https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60952125
The options are:
1. Ukraine has not carried out the strike. In that case it was (a) an accident at the oil depot as Ukraine claims
or (b) a false flag carried out by Russia. Why would Russia do this? To raise war fever and whip up even more anger/ resolve in its citizens and prepare them for a longer war?
To enable troop mobilisation in greater numbers as some internet theories go (unconfirmed but attack on Russian territory apparently legally enables the government to take more drastic mobilisation measures)? Please to pick your own conspiracy theory
2. Ukraine has carried out the strike and now is denying it. It would do that (a) to send a message to Russia but not escalate by denying it publicly or
(b) someone in Ukraine military acted unilaterally without the permission of the government.
Since it is being claimed as a helicopter strike, I personally find it amazing how a pair of Ukrainian helicopters managed to penetrate Russian airspace for 40 kilometres. And then returned to base (presumably since we haven’t had claims of them being shot down).
So many hypotheses!
I’d say this is a popular war for the Ukrainians and in war nothing else seems to matter. How much would we be willing to sacrifice if Chinese troops came boiling down the Himalayas?vinod wrote:
….
Ukraine has been able to impose a very high cost on Russia at the expense of almost complete ruin of their own country. How that makes sense to Ukranians, I do not understand.