http://ajaishukla.blogspot.com/2020/11/ ... eptor.html
30 Nov 2020

Guess they had changed it 20 years back and reverted to the same British one back for some reason( reason was better visibility, etc but I don't buy that). Anyways, that's how it is.m_saini wrote:Nice video, although I wish they update their ensign from St. George's cross (who was a crusader no less) to something more fitting. Though I'm sure they have more pressing concerns than to play around with ensigns.
Kursura and Karanj were deployed in the North Arabian sea. Kursura was deployed well before outbreak of hostilities with orders to attack and sink all Pakistani Naval ships, merchant ships detected (when specifically ordered), patrol and surveillance. Kursura arrived at her station on November 18 and remained on patrol till November 30. She thereafter rendezvoused with Karanj on December 2 to pass on information and instructions and subsequently entered Mumbai. During her daring deployment, she had encountered a number of merchant ships, whilst in her station.
Karanj sailed on November 30 with similar orders as Kursura and reached her station on December 3. The same night, she received news that hostilities with Pakistan had broken out, but was ordered to maintain her station. On December 5, she was ordered to deploy to a new station. During her transit, she received news of the Indian Navy’s audacious missile attack on Karachi and sinking of two Pakistan Navy warships. From December 6-14, whilst deployed in her station, Karanj encountered intense enemy air and warship activity. On four distinct occasions during the patrol, she came close to launching torpedoes on suspected enemy merchant ships, but held back due to orders to positively identify before engaging any merchantmen. Karanj returned to Mumbai harbour on December 20. This audacious deployment has been recorded in the annals of history as the longest by any Indian Naval unit during the 1971 Indo-Pak War.
On the Eastern seaboard, Khanderi sailed from Visakhapatnam on November 28, 1971, to patrol in the Bay of Bengal. Her orders were to cut off the shipping lane from Ceylon to Chittagong, destroy Pakistan Navaland merchant ships and provide timely intelligence of Pakistan maritime forces. Like her sister submarines on the West Coast, Khanderi too had restrictive orders to positively identify merchantmen prior to engaging. She returned to Visakhapatnam harbour on December 14, after a successful patrol in the thick of war.
The VC-11184:Strategic Frontier
@strategic_front
The VC-11184 is mean to track enemy nuclear weapons, provide targeting ability for Indian BMD & gather ELINT. The ship has a X-band, S-band radars that uses tech from the MOTR & LRTR family of radars. The ship was handed over to the Navy in early 2020 for sea trials.
Bhavesh Jaglan
@JaglanBhavesh
Replying to
@strategic_front
@Aryan_warlord
Sir, what's stopping India from building LPD's based on this base ship. It looks very similar to the Makassar-class landing platform docks that are cheap and can be built in greater numbers in a significantly lesser amount of time.
Mistral at most will cost no more bill each but would require a complement of atleast 15 helos which would cost equally as much if not more. Also with smaller design you are sacrificing a lot of capability and also you have risk of going with unproven LPD design and all the delays associated with it.chola wrote:A homegrown design could be more economical than the French, Italians and Spaniards selling us their gold-plated Mistral, Juan Carlos, etc. which were all over 20K tons. A smaller LPD based on the VC-11184 could be more affordable especially when you don't need to paid a premium for phoren "expertise."
-AnkitHowever, a different set of sources say that more than the ‘time gap’, the real issue was the emergence of a single-vendor situation, with an internal capability assessment going against one of the two shipyards in contention.
John ji, worries about sacrificing ability is rather meaningless if we cannot get the project off the ground because we cannot afford it, no?John wrote:Mistral at most will cost no more bill each but would require a complement of atleast 15 helos which would cost equally as much if not more. Also with smaller design you are sacrificing a lot of capability and also you have risk of going with unproven LPD design and all the delays associated with it.chola wrote:A homegrown design could be more economical than the French, Italians and Spaniards selling us their gold-plated Mistral, Juan Carlos, etc. which were all over 20K tons. A smaller LPD based on the VC-11184 could be more affordable especially when you don't need to paid a premium for phoren "expertise."
Looks to be an EO that’s not STGR which guides both the guns and Barak.srin wrote:At 4:37, what is it to the right of AK 630 ? Is it the FCR for the AK ?
John thanks for confirming. I had the same question as srin. I tried to dig up and I think its a similar EO sight platform as what the p17 uses. I reckon its a BEL product probably elbit.John wrote:Looks to be an EO that’s not STGR which guides both the guns and Barak.srin wrote:At 4:37, what is it to the right of AK 630 ? Is it the FCR for the AK ?
Yes there is one located on top of smaller mast.andy B wrote:still wonder if its for auto engagement against sea skimmers as well as Vikad. does carry stgr right?
The Indian Ministry of Defence will acquire five new fleet support vessels for the Indian Navy. A $2.3bn contract was signed between Hindustan Shipyard Limited (HSL) and the TAIS consortium between five Turkish shipbuilders for the collaboration to design and build the vessels.
Facepalm is correct. We cannot design and build replenishment vessels? And we are paying a potentially hostile nation that is aggressively pushing peacefool politics to build them for us? Insane.MeshaVishwas wrote:Future ships of the Indian Navy- Naval Technology
https://www.naval-technology.com/featur ... dian-navy/
*Facepalm*