Electric vehicle and power storage

The Technology & Economic Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to Technological and Economic developments in India. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
sanman
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4099
Joined: 22 Mar 2023 11:02

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by sanman »

Mort Walker wrote: 04 Aug 2023 04:07 Toyota, Mazda and now Volvo have studied and concluded that small batteries and hybrid vehicles are the way forward until solid state batteries take over.
Who will introduce the solid state batteries first? Tesla has already invested massively in gigafactories to produce existing batteries, but it's always possible that they'll spend more big bucks to re-tool, given Musk's preference for state-of-the-art.

One additional useful feature of solid state batteries is that they're all-weather, in contrast to current batteries with liquid electrolytes that can freeze in cold weather.
Mort Walker
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10369
Joined: 31 May 2004 11:31
Location: The rings around Uranus.

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Mort Walker »

It doesn't matter who introduces it first. If it's Tesla, then so be it as competition is good. Toyota & Mercedes are the most profitable car companies today, and if they don't innovate quickly, they'll be gone. That said, Toyota is putting it's best foot forward to bridge the gap with hybrids that have small batteries until the time comes for solid state batteries and fuel cell technology by 2040.

From 1890-1910 the external combustion engine (ECE) known as the steam engine was very popular for automobiles. At the time Stanley Steamer was all the rage in the US as it got relatively incredible power and acceleration compared to ICE and EVs of the time. However ICE prevailed because it had a much higher energy to weight ratio and Stanley Steamer finally dissolved in the 1920s. Tesla may be the Stanley Steamer of the 21st century.

For Li-ion electrolytes to freeze it has to be awfully cold and they have to sit for a long time like on the Siachin Glacier or Alaska. The neatest thing about Tesla is their space age battery heat exchange system which seems like that technology came out of Space X developments. Everyone else, including Toyota, is way behind. Which is why they thought that developing SS batteries is the path forward.

About Tesla's amazing battery thermal management. This review is from a mechanic. Watch from 3:00 to 16:30.
Jay
BRFite
Posts: 913
Joined: 24 Feb 2005 18:24
Location: Gods Country
Contact:

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Jay »

Mort Walker wrote: 04 Aug 2023 04:02
Given Toyota's announcement, we're about about 4-5 years away, and many people will wait if they're paying $50K+ for a vehicle.
Toyota has been always 4-5 years with this tech and I will be very surprised if Toyota or any other EV's will can launch a $50k car with over 200 miles of range and with a solid state battery. Toyota has been milking this PR point for half a decade now and I do not see it any different. AT the most, they will come with a Solid State battery by 2030 and that too would supplement its gas cars as a PHEV.

https://qz.com/toyota-solid-state-batte ... 1850605326

https://thedriven.io/2023/07/05/solid-s ... elivering/
Driving habits for those between age 20-54, according to US DoT and auto industry is over 15,000 miles per year. If you live in the US west of the Mississippi River, but east of WA, OR & CA, you'll most likely be driving more than in that age group.
And a relatively small number of people live in that area you are boxing, 20 million may be. While for 90% of population the current ranges absolutely suffice. Also, like how every vehicle is not suitable for everybody(dually in an urban enviornment), not every EV need to satisfy every case study. If there is someone who would love to drive 500 miles in one go and stop for nothing and needs towing capabilities, then an EV is not for them. Catering to these use cases will only delay the progress.
With large national highways now being completed in India, some people object to the car culture, but much like the US, it is something which brings national unity and understanding.
Possible, but it will also bring more road accidents, and pollution.
you can easily travel to states more than 300KM away to see the different geography, culture and temples. It's something where politicians can no longer divide people based on region and language. My family rents an Innova with driver to go where & when they want to go doorstep-to-doorstep.
I'm talking about EV's wrt US, not India. I'm acutely unaware of Indian long distance driving habits, EV availability, and charging infra. So I cannot comment anything about it.
In the US, the standard 120V residential circuit breaker rating is 20A, but older homes will be 15A. If nothing else is on that circuit, you may get between 1.4 KW - 2.4 KW power. The cost of getting the wall connector from Tesla is about $475 and getting a 240V/40A home connection has come down quite a bit with electricians doing it for $400-$800. It's not unreasonable if you're spending $33K-$55K on a car where you can get 40 miles range per hour charged.
This is the ideal scenario and not the only scenario. I charge my EV on a 120v circuit, the same one where I also occasionally plug my phone/speaker. Cost has come down, but that's the overhead in adopting a new tech. There are many tax incentives to get the burden lower. In my state(illinois), there were rebates on equipment and labor for installation and with a federal rebate an EV was a no-brainer.
At this time, the Tesla is a great commuting vehicle.
I agree, and that's a good starting point. Almost all of the families who live in the suburbs and beyond have more than 2 cars and when the time comes for a replacement, if even one of them is replaced by an EV, it would be much better for everyone.
Mort Walker
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10369
Joined: 31 May 2004 11:31
Location: The rings around Uranus.

