Internal Security Watch

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3116
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Internal Security Watch

Post by uddu »

https://x.com/IndianSinghh/status/1970791458635727005

@IndianSinghh
🚨Sonam Wangchuk had said few days back

" Ladakh needs Nepal like situation "

Now,

Heavy Protest in Leh and BJP office has been burnt on fire.

This needs to be stopped.

This is an experiment, if they get success.

They will do it in every part of the country.
vijayk
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9453
Joined: 22 Jun 1999 11:31

Re: Internal Security Watch

Post by vijayk »

That's why I don't fault Putin for poisoning criminal elements conspiring with his enemies ...

If you arrest the guy, our DEI head of SC (CJI) will give him a bail. Sometimes you need out of box thinking
LakshmanPST
BRFite
Posts: 750
Joined: 05 Apr 2019 18:23

Re: Internal Security Watch

Post by LakshmanPST »

vijayk wrote: 24 Sep 2025 19:38 That's why I don't fault Putin for poisoning criminal elements conspiring with his enemies ...

If you arrest the guy, our DEI head of SC (CJI) will give him a bail. Sometimes you need out of box thinking
To be honest, I seriously expected such things to happen in India post 2014... Not directly killing, but I expected Modi would eliminating the BIF threat in the backend...
Though Modi managed things fairly well without going down that path, the sad part is BIF networks & influence are more or less intact...
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3116
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Internal Security Watch

Post by uddu »

https://x.com/manamuntu/status/1970792017027567937
@manamuntu
Sonam Wangchuck and his CIA and ISI handlers! Leh is just the tip of the iceberg! This will reverberate across the nation and may turn into pan India protests on various issues according to our initial assessment.
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 35399
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Internal Security Watch

Post by chetak »

uddu wrote: 24 Sep 2025 20:03 https://x.com/manamuntu/status/1970792017027567937
@manamuntu
Sonam Wangchuck and his CIA and ISI handlers! Leh is just the tip of the iceberg! This will reverberate across the nation and may turn into pan India protests on various issues according to our initial assessment.

uddu ji

how did you forget his cheen handlers................. :mrgreen:
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 35399
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Internal Security Watch

Post by chetak »

https://archive.ph/GlKCa#selection-1867.0-2418.0


India’s democracy threatened by vote-rigging, says Gandhi

Opposition leader’s comments signal collapse of confidence in the electoral commission

Indian National Congress party leader Rahul Gandhi, left, addresses the media in front of a screen showing India’s Prime Minister

Narendra Modi, centre, and Home Minister Amit Shah at the party headquarters in New Delhi.

Rahul Gandhi, left, addresses the media in front of a screen showing Narendra Modi and Amit Shah © Arun Sankar/AFP/Getty

Andres Schipani and Robin Harding in New Delhi
Published 5 hours ago

The world’s largest democracy is under siege from systematic vote-rigging by the government of Narendra Modi, the leader of India’s opposition has alleged in an interview with the Financial Times.

Rahul Gandhi, scion of the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty that controls the Indian National Congress party, claimed there has been centralised manipulation of the voter rolls to “steal elections”, with the assistance of India’s electoral commission.

His remarks mark a breakdown in a sprawling democracy where there have often been allegations of voting irregularities but all parties have historically accepted the results of elections.

“We’ve been noticing anomalies in our election system as a political party for a long time,” said Gandhi, accusing the prime minister of the country of 1.4bn people of overseeing the alleged vote-rigging. “The guy at the top of the system has to do it,” he said. Modi’s office did not reply to a request for comment.

Gandhi’s comments come ahead of what analysts see as a closely contested state election in Bihar due in November. Opposition parties, including Congress, have been questioning the Election Commission of India’s decision to review the list of eligible voters in the northern state just months before the vote.


Modi’s nationalist Bharatiya Janata party, which performed below expectations and had to rely on allies to form a government following its third consecutive electoral victory last year, has won several state elections — including Haryana, Maharashtra and the capital region, Delhi — during the past year.

Gandhi and the Congress party did not provide evidence to show who was behind the alleged manipulation or that it was on a scale large enough to affect election results.

Gandhi provided what he said was sample evidence from elections in the states of Karnataka and Maharashtra, showing alleged deleted and duplicate voters, invalid addresses and bulk registrations at single locations.

