






Krita wrote:Langoor ke haath mein Angoor, to define 303 seats and BJP. What a bunch of pusillanimous Jokers.
I am going to send them bangles via Amazon.
Govt asks Twitter to remove tweet by BJP MP Tejasvi Surya linking terrorists and Islam
timesnownews.com
https://www.timesnownews.com/amp/india/ ... am/589051?
Thus, it appears that the list containing the tweets the removal of which was sought was not created by the elected representatives or Ministers of the Union Government but individuals who work as part of an empowered committee that works in tandem with the various agencies and creates these lists.
This is the simple fact. We should focus on two simple aspect: providing cheap, high quality education to the entire population AND focus on production of goods that is required by the population.Vamsee wrote:
since we are on HDI topic, I wrote a twitter thread on HDI few months ago. Reproducing it here with some edits. The only true wealth of nation is its high skilled citizens! That's why Germany & Japan were able to very quickly bounce back from devastating world war II where as we still remain in poverty despite escaping WW II.
the premise has been simplified to a very large extent and it has negated the marshall plan, the per capita investment in dollar terms in japan as well as germany, the money saved by these two in not maintaining a credible and expensive armed force because of the nuclear umbrella provided by the US and hence having the wherewithal to invest in "quality education"nam wrote:This is the simple fact. We should focus on two simple aspect: providing cheap, high quality education to the entire population AND focus on production of goods that is required by the population.Vamsee wrote:
since we are on HDI topic, I wrote a twitter thread on HDI few months ago. Reproducing it here with some edits. The only true wealth of nation is its high skilled citizens! That's why Germany & Japan were able to very quickly bounce back from devastating world war II where as we still remain in poverty despite escaping WW II.
Income, services, jobs, health, HDI etc will automatically flow from this two criteria.
arshyam ji,arshyam wrote:Btw, for once, auto-correct was on the money:
"Chacha Neverwho" instead of Nehru. Strangely appropriate
Never was Indian enough, yet who was instrumental in saddling us with strategic problems in all directions, starting with his own family.
Someone else can come up with a more pithy description, but the word is BRF dictionary worthy, methinks..
Uttar Pradesh: Severed head of calf found amidst reports of stray cows going ‘missing’ from roads
http://www.opindia.com/2020/05/muzaffar ... r-pradesh/
this is not the only oneKrita wrote:Langoor ke haath mein Angoor, to define 303 seats and BJP. What a bunch of pusillanimous Jokers.
I am going to send them bangles via Amazon.
Govt asks Twitter to remove tweet by BJP MP Tejasvi Surya linking terrorists and Islam
timesnownews.com
https://www.timesnownews.com/amp/india/ ... am/589051?
The world does not accord anyone charity. You grab what you consider yours, without seeking permission and daring anyone to stop you. Years ago, on some other western phorum, there was the usual talk about En Pee Tea and why India contravenes it and must shut down its weapons program - a strident Brit said so. I responded simply 'Or else what ?' It got him very hot and bothered and he ranted about how the UK can get the NATO involved. I responded that 'listen to me or I'll go tell daddy' isn't a particularly impressive threat once you're older than about 5. I got banned soon after, "for trolling"... Brits don't like being reminded that they're the little boy of the P5, even the French having some independence. Not much later Rakesh asked me to be a mod here. What to do onleearshyam wrote:^^ Now, ain't that the truth?
India was always a sideshow when it came to both the world wars, despite our not very voluntary, yet significant contribution, both in terms of men and materiel. A more charitable world would have at least acknowledged our efforts to end the wars in the Allied powers' favour, but the world ain't fair.