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Mort Walker »

Jay wrote: 04 Aug 2023 21:25
Toyota has been always 4-5 years with this tech and I will be very surprised if Toyota or any other EV's will can launch a $50k car with over 200 miles of range and with a solid state battery. Toyota has been milking this PR point for half a decade now and I do not see it any different. AT the most, they will come with a Solid State battery by 2030 and that too would supplement its gas cars as a PHEV.

https://qz.com/toyota-solid-state-batte ... 1850605326

https://thedriven.io/2023/07/05/solid-s ... elivering/
No. Toyota holds the most patents for SS batteries ahead of Panasonic. Toyota's 2022 net profit was over $18B and are investing heavily into PHEVs and BEVs. Toyota/Lexus roadmap shows 6-10 new BEV models by 2026, along with newer hybrids. Their slow approach is vindicated and they will make a battery breakthrough.
And a relatively small number of people live in that area you are boxing, 20 million may be. While for 90% of population the current ranges absolutely suffice. Also, like how every vehicle is not suitable for everybody(dually in an urban enviornment), not every EV need to satisfy every case study. If there is someone who would love to drive 500 miles in one go and stop for nothing and needs towing capabilities, then an EV is not for them. Catering to these use cases will only delay the progress.
Wrong. Those states account for nearly 90 million people (TX alone is 30M) and it doesn't matter what is suitable for 90% of the population. What matters is how cars are currently being used and what the expectation is for range and refueling time. Particularly if one is spending over $50K for a vehicle.
This is the ideal scenario and not the only scenario. I charge my EV on a 120v circuit, the same one where I also occasionally plug my phone/speaker. Cost has come down, but that's the overhead in adopting a new tech. There are many tax incentives to get the burden lower. In my state(illinois), there were rebates on equipment and labor for installation and with a federal rebate an EV was a no-brainer.
If you're spending over $50K for a car and then cutting corners for <2% of purchase, considering gasoline savings, it doesn't make sense not to update your home with a 240V/40A dedicated circuit. Tax incentives are income restricted.
Jay
BRFite
Posts: 913
Joined: 24 Feb 2005 18:24
Location: Gods Country
Contact:

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Jay »

Mort Walker wrote: 05 Aug 2023 08:51
No. Toyota holds the most patents for SS batteries ahead of Panasonic. Toyota's 2022 net profit was over $18B and are investing heavily into PHEVs and BEVs. Toyota/Lexus roadmap shows 6-10 new BEV models by 2026, along with newer hybrids. Their slow approach is vindicated and they will make a battery breakthrough.
No doubt, they hold the most patents and they are a juggernaut and I am not making a point of their demise. As a company, they are doing very well and their outlook for BEV's seem promising. Bet they did stumble in these beginning years of BEV's and it's jarring for the fact that when they released the pioneering Prius back in 1997-98, they were well on the way to eventual electrification. In the electrification arena, they fell from that mighty prius to the abysmal BZ4X, or whatever silly name they assigned for that abomination of an BEV.
Wrong. Those states account for nearly 90 million people (TX alone is 30M) and it doesn't matter what is suitable for 90% of the population. What matters is how cars are currently being used and what the expectation is for range and refueling time. Particularly if one is spending over $50K for a vehicle.
You are right. I was thinking about the Midwest states, not the west and your population counts hold true. If there are no climate mandates and we live merrily by burning gasoline, then Yes, an EV in its current form will not be a direct 1-1 replacement for gas cars. But it's turning out to be other factors that might compel users to move to BEV's.
If you're spending over $50K for a car and then cutting corners for <2% of purchase, considering gasoline savings, it doesn't make sense not to update your home with a 240V/40A dedicated circuit. Tax incentives are income restricted.
Yes, tax incentives are indeed income restricted as they should be. There is no reason for some one making $250k and above needing a handout. As for spending regarding electric updates, it depends on one's driving habits. I personally did not do it as I was lazy and put it off. But after living for more than an year with it for my use case that 120v seems perfectly adequate. Others mileage may vary.

AT the end of the day, I do not see Toyota not making on BEV's. They are a smart, industrious company to eff this up, even with a late start. As for their SS batteries and their availability in 5 years in an $50k car(inflation adjusted), I'll believe it when I see it.
Mort Walker
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10369
Joined: 31 May 2004 11:31
Location: The rings around Uranus.

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Mort Walker »

The Tesla’s heat exchange system wrt to battery thermal management puts it heads & shoulders above everyone else. Tesla is partners with Panasonic and their own development in the US. If Toyota has SS, they’re likely to as well. The fit & finish of many Tesla’s is deplorable, but some production runs of the Y have been great. The Model S is better, but ungodly expensive. A friend of mine is getting the Mercedes EQS and I’m anxiously awaiting to get into it. More importantly, I’d like to know more about Mercedes and Porsche/Audi/VW battery thermal management heat exchange. So far it’s been disappointing compared to Tesla, which is why Toyota has taken a slow approach using smaller NiMH batteries in their hybrids. Toyota’s BZ & RZ overall engineering is superior to the other companies, but battery thermal management is still behind Tesla.

Right now, if spending under $50K, I would prefer the Toyota Crown Limited. A hybrid full size comfortable sedan that gets 42 mpg. It’s made in Japan with great fit and finish.
Jay
BRFite
Posts: 913
Joined: 24 Feb 2005 18:24
Location: Gods Country
Contact:

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Jay »

Mort Walker wrote: 05 Aug 2023 17:36
Right now, if spending under $50K, I would prefer the Toyota Crown Limited. A hybrid full size comfortable sedan that gets 42 mpg. It’s made in Japan with great fit and finish.
What a beautiful car that Crown is, in a sea of SUV's, Crossovers, and pickups. If it had a PHEV option and was priced around $50k, I would have snapped one myself.
vera_k
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4420
Joined: 20 Nov 2006 13:45

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by vera_k »

Jay wrote: 31 Jul 2023 02:07 The average driver in US drives 37 miles/day and a little more than 13k miles/year, and that number is even lower in India.
Given this number, why is it that we don't see cheap EVs with lower range being sold? Would think that a $10-15K 5 seater with lower range will sell well. Heck, people are using golf carts on the road for lack of the equivalent of the Toyota Tercel.
Mort Walker
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10369
Joined: 31 May 2004 11:31
Location: The rings around Uranus.

