburgers!

Seems Benazir was in N. Korea in 1993, according to this article published by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, published November, 2002:

Pakistan and North Korea - Dangerous Counter Trades
As early as 1992, Pakistani officials visited North Korea to view a No-dong prototype, and, in May 1993, Pakistani engineers and scientists attended the No-dong test-launch at Musudan-ri. When then-Pakistani prime minister Benazir Bhutto visited Pyongyang in December 1993, analysts speculated that a missile deal featured on her agenda. Subsequently, in late 1995, Marshal Ch'oe Gwang, the former vice-chairman of North Korea's National Defense Commission, visited Pakistan and brokered a missile deal.

Details of Pakistan and North Korea's missile cooperation efforts surfaced in open source literature throughout the 1990s. In 1996, Taiwanese officials seized 15-tons of ammonium perchlorate - an oxidizing agent used in most modern solid-propellant formulas - an a freighter bound from North Korea to Paskistan's Space and Upper Atmosphere Research Committee.
Anantha
BRFite
Posts: 1351
Joined: 25 Mar 2002 12:31
Location: US

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Anantha »

Nuclear emasculation

The Muslim nuclear gladiators - probable ones like Libya and Iran have fallen; Pakistan, the real one, is on its feet yet. Will it be slain or mere castration will do?
:D
Calvin
BRFite
Posts: 623
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Calvin »

Kampani's write up is interesting in the facts it discloses, but even more interesting in the ones it chooses not to disclose - pertaining to China and Saudi; and as to why an implosion-type Pu-weapon design would be transferred to Libya when HEU equipment was being transferred.
svinayak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14222
Joined: 09 Feb 1999 12:31

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by svinayak »

Originally posted by Sandeep Kaul:
Benazir, it's about kim chi, not hamburgers!

Seems Benazir was in N. Korea in 1993, according to this article published by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, published November, 2002:

Pakistan and North Korea - Dangerous Counter Trades

As early as 1992, Pakistani officials visited North Korea to view a No-dong prototype, and, in May 1993, Pakistani engineers and scientists attended the No-dong test-launch at Musudan-ri. When then-Pakistani prime minister Benazir Bhutto visited Pyongyang in December 1993, analysts speculated that a missile deal featured on her agenda. Subsequently, in late 1995, Marshal Ch'oe Gwang, the former vice-chairman of North Korea's National Defense Commission, visited Pakistan and brokered a missile deal.

Details of Pakistan and North Korea's missile cooperation efforts surfaced in open source literature throughout the 1990s. In 1996, Taiwanese officials seized 15-tons of ammonium perchlorate - an oxidizing agent used in most modern solid-propellant formulas - an a freighter bound from North Korea to Paskistan's Space and Upper Atmosphere Research Committee.
http://www.wisconsinproject.org/countries/nkorea/nuke-miss-chron.htm

North Korea: Nuclear/Missile Chronology

The Risk Report
Volume 6 Number 6 (November-December 2000)

1993: North Korea successfully tests the Nodong missile to a range of about 500km.

1994: Agrees to one-time inspection of all seven declared sites, but balks at procedures.

1994: CIA Director says he believes North Korea may have produced one or two nuclear bombs.

1994: Agrees to inspection procedures but delays inspectors' visas and continues to bar inspectors from undeclared sites. Threatens to leave the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty if U.S. sends Patriot anti-missile batteries to South Korea.

1994: Inspectors find seals broken, are denied access to crucial equipment and cannot certify North Korean compliance.

1994: IAEA terminates inspections after North Korea bars inspectors from collecting samples at its plutonium reprocessing plant.

1994: U.S. cancels scheduled talks.

1994: IAEA announces again that it can no longer ensure that North Korea's nuclear materials were not being diverted for nonpeaceful purposes.

1994: North Korea begins removing spent fuel from the 5 Mwt. reactor, in "serious violation" of North Korea's safeguard agreement with IAEA. U.S. offers to hold high-level talks. IAEA reports that it is quickly losing ability to monitor past production of plutonium.

1994: IAEA tells UN Security Council that North Korea's recent removal of fuel rods makes it impossible to reconstruct the operating history of the reactor.

