gakakkad wrote: ↑11 May 2025 16:57Destruction of a nook warhead silo by conventional explosives will not trigger a chain reaction .Hriday wrote: ↑11 May 2025 15:01 Follow up on Jamval's finding of the missile hit on Pakistani strategic weapon storage site.
https://x.com/JaidevJamwal/status/19213 ... DUnyg&s=19
If Jamval is correct on the destruction of nuclear warheads then the radiation inside the bunker will be high and other conventional munitions and warheads will be hard to recover. Is that correct? Alternatively India only damaged the tunnel entrance to send the warning message.
Another video of a missile contrails in the air soon after the missile hit on the target. See the video in the link.
https://x.com/TheExplorerecho/status/19 ... 7d-sg&s=19
Triggering fission needs precise conditions including temperature ,pressure and multiplication factor k = 1.
Sudden conventional strike will lead to dispersion of the components of the nook . It'll end up being super critical (k> 1) .
Will lead to "conventional chain reaction " is the conventional explosives used as trigger in the nook will start blowing up.
Also the neutron reflector won't be aligned so no chain reaction.
Will lead to dirty bum effect but silos are supposed to be isolated anyway.
AmberG , VT and other pro fizzicks wallahs can pitch in an correct me if I am thinking wrong
gakakkad ji,
A nuke chain reaction is very unlikely
but a dirty bomb like after effect will happen for sure, even as the radiation leaks out and causes contamination
It's not a nuclear explosion, but a radiological one that occurs.
this is why there are persistent rumours that an amriki team (with a specially instrumented aircraft) is in pak right now because radiation leaks have been detected post Indian missile strikes and attacks
verification and confirmation awaited
for Rakesh ji: (https://x.com/SheriSandhya/status/19215 ... 89/photo/1)