Civil Aviation Development & Discussion

The Technology & Economic Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to Technological and Economic developments in India. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
srin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2587
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:13

Re: Civil Aviation Development & Discussion

Post by srin »

If only they mandate video recording of cockpit…
A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13524
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: Civil Aviation Development & Discussion

Post by A_Gupta »

Just how much would inspection of the cockpit fuel switches in an airline's Boeing fleet cost?
vera_k
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4477
Joined: 20 Nov 2006 13:45

Re: Civil Aviation Development & Discussion

Post by vera_k »

Not substantial, and definitely not material. If your flight has ever been delayed due to a "technical issue" you've seen that airlines do work on the planes as a routine part of daily operations. This would get added to that list.

This report from ToI today also confirms that the fuel control switches were previously replaced in 2023 since they are an integral part of the throttle control module.

AI 171 crash aftermath
vera_k
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4477
Joined: 20 Nov 2006 13:45

Re: Civil Aviation Development & Discussion

Post by vera_k »

AAIB is pushing back on the WSJ report.

AAIB slams irresponsible conclusions
Amber G.
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11149
Joined: 17 Dec 2002 12:31
Location: Ohio, USA

Re: Civil Aviation Development & Discussion

Post by Amber G. »

vera_k wrote: 17 Jul 2025 20:52 AAIB is pushing back on the WSJ report.

AAIB slams irresponsible conclusions
WSJ Aritcle- (New Details in Air India Crash Probe Shift Focus to Senior Pilot)
summary:
-New cockpit‑voice recordings and flight‑data evidence now suggest Captain Sumeet Sabharwal may have switched both engine fuel-control switches to “cutoff” shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad—causing a loss of thrust and ultimately triggering the crash .

- The first officer, Clive Kunder, is heard sounding panicked, asking “why” the switches were moved; the captain responds calmly and seemingly denies the action .

- At this stage, investigators haven’t concluded whether this was an intentional act or a mistake; U.S. authorities are considering whether criminal charges are warranted if deliberate action is confirmed.

AAIB has urged caution, stating conclusions are premature and criticizing what it called “irresponsible” media speculation ..

.
Tanaji
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4952
Joined: 21 Jun 2000 11:31

Re: Civil Aviation Development & Discussion

Post by Tanaji »

How are such details being leaked to the media?
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34910
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Civil Aviation Development & Discussion

Post by chetak »

vera_k wrote: 17 Jul 2025 20:52 AAIB is pushing back on the WSJ report.

AAIB slams irresponsible conclusions


vera_k ji,

Do we discern a difference in the approaches (and thereby the diverging interests) of the FAA and the NTSB, with one being openly partisan to the interests of the amriki deep state asset, while the other proceeds with the caution warranted by the gravity of the situation.

The AAIB is right to callout the WSJ, toilet, et al but at least for the moment, aren't the AAIB and the NTSB in the same corner
Post Reply