I wanted to say a little more about this for better explanatory context. The issue with nitpicking on the problems with HDI - and yes there are problems as with any index - is that the question of 'a better measure' is largely a statistical exercise that can go in the Math or Econ threads.Suraj wrote:KL Dubey - I already covered the question of the imperfect ness of HDI . You’re missing the point . I’m simply using it as a metric to track the evolution of states in one country . I deliberately avoided a multi country comparison and refused a request to do so, because I’d makes gaming the metric more a problem . By all means find a better metric and apply it to all Indian states over the past 30-40 years and report data from that here . Otherwise the argument doesn’t serve much purpose .
No problem saar - then you get to define the term with a 1-liner.. my suggestion was anyway a bit ponderous :mgreen:chetak wrote:arshyam ji,arshyam wrote:Btw, for once, auto-correct was on the money:
"Chacha Neverwho" instead of Nehru. Strangely appropriate
Never was Indian enough, yet who was instrumental in saddling us with strategic problems in all directions, starting with his own family.
Someone else can come up with a more pithy description, but the word is BRF dictionary worthy, methinks..
no auto correct, saar.
See some of my previous posts.
I claim copyleft onlee.
While “No non-Muslim slaughterer” Halal is mainstream, police in Chennai arrest Jain Bakery owner for “No Muslim staffs” advertisement
https://www.opindia.com/2020/05/while-n ... rtisement/
Journalist Deepak Chaurasia threatened over reporting the Palghar Sadhu lynching and questioning Tablighi Jamaat chief Maulana Saad, files FIRs
https://www.opindia.com/2020/05/deepak- ... lana-saad/
Illegal Bangladeshi Immigrants Detected In Tamil Nadu Following Dispute Over Sharing Covid-19 Relief Material, State Police Let Them Go Free
https://swarajyamag.com/news-brief/ille ... em-go-free
Exactly. I dont see what is so hard about this concept. Pick another bunch of metrics if you are unhappy with x, justify them logically, provide the data.Suraj wrote:By all means - collect and report the data you prefer then . I’ve already suggested that twice now . It doesn’t matter as long as there’s historical time series data between states . If you just say Y is better than X but don’t make the effort to provide alternative data on that basis, then that is not helpful .
Why Couldn’t India Become A Manufacturing Behemoth? Our Bizarre Socialist Labour Laws Are To Blame
| by Karan Bhasin
May 10, 2020, 12:26 pm |
Over the last couple of days, many states have announced bold factor market reforms such as labour reforms.
Some states have also undertaken substantial agricultural reforms such as Madhya Pradesh.
The common thing amongst these states is the fact that they’re all governed by BJP administrations.
It would be naïve to think that COVID–19 pandemic can be dealt with by just the central government alone.
The economic fallout is going to be significant and comparable to the Great Depression.
This, therefore, means that we need a multi-staged policy response from the government and some of the long-awaited reforms have indeed been pending are land and labour reforms.
These are ideally supposed to be done at the state level, and therefore, by BJP governments finally taking a bold decision, they have revealed a larger strategy for economic revival over subsequent months which relies on higher investments, especially in manufacturing sector.
This also signals a shift from the Nehruvian-Socialism that has failed us for decades and perhaps, COVID–19 has finally started to dismantle the remains of the pre-1991 India growth model.
That being said, it is important to take a minute and acknowledge that every economist has over successive years advocated for a change in our land and labour regulations.
For instance, the Industrial Disputes Act required companies to seek permission before retrenchment of workers if the establishment had more than 300 employees.
This was subsequently lowered to 100 workers.
To not being able to fire people, irrespective of a change in business conditions, naturally meant that businesses would keep their number of employees at less than 100, or create a new firm for the 100th employee and every subsequent employee that was hired henceforth.
These laws and excessive regulations in the formal sector led to companies outsourcing work to informal enterprises which didn’t have to meet such compliances.
Consequently, India created a structure that incentivised informalisation of the economy and at the same time had a structure that encouraged companies to remain small.
This was also the essence of the chapter on dwarf firms in the Economic Survey.
Our structures that discouraged firms from getting large gradually led to a decline in our competitiveness even as other countries built mega-factories and huge global conglomerates.