1994: IAEA exempts North Korea from technical assistance; North Korea reacts by quitting IAEA.

1994: U.S. announces it will pursue global economic sanctions against North Korea if North Korea does not allow IAEA inspectors to examine the spent fuel rods.

1994: U.S. builds up its troops in South Korea and announces it will begin consultations with other countries regarding sanctions.

1994: Former President Carter visits North Korea; Kim Il Sung offers to freeze North Korea's nuclear program in return for high-level talks between the U.S. and North Korea. U.S. offers to resume high-level talks and suspends efforts to sanction North Korea.

1994: U.S. begins negotiations with North Korea on freezing North Korea's nuclear program. Kim Il Sung dies; talks are suspended.

1994: U.S. and North Korea issue an "Agreed Statement,"under which North Korea will rejoin the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty in exchange for light-water reactors, interim energy supplies and normalization of political and economic relations.

1994: U.S. and North Korea conclude an "Agreed Framework," in which President Clinton promises to help arrange, finance and construct the light-water reactors and fund interim energy supplies.

1994: North Korea announces that it has halted construction on its two unfinished graphite-moderated reactors.

1994: Chinese President Jiang Zemin promises the U.S. that China will strongly support the U.S.-North Korea agreement.

1994: IAEA inspectors confirm North Korea has frozen its nuclear program and stopped construction on the unfinished reactors.

1994: U.S. helicopter strays over North Korea and is shot down; one pilot is killed, Bobby Hall is taken prisoner and released 13 days later.

In th eold thread of NoKo there was an item that christopher warren of US allowed NoKo to sell the nodong to TSP and cancelled the agreement by Israel to stop weapons program of NoKo for payment of money.

http://www.nti.org/db/profiles/dprk/msl/chron/NKMCH94Go_bg.html

April 1994
North Korean Foreign Ministry delegation led by Pak Chung Kuk travels to Iran and Pakistan.
—Joseph S. Bermudez, Jr., "A History of Ballistic Missile Development in the DPRK," Occasional Paper No. 2, Center for Nonproliferation Studies, November 1999, p. 23.

September 1994
A North Korean delegation, led by chairman of the North Korean State Commission of Science and Technology, travels to Pakistan.
—Joseph S. Bermudez, Jr., "A History of Ballistic Missile Development in the DPRK," Occasional Paper No. 2, Center for Nonproliferation Studies, November 1999, p. 23.

16 December 1994
Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin says it was a mistake to hold talks with North Korea in Beijing last year in an effort to persuade North Korea to stop missile exports to the Middle East. He says that instead of trying to solve the problem, "North Korea tried to fool Israel. Rabin reveals that North Korea demanded $1 billion to stop the sales, and he claims that Iran has provided North Korea with hundreds of millions of dollars to produce missiles with longer ranges.
[Note: The talks were held in June 1993.]
—"Rabin: Earlier Talks with N. Korea over Missiles Were 'Major Mistake'," Jerusalem Post, 18 December 1994, p. 2, in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, <http://www.lexis-nexis.com>.
Rye
BRFite
Posts: 1183
Joined: 05 Aug 2001 11:31

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Rye »

Maybe this is common knowledge, but after noting the careful manner in which china is being kept out of the picture by the Selective Proliferation crowd like Milhollin et. al, it is essentially to protect the NPT from crumbling apart. If one of the NW states is openly accused of proliferation, then one of the side-effects is that the NPT is not worth the paper it is written on (from the POV of the Sel-prol jihadis). The whole sel-prol crowd is now in a huge disinformation drive to revert the focus from the real proliferators, and shine the lights on the original targets of this bunch, i.e., countries like India.

Hard to determine who is more delusional: the bearded jihadi in Binori madrassa, or the selective proliferation jihadi from MIIS and similar ratholes.

rediff.com again does its weekly dose of anti-national nonsense with this (based on reports from the sel. prol. crowd in the rathole known as the Henry Stimson Center)

http://us.rediff.com/news/2004/feb/24aziz.htm?headline=Dirty~bomb~threat~real~in~S~Asia
It also warns that although India and Pakistan 'have established regulatory bodies to deal with the safety and security of their nuclear materials,' these may not be sufficient to protect against every potential threat.

