Seems endemic there.Paul wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfHJvcjReFI
Dine and Dashing.....I thought this only happened in IIIrd world countries.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNlBNGwB6rk
Seems endemic there.Paul wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfHJvcjReFI
Dine and Dashing.....I thought this only happened in IIIrd world countries.
via@tomselliottBiden’s UN ambassador, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, tells the National Action Network that if America's going to join the UN’s Human Rights Council, we must acknowledge our own failures: “White supremacy is weaved into our founding documents and principles”
For America especially white people and too a certain extent even Asian americans, BLM is far worse than jihadis. In this context Jihadis do not pose the same perceptible threat that BLM poses.Rudradev wrote:BLM can never be worse than jihadis, and that is indeed a highly self-defeating comparison to make.
However far-fetched the rhetoric of BLM, the fact that Blacks were brought to America as slaves, enslaved for centuries, then subjected to all kinds of discrimination even after being emancipated is undeniable. It is in the historical record.
Whereas there is no instance anywhere (at least in the Indian subcontinent) of Islam being oppressed by non-Muslim natives in any way, shape or form. Indeed the historical record points to Muslims being the invaders, enslavers, looters, mass-murderers and systematic eradicators of native culture in every situation. They have far more in common with "whites" than with any "blacks".
BLM is the white peoples' problem. The same white people cry "Hindu fundamentalist/fascist oppression against Maw Slums" when they want to virtue-signal from their "liberal" universalist facade. So I for one am glad that BLM is crawling up their unmentionables & calling them out as White Supremacists, 24 X 7 X 365.
Well the interests of Indian Americans may not always align with the interests of India. Sanctimonius white "liberals" love to preach about the caste system and supposed oppression of Muslims in "Hindoo Nationalist" India. Us talking about the appalling treatment of Black people in white-majority America is the best way to counter their propaganda and tell them to look in the mirror. One good point to hit them on (if they mention the caste system) is that the Indian constitution provides for Affirmative action on an unprecedented scale in the form of caste based reservations and minority quotas. In contrast to this, despite their sordid history of enslaving black people and committing genocide against Native Americans followed by segregation and denial of basic civil rights for a long time, even California, the paragon of "liberalism" fails to pass a law in favor of Affirmative action.darshhan wrote: For America especially white people and too a certain extent even Asian americans, BLM is far worse than jihadis. In this context Jihadis do not pose the same perceptible threat that BLM poses.
By the way Indian-Americans and PIOs along with other Asian-americans based in America have suffered much more at the hands of Black goons than those of white racists. Crime records will prove my point.
Agree with your post. This is one of the points where India's interests and Indian-American interests diverge. My post was only in context of Indian Americans and other asians in USA.nachiket wrote:Well the interests of Indian Americans may not always align with the interests of India. Sanctimonius white "liberals" love to preach about the caste system and supposed oppression of Muslims in "Hindoo Nationalist" India. Us talking about the appalling treatment of Black people in white-majority America is the best way to counter their propaganda and tell them to look in the mirror. One good point to hit them on (if they mention the caste system) is that the Indian constitution provides for Affirmative action on an unprecedented scale in the form of caste based reservations and minority quotas. In contrast to this, despite their sordid history of enslaving black people and committing genocide against Native Americans followed by segregation and denial of basic civil rights for a long time, even California, the paragon of "liberalism" fails to pass a law in favor of Affirmative action.darshhan wrote: For America especially white people and too a certain extent even Asian americans, BLM is far worse than jihadis. In this context Jihadis do not pose the same perceptible threat that BLM poses.
By the way Indian-Americans and PIOs along with other Asian-americans based in America have suffered much more at the hands of Black goons than those of white racists. Crime records will prove my point.
Now we know very well that the kind of affirmative action they were talking about would have been unfair to Indian Americans and other Asian Americans as much as if not more than white people. But that doesn't mean we can't use that to hit back against some pompous San Francisco white "liberal" who tries to sound off on the evil caste system in India.
There is absolutely no need to be fair in our criticism and derision of them, when they do not show any while doing the same to us.
