Small Armaments & Infantry Equipment - News & Discussion

The Military Issues & History Forum is a venue to discuss issues relating to the military aspects of the Indian Armed Forces, whether the past, present or future. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Post Reply
Manish_P
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6988
Joined: 25 Mar 2010 17:34

Re: Small Armaments & Infantry Equipment - News & Discussion

Post by Manish_P »

Rakesh wrote: 08 Sep 2025 18:34 Bengaluru-based SSS Defence wants to make everything, from pistols to sub-machine guns and sniper rifles, in India
https://www.theweek.in/theweek/specials ... rifle.html
07 Sept 2025
May they get lots and lots of export orders
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 21709
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Small Armaments & Infantry Equipment - News & Discussion

Post by Rakesh »

Manish_P wrote: 08 Sep 2025 20:04 May they get lots and lots of export orders
:mrgreen: :lol:
Manish_P
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6988
Joined: 25 Mar 2010 17:34

Re: Small Armaments & Infantry Equipment - News & Discussion

Post by Manish_P »

^ Was not being snarky, sir.

IMHO It is essential that the company survives and thrives and also inspires others to get into the field of arms manufacturing.

In the future our overlords might just become wise enough or benevolent enough to give them large local orders to turn
them into what Glock is to Austria.
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3652
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Small Armaments & Infantry Equipment - News & Discussion

Post by uddu »

https://x.com/sneheshphilip/status/1964919496462004518
@sneheshphilip
Good news

@sssdefence
gets additional order from friendly nation for sniper rifles

Also a USD 30 million worth ammunition order from the same

Indian companies are establishing itself in the global arena
Manish_P
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6988
Joined: 25 Mar 2010 17:34

Re: Small Armaments & Infantry Equipment - News & Discussion

Post by Manish_P »

^ A repeat order speaks well for both the quality and the pricing of their product.
Manish_P
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6988
Joined: 25 Mar 2010 17:34

Re: Small Armaments & Infantry Equipment - News & Discussion

Post by Manish_P »

Icomm-Caracal to supply 200 CSR 338 sniper rifles for CRPF

Image
Abu Dhabi-based Caracal, a designer and manufacturer of high-performance small arms, in collaboration with Icomm Tele Ltd, a group company of Megha Engineering & Infrastructures Ltd (MEIL), has been awarded a contract to supply 200 CSR 338 sniper rifles to India's Central Reserve Police Force.

Caracal is an EDGE group company.

Inaugurated in April this year, the facility serves as a local manufacturing hub producing a comprehensive portfolio of advanced weapons to meet the critical requirements of the Indian Armed Forces, the Central Armed Police Forces, and to cater to Caracal's global export requirements.

Hamad Alameri, CEO of Caracal, said: "Following the launch of the Icomm Caracal Small Arms Complex, we are advancing our partnership with Icomm and solidifying our commitment to Prime Minister Modi's Make in India initiative.
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3652
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Small Armaments & Infantry Equipment - News & Discussion

Post by uddu »

https://x.com/mountain_rats/status/1976458384288440760
@mountain_rats
SSS Defence has been manufacturing weapons and ammunition in India. You have fired quite a few weapons manufactured by them. Why is it that they still haven’t been able to get big contacts from the Indian forces?

I have heard great things about SSS weapons from many CO’s of SF units (can’t name the unit/CO for obvious reasons) but when the weapons were sent by SSS for trials/feedback all of them were super impressed!

https://x.com/Hashpipe821/status/1933390157811781876
@Hashpipe821
I visited @sssdefence @Viv_Krishnan yesterday and saw how they are quietly revolutionizing India’s small arms ecosystem and it’s about time the world took notice.

With a state-of-the-art facility built to global standards, SSS Defence brings unmatched professionalism to the manufacturing, testing, and production of modern firearms. Every weapon system is engineered with precision, rigorously tested, and fine-tuned to deliver superior performance under real combat conditions.