The report, authored by Kishore Kuchibhotla, currently a PhD student in biophysics at Harvard, and Matthew McKinzie, a nuclear physicist, currently a staff scientist with the Nuclear Program at
So who is this Kishore Kuchibhotla, I wonder.
I suppose Indians with a background in bio-physics, meta-physics etc. are the urgent need of the hour for the selective proliferation crowd, to provide the veneer of "acceptability" among Indians.
daulat
BRFite
Posts: 338
Joined: 09 Oct 2002 11:31

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by daulat »

Originally posted by Ananda:
Originally posted by Daulat:
my paranoid conspiracy theories are getting more vivid... :)
Actually you may be onto something here. Libya was pretty desperate to get out of the straitjacket of sanctions. And there is an additional motivation: Gaddafi has no love for the Pakistani military establishment, which had hanged his friend Bhutto.
i remain intrigued by the lateness of the libyan deal, the apparent extent of it, and the coincidental timing of the lockerbie trials, and ofcourse the volumes of information coming out of tripoli

gadaffi may be eccentric, but he's not stupid
Kuttan
BRFite
Posts: 439
Joined: 12 Jul 1999 11:31

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Kuttan »

Daulat:

Are you saying that the Lockerbie issue got settled BECAUSE Gaddafi agreed to nail the Pakis?

Excellent possibility. I too did not have an answer to why the Israelis did not bomb Libya if they knew about this - as they obviously did.

:rotfl: :rotfl:

Now mush can wonder: When Prince Bandar bin Sultan Al Terroristi came to visit Kahuta, heh-heh, was that a Culinary Institite of American delegation too???
daulat
BRFite
Posts: 338
Joined: 09 Oct 2002 11:31

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by daulat »

Originally posted by narayanan:
Daulat:

Are you saying that the Lockerbie issue got settled BECAUSE Gaddafi agreed to nail the Pakis?

Now mush can wonder: When Prince Bandar bin Sultan Al Terroristi came to visit Kahuta, heh-heh, was that a Culinary Institite of American delegation too???
no saar, i am hypothesising based on no data other than what i have read on this thread. you have to wonder why lockerbie is settled now after so many years? i heard quotes that muammar-bhai has sensed the winds of change, etc. - what were they? given TSP's centrality in the global market for the two things that muammar is accused of... you have to wonder

as for the good prince wences-saud's trip to kahuta-jhuta, the KSA royals will do a deal with unkil sometime - if not done already. al saud will dispose of TSP once its role as condom has been fulfilled to their satisfaction also
Rye
BRFite
Posts: 1183
Joined: 05 Aug 2001 11:31

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Rye »

Gaddafi's son wants to play pro soccer in Europe (and daddy got him his own pro soccer team), but has been hounded predictably by the EU countries, who have been claiming that he has been failing drug tests. But Gaddafi has been doing his penance as far back as 1998, when he paid 1 million $$ to Abu Sayyaf gang to release....captive American hostages!

Now, stupid fools like me could consider this funding terrorism in phillipines blatantly and openly, but the US had no problems passing on Gaddafi's money to Abu Sayyaf and releasing the captives. He also handed over the Iranians involved in lockerbie, and in general has been trying to become less of an outcaste...but...he started buying nukes from pakistan after he had started to "display his sincerity in reforming", so this man is a wily one.
Sunil
BRFite
Posts: 634
Joined: 21 Sep 1999 11:31

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Sunil »

Why are these Indian newspapers carrying the views of people like Milholn, Albright, Krepon etc...? who listens to them? the Pakistanis? the Chinese? or the Americans? - No.

Nobody listens to them and with good reason - these guys are completely irrelevant.

I guess it is fun to watch them writhe and groan in pain in their opeds but quite frankly there is serious work to be done.
Rye
BRFite
Posts: 1183
Joined: 05 Aug 2001 11:31

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Rye »

Originally posted by sunil s:
Nobody listens to them and with good reason - these guys are completely irrelevant.
I could be wrong, but they seem to have a huge grip on the Indian DIE and DDM. Thankfully, the english mediain total in India caters to a small part of the population, so in that sense they cannot do much damage even if they employ every pro-proliferation crook like Milholin or Krepon to write monthly columns. Krepon has been writing a periodic column in Outlook India since pokharan II, and the indian leftists and commies suck up all that this american has to say.
Bhai George
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 7
Joined: 07 Feb 2004 12:31

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Bhai George »

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/international/AP-Iran-India-Nuclear.html

Note the clever use of the words "Indian subcontinent" in this AP article on the Iranian nuclear probe.