The FT was unable to verify the evidence.

Gandhi’s comments form part of “a political strategy to say that the electoral commission, which is supposed to be a very impartial and neutral body, has steadily been hollowed out in the last 11 years,” said Nilanjan Mukhopadhyay, a political writer and author of Narendra Modi: The Man, The Times.

“Rahul is looking at a short timeline, looking immediately at the impending elections in Bihar, taking on this from a national perspective, therefore focusing on Bihar to thoroughly discredit the Election Commission.”


According to a survey published last month by the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies, a New Delhi-based research institution, confidence in India’s electoral body has dropped since the 2019 general election in all the six states surveyed. Overall, over half of respondents believed the election commission to be “working under pressure from the central government”.

The BJP and the Election Commission have both denied the rigging accusations. The commission said in a statement on Thursday that Gandhi’s claims about it were “incorrect and baseless”.

This week, at a political rally in Bihar, one of India’s most impoverished states, India’s home minister and Modi’s closest ally, Amit Shah, hit out at Gandhi, accusing him of spreading a “false narrative”.

Anurag Thakur, a member of parliament with the BJP, told reporters that it had “become a habit of Rahul Gandhi to make incorrect and baseless allegations”. He added: “The Congress party has lost approximately 90 elections under the leadership of Rahul Gandhi. His frustration is increasing day by day.”

Milan Vaishnav, director of the South Asia programme at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said the vulnerabilities of Indian elections should not be overhyped, but “pretty serious cracks” were appearing in their conduct.

“The credibility of the election commission, which is widely seen as one of the most powerful elections bodies in the world, has really eroded, in part because they no longer appear to be truly independent,” Vaishnav said.

Indian politics was dominated by Congress and the Nehru-Gandhi clan for much of its post-independence history.

But the party and India’s broader centre left has been seen as a waning force in recent years, with some critics asserting that the family’s dominance of Congress was an obstacle to its progress and an easy target for the populist BJP because of its dynastic heritage.

The Congress party has also faced allegations of election fraud in the past.

In 1975, the late former prime minister Indira Gandhi, Rahul’s grandmother, was convicted of electoral malpractice during the general election four years before.

She then imposed a state of emergency under which civil liberties were suspended and political opponents jailed. India’s Supreme Court later overturned the malpractice verdict against her.

Gandhi said his party’s strategy is to challenge the integrity of India’s electoral system by building public pressure.
“We are playing the game of mass mobilisation. That’s the only way we have,” he said. “It is going to end there because there are huge parts of this country that, simply, will not accept a rigged election.”

Additional reporting by Jyotsna Singh in New Delhi
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3116
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Internal Security Watch

Post by uddu »

https://x.com/amitmalviya/status/1970862652680548531

@amitmalviya
Congress Councillor (from Saspol) Smanla Dorjey Norbu released a provocative video yesterday evening, openly inviting youths to come out on the streets and fight blindly.

Today, we are witnessing the tragic result.

This instigation has pushed innocent lives into danger.

India’s Strong Messaging to Trump | Gen Z Protest in Ladakh? | Pakistan की पीटाई | Col Ajay K Raina


https://x.com/amitmalviya/status/1970861456624107846
@amitmalviya
In a dated video, Sonam Wangchuk urged protesters to come masked and hooded, while Smanla Norboo went so far as to threaten the stoning of the BJP office and openly provoked the masses. The so-called youth leaders — Stanzin Chosphel, Jigmet Paljor, and Padma Stanzin — who were instrumental in instigating the mob yesterday, were conspicuously absent today when violence erupted.

Who, then, bears responsibility for the tragic loss of young lives in today’s protest?

What explanation will Sonam Wangchuk give to the grieving parents of these children, who were asked to cloak themselves in masks and hoodies?

What justification will Smanla Norboo offer for fueling an anger that spiraled into deadly violence?

And what accountability will Stanzin Chosphel, Jigmet Paljor, and Padma Stanzin accept for inciting unrest yesterday, only to vanish when lives were lost today?

This is not leadership — it is misguidance. When leaders incite and then retreat, leaving the youth to pay the ultimate price, their silence becomes an indictment in itself.
Post Reply