This is Make in India done right.
This is Atmanirbhar Bharat in action.
This is the future of Indian firepower.
Manish_P
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6988
Joined: 25 Mar 2010 17:34

Re: Small Armaments & Infantry Equipment - News & Discussion

Post by Manish_P »

uddu wrote: 10 Oct 2025 17:15 https://x.com/mountain_rats/status/1976458384288440760
@mountain_rats
SSS Defence has been manufacturing weapons and ammunition in India. You have fired quite a few weapons manufactured by them. Why is it that they still haven’t been able to get big contacts from the Indian forces?

I have heard great things about SSS weapons from many CO’s of SF units (can’t name the unit/CO for obvious reasons) but when the weapons were sent by SSS for trials/feedback all of them were super impressed!
....
One reason could be large contracts tenders usually have a criteria that the applicant company show a high turnover/revenue. And also show 'n' number of successful deliveries to other government organisations.

Have experienced it personally in my (non-defense related) work applying to tenders by sarkaari departments
sanjayc
BRFite
Posts: 1407
Joined: 22 Aug 2016 21:40

Re: Small Armaments & Infantry Equipment - News & Discussion

Post by sanjayc »

^^ OFB has been making crap weapons since Independence, which turned India into one of biggest arms importers in the world. Enter SSS Defence. In five years they managed to make world-class weapons and started exporting guns. Was it so easy? Imagine what would have happened if that Nehru juvenile idiot had allowed private enterprise in defence since Day 1. Our weapons and aircraft would have been dominating the world by now. Nothing gives you more heft on international stage than the ability to tilt the balance of power in any part of the world by supplying world-class weapons.
SRajesh
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2744
Joined: 04 Aug 2019 22:03

Re: Small Armaments & Infantry Equipment - News & Discussion

Post by SRajesh »

^^ Ah yes
Look at the full Saga
https://swarajyamag.com/defence/indian- ... n%20Making
The incompetency of Babboos and the General Saabs in full glory!!
Why did we order Sig's without night sight??
And they Jammed as well but no hue and cry like the Insas!!
And if the article is to be belived now the baboos and the General Saab's have full PhD in advanced metallurgy!
Why is SSD not being promoted and local made 'Bandooks' bought
If the OFB made one are as good as 'Katta' why the hell are they still making it!!
ashthor
BRFite
Posts: 320
Joined: 13 Aug 2009 11:35

Re: Small Armaments & Infantry Equipment - News & Discussion

Post by ashthor »

SRajesh wrote: 17 Oct 2025 13:49 ^^ Ah yes
Look at the full Saga
https://swarajyamag.com/defence/indian- ... n%20Making
from the above article
The army’s handling of the T-90 tank purchase in the late 1990s followed a similar pattern, with an insistence on importing the tank, a willingness to compromise on capability, and a disregard for logic and long-term planning.

At the time, former Prime Minister HD Deve Gowda had opposed the deal, arguing that India could simply upgrade its existing fleet of T-72 tanks with modern fire-control systems and night-fighting gear at a fraction of the cost.

His objection was not entirely misplaced. Even the Russian Army had shown little enthusiasm for the T-90, preferring to improve its older tanks instead.

However, the army and the Ministry of Defence were determined to push the deal through. To neutralise Gowda’s resistance, they struck an understanding with Rosvoorouzhenie, Russia’s arms export agency. The plan was simple and cynical. The T-90 would be priced only marginally higher than the T-72 by stripping away several key systems, which India would then purchase later through separate contracts once the tank was in service.

Among the features removed was the Shtora active protection system, designed to intercept incoming anti-tank missiles. That this was omitted despite Pakistan’s missile-heavy anti-tank defences reflected poorly on the logic of India’s procurement. Short-term convenience trumped battlefield sense.
In 2019, the army contracted for 72,000 SIG716 rifles from USA’s Sig Sauer as a stop-gap measure to equip frontline troops, with the option of adding another 72,000.

The rifles had been imported without the sights. Various operational glitches, including jamming, also surfaced after the rifle was issued to troops. For a while, it seemed the army had decided against placing a repeat order. However, in 2024, the situation changed with an order for over 70,000 more SIG716 rifles.
Prem Kumar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4627
Joined: 31 Mar 2009 00:10

Re: Small Armaments & Infantry Equipment - News & Discussion

Post by Prem Kumar »

^ In spite of SIGs failing to live up to their hype (jamming), a subsequent order of 70K rifles was placed. Wonder how many green cards were minted in the bargain!
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3652
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Small Armaments & Infantry Equipment - News & Discussion

Post by uddu »

https://x.com/sriramthg/status/1981380548909269180
@sriramthg
ANI article clears my misunderstanding. ARDE carbine will be made by both L1 & L2. So that is a solid win.