White people are responsible for the colonization of my ancestral civilization, a colonization which continues to warp the minds of millions of my fellow Hindus today. They have distorted whatever in our culture they could not erase, enslaved whomever they could not exterminate, looted everything they could not seize through outright occupation.darshhan wrote:
For America especially white people and too a certain extent even Asian americans, BLM is far worse than jihadis. In this context Jihadis do not pose the same perceptible threat that BLM poses.
By the way Indian-Americans and PIOs along with other Asian-americans based in America have suffered much more at the hands of Black goons than those of white racists. Crime records will prove my point.
Well said. Even today the "secular and liberal" whites, and the "religious christian right" whites continue to push for complete destruction of Hindu civilization by pretending "religious freedom to convert" is a human right, so they can run their neo-colonial imperial agenda under the banner of "human rights for all".Rudradev: White people are responsible for the colonization of my ancestral civilization, a colonization which continues to warp the minds of millions of my fellow Hindus today. They have distorted whatever in our culture they could not erase, enslaved whomever they could not exterminate, looted everything they could not own through outright occupation.
Looks like you did not read my post carefully. First of all I did not disagree with what you wrote in your original post or in this post. I just pointed out that in the current American context, whites, Asian-Americans including Indian-Americans and even hispanic-americans are more threatened by BLM rather than jihadis. And this is true.Rudradev wrote:White people are responsible for the colonization of my ancestral civilization, a colonization which continues to warp the minds of millions of my fellow Hindus today. They have distorted whatever in our culture they could not erase, enslaved whomever they could not exterminate, looted everything they could not seize through outright occupation.darshhan wrote:
For America especially white people and too a certain extent even Asian americans, BLM is far worse than jihadis. In this context Jihadis do not pose the same perceptible threat that BLM poses.
By the way Indian-Americans and PIOs along with other Asian-americans based in America have suffered much more at the hands of Black goons than those of white racists. Crime records will prove my point.
If you want to sympathize with them, go ahead.
I for one have no special affiliation with black people. But I can see one thing very clearly. If Hindus did not have steel/gunpowder/horses and military technology by around 1500 CE-- when the white people came to India-- our fate would have been no different from the black people's.
Crime records prove nothing, by the way. They only prove that there are two Americas-- a nice place of suburban lawns, decent schools, safe streets, stock portfolios for the white people and a crime-ridden ghetto for everybody else. Indians and other Asians who emigrate to the US, being non-white, go to the ghetto by default unless they already have money backing them on arrival. White-controlled law-enforcement agencies don't care what goes on in such places (even if their residents pay taxes just like everyone else). So of course most crime committed against Asians is going to be by other non-white residents of the ghetto areas who live alongside them.
Why this urge to make excuses for their treatment of black people? You can attempt to analyze all the nuances and data to explain the situation but know that white Americans will not do us the same courtesy when they blame us for oppressing Muslims in India despite the fact that for most of the last 1000+ years it was the Hindus being oppressed in India. And they will vehemently protect their own academic when she demonizes Hinduism and refuses to acknowledge any atrocities committed on them by a well known historical mass murderer.sanjaykumar wrote:The race/crime equation is fraught with many victimhoods. Blacks are the recipient of black largesse. Blacks are the victims and perpetrators of a great deal of violent crime.
Of course it is not demanding to explain black violence. Just inconvenient.
The 13 year old kid had a handgun. The police officer had to make a quick decision on what to do - allow the kid to possible shoot him or shoot the kid. It's easy for us to pass judgement on the police from the safety of our living rooms but the streets are dangerous, especially the south side of Chicago. I have ventured there by mistake and it is a scary part of town.Philip wrote:How a 13 yr. old unarmed kid can be shot by a cop is incomprehensible. The spate of recent shootings by police plus by loonies killing the public has been described by Gerry Joe as an "epidemic". But for years only lip service has been done to address the disease.
The video, according to police, shows a gun in Toledo's right hand as he nears an open area of fence next to an empty lot. Toledo turns to his left, toward the officer, and what police say is the gun disappears behind his right side. Toledo begins to raise his hands as he's facing the officer when the officer fires his weapon.