Paki involvement in Iran was given a short shrift, while the article seemed to suggest India was somehow involved.

"Last week, Iran confirmed it had bought nuclear equipment from international dealers, including from the Indian subcontinent ..."
Rye
BRFite
Posts: 1183
Joined: 05 Aug 2001 11:31

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Rye »

The sudden shift from "south asia" to "Indian subcontinent" when it comes to proliferation, both by BBC and NYTimes(added later: actually Associated Press, as noted by Rangudu and Bhai "Boy" George), is extremely noteworthy. These buggers use the terms "south asia" *deliberate* to spread the equal-equal slant. And now, to "Indian subcontinent" for the equal-equal slant.
Bhai George
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 7
Joined: 07 Feb 2004 12:31

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Bhai George »

I'm half expecting to read headlines like this in future:

"Nuke proliferation by erstwhile part of India"

"India-born Dr. Khan is rogue scientist"

"New Delhi-born Musharaff, encouraged nuke madness"

"Al Queda receive support from India-bordering country"

and so on...
Rangudu
BRFite
Posts: 1751
Joined: 03 Mar 2002 12:31
Location: USA

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Rangudu »

Rye,

FYI, it was not NY Times but the Associated Press.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60273
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by ramana »

You know all this Shakepearean talk reminds me of another play. The lack of US reaction to AXK's shenanigans is "Much Ado About Nothing"
Rak
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 54
Joined: 21 Jun 2000 11:31

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Rak »

Originally posted by Bhai George:
I'm half expecting to read headlines like this in future:

"Nuke proliferation by erstwhile part of India"

"India-born Dr. Khan is rogue scientist"

"New Delhi-born Musharaff, encouraged nuke madness"

"Al Queda receive support from India-bordering country"

and so on...
"North Korea which is North of India, is still receiving Nuclear material from AQ.Khan who was born in India and Pakistani President Musharraf who was also born in India, said he still has no idea but gave 1billion% assurance that the army and the government are not involved"
Rangudu
BRFite
Posts: 1751
Joined: 03 Mar 2002 12:31
Location: USA

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Rangudu »

Looks like George Tenet's recent trip to Islamaintgood included a session where he personally removed A.X.K's chaddies.

http://www.nation.com.pk/daily/Feb-2004/26/main/top6.asp
CIA chief debriefs Dr Khan?

From Absar Alam

ISLAMABAD—A top US intelligence official interrogated Dr A. Q. Khan during his recent visit to Islamabad early this month to verify the authenticity of the information supplied by Pakistan to the US on nuclear proliferation, reliable sources told The Nation Tuesday.
The US embassy neither denied nor confirmed the information, but Pakistani officials dismissed it summarily.

George Tenet, the CIA chief, had a debriefing session with Dr Khan on February 12 in Islamabad, sources said. The debriefing session was arranged following Bush administration’s assertion to have a direct contact with Dr Khan.

Within 48 hours after the debriefing session Dr Khan went through, what a Pakistani spokesman termed “routine,” medical check-up on February 14 for cardiac stress.

A US embassy spokesman neither denied nor confirmed the debriefing session between Khan and Tenet. “I cannot confirm this information,” the spokesman said when approached by phone for his comments. Asked specifically if he would deny that Tenet had interviewed Khan he said he would not confirm.

Unlike US embassy spokesman, Shaukat Sultan, the Director General of the Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR) was quick to deny this report. “Absurd,” Sultan curtly said when contacted to seek his side of the story.
Saying there is nothing of this sort (meeting between Khan and Tenet) Sultan said the cooperation about investigation into nuclear proliferation was at the government-to-government level. He said Pakistan was providing information only to International Atomic Energy Agency.
However, the US embassy spokesman answering a question whether Islamabad was cooperating well to meet the expectations of Washington said consultations, meetings and dialogues were going on. “This is an ongoing process,” he said.
Asked if the investigations into worldwide nuclear proliferation had come to a conclusion, he said: “It’s far from over. Everyone is continuing to learn more.”

