
https://eurasiantimes.com/british-storm ... aze-drone/
Ukrainian Stormer HVM Being Engaged By Loitering Munition
probably become target practice for the robust anti air Russian defence systems., but the motivation to send them would be free second hand western fighters !Tanaji wrote:It seems that Slovakia and Poland are sending Ukraine Mig 29s. The former is sending 13 the latter 4.
I wonder what variant and what weapons. Ukraine don’t manufacture Mig parts and only the Indians and Israelis have actually mated western missiles to it…
I don't think anything will be free. US will making either Polish or Ukrainians pay in loans for this capex.Tanaji wrote:with Poland transferring its stocks to Ukraine and poised to get modern weapons in return free of cost.
And there are plenty of those (rabid Polish leaders). The Baltic republics too (Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia).Tanaji wrote:It will only take a single rabid Polish nationalist leader to point these weapons at Germany.
It's not just Europe. Plenty of whackjobs like that in the US Senate and in the State Dept. In fact, the US side of this is the main driving force. Without the US side, there would be no war in Ukraine.Cyrano wrote:No one in Europe's leaders is thinking beyond the next drug dose of somehow humiliating Putin, however flimsy and ridiculous it may be. Its exactly that - crack addict behaviour, delusional, paranoid, reckless.
Of course. Europe has made its only too easy for the US thanks to their woke attitude. No wonder they got the disdainful "**** the EU" compliment from Nuland.Roop wrote:It's not just Europe. Plenty of whackjobs like that in the US Senate and in the State Dept. In fact, the US side of this is the main driving force. Without the US side, there would be no war in Ukraine.Cyrano wrote:No one in Europe's leaders is thinking beyond the next drug dose of somehow humiliating Putin, however flimsy and ridiculous it may be. Its exactly that - crack addict behaviour, delusional, paranoid, reckless.
The UK government is sending depleted uranium shells for use in the Challenger 2 tanks gifted to Ukraine, a move CND has condemned as an additional environmental and health disaster for those living through the conflict.
Defence Minister Baroness Goldie admitted in the answer to a written question that armour piercing rounds containing depleted uranium (DU) were included in its tank package for Kiev. She added that the rounds “are highly effective in defeating modern tanks and armoured vehicles.”
A byproduct of the nuclear enriching process used to make nuclear fuel or nuclear weapons, DU emits three quarters of the radioactivity of natural uranium and shares many of its risks and dangers. It is used in armour piercing rounds as it is heavy and can easily penetrate steel. However on impact, toxic or radioactive dust can be released and subsequently inhaled.
DU shells were used extensively by the US and British in Iraq in 1991 and 2003, as well as in the Balkans during the 1990s.
It is thought that the extensive use of these shells is responsible for the sharp rise in the incidence rate of some cancers like breast cancer or lymphoma in the areas they were used. Other illnesses linked to DU include kidney failure, nervous system disorders, lung disease and reproductive problems. However, a lack of reliable data on exposure to DU means no large-scale study on its true impact exists.
CND General Secretary Kate Hudson said:
“Like in Iraq, the addition of depleted uranium ammunition into this conflict will only increase the long-term suffering of the civilians caught up in this conflict. DU shells have already been implicated in thousands of unnecessary deaths from cancer and other serious illnesses. CND has repeatedly called for the UK government to place an immediate moratorium on the use of depleted uranium weapons and to fund long-term studies into their health and environmental impacts. Sending them into yet another war zone will not help the people of Ukraine.”
"Alongside our granting of a squadron of Challenger 2 main battle tanks to Ukraine, we will be providing ammunition including armor piercing rounds which contain depleted uranium. Such rounds are highly effective in defeating modern tanks and armored vehicles," Baroness Annabel Goldie said in a statement
LONDON, March 21. /TASS/. The British authorities will supply Ukraine with shells containing depleted uranium and having increased efficiency in destroying armored vehicles, as follows from a written response from Deputy Secretary of Defense, Baroness Annabel Goldie, to a question from a member of the House of Lords, Raymond Jolliffe.
"Alongside our granting of a squadron of Challenger 2 main battle tanks to Ukraine, we will be providing ammunition including armor piercing rounds which contain depleted uranium. Such rounds are highly effective in defeating modern tanks and armored vehicles," Goldie said in a statement uploaded to the parliamentary website.
British military assistance to Ukraine in 2022 amounted to about Ј2.3 billion ($2.8 billion). In particular, London sent more than 10,000 NLAW anti-tank missile systems, more than 200 armored vehicles, M270 multiple launch rocket systems and Brimstone high-accuracy missiles. British instructors have already trained more than 10,000 Ukrainian troops. UK authorities estimate humanitarian and economic assistance provided at Ј1.5 billion ($1.86 billion). In 2023, the British authorities intend to allocate at least $2.3 billion for military assistance to Ukraine.
