Transport Aircraft for IAF

The Military Issues & History Forum is a venue to discuss issues relating to the military aspects of the Indian Armed Forces, whether the past, present or future. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Post Reply
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 22278
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Transport Aircraft for IAF

Post by Rakesh »

ritesh wrote: 11 Jan 2026 19:42 Guru log, does a 19 seater plane warranty 2 member flying crew? Shouldn't pilot be enough to take up all the responsibilities of flying such a small capacity plane?

Yes. Most transport & civilian aircraft require at minimum two pilots. Not ideal or responsible to put the lives of 19 people in one person’s hands.
bala
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3346
Joined: 02 Sep 1999 11:31
Location: Office Lounge

Re: Transport Aircraft for IAF

Post by bala »

uddu wrote: 11 Jan 2026 13:10 What's the reason NAL being entrusted with making the aircraft itself rather than let HAL do it? Surely their expertise in making new components and even design of aircrafts could be good, but while keeping that, the advantage of various modern manufacturing techniques and technologies that must have been incorporated by the likes of HAL and other private players is absent with NAL. I do feel that there is a need to cut down the responsibility of NAL to design and research on new technology and while working alongside HAL and other private players to get the manufacturing of the same done at a faster phase.
So far, NAL has not produced any aircraft which is used pervasively in Indian skies. They have a small aircraft but no demand for that. Saras keeps popping up now and then but where is it in terms of actual flying/usage. HAL has many products - trainer aircraft, helos, LCA and they manufacture Su30MKI. India's biggest hole is engines. GTRE is another NAL like entity, which is yet to give India its fighter jet engine.

A reorg is required. R&D is one aspect of aircraft development. HAL has more knowledge of working systems. A mission mode charter is required to get various types of planes including transporters. Maybe NAL, GTRE, IIT, IISc, DMRL (dealing with materials for aerospace) etc are clubbed under single R&D with a mandate to move the needle in new areas. They can co-opt private entities to work on such R&D. HAL is the official entity with project oversight of all new aircraft products including engines for aircrafts. Herein private players for supplying aircraft components are required.
bala
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3346
Joined: 02 Sep 1999 11:31
Location: Office Lounge

Re: Transport Aircraft for IAF

Post by bala »

Rakesh wrote: 11 Jan 2026 21:34 Yes. Most transport & civilian aircraft require at minimum two pilots. Not ideal or responsible to put the lives of 19 people in one person’s hands.
I have been on a single engine commercial craft (6 passengers) which covered a short distance within a videshi state. The single pilot took our luggage and loaded them into the craft and once seated / in flight passed drinks in cans while on auto-pilot.
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 22278
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Transport Aircraft for IAF

Post by Rakesh »

bala wrote: 11 Jan 2026 21:56 I have been on a single engine commercial craft (6 passengers) which covered a short distance within a videshi state. The single pilot took our luggage and loaded them into the craft and once seated / in flight passed drinks in cans while on auto-pilot.
You like to live life on the dangerous side :)

There is a cost / risk assessment to everything. The Honda Jet - can be flown by a single pilot - if needed. The automation on board permits that. But as a general rule of thumb, in a medium to large aircraft is better served by two pilots.
RCase
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2675
Joined: 02 Sep 2011 22:50
Location: Awaiting the sabbath of Fry djinns

Re: Transport Aircraft for IAF

Post by RCase »

Rakesh wrote: 11 Jan 2026 22:58
bala wrote: 11 Jan 2026 21:56 I have been on a single engine commercial craft (6 passengers) which covered a short distance within a videshi state. The single pilot took our luggage and loaded them into the craft and once seated / in flight passed drinks in cans while on auto-pilot.
You like to live life on the dangerous side :)

There is a cost / risk assessment to everything. The Honda Jet - can be flown by a single pilot - if needed. The automation on board permits that. But as a general rule of thumb, in a medium to large aircraft is better served by two pilots.
A quick search on Google:

Yes, U.S. airlines do fly small commercial flights with a single pilot, particularly on regional routes using small turboprop or light jet aircraft like the Cessna 208 Caravan, where FAA regulations and aircraft certification allow for it, though this is debated by unions and regulations are strict, with most large jet airline operations requiring two pilots.

Aircraft Size: The primary factor is the aircraft's maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) and manufacturer certification; aircraft under 12,500 lbs and smaller jets like some Citations can be single-pilot.

Regional/Commuter Airlines: Carriers like Cape Air (though potentially transitioning) often use single-pilot crews for short hops to smaller communities.

Private/Business Aviation: Light jets used for private charter frequently fly with just one pilot.
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4615
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Transport Aircraft for IAF

Post by uddu »

A400 back in the contest, giving competition to C390.

Indian Defence Updates: New Hypersonic ALCM, 155mm Ramjet Test, S-400 Assembly, QRSAM Deal, Drone Lab

Germany offering 85 percent localization and Engine MRO within India for A400.
Work on C-295 Maritime variant started by Tata+Airbus and DRDO


Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 22278
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Transport Aircraft for IAF

Post by Rakesh »

RCase wrote: 12 Jan 2026 00:46 A quick search on Google:
Thank You.
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 22278
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Transport Aircraft for IAF

Post by Rakesh »

uddu wrote: 13 Jan 2026 21:28 A400 back in the contest, giving competition to C390.

Germany offering 85 percent localization and Engine MRO within India for A400.
Work on C-295 Maritime variant started by Tata+Airbus and DRDO
A-400M will win if rapid transport of the Zorawar light tank is an absolute must.

C-295 maritime variant was set in stone and will grow in numbers, especially since Boeing is playing hardball in cost negotiations with regards to the third batch of P-8Is.
Tanaji
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5263
Joined: 21 Jun 2000 11:31

Re: Transport Aircraft for IAF

Post by Tanaji »

A400 and C390 are almost different class of aircraft. The former has more carrying capacity and is a turboprop. The latter I think has better range.

IAF should have gotten more C17s when the going was good but thats obviously crazy talk …
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 22278
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Transport Aircraft for IAF

Post by Rakesh »

This is what happens when you have a RFI that has a weight capacity of 18 - 30 tons. Quick transport of Zorawar is the make-or-break issue here. If there was no Zorawar tank, the C-390 will be the clear winner.
Tanaji
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5263
Joined: 21 Jun 2000 11:31

Re: Transport Aircraft for IAF

Post by Tanaji »

Wait , it gets better… the order for Zorawar for which the RFP is based has a grant order of 56 and weighs 25 tons.

The Sprut which the DGMF is lusting for is 20 tons…
Post Reply