Cyrano wrote: ↑02 Oct 2025 18:54
Chetak Saar,
That's why they are called eurotards! Despite all the hooman rights blabber, most Europeans have no special love for heathen India. Many still think that if they could colonise us once in the past, they can somehow dominate Bharat again.
It's much more than that.
In the past two decades, we've seen strange cycles of cause-and-effect in dozens of European cities.
1) Moroccan soccer team loses the world cup -> Muslims riot, destroy public property, burn down cars and buildings, paralyze economic life.
2) Israel retaliates against Palestinian terrorism -> Muslims riot, destroy public property, burn down cars and buildings, paralyze economic life.
3) Somebody somewhere in some third country is alleged to have defiled a Quran -> Muslims riot, destroy public property, burn down cars and buildings, paralyze economic life.
All this is set against a continuous backdrop of Muslim child-r4pe gangs, no-go zones for police in Muslim neighborhoods, careers destroyed by gaslighting accusations of "Islamophobia". It is regularly punctuated by classic Islamic terrorist attacks like driving trucks into Xmas markets, shooting up a pop concert attended by pre-teens, going on knife-wielding sprees at airport lounges, etc.
Now one may ask "why". The obvious reason is that Islam is inherently rabid. But look beyond that for a moment.
What happens when there is a dispute over (say) whether India or Pakistan should have the authority to label basmati rice for export? What factors influence the choice European countries have to make over this issue-- other than the difference in size and performance of the Indian vs. Pakistani economies, which you would think is the only rational factor?
Islam in the West is essentially: "nice country you have here, it would be a shame if something happened to it". That leverage applies to everything in every sphere of domestic AND foreign policy.
