isn't the surname "punjabi" usually a sindhi nameAvtar Singh wrote:You worry too much, please get a grip.Punjabi wrote: .................God Help us![]()
Stiff upper lip and all that and for gods sake remember, you are after all a PUNJABI![]()
as am I.

isn't the surname "punjabi" usually a sindhi nameAvtar Singh wrote:You worry too much, please get a grip.Punjabi wrote: .................God Help us![]()
Stiff upper lip and all that and for gods sake remember, you are after all a PUNJABI![]()
as am I.
one would expect nothing less from a party that fielded cigar smoking cash clinton, email server hillary, obamacare obama, hunter biden's pater: papa biden and of course the black baptist, the mylapore maami.vera_k wrote:Sure. The NGO involved has started suing some states. Will be popcorn time if either side finds a systematic operation of having people vote in multiple states. The distances involved are no longer a barrier given the invention of the automobile.chetak wrote:is there any truth to this
Judicial Watch finds 1.8 million 'ghost voters' in 29 states, warns of 'dirty elections'
The irony now is that the Trump gang doesn't know for sure if getting these ballots delivered and counted them will hep them reverse the tide and help him win or if they will turn out mostly in Dem's favour and increase Biden's lead. They are stuck and in a panic situation realising that they -may- have shot themselves in the foot by making US Postal play dirty.Roughly 300,000 ballots that the Postal Service says it processed showed no scan confirming their delivery to ballot-counting sites, according to data filed recently in federal court in Washington, D.C., leaving voter-rights advocates concerned.
Cyrano jiCyrano wrote:Chetak ji, whats the point? Similar invective can be made for Rep presidents, especially on the latest one across several additional categories like sexual abuse, rape, misogyny, racism, corruption, tax fraud, perjury, treason (was impeached, remember?)... There are no doodh ka dhulas on either side.
This is NOT a thread to debate Rep vs Dem, just about the election. The Dems are the likely winners of the election, and they will therefore be scrutinized. Not the place to debate 'but what about the other side'. We'll discuss the other side if they're the winner, eh ?Cyrano wrote:Chetak ji, whats the point? Similar invective can be made for Rep presidents, especially on the latest one across several additional categories like sexual abuse, rape, misogyny, racism, corruption, tax fraud, perjury, treason (was impeached, remember?)... There are no doodh ka dhulas on either side.
No. Everyone including the Trump campaign were alarmed when healthy leads were not called in his favor but Biden's lead even at 40% counting was called in his (ex : AZ). The "phases" thing is nothing new but we've never seen counting go on for 3 days with no decision in sight, and you blame Trump and his supporters for doubting this ? Every election including 2016 were decided by 11 PM est, here we are on 5th with still no clear outcome other than democrat run states keep finding these stack full of Biden ballots ! Unless opening the envelopes this year is akin to disarming a nuclear tipped missile, nothing explains why it should take 3 days with a familiar trend of cutting Trump's lead in all democrat states.Cyrano wrote:It seems to me that ....
Lovely jubbly mess !!! Grab some popcorn....
..so will be the house.Cyrano wrote:I wouldn't be so sure about that. With Trump no longer looming large, Dems can flip 2 or 3 Rep senators on some issues and push through... Plus some senate seats will again be up for renewal in 2 yrs from now.
Trump has done somethings that I think the past Dem and Republicans would never do.chetak wrote:Cyrano jiCyrano wrote:Chetak ji, whats the point? Similar invective can be made for Rep presidents, especially on the latest one across several additional categories like sexual abuse, rape, misogyny, racism, corruption, tax fraud, perjury, treason (was impeached, remember?)... There are no doodh ka dhulas on either side.
just chalk it down to the disappointment of trump not making it.
Seems like a fairly accurate summary to my amateur eyes.Cyrano wrote:It seems to me that there are three broad phases of vote counting, though this is not done this way due to any specific law or guideline, but mostly as a practice inherited from previous elections.
...
Ah, I see. Certain text messages reported by friends (saying - please vote in person, don't mail in) are starting to make sense now. At the time, I was likeMeanwhile, his crony appointee Post Master General Louis De Joy (appointed mid June after suddenly firing the previous PMG) has ensured that many thousands of mail in ballots were kept undelivered and don't enter counting centres before the cutoff date in some states (rules vary). It is believed that this was done mostly in counties where strong fight was expected from Dems.
Unable to be that objective, the consequences of a dem win being what they are.Lovely jubbly mess !!! Grab some popcorn....
Trump is already planning a 2024 run if 2020 does not work out.Cyrano wrote:I wouldn't be so sure about that. With Trump no longer looming large, Dems can flip 2 or 3 Rep senators on some issues and push through... Plus some senate seats will again be up for renewal in 2 yrs from now.