Well-placed diplomatic sources confirmed to The Nation that Musharraf regime had turned over tons of information acquired from the scientists to the United States. “It will take several months to go through the results of the investigations and the contents of the statements given by Dr Khan, and his Pakistani and foreign associates,” sources said.

The data and documents were made available to the CIA officials to allay US apprehensions that Islamabad might not be telling the whole truth. “The US wanted to double-check the information provided by Pakistan,” diplomatic sources said. In addition to answering CIA chief’s questions this month, Dr Khan was also quizzed by a few more US officials in earlier sessions as well.

General Musharraf had announced pardon for Dr Khan on February 5 proclaiming that he would stand between the Dr Khan and the international community. Two days later, February 7, US Secretary of State made a telephone call to Musharraf. On February 9, the Foreign Office issued statement saying Dr Khan was not given a blanket pardon.

The FO spokesman said the pardon was granted for what Dr Khan had confessed meaning if there was information about Dr Khan’s involvement in anymore proliferation activity, the pardon would be withdrawn.

“The US officials are sifting through the statements and information supplied by Islamabad to establish whether Khan had provided nuclear technology only to Iran, Libya, and North Korea or there are other countries too,” sources claimed.

The US investigation team, it was learnt, was trying to locate a link between Dubai-based firms, being accused of trading nuclear equipment, and front companies set up by Saddam Hussain and one Asian country to acquire centrifuges.

Dismissing the common perception in Pakistan that the whole affair was timed to force Islamabad rollback its nuclear programme, the diplomatic sources said, “The American objective is have complete information about the so-called underworld of nuclear proliferators and uproot their network once for all.”

The sources claimed that the US was most concerned about the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the information from Pakistan would help improve the existing system that failed to stop nuclear proliferation.
Kuttan
BRFite
Posts: 439
Joined: 12 Jul 1999 11:31

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Kuttan »

Sorry, ramana :D
The lack of US reaction to AXK's shenanigans is "Much Ado About Nothing"
That's "nothing because there ain't nothing"

OTOH, US GOTUS/SD reaction to the entire Paki saga is more like Hamlet:
To lie, or not to lie, is never the question. To debrief, or not to brief, THAT is the question
:eek:
Raman
BRFite
Posts: 305
Joined: 06 Mar 2001 12:31
Location: Niyar kampootar onlee

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Raman »

Ah, but where would that leave Mushy's indignant 400% non-prolif guarantees??
A tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60273
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by ramana »

Rye asks:
So who is this Kishore Kuchibhotla, I wonder.
From google he is a graduate of MIT class of 2002 - astrophysics?. He has particpated in many seminars on intl relations etc while at MIT. He appears to have written stuff for Henry Stimson Center. From what I can make out he is an intellectual kid deeply worried about nuke war.

On an aside the US has somethng called subaltern studies. What they do is have the natives/native origin folks go deconstruct their own societies along with a few US locals for verification. So what is seen at social studies depts is a massive out pouring of literature on India and what makes it tick. You would be surprized at how seriously Bollywood films are studied.

So KK might be assigned to look at S Asia and see what he can come up with. Many ABCD are hyper brilliant and social studies is bhaian haath ka kel hain. So arms control is hobby for him.
Vick
BRFite
Posts: 753
Joined: 14 Oct 1999 11:31

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Vick »

usual suspects, check mail.
Rye
BRFite
Posts: 1183
Joined: 05 Aug 2001 11:31

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by Rye »

Originally posted by ramana:
From what I can make out he is an intellectual kid deeply worried about nuke war.
IMHO, It is these people that the pro-proliferation mullahs in MIIS and Millholin-types aim to influence. Smart as KK might be, he is not going to figure out a damn thing if the pro-prolif crowd is the main source of disinformation.

Follows the known rule that the best person to counter fraud is never a scientist but another con man.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25382
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004

Post by SSridhar »

No proliferation ever... by the gola CEO.
He laid strong emphasis on drawing appropriate lesions :p from the unfortunate proliferation in the past.
Locked