Indian Army signs Rs 2,700 crore deal for 4.25 lakh close-quarter carbines
https://www.aninews.in/news/national/ge ... 022221525/
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60355
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Small Armaments & Infantry Equipment - News & Discussion

Post by ramana »

ashthor wrote: 17 Oct 2025 14:17
SRajesh wrote: 17 Oct 2025 13:49 ^^ Ah yes
Look at the full Saga
https://swarajyamag.com/defence/indian- ... n%20Making
from the above article

In 2019, the army contracted for 72,000 SIG716 rifles from USA’s Sig Sauer as a stop-gap measure to equip frontline troops, with the option of adding another 72,000.

The rifles had been imported without the sights. Various operational glitches, including jamming, also surfaced after the rifle was issued to troops. For a while, it seemed the army had decided against placing a repeat order. However, in 2024, the situation changed with an order for over 70,000 more SIG716 rifles.
The understanding was the sights would be procured locally and that would keep the cots low and support local industry. As for the fouling the understanding was that rifles would be cleaned consistently by the troops as the OFB cartridge composition leaves residue. This was not done by the field formations.
Any hit on Sig Sauer is a scurrilous blow on late Gen Rawat who ensured the rifle decision is taken care of. These folks wish they could import the sights and the ammo!

Yes 72K rifles were further imported as follow-on to the first order. Total two tranches and most likely will be another tranche after measures are in place.
Please don't take every report as gospel. Reporters don't know how to verify facts and print stuff for access.
Tanaji
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5158
Joined: 21 Jun 2000 11:31

Re: Small Armaments & Infantry Equipment - News & Discussion

Post by Tanaji »

Ramanaji, isn't the whole purpose of tests to precisely identify these types of issues? The use case of OFB ammo is hopefully not a revelation to the powers that be that do such tests. So why wasnt the issue of residue not picked up earlier? OFB ammo is not exactly a rare commodity?
In any contract this would have been the first line item for compliance, in fact the vendor should have been sent sample ammo to ensure full disclosure before they sign up.

Clearly someone dropped the ball either by omission or commission.
VinodTK
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3334
Joined: 18 Jun 2000 11:31

Re: Small Armaments & Infantry Equipment - News & Discussion

Post by VinodTK »

Tanaji wrote: 27 Oct 2025 02:42 Ramanaji, isn't the whole purpose of tests to precisely identify these types of issues? The use case of OFB ammo is hopefully not a revelation to the powers that be that do such tests. So why wasnt the issue of residue not picked up earlier? OFB ammo is not exactly a rare commodity?
In any contract this would have been the first line item for compliance, in fact the vendor should have been sent sample ammo to ensure full disclosure before they sign up.

Clearly someone dropped the ball either by omission or commission.
Ramana je is right regular cleaning is required after use, based on my personal experience with SIG
I have used Sig and non Sig amo same amount of cleaning is required (manufacturer recommend cleaning process should be followed
or user developed protocols for cleaning should be implemented based on use, climate, and environmental factors)
Tanaji
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5158
Joined: 21 Jun 2000 11:31

Re: Small Armaments & Infantry Equipment - News & Discussion

Post by Tanaji »

Saar, all guns require regular cleaning and this is basic skills taught to every soldier and infantryman. The vendor no doubt will recommend a schedule based on rounds fired which the quartermasters and NCOs make sure gets implemented. Ramanaji is saying the OFB ammo results in more residue that requires a change to the schedule and more frequent cleaning.

The question then becomes:
Why wasn’t this obvious in evaluation and testing stage as OFB ammo use is not a surprise. Why did army agree to this extra concession and effort for SIG?
If they agreed to this concession why wasn’t this communicated to field formations that were issued with the guns?
Post Reply