VinodTK wrote:Wellcome back Chetak Jeechetak wrote: Thanks to you, hnair saab. You made it possible.
Thanks also to others who welcomed me back
Family. Nice to be back again.

VinodTK wrote:Wellcome back Chetak Jeechetak wrote: Thanks to you, hnair saab. You made it possible.
Thanks also to others who welcomed me back
Family. Nice to be back again.
Thankyou Tanaji saar.Tanaji wrote:Welcome back Chetak Saar, even your bosom pal Raghuram Rajan was asking about you all this while…
HNairji,hnair wrote:chetak, good to see you back![]()
Inspector-saab, please send a mail with your BRF userid to [email protected] in future, incase you get locked out. The mail will get charcoaled on the walls of the kave-kamplex of admin jirga by the Boss-djinn. Some adminullah coming in for khushboo’s feed and a bottle of Pindi-noir will see it and fix issue. Aasman-ak-phyr all round.g.sarkar wrote: Cyranoji,
I think this is a common problem with BRF. This is my third incarnation in this forum, having lost my password, I had to register again and again. But as long as the atman is the same, it does not matter what name or form we assume while reincarnating.
Gautam
Justice Hemant Gupta: Whether college management can take a call on uniform of students and if wearing of Hijab and restricting it is violative of Article 25.
Whether right under Article 19 and Article 25 is mutually exclusive.
Whether government order infringes upon the fundamental right.
Updated at:13th Oct, 2022 at 10:43 AM
Justice Hemant Gupta: Can student exert her fundamental right, is wearing right a part of essential religious practice under Islam, whether government order serves purpose of access of education: the answer according to me IS AGAINST THE APPELLANT. I DISMISS THE APPEAL.
Updated at:13th Oct, 2022 at 10:43 AM
Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia: I have set aside the Karnataka High Court order and quashed the government order.
Updated at:13th Oct, 2022 at 10:43 AM
Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia: Venturing into essential religious practice was not needed and the court took a wrong way. It was just a question of choice. I have held the ratio in Bijoy Emmanuel squarely covers the case. One thing which was topmost for me was education of girl child.
Updated at:13th Oct, 2022 at 10:43 AM
Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia: A girl child in areas does household work and chores before going to school and are we making her life any better by doing this. I have respectfully differed. This was a case only dealing with Article 19 and 25.
Updated at:13th Oct, 2022 at 10:43 AM
Justice Hemant Gupta: In view of divergent opinion, let the matter be placed before the Chief Justice of India for appropriate directions.
Sachin wrote:'Divergent views': Supreme Court delivers spilt verdict in Karnataka hijab ban case
And the case goes on. The champions for the Hijab cause - the Campus Front of India - is now a banned organisations, so it is up to the other secular, progressive organisations to take the case forward.
Pranam Rsatchi ji and thank you.Rsatchi wrote:^^
Chetakji Pranam and welcome back.
Do you think this a well thought plan as the new CJI taking over and lots of vacancies on the bench
Who knows if they fill it with Wokish ones
And we have important one's line Temple act, Demonetisation etc coming up when will the Executive crack the whip if the Judiciary keeps crossing the 'Rubicon' or in our parlance 'Lakshmanrekha'
Thank youLisa wrote:Chetakji,
All is forgiven. The silence is deafening. Please write again.
Thank you Neela ji. Nice to be backNeela wrote:chetak-ji, welcome back. you were missed for the 360 degree views.
https://www.deccanherald.com/national/d ... 53181.html"It (wearing of hijab) is a matter of choice, nothing more and nothing less,” Justice Dhulia, adding what weighed on his mind the most was whether we are making a girl student's life better by putting such restrictions.
Even for a trivial case of hijab. YouKnowWho could not dare to take a stand, do any one think they can do justice by standing firm on matter of worshipAct1991, WTF Act, UCC, CAA, NRC?hnair wrote:This should have been disposed off right at this two-bench level, instead we have this:
https://www.deccanherald.com/national/d ... 53181.html"It (wearing of hijab) is a matter of choice, nothing more and nothing less,” Justice Dhulia, adding what weighed on his mind the most was whether we are making a girl student's life better by putting such restrictions.
In this Age of Enlightenment and gender fluidity, maybe the learned Justice should try being an Iranian woman to do some further weighing of mind
Khujli is just establishing his differentiation and positioning clearly as the opposite of brahmachari nicker dhari hindutva vaadis.crazywala was following P0rn star @Essm4Keeps
Cyrano saar you are giving me far too much credit here! My only worthwhile contribution was to try collect all articles on Indian military aviation all those years ago and share with like minded munnas. Great to see you post as well albeit this isn't your first avatar either!Cyrano wrote:Some revival going on here, andy B is an ancient name from the abysses of my memory. Good to see you post saar. Hope more rishis and munis of yore give us darshans again. Namovah!