With a large domestic consumer market like India, there was potential to have some of our key companies emerge as MNCs competing with the best in the world, but the reason why that didn’t happen was because our policies didn’t want companies to become big.
The laws and regulations that have been created were done to protect the dignity of labour.
The question is, were these norms successful in achieving the objective?
The answer is obviously ‘no’.
It is intuitive that informal workers are worse off with little to no job security and we know from our experience that these norms did result in greater informalisation.
Moreover, they prevented investments in India by large companies which would have helped us integrate further with the global value chains.
Consider this: While these norms were meant to protect those who were employed, they prevented investment which prevented the creation of job opportunities.
Therefore, while those in the formal sector may have benefited from these regulations, a large section of the population, especially those in the agricultural sector, continued to be in a state of disguised unemployment.
It shouldn’t be a surprise that India didn’t witness the kind of manufacturing revolution that some of the other emerging economies did.
The fact that some of these reforms have happened in land-locked regions such as UP and MP are also encouraging as our peninsular states had initiated some partial relaxation of these norms in the past and had some success in attracting industries.
Overall, the prospects of labour reforms come with one of the biggest corporate tax cuts in the world.
This, at a time when companies are looking at alternatives to China, is an excellent opportunity for India to seize the moment and several BJP ruled states have already started talking to some of these companies.
The interesting point here will be a politico-economic one.
That is, whether the Congress ruled states, or the other Opposition ruled states also start dismantling the Nehruvian Socialist model? If not, then, it becomes imperative for the BJP ruled states to be as aggressive as possible on some other reforms such as the new electricity Bill and a revised land acquisition amendment to name a few.
Success of these states in their transformation is critical not just for the overall economic recovery post COVID, but also for creating a new India Growth Model which can be replicated across other states.
If successful, then who knows, other developing and low-income countries may study (and try to emulate the same) for decades.
There’s a lot at stake here, and it’s important that we double down on reforms over the coming months.
There is a limit to how much two individuals can do. The next capable people (like Yogi) are doing their best in states like UP. But beyond that many of the BJP MPs are just 'numbers' to get the absolute majority in Parliament. All craving for some media attention, or using the opportunity to further their own individual agendas. Take for example Rajeev Chandrasekhar MP, who is on the director board of a Malayalam news channel Asianet News. This news channel has been anti-BJP 100% and even resorted to false reporting. I don't know what has this man's contribution to BJP agenda. The next ministries which always seems to be on the defensive seems to be the Education & HRD and the Information & Broadcasting ministries. At times I even get a feeling that there is some 'super power' who allows Modi to run the show, provided that these to ministries have below average/poor leadership.syam wrote:BJP lost the plot. Modiji and Amit Shah are busy with big matters.
there is no 'super power' here. it's sheer incompetence of rest of bjp leaders. do you remember amhed bhai rajya shabha election? some how shah reduced the congis mla numbers and made him lose the seat. then ahmed bhai did his own thing and got some mla disqualified. at the time, rsp and his gang in delhi went to ec office and made fool of themselves. it was big epic fail. even shah knows these guys are useless. the problem with rw is they don't criticize these two bit dumbos. instead they target modiji directly. if rw can raise a big storm about these leaders, they will lose their ministries within a month. sadly, the supporters also less savvy when it comes to politics.Sachin wrote: There is a limit to how much two individuals can do. The next capable people (like Yogi) are doing their best in states like UP. But beyond that many of the BJP MPs are just 'numbers' to get the absolute majority in Parliament. All craving for some media attention, or using the opportunity to further their own individual agendas. Take for example Rajeev Chandrasekhar MP, who is on the director board of a Malayalam news channel Asianet News. This news channel has been anti-BJP 100% and even resorted to false reporting. I don't know what has this man's contribution to BJP agenda. The next ministries which always seems to be on the defensive seems to be the Education & HRD and the Information & Broadcasting ministries. At times I even get a feeling that there is some 'super power' who allows Modi to run the show, provided that these to ministries have below average/poor leadership.