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Mort Walker »

Jay wrote: 05 Aug 2023 20:51
Mort Walker wrote: 05 Aug 2023 17:36
Right now, if spending under $50K, I would prefer the Toyota Crown Limited. A hybrid full size comfortable sedan that gets 42 mpg. It’s made in Japan with great fit and finish.
What a beautiful car that Crown is, in a sea of SUV's, Crossovers, and pickups. If it had a PHEV option and was priced around $50k, I would have snapped one myself.
Maybe for model year 2025.
Vayutuvan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13518
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 04:36

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Vayutuvan »

Volvo has a PHEV @70k USD. It is luxury vehicle compared to Toyota, supposedly. Maybe some are willing to pay that price for the safety and luxury.
Cyrano
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6356
Joined: 28 Mar 2020 01:07

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Cyrano »

Has anyone heard of this? Looks like snake oil to me.
https://www.benzinga.com/news/23/08/339 ... and-longer
Cyrano
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6356
Joined: 28 Mar 2020 01:07

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Cyrano »

https://www.euronews.com/2023/08/22/wer ... ts-2352134

Where will all that electricity come from?! Coal burning plants if not nuclear!
Pratyush
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12686
Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Pratyush »

Cyrano wrote: 23 Aug 2023 11:25 Has anyone heard of this? Looks like snake oil to me.
https://www.benzinga.com/news/23/08/339 ... and-longer
[/quote


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium ... ir_battery

It does show the potential of aluminium batteries. So it's an understood technology.

The issue is making rechargeable batteries.

It is still not understood how to make rechargeable aluminium batteries. At the customer's house.

So cannot say, if this battery is snake oil or not.
Pratyush
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12686
Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Pratyush »

Cyrano wrote: 23 Aug 2023 11:25 Has anyone heard of this? Looks like snake oil to me.
https://www.benzinga.com/news/23/08/339 ... and-longer

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium ... ir_battery

It does show the potential of aluminium batteries. So it's an understood technology.

The issue is making rechargeable batteries.

It is still not understood how to make rechargeable aluminium batteries. At the customer's house.

So cannot say, if this battery is snake oil or not.
vera_k
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4420
Joined: 20 Nov 2006 13:45

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by vera_k »

vera_k wrote: 05 Aug 2023 21:20
Jay wrote: 31 Jul 2023 02:07 The average driver in US drives 37 miles/day and a little more than 13k miles/year, and that number is even lower in India.
Given this number, why is it that we don't see cheap EVs with lower range being sold? Would think that a $10-15K 5 seater with lower range will sell well. Heck, people are using golf carts on the road for lack of the equivalent of the Toyota Tercel.
WSJ article answering this question. The US model is not the best one to spur EV adoption.

Why Our EV Policies Are So Extremely Stupid
Also existing for no good purpose is the 1964 LBJ chicken tax. Enacted to keep a VW pickup out of the U.S. market, this 25% tariff on imported pickups and large SUVs is now the financial concession the U.S. industry revolves around.
Now excess pickup profits subsidize oversized EVs for the wealthy; previously they subsidized money-losing small sedans for the less-affluent.
The goal of auto companies is unchanged, to lose as little money as possible. So they build giant EVs hauling around giant batteries precisely because, as my irate emailer points out, consumers are willing to spend money on them that they are unwilling to spend on a small, efficient electric runabouts.
rajkumar
BRFite
Posts: 478
Joined: 22 Sep 2000 11:31
Location: London U.K
Contact:

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by rajkumar »

Presenting acti.ev | TATA.ev's first Pure EV architecture

disha
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 8423
Joined: 03 Dec 2006 04:17
Location: gaganaviharin

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by disha »

vera_k wrote: 26 Aug 2023 05:56
WSJ article answering this question. The US model is not the best one to spur EV adoption.

Why Our EV Policies Are So Extremely Stupid
There are lot of fallacies in WSJ article. There is lot of stupidities (due to pork barrel politics) in the US on the EV and Passenger vehicle laws. But WSJ does a disservice. Its target is Tesla.
Hriday
BRFite
Posts: 500
Joined: 15 Jun 2022 19:59

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Hriday »

A Twitter war between BJP and Congress units of Kerala about the viability of Nitin Gadkari's plan of removing petrol, and diesel vehicles by 2034. Gadkari's statement was on May 25th, 2024. I wonder why it wasn't discussed in the EV thread in this forum.

https://x.com/BJP4Keralam/status/180482 ... cQ-dQ&s=19
Hriday
BRFite
Posts: 500
Joined: 15 Jun 2022 19:59

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Hriday »

Hriday wrote: 24 Jun 2024 21:21 A Twitter war between BJP and Congress units of Kerala about the viability of Nitin Gadkari's plan of removing petrol, and diesel vehicles by 2034. Gadkari's statement was on May 25th, 2024. I wonder why it wasn't discussed in the EV thread in this forum.

https://x.com/BJP4Keralam/status/180482 ... cQ-dQ&s=19
During the last peak summer season in Kerala, there was a record electricity demand due to large-scale use of airconditioner and electric vehicle charging. It was reported in the newspaper that electricity can be procured from outside Kerala but transformers can't carry that much load. The remedy is to replace them with higher-capacity transformers but they are very costly. Thus there was a request by the Kerala Electricity Board to the public to avoid even using airconditioners during the peak demand time between 8 and 11 PM.

Given that most State electricity boards are burdened with heavy subsidies, how this problem will be solved?

