hanumadu ji,
his boss's cheeni paymasters wanted to know.
They didn't got their money's worth during the recent excitement
I’m not watching. What was the answer?
It's a free press, and he's asking the question we've all wanted to know the answer to. Up to GoI to respond accordingly. Nothing wrong with that. We're not a totalitarian failed state. I expect journalists to ask tough questions. It's when they report untruthfully / with a clear bias / push an agenda that it becomes problematic.
Would be interesting to see what the paki DGMO has to sayernest wrote: ↑11 May 2025 20:15 I guess after this press briefing by DGMO, the rona dhona on information warfare / propaganda failure will stop.
We hit them all over, brought all their airbases to their knees, and are now showing those images in the press conference. With no loss of pilots.
Complete dominance
k prasad ji,k prasad wrote: ↑11 May 2025 20:54It's a free press, and he's asking the question we've all wanted to know the answer to. Up to GoI to respond accordingly. Nothing wrong with that. We're not a totalitarian failed state. I expect journalists to ask tough questions. It's when they report untruthfully / with a clear bias / push an agenda that it becomes problematic.
The Hindu amplifies Pakistani propaganda that three Indian fighter jets crashed in Kashmir, deletes report after being called out
The Hindu claimed that the jets crashed in Jammu and Kashmir's Akhnoor, Ramban, and Pampore areas, and published some photographs. But the photos published by them show that the object that crashed onto the ground is actually an external fuel tank, not a fighter jet
However, after it was pointed by netizens that the news is fake and the images used by The Hindu were old, the newspaper was forced to remove the claim and issue an apology.
Earlier today, The Hindu posted on X, saying, “JUST IN | At least three Indian jets have crashed in Jammu and Kashmir’s Akhnoor, Ramban, and Pampore areas, a government official told The Hindu.” They stated that this report was filed by Deputy Editor Vijaita Singh, who has a long history of publishing fake and baseless reports.
He was pushing an agenda and wanted to elicit information that shouldn't be said. The 'no comments' answer from the Air Marshall is an indication that he shouldn't have asked the question. The Air Marshall already refused to answer the losses suffered by the pakis, so why do you think it is ok to ask for the losses suffered by India. Yes, we all want to know but we also realize that it will be revealed in time.k prasad wrote: ↑11 May 2025 20:54It's a free press, and he's asking the question we've all wanted to know the answer to. Up to GoI to respond accordingly. Nothing wrong with that. We're not a totalitarian failed state. I expect journalists to ask tough questions. It's when they report untruthfully / with a clear bias / push an agenda that it becomes problematic.
second that. Also Saurav Jha has started a thread on his twitter. Please do contribute there, and copy credible info from there to the thread
Will be filled with lies and horseshit. Will be fun to watch though. Get your Samosa and Chai ready.Dilbu wrote: ↑11 May 2025 20:28 TSP press conference coming up.https://x.com/griezmenace/status/192157 ... 28032?s=46DG ISPR PC delayed by 2 hours after IAF showed proof of strikes
hanumadu wrote: ↑11 May 2025 21:15He was pushing an agenda and wanted to elicit information that shouldn't be said. The 'no comments' answer from the Air Marshall is an indication that he shouldn't have asked the question. The Air Marshall already refused to answer the losses suffered by the pakis, so why do you think it is ok to ask for the losses suffered by India. Yes, we all want to know but we also realize that it will be revealed in time.k prasad wrote: ↑11 May 2025 20:54
It's a free press, and he's asking the question we've all wanted to know the answer to. Up to GoI to respond accordingly. Nothing wrong with that. We're not a totalitarian failed state. I expect journalists to ask tough questions. It's when they report untruthfully / with a clear bias / push an agenda that it becomes problematic.
Apparently the hangar had an awacs undergoing maintenance. TIFIWBharadwaj wrote: ↑11 May 2025 15:17 The lies peddled by certain media houses have started getting exposed as the satellite imagery from our strikes come in. I presume this hangar had a few f-16s inside. There are even exit wounds on the other side of the structure. Brahmos or scalp zindabad.