Erm, were the other elections held during a global pandemic which pushed a lot of voters primarily from a single party to vote via early voting or mail-in ballots? The past elections were decided not because all of the votes were counted but because there were enough trends to know the end result. A] We have a record amount of mail-in ballots which are notoriously slower to count especially in states which have rules that prevent preprocessing of them. B] The distribution of votes is skewed by the method of voting. If both Republicans and Democrats were equally likely to have voted in person and by ballot we would have already known the results by now. At the very least, we would not have had a massive shift.Ambar wrote:No. Everyone including the Trump campaign were alarmed when healthy leads were not called in his favor but Biden's lead even at 40% counting was called in his (ex : AZ). The "phases" thing is nothing new but we've never seen counting go on for 3 days with no decision in sight, and you blame Trump and his supporters for doubting this ? Every election including 2016 were decided by 11 PM est, here we are on 5th with still no clear outcome other than democrat run states keep finding these stack full of Biden ballots ! Unless opening the envelopes this year is akin to disarming a nuclear tipped missile, nothing explains why it should take 3 days with a familiar trend of cutting Trump's lead in all democrat states.Cyrano wrote:It seems to me that ....
Lovely jubbly mess !!! Grab some popcorn....
So many such cases. ..
Why did you not quote the math that I posted? Or were you worried that you'd be outed?DavidD wrote:If your numbers/math is wrong, which it is, then it's not a 20% jump. I felt that should be addressed first, don't you agree?george wrote:
I see that you simply sidestepped the question of a 20% jump in turnout in both states and instead want to judge my math skills?
http://www.electproject.org/home/voter- ... rnout-data
For example, Michigan's voter turnout was 65.7% (4.87M / 7.42M) in 2016, 73.5% (5.55M / 7.55M) this year, a relative increase of 11.8% (73.5 - 65.7 / 65.7).
Note that I'm using the "total votes counted" for my calculations, which includes votes for 3rd party candidates and votes that did not go for any presidential candidate. Those votes constitute <2% of total votes each year.
Observers mean jacksh* if the ballots themselves are fraudulent. Besides, from NV to PA we have recorded evidence of GoP observers not being allowed inside the counting stations. Nevada has 1.8 million voters, most wards in Mumbai have more people than that and they are saying it will take days for them to arrive at the final number. Btw, the MI spike was real , they said it was a "clerical error" in Shiawassee county of adding an addition 0 against Joe Biden's number.Cyrano wrote:I'm not saying election frauds can't happen, they indeed can at every stage of the process, starting from drawing up electoral rolls to declaring the final result and during each of the umpteen stages in between.
I understand both parties can and do have their representatives and observers in every counting centre. If one party is cheating by counting tens/hundreds of thousands of votes for their candidate in a bunch, in a specific time window, what are the reps from the other party doing? There are many steps for checking the voter's identity, ballot validity, signature check, tallying, etc that can be and are indeed crosschecked by reps of both parties, and then by officials.
Despite all these the claim is that thousands of votes have escaped all scrutiny points and landed exclusively in one party's count onlee in an hour or two.
Hmmm.......must be Houdinis performing in front of the Blind+Deaf+Dumb.
That of course is entirely possible. I don't know the step by step process lifecycle from the time a ballot is printed to counted and then finally destroyed. Perhaps you know better and can pin point in which step(s) fraud has happened and how.Observers mean jacksh* if the ballots themselves are fraudulent.
Check my previous posts i have posted links to videos where GoP poll observers with authorization and all the necessary paperwork were denied entry in NV and PA . Yes, proud boys bad and antifa / BLM are angels who's first shift is to stuff ballots and second is to burn cities.Cyrano wrote:That of course is entirely possible. I don't know the step by step process lifecycle from the time a ballot is printed to counted and then finally destroyed. Perhaps you know better and can pin point in which step(s) fraud has happened and how.Observers mean jacksh* if the ballots themselves are fraudulent.
Oh, there must have been significant armed resistance if Trump's Proud Boys were not even allowed into Counting stations. But there hasn't been. Why? Bcoz no one can just walk into counting centres under police protection unless registered as a volunteer or as a party rep. This is not some free peep show. More lies spread by Trumpists. Some GoP "observers" complain they aren't allowed to personally verify signatures, scans on ballots etc. Thats not the role of observers as per established rules. The bad faith is staggering but has ceased to shock me or the RoW.
Almost into day 4 and counting is still on ? - CheckCyrano wrote:Boss, you keep jumping from one fraud claim to another, first its counting, then misinterpreted graphs, then ballots themselves then observers... I'll let your arguments pass. Believe what you will.
It certainly will be ineffectual one way or another but foreign policy will be affected by the Paki controlled/infiltrated Demsmappunni wrote:Did anyone even consider the impact of Republicans holding the Senate?
So even if the democrat-controlled house passe bills it will be spiced by the Senate Republicans to include whatever they want, if they want to pass the bill.
The rest of the democratic house passed bills are going to die a slow painful death, by the Leader of the Senate not even putting up the bill for discussion.
What is your take? Will it turn out to be a lame-duck Presidency?