I remember reading similar requests by some states in the USA to the public to avoid electric vehicle charging.
VKumar
BRFite
Posts: 786
Joined: 15 Sep 1999 11:31
Location: Mumbai,India

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by VKumar »

Meanwhile government continues to tax Hybrids almost same as fossil
disha
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 8423
Joined: 03 Dec 2006 04:17
Location: gaganaviharin

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by disha »

VKumar wrote: 25 Jun 2024 17:18 Meanwhile government continues to tax Hybrids almost same as fossil
I think it is a good thing. It will move more towards BEV.
Vayutuvan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13518
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 04:36

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Vayutuvan »

Just returned from local Honda dealership to get my Hybrid serviced. They have a new BEV SUV 97 MPGe with 270 Mile range. 9.5 hours for 100% charging. Sticker price is 59,700 USD. Fuel savings over a five year period (estimated ofc) is 5,500 USD. I asked the dealer to send me details and availability. But I don't think it makes sense for me. I usually make a round trip 300 miles with over night stop away from home. I have to charge for sure.

It is quite steep considering a fully loaded CR-V Hybrid Sports Touring is ~45K USD out ot f the door - taxes,tags, registration included. No range anxiety. At all.
TKiran
BRFite
Posts: 998
Joined: 13 Dec 2009 00:22

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by TKiran »

Vayutuvan wrote: 02 Jul 2024 06:10 Just returned from local Honda dealership to get my Hybrid serviced. They have a new BEV SUV 97 MPGe with 270 Mile range. 9.5 hours for 100% charging. Sticker price is 59,700 USD. Fuel savings over a five year period (estimated ofc) is 5,500 USD. I asked the dealer to send me details and availability. But I don't think it makes sense for me. I usually make a round trip 300 miles with over night stop away from home. I have to charge for sure.

It is quite steep considering a fully loaded CR-V Hybrid Sports Touring is ~45K USD out ot f the door - taxes,tags, registration included. No range anxiety. At all.
Range is not a problem for BEV's as you can get 30% charged in 20 mins. at any Mc Donalds you may wanna go 150 miles and take a break and drive 150 miles again.
Vayutuvan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13518
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 04:36

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Vayutuvan »

Winters here can be very bad. Heating the auto takes time and battery drains - at a much a faster rate due to the low temp and load of heating the car.
disha
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 8423
Joined: 03 Dec 2006 04:17
Location: gaganaviharin

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by disha »

Hriday wrote: 25 Jun 2024 15:07
Hriday wrote: 24 Jun 2024 21:21 A Twitter war between BJP and Congress units of Kerala about the viability of Nitin Gadkari's plan of removing petrol, and diesel vehicles by 2034. Gadkari's statement was on May 25th, 2024. I wonder why it wasn't discussed in the EV thread in this forum.

https://x.com/BJP4Keralam/status/180482 ... cQ-dQ&s=19
During the last peak summer season in Kerala, there was a record electricity demand due to large-scale use of airconditioner and electric vehicle charging. It was reported in the newspaper that electricity can be procured from outside Kerala but transformers can't carry that much load. The remedy is to replace them with higher-capacity transformers but they are very costly. Thus there was a request by the Kerala Electricity Board to the public to avoid even using airconditioners during the peak demand time between 8 and 11 PM.

Given that most State electricity boards are burdened with heavy subsidies, how this problem will be solved?

I remember reading similar requests by some states in the USA to the public to avoid electric vehicle charging.

Hriday'ji, thanks for putting together the above two posts. Lot of clarifications need to be made though, particularly lot of mis-assumptions are made. I will restrict to the bolded part. The mis-assumptions almost make the post very nonsensical.

As a background, I have two EVs since last 7 years, and total miles driven is >150k (miles) and that is almost 250k KM. I also have over years installed 24 KW of Solar. At this point, if I install batteries, then I am totally and completely energy independent and grid free. I use the electrical grid as battery.

And as part of the entire setup, I was thinking of installing a step-down transformer. Once available here are the 480v-240v 90A-180A and a further step down from 240v-120v 180A-208A. Total cost would be around USD 20k including installation and permission and line trenching etc. It would have taken approx. 30 cu. ft. of space (put both together). I did not go for it, since that would be too much capital cost for an individual resident to completely go off-the-grid and still have a major line coming in as nothing but insurance in case my solar panels get blown away in Category 5 hurricane. They would take the roof along with it anyway. And myself will also be tagging along. So what's the point?

Anyway, my point is, when I talk about BEV, Solar Panels, transformers etc, I talk with very good authority. I am living it. And hence the statement that your mis-assumptions make the post almost non-sensical. Let's peel them one after another:

1. there was a record electricity demand due to large-scale use of airconditioner and electric vehicle

How many AC's are there in whole of Kerala and how many EVs? Let's say 10% of Kerala households have 1-ton ACs and 30% of shopping and small business enterprises have 1.5 ton AC's, then we are talking about ~1 million or ~ 10 lakhs household ACs and ~7.5 lakh SMEs have ACs. I am estimating on the lower side and the primary calculations for the above can be googled. Converting the 1.5 ton ACs in SMEs to 1 ton will give us approx. 10 lakhs 1-ton AC equivalent in SMEs. Note that some households may have multiple 1.5 ton ACs so we are balancing it out.

That is, we are talking about ~20 lakh 1-ton AC units in the entire state of Kerala.

Do we have 20 lakh BEVs in Kerala? I have this news report to go by https://www.newindianexpress.com/kerala ... he%20away.