I am not surprised , if any Indian politician has to rise in the West he has to play to thier tunes lest he be accused as an Indian. The pramila Jaypal's and Ro Khanna 's bad mouth India in Kashmir to pass the loyalty test.Cyrano wrote:WTH is Sunak doing? It appears he has no say in these matters and is a puppet of Def min Ben Wallace. After mooching Zelinsky shamelessly and now failing to protect Indian consulate in London, one starts to wonder if there remains any dharmic bone in his body. Very disappointing to see my speculation that he will only be allowed to clean up the domestic mess and matters of defence and foreign policy will be out of his reach come true.
Defence and international relations are all led by the US and followed through by the British bureaucracy, much like India and Bhutan. It would take a Margaret thatcher to go against the status quo. Sunak is there playing to the gallery and keeping domestic audience happy.Cyrano wrote:WTH is Sunak doing? It appears he has no say in these matters and is a puppet of Def min Ben Wallace. After mooching Zelinsky shamelessly and now failing to protect Indian consulate in London, one starts to wonder if there remains any dharmic bone in his body. Very disappointing to see my speculation that he will only be allowed to clean up the domestic mess and matters of defence and foreign policy will be out of his reach come true.
the ukrainians should have
3:03 obliged the Russians by pouring tens of
3:06 thousands of troops in eastern Ukraine
3:08 into offensives over the last several
3:11 months attack after attack after attack
3:13 this started long before uh the fall in
3:16 uh last year
3:18 and they've lost tens of thousands of
3:19 people the most recent
3:22 figures that I've seen and they're very
3:24 very credible suggests that there were
3:26 up to about 250 000 dead ukrainians
3:29 I mean that's that's a horrific number
3:31 for a war that's only been going on for
3:33 about a year
5:22 ..I mean just this morning I I
5:24 read the the final tallies coming in
5:26 from credible sources that the Russian
5:28 integrated air defenses have shot down
5:30 402 Jets
5:32 256 helicopters whoa thousands and
5:36 thousands of unmanned aircraft or what
5:38 we call drones
5:39 so the integrated Russian air defenses
5:41 have turned out to be extremely lethal
5:43 and very very effective
This is a proxy war. West vs Russia. I think it is better for Russia to declare cease fire and keep the territories under her control.Thakur_B wrote:402 jets? Really? Did Ukraine even had that many jets at the peak of Soviet Union?
Thakur_B wrote:402 jets? Really? Did Ukraine even had that many jets at the peak of Soviet Union?
...Armored corps veterans says the tanks given to the infantry units were largely static and had limited hull movement but full turret movement. The guns are manned by armored corps gunners. The .50 calibre coaxial guns were also used in cross-border firing.
Source: here...Disused tanks were extensively used as pillboxes during the Second World War where their hulls were buried in ditches and the hulls used as static artillery. The Soviet Union stationed thousands of obsolete tanks as pillboxes along the border with China during the 1960s.
Apart from using T-55's in static defensive positions (nothing wrong in that) there is a practical reason for their use.MeshaVishwas wrote:Roos reportedly using T-55s
I personally believe that these will go into fortified defensive positions acting as pillboxes....
UKR will demand more switchblades from the US.MeshaVishwas wrote:...
I personally believe that these will go into fortified defensive positions acting as pillboxes.
I agree, and Iran and Viet Nam are two great non Indian examples that also find creative ways to employ old gear.Deans wrote:Apart from using T-55's in static defensive positions (nothing wrong in that) there is a practical reason for their use.MeshaVishwas wrote:Roos reportedly using T-55s
I personally believe that these will go into fortified defensive positions acting as pillboxes.
Iran had bought a number of T-55 tanks from Russia, which it upgraded. The upgraded gun is no longer 100mm, however Iran regains the
manufacturing capacity for 100mm shells and is reportedly supplying them to Russia (Russia probably retains 100 mm shell capacity too).
Since there is an overall shortage of heavier caliber shells, it makes sense to use 100mm shells on a T-55, against infantry, bunkers etc
instead of scarcer heavier caliber shells.
You are believing the Western/Ukranian narrative, Ukraine was well prepared long before 24 Feb 22, they probably had a lot of Nasams, Hawk and few Patriots before then.Yagnasri wrote:One thing we are not seeing is the Russian Air force. With all the S300s etc of UKN gone, it can be now used with near impunity by Russians.