Sudhir Suryawanshi@ss_suryawanshi·2h
In the Apex court hearing, it is clear now Maharashtra police is also investigating financial angle in Republic Editor in chief Arnab Goswami case. Police wants 2 know, reasons behind d meteoric rise of channel & owner. Govt may also hand over case to Economic Offense Wing ( EOW)
I am now pretty much sure that Republic TV would be thrown under the bus by the I&B ministry. Or rather they may work out a plan to quickly scuttle the channel. I have got a response on an RTI filed for knowing what happened on Media One channel in Kerala and its ban for 2 days. The response and the reality; clearly shows the capabilites of the ministry.chetak wrote:the evil cabal has to be broken before they break the republic channels and the effective spread of such other similar media networks.
+1syam wrote:there is no 'super power' here. it's sheer incompetence of rest of bjp leaders. do you remember amhed bhai rajya shabha election? some how shah reduced the congis mla numbers and made him lose the seat. then ahmed bhai did his own thing and got some mla disqualified. at the time, rsp and his gang in delhi went to ec office and made fool of themselves. it was big epic fail. even shah knows these guys are useless. the problem with rw is they don't criticize these two bit dumbos. instead they target modiji directly. if rw can raise a big storm about these leaders, they will lose their ministries within a month. sadly, the supporters also less savvy when it comes to politics.Sachin wrote: There is a limit to how much two individuals can do. The next capable people (like Yogi) are doing their best in states like UP. But beyond that many of the BJP MPs are just 'numbers' to get the absolute majority in Parliament. All craving for some media attention, or using the opportunity to further their own individual agendas. Take for example Rajeev Chandrasekhar MP, who is on the director board of a Malayalam news channel Asianet News. This news channel has been anti-BJP 100% and even resorted to false reporting. I don't know what has this man's contribution to BJP agenda. The next ministries which always seems to be on the defensive seems to be the Education & HRD and the Information & Broadcasting ministries. At times I even get a feeling that there is some 'super power' who allows Modi to run the show, provided that these to ministries have below average/poor leadership.
There's no information in wailing 'BJP is useless onlee'. They were useless in 2015, 2010, 2005, all according to this forum. In fact they've been continuously useless for the entire existence of politics threads on this forum regardless of how many seats they have. You're not telling us anything new, and wailing about it here on this forum isn't much use. I mean what's to be said ? 'Yes yes I agree, let's all give up, shut the thread and go home' ? Except for its uppermost echelons, the BJP has been generally consistently weak at media relations. Live with it.syam wrote:there is no 'super power' here. it's sheer incompetence of rest of bjp leaders. do you remember amhed bhai rajya shabha election? some how shah reduced the congis mla numbers and made him lose the seat. then ahmed bhai did his own thing and got some mla disqualified. at the time, rsp and his gang in delhi went to ec office and made fool of themselves. it was big epic fail. even shah knows these guys are useless. the problem with rw is they don't criticize these two bit dumbos. instead they target modiji directly. if rw can raise a big storm about these leaders, they will lose their ministries within a month. sadly, the supporters also less savvy when it comes to politics.
the taliban is very keen to "make friends" with India so that they continue their free ride on infrastructure, hospitals. power stations, food aid in millions of tons of free food grains and all such aid and more can continue unhindered and what not.chetak wrote:Rsatchi wrote:^^^
'At each stop he ( meaning Khalilzad), will urge support for immediate reduction in violence, yada yada'
so In Delhi will he ask us to stop hitting Pakis???
What reduction in violence can we offer???
And later he is going to Slumbad!!!
I think Pakis want Khan to ask Namo to give them breathing space and not keep the LOC hot!!!
Pretty sure there is some serious things going on at the border.