2023-24, Kerala had 75k EVs. Assuming a jump of 300% in sales from 2022 (when most of the EVs came on market in India), we can safely say Kerala has 100k EVs now.

So the number of EVs is a mere fraction (0.5%) of the total ACs operating in Kerala. Both EV and AC consume electricity. Let's call their numbers as "charging units", that is you have 20 lakh AC charging units (not to confuse with 1 KWh a.ka as unit) and 0.1 lakh EV charging units.

To state that there was a record electricity demand from 0.5% of charging units is patently false.

1a. avoid even using airconditioners during the peak demand time between 8 and 11 PM.

Now let's look at consumption. 1 ton AC typically consumes 3.5 KW of energy. So AC's running 3 hours in a day will consume 10.5 KWh of energy. Assuming all AC's run 6 hours a day (1/4th), we are talking about 21 KWh of energy consumption.

Ola EV scooter has 2.5 KWh battery, that is, it consumes 25% less energy for full charge compared to a 1-ton AC running for 1 hour. In effect, the charging of EV scooter (Ola EV) is approx. 1/10th of AC power consumption in a day. Keep that in mind, since we will do a thumb-rule consolidated average.

Nexon EV LR is ~41 KWh battery pack. So taking up the above calculation, charging of a Nexon EV car is equivalent to running AC for two days, 6 hours every day. Tata tiago is 19.2 (~20) KWh and MG 100 is 50.3 (~50 KWh). If both are sold at 1:1 ratio (unlikely), the average is still 35 KWh. So an avg. EV car has a battery pack of 35 KWh.

^Keep the above calculation in mind. Now, let's do another simple calculation. That is, breakdown 100k EVs into cars and scooters. There is no real portal that gives the breakdown. So we might have to do some thumb rules. So I am taking the 2016 number of 4 wheeler cars to 2 wheelers ration from 2016 (https://mvd.kerala.gov.in/en/node/703). That is 1:3, for every 4-wheeler passenger car, there are 3 2-wheelers. And Kerala offering good EV incentive, I think the two wheeler EVs have a higher ratio. But let's stick to 1:3.

Taking that into account, for 100k evs, 25k are cars and 75k are two-wheelers. 25k cars at 40 KWh battery pack is 10,00,000 (10 Lacs) KWh (1000 MWh) and 75k two-wheelers at 20 KWh, is 15L KWh (1500 MWh) **. Since the cars are charged generally over 3 days, the daily consumption is ~300 MWh equivalent and for 2 wheelers, the daily consumption can be estimated to 1500 MWh. Combined is 1800 MWh.

**This number is slightly misleading since it assumes all EVs will be charged max within an hour. That is not the case, since a car of 40 KWh battery will easily give 250 Km range, that is distributed over 3 days. While a 2Wheeler with 2.5 KWh battery will give 80 Km range. Which may require daily re-charge.

And the AC's are 20 lakh units each with 3.5 KWh avg. consumption and that comes out to 8750 MWh. When operating over 6 hrs, that is 52500 MWh.

Given the above, power consumption by EV is 3% of AC power consumption. So your statement that EVs + ACs caused heavy load is nonsensical. Again the 3% utilization is heavily skewed against EVs by giving large margins to ACs. Indian ACs are notoriously inefficient. People run it for more than 6 hours a day. There are more ACs than EVs, then calculated above. So the real breakdown will be like EVs using 1% of the total power consumption of ACs.

NOTES:

1. EV policy of Kerala is actually very very good and all other states, particularly Rajasthan, MP, Gujarat, UP, Bihar, Mah, K'tka, TN, Orissa, TG and Andhra must copy it with some local modifications.

2. Kerala also has good solar penetration. The EVs are actually self sufficient. Currently Kerala imports 75% of electricity. Kerala can cut down on ACs or shut off ACs for some days and conserve energy.

IMPORTANTLY, 2500 MWh of battery capacity on a two wheeler at 1 KWh for 25 km scooter, means 62500000 Km range. Or petrol equivalent of 900 Kl (Kilo litres). Or 240k gallons of petrol a day. That is like saving 750k USD per day.

EV is the way to go. Particularly for India, with 5-7 hours of peak solar output (that produces some 30 KWh in a day on a 1 square meter solar panel) will help get India off petrol and diesel completely.

Request: You can do the calculation of petrol saved in cars with 1 KWh - 6 Km car equivalent.
Hriday
BRFite
Posts: 500
Joined: 15 Jun 2022 19:59

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Hriday »

disha wrote: 02 Jul 2024 11:42
Hriday wrote: 25 Jun 2024 15:07


EV is the way to go. Particularly for India, with 5-7 hours of peak solar output (that produces some 30 KWh in a day on a 1 square meter solar panel) will help get India off petrol and diesel completely.

disha ji, thanks for the very detailed post. I hadn't thoroughly gone through the maths and science in your post. It will take time for me. If what you are saying is true then it will be the most exciting development in recent history even affecting geo-political power equations. Gadkari will not issue that statement just for fun, I think. That much money circulating inside India and creating wealth is mind-boggling.
disha
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 8423
Joined: 03 Dec 2006 04:17
Location: gaganaviharin

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by disha »

Thanks Hriday'ji. My only suggestion is to stay away from rhetorics vomited by mediapimps and assorted journos. Most of them are called charitably DDM for Dumb-Dork-Media. That is a charitable view. Some of them are outright evil. Others are mediapimps a.ka presstitutes. Treat whatever they vomit with disdain. Zero trust.

And lot of desis are entitled. While growing up, they were made to feel entitled by previous generation and now continue to feel entitled and want to be taken care by the government. So they will latch on to any nonsense spewed by mediapimps without using their brains. One does not need to be a math expert for the above. Just use common sense.