From the time police said the gun was first visible on body-worn camera footage in Toledo's hand, to the time the officer fired his weapon, was eight tenths of a second. In that period of time, his right arm disappears behind the fence before he begins to raise both hands.
In Indian terms it is not short of genocide. Repeated year after year. However, most politicians and judges are supportive of it because it is enabled by the constitution. This explains why nothing is done and at best there is lip service after every incident.Philip wrote:The spate of recent shootings by police plus by loonies killing the public has been described by Gerry Joe as an "epidemic". But for years only lip service has been done to address the disease.
The problem is that BLM is an organization which falls under the Venn diagram intersection of anarchists, SJW and BIF allies. BLM has forgotten the lessons of protests that were used by MLK and MKG before him. India has no dog in this fight except that BLM's issues do highlight American hypocrisy of human rights. Let BLM and whites resolve their own issues. However, the people who are in BLM will indeed target Indians and Indian origin people.nachiket wrote:
Why this urge to make excuses for their treatment of black people? You can attempt to analyze all the nuances and data to explain the situation but know that white Americans will not do us the same courtesy when they blame us for oppressing Muslims in India despite the fact that for most of the last 1000+ years it was the Hindus being oppressed in India. And they will vehemently protect their own academic when she demonizes Hinduism and refuses to acknowledge any atrocities committed on them by a well known historical mass murderer.
That is precisely why we should use it to the full extent possible to reveal their hypocrisy and counter their propaganda against India and Hindus.Mort Walker wrote: India has no dog in this fight except that BLM's issues do highlight American hypocrisy of human rights.
I will accept that when they show the same courtesy towards India instead of running their mouth without even attempting to fully understand what's going on.Let BLM and whites resolve their own issues.
+1,00,008Jaeger wrote:So sad. It's becoming so difficult for a good white herrow to break the arms of 73-year-old ladies with dementia or shoot a 13-year-old kid. My heart goes out to him.
I see all this a little differently. From my comfortable armchair in desh, I feel Hindu/Indian community has missed a trick or two. The tactic should've been to out-woke the wokes from Day 0. Look at the mf-ing Pakis. They can literally JDAM their own people and yet they claim full victimhood in the West.
Time for us to put on the mask and wail as loudly as anyone while making good woke noises about killer cops and BLM. White wokes are still White first. When presented with a good helping of butter, they will swallow anything. JMT, IMHO, etc.
Not necessarily. There are based Hindus using the woke/postmodern rhetoric effectively to make the case for India and Sanatan Dharma without falling into any kind of self-flagellation. Indu Vishwanathan, Vishal Ganeshan, Mukunda Raghavan, Ruchir Sharma to name a few.nachiket wrote:There is a section of the Indian American population which attempts to out-woke the woke like the Pramila Jaypal types and that commie nutbag from Seattle Kshama Sawant etc. A lot of Indian origin candidates in the Democratic party might fall into this category to be honest. But without fail they will out-woke the woke in attacking India and Hindus as well.
check it out.Rudradev wrote:Has this thread officially become the dumping yard for any and all garbage picked up from dubious Twitter handles?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/fac ... 241450002/The New York Post reported that Khan-Cullors has purchased four properties in recent years, though two came before 2020 brought a swell of attention and donations to Black Lives Matter. Three of those properties were in the Los Angeles area, and one was in suburban Atlanta, according to the Post.
One of the Los Angeles properties cost $510,000 when Khan-Cullors purchased it in 2016. A second Los Angeles home ran her $590,000 in 2018, the Post reported. A suburban Atlanta property was purchased for $415,000 in 2020
Yagnasri wrote:I have followed Floyd case...
But is there any proof beyond reasonable evidence to convict the police officer? Add that to no sequester of the jury, ... Prosecutor was making allegations which is not made in a criminal trial... I am not sure even the Jury was instructed properly by the Judge.
Registered. Circulated in my groups.Rudradev wrote:On that note I encourage everybody here to sign up for this online program on Friday, April 23rd.
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/understand ... 9644973143
Please share the link as widely as possible and encourage others to sign up/sign on as well.