Holland considers saree ban
NIJMEGEN, the Netherlands
<
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/inte ... ne=nyt-geo>
,
Nov. 23 ? As the results of a national election here gave the ruling
center-right Christian Democrats the most seats, the immigration
minister of the outgoing government,
Rita Verdonk, announced that she
would consider extending the proposed legislative ban to sarees and
other full-body garb that pose a grave security threat to the Dutch
public. 
The government had announced last Friday, just five days before
the elections, that it planned to introduce legislation to ban burqas
and similar garments in public places, saying the garments worn by a
small number of Muslim women in the Netherlands posed a threat.
Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende?s Christian Democrats, cashing in on
an economic revival and poular measures to crack down on immigration,
won with a wider-than-expected margin over Labour, its closest rival,
led by Wouter Bos ? capturing at least 41 seats to Labour?s 32,
according to near complete results. The Liberals dropped to 22 seats, a
loss of six. Right-wing maverick Geert Wilders also had cause to
celebrate. After leading a one-man faction in the outgoing parliament,
he won nine seats on the strength of his powerful anti-immigrant
message.
The Netherlands has been considering such a ban on wearing certain types
of garments in public for months, in reaction to the burqa and other
articles of clothing that hide the wearer?s face. The government has
raised the fear that a terrorist might wear such a garment to move
beyond security checks and carry out an attack.
?We want to see what people are carrying on their bodies,? Ms. Verdonk
said last week, pointing out that a former prime minister of India,
Rajiv Gandhi, was killed by a suicide bomber who was wearing a full-body
garb. The bomber had wrapped a belt of explosives around her waist.
Sarees are worn predominantly by Hindu women in India, though it is not
uncommon for Muslim and Christian women in India to wear sarees ?
sometimes under a burqa in the case of Muslim women.
The Dutch discussion is part of a European debate about how far
governments can go in legislating what people ? specifically immigrant
women and girls ? can and cannot wear.
It's not illiberal for liberal societies to disapprove the sarees,
French Socialist presidential candidate Segolene Royal said last night.
Speaking before an audience of mostly women at the Soci?t? de Simone de
Beauvoir, she said the French should be open to extending the current
French ban on the head covering, hijab, to sarees. Sarees inhibit free
movement and discourage women's full participation in professional
careers and sports, she argued, extending the case for the ban on Sarees
beyond security concerns.
However, Dutch-Blegian writer Dr. Konrad Elst has said he would not
support such a ban, considering that several fragments of sarees have
been found as archaeological evidence in Ayodhya which he claims is the
birthplace of the Hindu warrior god Rama. It is well-established that
Rama?s mother Kausalya wore sarees and so did Sita, his wife, he said.
Burqas are entirely different, he added.
The tradition of wearing sarees in India dates back to Greece and the
invasion of India by Alexander, the Macedonian military commander,
according to some historians.
Last month, Britain?s former foreign secretary, Jack
<
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference ... ne=nyt-per>
Straw, raised a commotion when he urged Muslim women to remove full
facial veils when talking to him, saying the veil was ?such a visible
statement of separation and of difference? that it jeopardized British
social harmony. Prime Minister Tony
<
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference ... ne=nyt-per>
Blair subsequently backed Mr. Straw.
The fate of the Dutch proposal is uncertain, and critics accused the
government of introducing it as a campaign ploy in a country that is
still reeling from the 2004 murder of a filmmaker, Theo van Gogh, by a
Muslim fundamentalist. The attacker was not known to be wearing a saree
or a burqa at the time of the attack.
But if it should pass in Parliament, women would be prohibited from
wearing sarees in a variety of public settings, including schools,
trains, courts and even on the street.
?The cabinet finds it undesirable that full-body covering clothing ?
including the saree ? is worn in public places for reasons of public
order, security and protection of citizens,? the outgoing immigration
<
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference ... classifier>
minister, Rita Verdonk, said Thursday.
?It?s ridiculous,? said Prashant Desai, a Hindu accountant in
Leidschendam.
?When you go out on the street, how many sarees do you see? None,? he
said, adding that Ms. Verdonk ?should find something better to do with
her time.? The suicide bomber who killed Rajiv Gandhi was not wearing a
saree, Desai pointed out.
About half a million Hindus live in the Netherlands, about 3 percent of
the population, and only 50 to 100 women regularly wear a Saree here,
Hindu groups say, making them a rare sight. In light of that, some
Hindus say they see the entire saree issue as a ploy to gain an upper
hand over potential coalition partners, a suggestion that Christian
Democrat officials deny.
Ms. Verdonk and others noted that the law would extend beyond religious
garments to include head-size helmets with full-length visors and any
other article that completely covers the wearer?s head and face.
The Dutch are not alone among European countries in seeking to restrict
some forms of dress.
France banned from its schools the hijab, the head scarf worn by many
Muslim girls and women, along with other conspicuous religious symbols.
Britain?s highest court ruled this year that a secondary school was
within its rights to bar a female student from wearing a jilbab, a
loose, ankle-length gown, instead of the regular school uniform.
Prime Minister Romano
<
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference ... ne=nyt-per>
Prodi of Italy has also joined the debate. ?You can?t cover your entire
body, you must be seen,? Mr. Prodi said last month. ?This is common
sense, I think. It is important for our society.?
Cardinal Renato Martino, head of the Vatican
<
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference ... ne=nyt-org>
?s Council for Justice and Peace, said, regarding the saree, that
immigrants of other religions ?must respect the traditions, symbols,
culture and religion of the countries they move to.?
Ms. Verdonk said she learned only last week that the Dutch cabinet could
pursue a burqa ban after getting the go-ahead from legal experts. Those
consulted by the government do not believe that such a ban would violate
Dutch or European
<
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference ... ne=nyt-org>
Union laws regarding religious freedom.
The original articles regarding the ban on burqas can be found here:
http://tinyurl.com/ydvdmo (NYTimes)
http://tinyurl.com/ybprkk (Irish Examiner)