Given that, lot of nonsense will be made against EVs. Examples abound like "Lithium is the new oil" (nonsense, lithium is not burnt up like oil. It is reused every power cycle and at the end of life of the battery can be reprocessed, currently it is *not* since lithium is abundant). Answer to that rhetoric is ask them to put a pipe from their car's tailpipe to the gas tank. You see recharge.

Another nonsense abounds that the power generated is by coal mines and hence it is polluting. Well, one can opt for solar, ygwhich is a clean energy or nuclear which is even cleaner. As for the coal generated power, it is still better than drilling for crude and fracking it to get refined petroleum. Even the most optimistic energy recovery from an equivalent unit of oil is 16% compared to 60% from coal unit. That is, your coal unit goes further and pollutes less than an equivalent refined petroleum unit to drive your vehicle over 1 km (or unit distance). Yes. using EV with coal based power is 3.5x over refined petroleum, approx. 12x when using Solar and a whole magnitude higher (maybe 30-40x) with nuclear. Wind energy is actually more polluting than coal based energy!

That is why, add roof top solar. At least 8KW panels. Grow some plants over the roof. In Kerala, if you have the option, I think an entire supply of vegetables and herbs for a family of four can be grown over a 1000 sqft roof and yes, that includes 8 KW rooftop solar. Wear helmets and use EV Scooters/bikes to start with. Upgrade to cars for local driving. For long distance, use UDAAN, Vande Bharat or trains where applicable.
Hriday
BRFite
Posts: 500
Joined: 15 Jun 2022 19:59

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Hriday »

disha wrote: 03 Jul 2024 01:24 ...

Given that, lot of nonsense will be made against EVs. Examples abound like "Lithium is the new oil" (nonsense, lithium is not burnt up like oil. It is reused every power cycle and at the end of life of the battery can be reprocessed, currently it is *not* since lithium is abundant).

Even the most optimistic energy recovery from an equivalent unit of oil is 16% compared to 60% from coal unit. That is, your coal unit goes further and pollutes less than an equivalent refined petroleum unit to drive your vehicle over 1 km (or unit distance). Yes. using EV with coal based power is 3.5x over refined petroleum, approx. 12x when using Solar and a whole magnitude higher (maybe 30-40x) with nuclear. Wind energy is actually more polluting than coal based energy!

...
Thanks disha ji, very informative. Can you give a general estimate of how much India can progress in replacing crude oil in the next 5 to 10 years?

Ambani and Adani are planning giga factories for green energy. Ola also planning to develop its battery. There is a PLI scheme support from govt for advanced battery manufacturing. I remember reading that several years ago govt backtracked from making swappable battery design compulsory for enabling the continuous innovation in batteries by Indian companies. Now Reliance is said to be planning to introduce a swappable multi-purpose battery to be charged by solar panels.
Amber G.
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10957
Joined: 17 Dec 2002 12:31
Location: Ohio, USA

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Amber G. »

Just some comments on some points (chosen at random) using well-known facts or math:
Wind energy is actually more polluting than coal-based energy!
This statement is incorrect. Wind energy is a renewable energy source that generates electricity without emitting greenhouse gases or pollutants during operation. In contrast, coal-based energy produces air pollutants like particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides, contributing to climate change and negative health effects.

"
Your coal unit goes further and pollutes less than an equivalent refined petroleum unit to drive your vehicle over 1 km (or unit distance)!
"
This claim is misleading. While coal may have a higher energy conversion efficiency than refined petroleum, the overall emissions and pollution from coal are significantly higher due to the mining, transportation, and combustion processes involved.
Using EV with coal-based power is 3.5x over refined petroleum, approx. 12x when using Solar and a whole magnitude higher (maybe 30-40x) with nuclear!
The comparison is oversimplified and disregards the well-to-wheel emissions and lifecycle assessments of different energy sources. EVs powered by coal-based electricity still offer a lower carbon footprint than refined petroleum, and the benefits of EVs increase significantly when paired with renewable energy sources like solar or nuclear power
disha
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 8423
Joined: 03 Dec 2006 04:17
Location: gaganaviharin

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by disha »

Thumb rule calculations are always simplified. And are generally estimates.

For real deep calculations, eminent physicist, chemist and mathematician like you can do the needful.
Amber G. wrote: 05 Jul 2024 05:54 This statement is incorrect. Wind energy is a renewable energy source that generates electricity without emitting greenhouse gases or pollutants during operation. In contrast, coal-based energy produces air pollutants like particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides, contributing to climate change and negative health effects.
Can you do a complete lifecycle analysis and comparison of both an off-shore and on-shore wind farm vis-a-vis a current generation thermal/coal power. If you do not find it challenging enough, please add in a renewable source like hydro-electric as well And this is a complete lifecycle analysis, including what you do with the wind blades at their end of life cycle. Do include all items that contribute to emitting greenhouse gases or pollutants during its complete lifecycle. And the pollutants include not just pollutants leached into air, but also into ground and water.

A complete analysis means a complete analysis. With data, links and proper calculations. I understand it may take time, but then who better than an eminent physicist, chemist & an intrepid mathematician like you to take up that small task?

Since there is discussion on Wind power as a "clean renewable energy source", here is a photo for ordinary folks like myself:

https://www.texasmonthly.com/news-polit ... ades-dump/

Image

PS: Do indicate where do the plastics that constitute the wind turbine blades come from.