And Baba Banaras is off line to give any second hand tidbits!!! as well.
zalmay Khalilzad is a pashtun snake oil salesman whom no one trusts and is an ameriki citizen.
be interesting to see what he is peddling this time around.
for sure, paki matters concerning India are mixed up somewhere in all this.
probably conveying trump sab's aadesh to Modi to go easy on niazi.
MAY 08, 2020
India should discuss its concerns on terrorism directly with the Taliban, said U.S. Special Representative for Afghanistan Reconciliation Zalmay Khalilzad, adding that he had discussed how India could play a “more active role” in the Afghan reconciliation process during his talks in Delhi on Thursday.
“India is an important force in Afghanistan and it would be appropriate for that [India-Taliban] engagement to take place,” Mr. Khalilzad told The Hindu in an exclusive interview.
The envoy said India had a “significant role” in Afghanistan’s development, but paradoxically, doesn’t play a role in the international peace efforts. “India and Afghanistan have historic ties, and I believe that dialogue between India and the Taliban is important, and it would be important that issues of concern like this [terrorism] are raised directly,” he added.
This is the first time the U.S. has publicly suggested an engagement between India and the Taliban. New Delhi, that still considers the Taliban a terror group allied to Pakistan, has thus far distanced itself from any talks.
During their meeting on Thursday, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar and National Security Advisor Ajit Doval had raised concerns over increasing violence in Afghanistan and the need to protect minorities including Afghan Sikhs and Hindus.
Mr. Khalilzad, the architect of the U.S.-Taliban agreement, travelled to Doha, Delhi and Islamabad, in an effort to iron out an impasse in the agreement over the release of prisoners and intra-Afghan negotiations. While recognising concerns over the Doha agreement, he told The Hindu that there “was no alternative” to it and hoped that India would engage “all forces” in Afghanistan, including the Taliban.
If you look at the opposition they too have plenty of duds running into each other like headless chicken ! The difference between islamist-leftists and the nationalists is that the former dont constantly second guess their own but the later always do.syam wrote:there is no 'super power' here. it's sheer incompetence of rest of bjp leaders. do you remember amhed bhai rajya shabha election? some how shah reduced the congis mla numbers and made him lose the seat. then ahmed bhai did his own thing and got some mla disqualified. at the time, rsp and his gang in delhi went to ec office and made fool of themselves. it was big epic fail. even shah knows these guys are useless. the problem with rw is they don't criticize these two bit dumbos. instead they target modiji directly. if rw can raise a big storm about these leaders, they will lose their ministries within a month. sadly, the supporters also less savvy when it comes to politics.Sachin wrote: There is a limit to how much two individuals can do. The next capable people (like Yogi) are doing their best in states like UP. But beyond that many of the BJP MPs are just 'numbers' to get the absolute majority in Parliament. All craving for some media attention, or using the opportunity to further their own individual agendas. Take for example Rajeev Chandrasekhar MP, who is on the director board of a Malayalam news channel Asianet News. This news channel has been anti-BJP 100% and even resorted to false reporting. I don't know what has this man's contribution to BJP agenda. The next ministries which always seems to be on the defensive seems to be the Education & HRD and the Information & Broadcasting ministries. At times I even get a feeling that there is some 'super power' who allows Modi to run the show, provided that these to ministries have below average/poor leadership.
Abdul Mateen Imran@AbdulMateenImr1
#Taliban's Suhail Shaheen said, "Based on our national interest& mutual respect, we would like to have positive relations with neighbouring countries including #India&welcome their contribution and cooperation in the reconstruction of future Afghanistan."
https://dnaindia.com/india/report-talib ... ssion=true
3:47 AM · May 10, 2020
It's pointless to do so here, is my point. As you just said, whatever BRF does is different from what Health Minister does, so complain directly instead of complaining here where no one in the Health Ministry or rest of Government is going to see it and mods have to clean up when posters whine.syam wrote:I simply expressed my displeasure about it.