I wouldn’t call it “walking back” by Germany.chetak wrote:for germany's foreign minister annalena baerbock, discretion indeed remains the better part of unwarranted diplomatic valour.
the second blabbermouth of the fortnight that has just passed, the first was the britshit home secretary suella braverman.
…
germany has walked back the comments of their foreign minister annalena baerbock after India's rebuke.
"minister baerbock underlined that bilateral path is way forward. When she referred to UN, what one can say is that there's UNMOGIP in Kashmir & that's where we see UN in Kashmir conflict," the German ambassador said.
In international relations, this is about how far they will go to acknowledge and accommodate our position. It was obvious to all that baerbock was speaking with an ameriki tongue and parroting the US state dept line.KLNMurthy wrote:
I wouldn’t call it “walking back” by Germany.
All I saw was an underling of the German FM mumbling vague platitudes in response to timid questions from the Indian media people. He didn’t even say that they don’t believe that Germany has a “special responsibility” let alone explain how come FM said that stuff while standing next to the representative of a criminal terrorist regime that has been carrying out a systematic genocide of Hindus (& Christians) since at least 1971.
A true walk-back would be if the Chancellor’s or his office repudiated the FM’s statement.
I am really beginning to have a problem with our Indian eagerness to take a small crumb and spin it to ourselves as a great victory. Too much time spent paying attention to TSP?
Ysterday in SpainKLNMurthy wrote:
I am really beginning to have a problem with our Indian eagerness to take a small crumb and spin it to ourselves as a great victory. Too much time spent paying attention to TSP?
Asha Jadeja Motwani @ashajadeja325
Full page ad war on India’s growth & progress. WSJ These are deep pocketed Hindu haters, pretending this is a war on Modi. Shame on Wall Street Journal for allowing such misinformation & lies. My guess ? CAIR & IAMC are drawing from the “oil money pool” that these groups use.
This action brought forth by Frontiers of Freedom on behalf of Ramachandran Viswanathan and in cooperation with his counsel, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, is in response to the Modi regime’s campaign of transnational repression against Mr. Viswanathan. The Modi government has sought to hoodwink the U.S. government into using the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty in Criminal Matters between the U.S. and India to gain intelligence, monitor, question and arrest Mr. Viswanathan. Alarmingly, the Indian government has put forth fake claims of fraud and criminal actions to Interpol in a deliberate effort to secure a Red Notice for the arrest and extradition of Mr. Viswanathan. This is all to stop the efforts of Mr. Viswanathan’s company he co-founded, Devas, from enforcing a billion dollar arbitration judgment against the Indian government.
George Landrith, President of Frontiers of Freedom, made the following statement:
“The actions of the autocratic Indian regime led by Prime Minister Modi are an assault on the rule of law and the rights and freedoms granted to every American. We urge the U.S. government to look past India’s façade and punish, with sanctions, those who seek to violate the rights of Mr. Viswanathan. By doing so, the U.S. will send a strong signal to India and the rest of the world that the United States will not hesitate to stand up for the rule of law, and the rights and freedoms granted to every American.”
Matthew D. McGill, lead counsel to Devas shareholders and partner at Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, made the following statement upon submission
About Ramachandran Viswanathan
Ramachandran Viswanathan is currently CEO of Omnispace, a company focused on delivering the world’s first satellite and 5G-based ‘one global network.’ He is also the co-founder of Devas Multimedia.
About Frontiers of Freedom
Frontiers of Freedom is an educational NGO whose mission is to promote the principles of individual freedom, peace through strength, limited government, free enterprise, free markets, and traditional American values as found in the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.
Ramachandran Viswanathan, a US citizen of Indian origin, has been at loggerheads with the Indian government so much so that he wants Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman and 10 others banned by the Biden administration.
Dubbed a ‘fugitive economic offender‘ by the Enforcement Directorate (ED), Viswanathan is pleading with the US government to impose visa and economic sanctions against 11 Indians for supposed ‘corruption’ and ‘human rights violation’ – with no proof, of course.
Besides Nirmala Sitharaman, the list includes Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, Additional Solicitor General N Venkataraman, and Supreme Court Judges Hemant Gupta and V Ramasubramanian. The Director, Assistant Director and Deputy Director of the ED are also named by Viswanathan.
The ‘economic offender’ has pinned his hopes on the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act of 2016, which empowers the US government to sanction foreign govt officials, freeze their assets and stop them from entering the country for ‘human rights violations.’
This Khujli Blue is an eye sore, can’t wait to use Ariel white on thatvijayk wrote:Biden is slowly pushing Germany to need India
Kujli with German ambassador
IMF chief begs India to Re-consider wheat export ban
Why should we?
Let's stop all the wheat exports based on the happiness index & Hunger Index report
Let them get from Srilanka, Bangladesh & Pakistan who are far ahead of us in both.