"
Amber G. wrote: 05 Jul 2024 05:54 While coal may have a higher energy conversion efficiency than refined petroleum, the overall emissions and pollution from coal are significantly higher due to the mining, transportation, and combustion processes involved.
Thanks for the above bolded part. It will be interesting to do a complete apples to apples comparison of coal-electricity-ev to crude-refining-ice energy conversion with data.

While at it, we can also discuss emissions and pollution (including land and water), methane leaks from oil and natural gas drills (remember methane is a far more potent GHG than CO2, so you have to normalize methane to CO2 GHG equivalent),

And finally, here is a statement: Humankind is stuck to mining, extracting and using coal for at least next several decades if not a century or so. Why? I hope your research into gathering data will uncover some of the facts that leads to the above statement.

---

For India, we need to replace large scale paddy cultivation in Punjab and UP and Haryana to high-yield sugarcane. The first transition to make is blend ethanol with refined petroleum, use the bagasse to generate energy for both sugar processing and electricity generation.
Vayutuvan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13518
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 04:36

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Vayutuvan »

@disha ji, exactly.

“Well to wheels” is a terrible metric. It looks good in the short term.

A better metric is “cradle to wheels to recycling to cradle to wheels …” till the efficiency goes to zero or the “cradle” is a mix of “recycling and new”. Over three recycling cycles, the percentage of recycled material in the “cradle” goes down so much so that one has to consider it as new.
Vayutuvan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13518
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 04:36

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Vayutuvan »

@disha ji, I don’t agree with bio ethanol. Second generation biogas plants are the way to go. Please stay tuned.
hgupta
BRFite
Posts: 555
Joined: 20 Oct 2018 14:17

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by hgupta »

“disha” wrote:Can you do a complete lifecycle analysis and comparison of both an off-shore and on-shore wind farm vis-a-vis a current generation thermal/coal power. If you do not find it challenging enough, please add in a renewable source like hydro-electric as well And this is a complete lifecycle analysis, including what you do with the wind blades at their end of life cycle. Do include all items that contribute to emitting greenhouse gases or pollutants during its complete lifecycle. And the pollutants include not just pollutants leached into air, but also into ground and water.

A complete analysis means a complete analysis. With data, links and proper calculations. I understand it may take time, but then who better than an eminent physicist, chemist & an intrepid mathematician like you to take up that small task?

Since there is discussion on Wind power as a "clean renewable energy source", here is a photo for ordinary folks like myself:

https://www.texasmonthly.com/news-polit ... ades-dump/

Image

PS: Do indicate where do the plastics that constitute the wind turbine blades come from.

For that one photo I can show you pictures of thousands of sites filled up with coal ash and waste leftover from mining coal that go way into million of tons of waste not to mention the environmental costs of strip coal mining such as removal of trees and biodiversity fauna. Let’s be fair about it.

Since you asked AmberG to do the calculations for wind power why don’t you do the same for coal power and calculate the costs accordingly?

You are basically tilting at the windmills.
disha
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 8423
Joined: 03 Dec 2006 04:17
Location: gaganaviharin

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by disha »

hgupta wrote: 06 Jul 2024 22:58
For that one photo I can show you pictures of thousands of sites filled up with coal ash and waste leftover from mining coal that go way into million of tons of waste not to mention the environmental costs of strip coal mining such as removal of trees and biodiversity fauna. Let’s be fair about it.

Since you asked AmberG to do the calculations for wind power why don’t you do the same for coal power and calculate the costs accordingly?

You are basically tilting at the windmills.
No sir, you are tilting at windmills. Literally. Since you need to move out of wind based power discussion only. Rhetorics aside, I have provided the paper and calculations in the forum. You can do a search and read. You can do it on Amber's behalf or both of you can team up and do the calculation. But provide the data. Let's have a data based discussion.

As I pointed out, mine are thumb rule based calculations. If you are not happy with it and you have factual data based calculations, please bring it forth!

And yes, you can show thousands of sites filled up with coal ash and waste leftover. It must be shown, so that we can get people thinking of alternatives and how to clean up the act. Acceptance goes a long way. Both ways. Coal ash and tailings can be up cycled. Same for wind turbine blades. Can it be made scalable? Now? In short future?

Still the point remains and boils down to a simple fact, what is the unit input energy and output pollutant for a unit energy output comparison of wind and coal. Do add in Solar as well.

And the second part is evacuation of that unit energy, its transmission and distribution as an input reliable source to say EVs. And calculate that reliable input energy to miles driven. Yes, there is a cost to EVs as well, particularly the nickel, cobalt and mananese. We will come to that later.

Some of the above calculations have been done before across various threads on this forum.

My statement boils down to the following:

1. Energy shift from fossil fuels and hydro electric to nuclear, solar, tidal and bio-fuels (eg. ethanol, bagasse, seed oils, algae oils, gobar gas etc etc)*
2. Mass scale roll out of public transportation like metros, high speed rails etc etc
3. Conversion to EV for all vehicular transportation incl. large trucks
4. Conversion to local manufacturing and distribution wherever applicable and using urban waste as a source of energy

*Wind is not in the mix. Hydro-electric, another renewable source is not in the mix either as primary. Storing water for irrigation and generating electricity as an adjunct is fine. But that is secondary (implied in so many words).

Can the above be done in next 25 years? I think so.
Vayutuvan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13518
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 04:36

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Vayutuvan »

disha wrote: 06 Jul 2024 22:12 For real deep calculations, eminent physicist, chemist and mathematician like you can do the needful.
@disha ji, let me come to @Amber G ji's defense here. They (I am using it as a plural to show respect and also as a gender neutral thingy :) ) were always for nuclear energy unlike the bi-coastal "woke" set and the European elite le lis.