[https://x.com/alpha_defense/status/1921496551861400047
They were taking questions from journalists. So your point about being able to ask questions is a strawman. Its the particular question that is problematic, especially when he refused to speak about even the numbers of the pakis. The govt had previously said we did not lose any aircraft. So, why couldn't he be satisfied with that answer until the hostilities subside?k prasad wrote: ↑11 May 2025 22:29hanumadu wrote: ↑11 May 2025 21:15
He was pushing an agenda and wanted to elicit information that shouldn't be said. The 'no comments' answer from the Air Marshall is an indication that he shouldn't have asked the question. The Air Marshall already refused to answer the losses suffered by the pakis, so why do you think it is ok to ask for the losses suffered by India. Yes, we all want to know but we also realize that it will be revealed in time.
I wasn't saying he didn't have an agenda. I'm just saying that the asking questions isn't the problem. One expects leading and motivated questions from journos, especially if they are from foreign press or other ideological publications. It's how we respond to them that matters. The response from the air marshal was perfect. The journos can still ask the question just as the AM can (and did) shut him down. Telling our press to not ask those questions is a slippery slope imo.
I was wondering if the pakis forgot to defend against the drones basking in their hq9 and hq16 systems. Obviously hq9s and hq16s cant be used against drones just like our s-400 or MRSAMs or Akash cant be used. Did they have anything serious deployed against the drones?chetak wrote: ↑11 May 2025 22:26 This is a game changer and a national asset
AkashTeer: India’s Game-Changer That Left US, China, and the World Stunned
This is the first time in modern warfare history that a non-Western, non-NATO country has demonstrated a fully indigenous, AI-coordinated, satellite-linked, autonomous battle swarm, changing the very nature of combat response and airspace control.
...
Is invisible to traditional radar systems used by Pakistan and even China
...
USA – Shocked & Scrambling
Pentagon analysts were stunned when AkashTeer drones bypassed all Pakistani and Chinese radar shields, hinting that US-grade stealth capabilities had been matched—or even outclassed—by India. This has triggered internal reviews of how the US misjudged India’s indigenous tech rise.
China – Silenced with Fear
China's top drone and satellite systems (CASC and BeiDou) are now being recalibrated to counter Indian algorithms, but analysts admit they did not anticipate India’s combat satellite + AI fusion. Beijing's military spokesmen have gone unusually silent, a signal of true strategic surprise.
...
Turkey – Stunned by Drone Supremacy
Turkey, proud of its Bayraktar TB2 drones, realized that AkashTeer drones are lighter, faster, stealthier, and more autonomous. Ankara is now desperately seeking software upgrades.
Pakistan – Completely Blind-Sided
Pak Army’s radar and air command centers failed to detect the entry of AkashTeer drones near sensitive zones. Their response systems froze because no known signature or frequency was picked up. This has crippled confidence in US-supplied AWACS and anti-drone radars.
...
He said that equipment losses in combat are normal, and all our pilots are safe, that's what matters. He did not go into further details.
PAF pilots did not fly Qatari Rafales. That was another psy ops play, put out by DGISPR.Ambar wrote: ↑12 May 2025 01:17 He said that equipment losses in combat are normal, and all our pilots are safe, that's what matters. He did not go into further details.
PAF pilots flying Qatari Rafales and the experience and insight they gain from it should have been a factor in the MRCA decision. But whatever the case, HAL needs to produce the Tejas on a war footing. The next conflict won’t be a three-day skirmish.
Red-faced. I fell for this bit of fake news.Rakesh wrote: ↑12 May 2025 01:33
PAF pilots did not fly Qatari Rafales. That was another psy ops play, put out by DGISPR.
“News of Pakistani pilots training to fly Qatari Rafale is fake news,” French ambassador to India says
https://theaviationgeekclub.com/news-of ... ndia-says/
15 April 2019
The Rafales proved themselves to be extremely valuable to the IAF this past week. The MRFA, in whatever number that will be chosen, will be the Rafale. Just look at the post above![]()
Pakistan army has always been led by duffers.
India’s Operation Sindoor dismantled key terror infrastructure, prompting a desperate Pakistani appeal for a ceasefire.
Despite US claims of mediation, it was Pakistan that reached out to India’s military leadership to halt hostilities.
The Indian response was measured, precise, and decisive—altering the battlefield and the narrative.
With global support behind it, New Delhi set new rules of engagement.
This is the inside story of how the ceasefire came to be—and how India forced Islamabad’s hand.
At least they knew how to paint