@hgupta ji on the other hand, is coming totally from business perspective which won't work either.

My questions:

1. What is the difference between renewables and sustainable energy sources? Which is preferable in the long term?
2. What are the bridge energy sources to go from 50% - or x% - fossil to r% renewables + (100-r)% sustainables?
3. What is the embodied energy for cradle to cradle, multiple cycles of recycling included for both renewables and sustainable?
4. Should we do calculations for different countries and regions separately and consolidate into a calculation for the world or we set targets at Paris accord?WEF like shindigs and then enforce on all the countries?
5. What form do these "calculations" take?
6. Who is going to pay for this?
7. Who is going to take a look at the carbon credits markets and project how it is going to perform?
...
...
Vayutuvan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13518
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 04:36

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Vayutuvan »

@hgupta esq, I have a few questions for you in the ^ post of mine.
Vayutuvan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13518
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 04:36

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Vayutuvan »

@disha ji, Sugar plants do use bagass burn for their heating needs. If you put them into thermal power plants, then you lose energy due to generation/transmission efficiency.

Gobar gas is not scalable. It is sort of ok for cooking needs. But farmers have so many things to take care of on the farm that they have scant time to collect gobar and feed even a small underground pit. Agri labor is hard to come by even in the most rural areas. People had been complaining about this shortage for as long as I can remember. It has become worse now that there is greater mobility due to better infrastructure and availability of service jobs in even second tier/third tier cities of Bharat.

As for the US, agri sector employs 1.5% of the US workforce due to high level of automation. They already overproduce and have to export or get price support from the govt., subsidies, and regulations like x% ethanol mixed into gas at the pump.

Fear-mongering about harmful effects of GMOs (I know you support GMOs which is the correct long term perspective to take) is a problem too. These "woke" ideas have made their way into Bharat in a big way.

TAANSTAFL - Robert A Heinlein, in his book The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress
Last edited by Vayutuvan on 07 Jul 2024 09:47, edited 1 time in total.
Najunamar
BRFite
Posts: 466
Joined: 28 Dec 2007 16:40
Location: USA

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Najunamar »

As someone who did (briefly for 4 years) work for a wind turbine manufacturer, one more issue is the high strength permanent magnets using Neodymium and other materials very hard to extract and causing additional pollution in the extraction process. So there may be some truth to the overall pollution being similar, yet it is also not as centered in the generation plants ( more in the supply sources) as in traditional power sources.
Vayutuvan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13518
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 04:36

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Vayutuvan »

@ramanujaN gaaru, please to explain your experience in detail. Only.
Amber G.
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10957
Joined: 17 Dec 2002 12:31
Location: Ohio, USA

Re: Electric vehicle and power storage

Post by Amber G. »

Najunamar wrote: 07 Jul 2024 06:10 As someone who did (briefly for 4 years) work for a wind turbine manufacturer, one more issue is the high strength permanent magnets using Neodymium and other materials very hard to extract and causing additional pollution in the extraction process. So there may be some truth to the overall pollution being similar, yet it is also not as centered in the generation plants ( more in the supply sources) as in traditional power sources.
You raise a valid point about the environmental impact of wind turbine manufacturing, particularly with regards to the extraction of rare earth metals like Neodymium. However, it's essential to consider the bigger picture and the overall lifecycle emissions of wind energy compared to traditional fossil fuels.

But as I some time tell to my students "Mathematics is the supreme judge" so using a typical data available ...

We get : wind energy generates significantly less greenhouse gas emissions and pollution per kilowatt-hour (kWh) compared to coal power. Here are some estimates ..

Wind energy: 12-15 grams of CO2e (carbon dioxide equivalent) per kWh (including production and manufacturing emissions)
Coal power: > about 1000 grams of CO2e per kWh (including production, transportation, and combustion emissions)

That's a difference of two orders of magnitude! For every kWh generated, coal power produces roughly 66 times more greenhouse gas emissions than wind energy.

Additionally, a study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) found that wind energy reduces air pollution by an average of 2.2 grams of SO2 (sulfur dioxide), 1.4 grams of NOx (nitrogen oxides), and 0.6 grams of PM2.5 (particulate matter) per kWh.
So, while it's important to address the environmental concerns related to wind turbine manufacturing, the overall benefits of wind energy in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution far outweigh those of traditional fossil fuels like coal.

Added later: Above is could be looked up in *any* good reputable sources - and can be seen in any link and summary of these two from *simple*
googling - (Link may already be given before in my message)

https://www.factcheck.org/2018/03/wind- ... footprint/
https://ourworldindata.org/safest-sources-of-energy

I have taught physics for decades and actually know quite a bit of details in these matters - and has advised leaders in these kind of policy issues ..FWIW the above estimates are *VERY* conservative side ... These values obviously vary from country to country ..manufacturing process , and introduction of new technology -- but most people/experts will estimate the ratio ( Coal vs Wind mills - taken all into account) could be 100- 1000 times higher (or more)that the value quoted above...

Yes I know there are many nonsensical writes up and posts - some even with world leaders eg this from an ex-president of USA:
Wind turbines, they're loud, they're ugly, they kill the birds, and they're very expensive. And, you know, they don't work without wind. And, you know, the wind doesn't always blow. So, I mean, it's a very expensive way to generate energy. And, you know, the whales, the whales are getting caught in the turbines, and they're getting killed. Believe me, it's a disaster."
— Donald Trump, 2019
Last edited by Amber G. on 07 Jul 2024 22:01, edited 2 times in total.
Post Reply